... respectively[*]
One might notice that, in Paper I, we divided the high and low-redshift data points at z = 0.25, whereas in this paper we divide them at z = 0.34. The results of Paper I remain unchanged irrespective of whether the points are divided at z = 0.25 or at z = 0.34; this is because there were very few points between these redshifts.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Copyright ESO 2005