Table 6: Depolarisation parameters.
  Name   $\sigma _{\rm obs}$   $\sigma_{\rm sf}$  s0/b  $m_0(\%)$ Notes
  0003+387 250 1525 [1] 2.4  
$\dag $ 0034+444 75 1080 [1] 3.2  
  0039+412 20 [85] [1] 5.2  
  0049+379 296 2160 [0.5] 9.0  
$\dag $ 0110+401 9 55 [1] 5.1 3
  0120+405 (140) 470   5.2 1
$\dag $ 0123+402 100 [420] [1] 4.7  
  0137+401  $(\le$12)  $\le$80   1.6 1
  0144+432 19 100 [1] 3.2  
  0213+412 60 140 1.0 3.1 4
  0222+422A 225 4560 1.5 3.6  
  0228+409A (200) [840]   3.5 2
  0254+406 10 50 [1] 1.7  
  0744+464 (200) 3080   4.7 1
$\dag $ 0748+413B 215 [900] 1.1 17.2  
$\dag $ 0754+396 11 110 [1] 11.5 3
$\dag $ 0800+472 (100) [420]   2.4 2
  0805+406 11.5 [50] [1] 6.7 4
$\dag $ 0809+404 250 600 0.9 4.4 4
  0930+389 ($\le$18)  $\le$210   2.9 1
  0951+422 (180) 1395   3.9 2
  0955+390 12 [50] [1] 6.6 4
  1025+390B ??     $\sim$2 2
$\dag $ 1039+424 14 [60] [1] 7.2  
$\dag $ 1044+454 (190) 4940   8.3 1
$\dag $ 1055+404A 11 [45] [1] 5.8  
  1201+394 44 90 [1] 3.0  
  1204+401 30 280 [$\le$0.1] 4.9  
  1216+412 (200) 620   3.8 2
  1220+408 80 [500] 0.4 7.5 4
  1233+418 140 220 0.7 4.2  
$\dag $ 1343+386 150 1210 1.7 3.0 5
  1350+432 (150) 1490   9.7 2
  1458+433 $\approx$0 $\approx$0 [1] 2.3  
  2304+377 270 530 1.2 3.2 3
  2311+469 13 40 [1] 5.5  
  2322+403 195 [820] [$\le$0.2] 6.5  
  2348+450 300 1175 [1] 2.4  
Faraday dispersions ( $\sigma _{\rm obs}$ and  $\sigma_{\rm sf}$) are in rad m-2. Values in [  ] for s0/b mark sources equally well fitted by Burn and Tribble models.

Notes:

1 = too a high  RM to allow a reliable correction of $m_{\rm v}^{1.4}$;

2 = no acceptable model;

3 = bad fit with the 2.7 GHz data;

4 = fair agreement with the 2.7 GHz data;

5 = change of model (see text).


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text