Table 1: EGRET third catalogue sources observed by our array. l_d and b_d are displaced galactic coordinates, $\sigma _{E1}$ , $\sigma _{E2}$ and $\sigma _{\rm tot}$ are the statistical significances related to the first experiment, the second experiment and the sum of the two, $r_{\rm e}$ is the error angular radius, $\bar{z}$ is the mean value of zenith angles of EASs for source and "Flux'' is the number of EAS events for source. t1: AGN which has been investigated before by CASA-MIA (Catanese et al. 1996), t2: sources with energy >1 GeV (Lamb & Macomb 1997). Sources number 5 and 7 are "Mrk 421'' and "4C +10.45'' respectively.
Name l b ID l_d b_d $\sigma _{E1}$ $\sigma _{E2}$ $\sigma _{\rm tot}$ $r_{\rm e}(^\circ)$ $\bar{z}$ Flux t1 t2

1 3EG J0237+1635 156.46 -39.28 A 157 -39 1.29 2.80 2.90 4.70 24.87 630 $\surd$ $\surd$

2 3EG J0407+1710 175.63 -25.06 175 -24 1.65 1.28 1.95 4.78 24.05 782

3 3EG J0426+1333 181.98 -23.82 182 -23 1.11 2.60 2.79 4.89 26.97 702

4 3EG J0808+5114 167.51 32.66 a 168 33 1.40 1.37 1.91 5.10 23.29 1241

5 3EG J1104+3809 179.97 65.04 A 180 66 1.17 1.30 1.73 4.43 15.97 485 $\surd$ $\surd$

6 3EG J1308+8744 122.74 29.38 124 28 2.43 1.88 3.43 4.76 44.14 412

7 3EG J1608+1055 23.51 41.05 A 23 42 1.53 1.55 2.11 4.62 29.27 431 $\surd$

8 3EG J1824+3441 62.49 20.14 61 21 1.05 1.60 1.91 4.74 16.19 1370

9 3EG J2036+1132 56.12 -17.18 A 57 -18 1.09 1.62 1.95 5.16 28.05 851

10 3EG J2209+2401 81.83 -25.65 A 81 -27 1.45 1.60 1.86 4.25 21.40 844 $\surd$

**Table 1:** EGRET third catalogue sources observed by our array. l_d and b_d are displaced galactic coordinates, $\sigma _{E1}$ , $\sigma _{E2}$ and $\sigma _{\rm tot}$ are the statistical significances related to the first experiment, the second experiment and the sum of the two, $r_{\rm e}$ is the error angular radius, $\bar{z}$ is the mean value of zenith angles of EASs for source and "Flux'' is the number of EAS events for source. t1: AGN which has been investigated before by CASA-MIA (Catanese et al. 1996), t2: sources with energy >1 GeV (Lamb & Macomb 1997). Sources number 5 and 7 are "Mrk 421'' and "4C +10.45'' respectively.
	Name	l	b	ID	l_d	b_d	$\sigma _{E1}$	$\sigma _{E2}$	$\sigma _{\rm tot}$	$r_{\rm e}(^\circ)$	$\bar{z}$	Flux	t1	t2
1	3EG J0237+1635	156.46	-39.28	A	157	-39	1.29	2.80	2.90	4.70	24.87	630	$\surd$	$\surd$
2	3EG J0407+1710	175.63	-25.06		175	-24	1.65	1.28	1.95	4.78	24.05	782
3	3EG J0426+1333	181.98	-23.82		182	-23	1.11	2.60	2.79	4.89	26.97	702
4	3EG J0808+5114	167.51	32.66	a	168	33	1.40	1.37	1.91	5.10	23.29	1241
5	3EG J1104+3809	179.97	65.04	A	180	66	1.17	1.30	1.73	4.43	15.97	485	$\surd$	$\surd$
6	3EG J1308+8744	122.74	29.38		124	28	2.43	1.88	3.43	4.76	44.14	412
7	3EG J1608+1055	23.51	41.05	A	23	42	1.53	1.55	2.11	4.62	29.27	431	$\surd$
8	3EG J1824+3441	62.49	20.14		61	21	1.05	1.60	1.91	4.74	16.19	1370
9	3EG J2036+1132	56.12	-17.18	A	57	-18	1.09	1.62	1.95	5.16	28.05	851
10	3EG J2209+2401	81.83	-25.65	A	81	-27	1.45	1.60	1.86	4.25	21.40	844	$\surd$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Experimental set-up
	3 Data analysis
	4 Results
	5 Discussion and concluding remarks
	References