**Table 15:** Comparison of zinc abundances from our results and from other authors.
Star	$T_{\rm eff}$	$\log {g}$	$\xi_t$	[Fe/H]	[Zn/Fe]	[Zn/Fe] $_{\rm liter}$	Ref.
	(K)	(cm s^-2)	(km s^-1)
HD 9826	$6212\pm64$	$4.26\pm0.13$	$1.69\pm0.16$	$0.13\pm0.08$	$-0.12 \pm 0.10$	0.05	1
HD 22049	$5073\pm42$	$4.43\pm0.08$	$1.05\pm0.06$	$-0.13\pm0.05$	$-0.12 \pm 0.08$	-0.16	1
HD 38529	$5674\pm40$	$3.94\pm0.12$	$1.38\pm0.05$	$0.40\pm0.06$	$-0.14 \pm 0.08$	0.38	1
HD 52265	$6105\pm00$	$4.28\pm0.00$	$1.36\pm0.00$	$0.23\pm0.00$	$-0.09 \pm 0.07$	0.14	1
HD 75732	$5279\pm62$	$4.37\pm0.18$	$0.98\pm0.07$	$0.33\pm0.07$	$0.16 \pm 0.09$	0.48	1
HD 92788	$5821\pm41$	$4.45\pm0.06$	$1.16\pm0.05$	$0.32\pm0.05$	$0.11 \pm 0.07$	0.29	2
HD 95128	$5954\pm25$	$4.44\pm0.10$	$1.30\pm0.04$	$0.06\pm0.03$	$0.00 \pm 0.07$	0.11	1
HD 106252	$5899\pm35$	$4.34\pm0.07$	$1.08\pm0.06$	$-0.01\pm0.05$	$-0.13 \pm 0.07$	-0.12	2
HD 130322	$5392\pm36$	$4.48\pm0.06$	$0.85\pm0.05$	$0.03\pm0.04$	$0.06 \pm 0.13$	0.01	2
HD 134987	$5776\pm29$	$4.36\pm0.07$	$1.09\pm0.04$	$0.30\pm0.04$	$0.19 \pm 0.07$	0.31	2
HD 141937	$5909\pm39$	$4.51\pm0.08$	$1.13\pm0.06$	$0.10\pm0.05$	$-0.02 \pm 0.08$	0.05	2
HD 143761	$5853\pm25$	$4.41\pm0.15$	$1.35\pm0.07$	$-0.21\pm0.04$	$0.10\pm0.08$	-0.10	1
HD 145675	$5311\pm87$	$4.42\pm0.18$	$0.92\pm0.10$	$0.43\pm0.08$	$0.16 \pm 0.11$	0.54	1
HD 168746	$5601\pm33$	$4.41\pm0.12$	$0.99\pm0.05$	$-0.08\pm0.05$	$0.14 \pm 0.08$	0.02	2
HD 186427	$5772\pm25$	$4.40\pm0.07$	$1.07\pm0.04$	$0.08\pm0.04$	$0.11\pm0.06$	-0.03	1
HD 187123	$5845\pm22$	$4.42\pm0.07$	$1.10\pm0.03$	$0.13\pm0.03$	$0.08 \pm 0.06$	0.08	2
HD 192263	$4947\pm58$	$4.51\pm0.20$	$0.86\pm0.09$	$-0.02\pm0.06$	$0.07 \pm 0.09$	0.12	2
HD 217014	$5804\pm36$	$4.42\pm0.07$	$1.20\pm0.05$	$0.20\pm0.05$	$-0.02 \pm 0.07$	0.18	1
HD 217107	$5645\pm00$	$4.31\pm0.00$	$1.06\pm0.00$	$0.37\pm0.00$	$0.04 \pm 0.07$	0.27	1

¹ From Takeda et al. (2001).
² From Sadakane et al. (2002).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text