One might notice that, in Paper I,
we divided the high and low-redshift
data points at z = 0.25, whereas in this paper we divide them
at z = 0.34. The results of Paper I remain unchanged irrespective
of whether the points are divided at z = 0.25 or at z = 0.34; this
is because there were very few points between these redshifts.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.