$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7.5cm,clip]{2212fi1.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Time-step of the model representing stochastic longitudinal flux-tube waves after 2366 s. Shown are temperature T (thick-solid) and particle densities n₁ (thin-solid), n₂ (dashed), and $n_{\rm e}$ (dotted line).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11cm,clip]{2212fi2a.ps}\par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11cm,clip]{2212fi2b.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: Temperature contour maps for the monochromatic longitudinal wave model (model 2) ( top) and stochastic longitudinal wave model (model 3) ( bottom) based on the data also taken for the calculation of the different types of time-averaged temperatures.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7.5cm,clip]{2212fi3.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Minimum and maximum temperature values for the pre-shock and post-shock temperatures T₁ and T₂(solid lines) given by the monochromatic acoustic wave model (model 1) after dynamic equilibrium has been attained. The average values are given as dotted lines. Note that shock formation occurs near 570 km.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm,clip]{2212fi4a.ps}\par\i... ...2fi4b.ps}\par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm,clip]{2212fi4c.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: Comparison of $T_{\rm ion}$ , $T_{\rm mean}$ , and $T_{\rm median}$ for the monochromatic acoustic wave model (model 1) ( top), the monochromatic longitudinal wave model (model 2) ( middle), and the stochastic longitudinal wave model (model 3) ( bottom). Note that the T-scale of model 3 is increased by a factor of 5 and is given in logarithmic units.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7.5cm,clip]{2212fi1.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 1: Time-step of the model representing stochastic longitudinal flux-tube waves after 2366 s. Shown are temperature T (thick-solid) and particle densities n₁ (thin-solid), n₂ (dashed), and $n_{\rm e}$ (dotted line).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11cm,clip]{2212fi2a.ps}\par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=11cm,clip]{2212fi2b.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Temperature contour maps for the monochromatic longitudinal wave model (model 2) ( top) and stochastic longitudinal wave model (model 3) ( bottom) based on the data also taken for the calculation of the different types of time-averaged temperatures.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7.5cm,clip]{2212fi3.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: Minimum and maximum temperature values for the pre-shock and post-shock temperatures T₁ and T₂(solid lines) given by the monochromatic acoustic wave model (model 1) after dynamic equilibrium has been attained. The average values are given as dotted lines. Note that shock formation occurs near 570 km.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm,clip]{2212fi4a.ps}\par\i... ...2fi4b.ps}\par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm,clip]{2212fi4c.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: Comparison of $T_{\rm ion}$ , $T_{\rm mean}$ , and $T_{\rm median}$ for the monochromatic acoustic wave model (model 1) ( top), the monochromatic longitudinal wave model (model 2) ( middle), and the stochastic longitudinal wave model (model 3) ( bottom). Note that the T-scale of model 3 is increased by a factor of 5 and is given in logarithmic units.
Open with DEXTER