All Tables
- Table 1:
Duration after flare rejection. The location of the different pointings is shown in Fig. 2.
- Table 2:
Best fit parameters for the power-law model using the MOS and pn data all at once.
The errors are in the range
(90% confidence level) on one parameter.
The regions shown in Fig. 8.
Norm is given in units of photons/cm2/s/keV/arcmin2 at 1 keV.
- Table 3:
Best fit parameters for the power-law plus equilibrium model using the MOS and pn data all at once.
The errors are in the range
(90% confidence level) on one parameter.
The regions are shown in Fig. 8.
Norm is given in units of photons/cm2/s/keV/arcmin2 at 1 keV.
- Table 4:
Values of postshock electronic number density for a few regions (see Fig. 8) using
Eq. (1) with
.
D1 is the distance in units of 1 kpc.
The selected regions are those for which the
thermal emission is detected for temperatures of
0.5-0.6 keV.
- Table 5:
Best fit parameters for different one component spectral models for 1WGA J1713.4-3949 using the MOS and pn data all at once.
The errors are in the range
(90% confidence level) on one parameter. D1 is the distance in units of 1 kpc.
- Table 6:
Best fit parameters for different two components spectral models for 1WGA J1713.4-3949 using the MOS and pn data all at once.
The errors are in the range
(90% confidence level) on one parameter. D1 is the distance in units of 1 kpc.
- Table 7:
Values of the accumulative absorbing column density
towards the NW, SW and CE as obtained from CO and HI observations
for several LSR radial velocities or equivalently for several distances.
The values of
which are in bold font are those compatible with the X-rays.
- Table 8:
Parameters for main sequence evolution for different progenitor masses
(from Chevalier 1999 and references therein).
is the mass loss rate,
is the mechanical wind luminosity,
is the main-sequence age and
is the
maximum size of the wind bubble.