Table 2: Best fit results for p, with the two different radial velocity sets. The third line is a weighted average of the two individual measurements. Fourth and fith lines are the detailed quadratic contribution to the final error bar. Last line gives the final adopted value with the overall error bar. References are: (1) Bersier et al. (1994); and (2) Barnes et al. (2005).
$p\pm\sigma_{\rm Vrad.}$ 1.269 $\pm$ 0.008 ref. (1)

1.280 $\pm$ 0.012 ref. (2)

$p\pm\sigma_{\rm Vrad.}$ 1.273 $\pm$ 0.007 consolidated

$\sigma_{\rm interf.}$ $\pm$ 0.020

$\sigma_{\rm dist.}$ $\pm$ 0.050

p 1.27 $\pm$ 0.06

**Table 2:** Best fit results for p, with the two different radial velocity sets. The third line is a weighted average of the two individual measurements. Fourth and fith lines are the detailed quadratic contribution to the final error bar. Last line gives the final adopted value with the overall error bar. References are: (1) Bersier et al. (1994); and (2) Barnes et al. (2005).
$p\pm\sigma_{\rm Vrad.}$	1.269 $\pm$ 0.008	ref. (1)
	1.280 $\pm$ 0.012	ref. (2)
$p\pm\sigma_{\rm Vrad.}$	1.273 $\pm$ 0.007	consolidated
$\sigma_{\rm interf.}$	$\pm$ 0.020
$\sigma_{\rm dist.}$	$\pm$ 0.050
p	1.27 $\pm$ 0.06

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Application of the BW method to ${\delta }$ Cep
	3 Discussion
	References
	Online Material