Table 5: Models for $\eta$ Boo. The M1 and M2 models include rotation and atomic diffusion, while the M3 model is a standard model computed with an overshooting parameter $\alpha _{{\rm ov}}=0.2$ . The upper part of the table gives the observational constraints used for the calibration. The middle part of the table presents the modeling parameters with their confidence limits, while the bottom part presents the global parameters of the star.
Model M1 Model M2 Model M3

$L/L_{\odot}$ $9.02 \pm 0.22$ $9.02 \pm 0.22$ $9.02 \pm 0.22$

$T_{{\rm eff}}$ [K] $6030 \pm 90$ $6028 \pm 45$ $6030 \pm 90$

$(Z/X)_{{\rm s}}$ $0.039 \pm 0.007$ $0.057 \pm 0.007$ $0.039 \pm 0.007$

V [km s^-1] $\sim$ 12.8 $\sim$ 12.8 -

$\Delta\nu$ [ $\mu$ Hz] $39.9 \pm 0.1$ $39.9 \pm 0.1$ $39.9 \pm 0.1$

$\delta\nu_{02}$ [ $\mu$ Hz] $3.95 \pm 0.90$ $3.95 \pm 0.90$ $3.95 \pm 0.90$

M $[M_{\odot}]$ $1.57 \pm 0.07$ $1.69 \pm 0.05$ $1.70 \pm 0.05$

t [Gyr] $2.67 \pm 0.10$ $2.65 \pm 0.10$ $2.14 \pm 0.10$

$V_{{\rm i}}$ [km s^-1] $\sim$ 90 $\sim$ 80 -

$(Z/X)_{{\rm i}}$ $0.0391 \pm 0.0070$ $0.0580 \pm 0.0070$ $0.0390 \pm 0.0070$

$L/L_{\odot}$ 8.89 9.10 9.11

$T_{{\rm eff}}$ [K] 6053 6013 6005

$R/R_{\odot}$ 2.72 2.78 2.79

V [km s^-1] 12 15 -

$(Z/X)_{{\rm s}}$ 0.0388 0.0570 0.0390

$\Delta\nu$ [ $\mu$ Hz] 39.9 39.9 39.9

$\delta\nu_{02}$ [ $\mu$ Hz] 3.79 3.67 3.45

**Table 5:** Models for $\eta$ Boo. The M1 and M2 models include rotation and atomic diffusion, while the M3 model is a standard model computed with an overshooting parameter $\alpha _{{\rm ov}}=0.2$ . The upper part of the table gives the observational constraints used for the calibration. The middle part of the table presents the modeling parameters with their confidence limits, while the bottom part presents the global parameters of the star.
	Model M1	Model M2	Model M3
$L/L_{\odot}$	$9.02 \pm 0.22$	$9.02 \pm 0.22$	$9.02 \pm 0.22$
$T_{{\rm eff}}$ [K]	$6030 \pm 90$	$6028 \pm 45$	$6030 \pm 90$
$(Z/X)_{{\rm s}}$	$0.039 \pm 0.007$	$0.057 \pm 0.007$	$0.039 \pm 0.007$
V [km s^-1]	$\sim$ 12.8	$\sim$ 12.8	-
$\Delta\nu$ [ $\mu$ Hz]	$39.9 \pm 0.1$	$39.9 \pm 0.1$	$39.9 \pm 0.1$
$\delta\nu_{02}$ [ $\mu$ Hz]	$3.95 \pm 0.90$	$3.95 \pm 0.90$	$3.95 \pm 0.90$
M $[M_{\odot}]$	$1.57 \pm 0.07$	$1.69 \pm 0.05$	$1.70 \pm 0.05$
t [Gyr]	$2.67 \pm 0.10$	$2.65 \pm 0.10$	$2.14 \pm 0.10$
$V_{{\rm i}}$ [km s^-1]	$\sim$ 90	$\sim$ 80	-
$(Z/X)_{{\rm i}}$	$0.0391 \pm 0.0070$	$0.0580 \pm 0.0070$	$0.0390 \pm 0.0070$
$L/L_{\odot}$	8.89	9.10	9.11
$T_{{\rm eff}}$ [K]	6053	6013	6005
$R/R_{\odot}$	2.72	2.78	2.79
V [km s^-1]	12	15	-
$(Z/X)_{{\rm s}}$	0.0388	0.0570	0.0390
$\Delta\nu$ [ $\mu$ Hz]	39.9	39.9	39.9
$\delta\nu_{02}$ [ $\mu$ Hz]	3.79	3.67	3.45

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Observations and data reduction
	3 Power spectrum analysis
	4 Comparison with models
	5 Conclusions
	References