$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.4cm,clip]{1229_fig1.ps} \par\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Mode mass computed for different heights. Because the modes at higher frequencies are concentrated closer to the surface, the masses tend to decrease with increasing frequency. The increasing value of the eigenfunction $\xi$ for larger heights gives the variation of mass versus height.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.4cm,clip]{1229_fig2.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: Excitation rate computed from Lorentzian profiles and asymmetric profiles, showing a significant bias.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.7cm,clip]{1229_fig3.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Fitted heights for $m=\pm$ 1 for $\ell =1$ modes, which shows that the hypothesis of equal height for $\vert m\vert=\ell$ components is acceptable (error bars are 1 $\sigma$ ).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.4cm,clip]{1229_fig5.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Comparison of the excitation rate computed from the fitting procedure applied to a simulated spectrum (solid line) and the input excitation rate used for the simulation (crosses).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.4cm,clip]{1229_fig1.ps} \par\end{figure}$	Figure 1: Mode mass computed for different heights. Because the modes at higher frequencies are concentrated closer to the surface, the masses tend to decrease with increasing frequency. The increasing value of the eigenfunction $\xi$ for larger heights gives the variation of mass versus height.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.4cm,clip]{1229_fig2.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Excitation rate computed from Lorentzian profiles and asymmetric profiles, showing a significant bias.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.7cm,clip]{1229_fig3.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: Fitted heights for $m=\pm$ 1 for $\ell =1$ modes, which shows that the hypothesis of equal height for $\vert m\vert=\ell$ components is acceptable (error bars are 1 $\sigma$ ).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.6cm,clip]{1229_fig4.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: Power spectrum at high frequencies from GOLF data, showing the overlapping pairs of modes.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.4cm,clip]{1229_fig5.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Comparison of the excitation rate computed from the fitting procedure applied to a simulated spectrum (solid line) and the input excitation rate used for the simulation (crosses).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.8cm,clip]{1229_fig6.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 6: Raw (no mass mode correction) acoustic rates for the three instruments.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.8cm,clip]{1229_fig7.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 7: Mode mass corrected acoustic rates for the three instruments.
Open with DEXTER