All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,clip]{1573fig1.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Ultraviolet spectra taken with IUE ( upper panel), FOS ( middle panel), and STIS ( lower panel), all in full line. The best model (dashed line) is at d=42.3 pc with $T_{{\rm eff}}=24~000$ , and $\log g=7.91$ , in all three panels.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{1573fig2.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: The Fourier transform of the FOS data, obtained in 1996, for summed UV ( right panels) and zeroth-order data ( left panel). From top to bottom, we show the dominant mode around P=423 s (k=8, m=0), another periodicity at 464.2 s (k=9, m=0) identified by pre-whitening analysis, the noise after both subtraction, and the spectral window. The mode identification is described by Kepler et al. (2003).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{1573fig3.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: Chromatic amplitude changes the way the amplitudes normalized at 3400 Å changes with wavelength. The main mode at P=423.2 s and the mode at P=464.2 s are most probably $\ell =1$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{1573fig4.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: The probability distribution of effective temperature derived by amplitude variation with wavelength, using the two periodicities detected with FOS data in 1996. The most probable value is 23 400 ⁺³⁰⁰⁰_-1800 K.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{1573fig5.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: The phases (times of maxima) do not change with wavelength for detected periodicities at P=423.2 s ( upper panel) and at P=464.2 s ( lower panel), in FOS data, in accordance with an $\ell =1$ mode.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,clip]{1573fig1.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Ultraviolet spectra taken with IUE ( upper panel), FOS ( middle panel), and STIS ( lower panel), all in full line. The best model (dashed line) is at d=42.3 pc with $T_{{\rm eff}}=24~000$ , and $\log g=7.91$ , in all three panels.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{1573fig3.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Chromatic amplitude changes the way the amplitudes normalized at 3400 Å changes with wavelength. The main mode at P=423.2 s and the mode at P=464.2 s are most probably $\ell =1$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{1573fig4.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: The probability distribution of effective temperature derived by amplitude variation with wavelength, using the two periodicities detected with FOS data in 1996. The most probable value is 23 400 ⁺³⁰⁰⁰_-1800 K.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{1573fig5.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: The phases (times of maxima) do not change with wavelength for detected periodicities at P=423.2 s ( upper panel) and at P=464.2 s ( lower panel), in FOS data, in accordance with an $\ell =1$ mode.
Open with DEXTER