All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig1.ps}}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Upper-left panel: the object; upper-right: the reconstruction after 1000 OS-EM iterations (first step); lower-left: the mask obtained with a thresholding of the previous reconstruction (50% of the maximum value); lower-right: the restoration after 1000 OS-EM iterations, initialized with the previous mask (second step). The diameter of the circle shown in each picture is $\lambda /B$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{15cm}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig2.eps}}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: One-pupil AO-corrected K-band PSFs: ideal case ( left), on-axis case ( middle), and $15 \hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ off-axis case ( right). The total field is $256\times 0.0025=0.64 \hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ and for rendering purpose the images are shown at the power of 0.2. Note the slight difference in image quality between the on-axis PSF and the off-axis PSF.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{15cm}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig3.eps}}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Interferometric AO-corrected K-band PSFs: ideal case ( left), on-axis case ( middle), and $15 \hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ off-axis case ( left). The total field is $256\times 0.001=0.256 \hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ and for rendering purpose the images are shown at the power of 0.2. The difference in image quality between the on-axis PSF and the off-axis PSF is appreciable. The PSFs shown here correspond to the case of $0^\circ$ parallactic angle. Note that in our simulations we use two other similar sets at $60^\circ$ and $120^\circ$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\begin{tabular}{c} \includegraphics[height=3cm,clip]{0366fg4... ...\includegraphics[height=3cm,clip]{0366fg4c.ps}\\ c) \end{tabular}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: Example of application of the two-step algorithm. The object is a binary consisting of two stars with angular separation $\frac{1}{4} \lambda/B$ (B = maximum baseline of LBT) and with the same magnitude m=12; three interferometric noisy images are generated by convolving the object with the PSFs with an average Strehl ratio of 66% and are deconvolved by means of the PSFs with an average Strehl ratio of 77% (see Fig. 3): a) the original object; b) the restored object obtained after Step 1; c) the restored object obtained after Step 2.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig5.eps}}\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Behaviour of the maximum magnitude difference $\Delta m_0$ which can be detected as a function of the magnitude m of the main component - monolithic case. For the sake of clarity coincident points are represented with a small horizontal shift.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig6.eps}}\end{figure}$ Figure 6: Behaviour of the maximum magnitude difference limit $\Delta m$ which can be detected as a function of the magnitude m of the main component - interferometric case. For the sake of clarity coincident points are represented with a small horizontal shift.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{15cm}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig2.eps}}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: One-pupil AO-corrected K-band PSFs: ideal case ( left), on-axis case ( middle), and $15 \hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ off-axis case ( right). The total field is $256\times 0.0025=0.64 \hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ and for rendering purpose the images are shown at the power of 0.2. Note the slight difference in image quality between the on-axis PSF and the off-axis PSF.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig5.eps}}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Behaviour of the maximum magnitude difference $\Delta m_0$ which can be detected as a function of the magnitude m of the main component - monolithic case. For the sake of clarity coincident points are represented with a small horizontal shift.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{0366fig6.eps}}\end{figure}$	Figure 6: Behaviour of the maximum magnitude difference limit $\Delta m$ which can be detected as a function of the magnitude m of the main component - interferometric case. For the sake of clarity coincident points are represented with a small horizontal shift.
Open with DEXTER