... parameters

http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... cases

In most cases the classification is obvious, although PSR B1259-63 is a bit problematic. We classified this pulsar as DP-IP, while Manchester (1996) argued that it is just a case of a wide hollow-cone. However, we note that interpulse properties of this pulsar are almost identical to those of the Crab pulsar, which is commonly classified as an almost orthogonal rotator with an interpulse corresponding to the opposite magnetic pole. In both these pulsars the separation ($145^\circ$) between the MP and IP is frequency independent, which seems to contradict the wide hollow-cone hypothesis. We note that the classification uncertainty of this pulsar does not significantly change the observed percentages of interpulse emission in normal pulsars (Table 3).

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... case

Figures 1-3 compare the distributions in a linear scale. Given the many orders of magnitude covered by the period and pulse width, it is worthwhile to compare distributions in a log-scale. We have binned the logarithm of the period pulse width and found that the results both for histograms and K-S tests do not change.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.