G. S. Bai1 - G. Zhao1 - Y. Q. Chen1 - J. R. Shi1 - V. G. Klochkova2 - V. E. Panchuk2 - H. M. Qiu1 - H. W. Zhang1,3
1 - National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, PR China
2 - Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences, Karachai-Cirkassian Republic, Nizhnij Arkhyz 369167, Russia
3 - Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
Received 27 November 2003 / Accepted 3 May 2004
We present observations of ten metal-poor halo stars with the metallicity range -2.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.4 and derive their stellar parameters, acquire some elemental abundances relative to iron and discuss the relation between the abundance ratio and the metallicity. It was found that oxygen abundances are nearly constant at a level of 0.6 dex for our metal-poor halo stars when the non-LTE correction is considered. The -elements (Mg, Si, Ca and Ti) are overabundant relative to Fe and decrease with increasing metallicity. We also obtained a significant underabundant non-LTE [Na/Fe] ratio from Na I D lines which have a large deviation from the LTE assumption. Scandium is marginally overabundant with respect to iron and tends to decrease with increasing metallicity like the -elements. A nearly solar value of [Cr/Fe] ratio and underabundant [Mn/Fe] ratio are obtained.
Key words: stars: abundances - stars: fundamental parameters - Galaxy: abundances - Galaxy: halo
Abundance analysis of the stellar atmosphere for different population stars provides a constraint for the model of Galactic evolution and nucleosynthesis. Specifically, the investigations of chemical composition of low mass metal-poor stars ( , [Fe/H] < -1.0) which have retained the initial material they formed in the early Galaxy is important means of the understanding an original Galactic formation. The overabundances of -elements relative to iron observed in old stars (Zhao & Magain 1990; Gratton et al. 1997, 2003) has been seen, but different trends are obtained by other authors (Nissen et al. 1994; Stephens & Boesgaard 2002). Determination of oxygen abundance is one of the most controversial and interesting topics, especially the behavior of the [O/Fe] ratio in metal-poor halo stars. There are several indicators of oxygen abundance for metal-poor stars, but the different indicators give different results: plateau-like [O/Fe] from [O I] lines, and rising [O/Fe] from O I triplets or OH lines (see, e.g., Boesgaard et al. 1999; Mishenina et al. 2000; Allende Prieto et al. 2001; Nissen et al. 2002; Takeda 2003). [O I] lines are considered more reliable indicators due to their weak sensitivety as well as the general belief of the validity for the assumption of LTE, while O I and OH lines are less reliable because of the uncertainties involved in the non-LTE correction (O I triplets) or with the effect of atmospheric inhomogeneity (OH lines, Asplund & García P rez 2001; Takeda 2003). In this paper, we discuss [O/Fe] abundance using O I triplets with the consideration of non-LTE corrections. The heavy elements in the Universe have been synthesized by a variety of nucleosynthesis processes. Fe-group elements are mainly produced in supernovae with less massive progenitors (type Ia supernovae), although a non-negligible amount can also be produced in type II supernovae (Nomoto et al. 1984). All elements heavier than the Fe-group are synthesized predominantly by neutron capture reactions that have often referred to as s-process or r-process elements (Wheeler et al. 1989). In recent years, the heavy element abundance of very metal poor stars has been of special interest, as it offers an opportunity to study the astrophysical neutron-capture processes (e.g., Ryan et al. 1996; Norris et al. 2001).
Table 1: The basic parameters and observational data of sample stars.
Although the abundances of halo stars have been studied in many extensive papers (e.g., McWilliam et al. 1995; Gilmore & Wyse 1998) they are still of high interest in studying the accretion history of our Galaxy with companion galaxies. Nissen & Schuster (1997) found a group of the reduced [/Fe] halo stars which belong to the outer halo with the very large (the maximum distance from the Galactic center) and (the maximum distance from the Galactic plane). Combined with the [Na/Fe] and [Ni/Fe] results, they suggested that -poor halo stars have been accreted from dwarf galaxies with a different chemical evolution history from the Milky Way. Hanson et al. (1998) found that a total of 20 of retrograde giant sample stars and 13 of all halo giant sample stars have low [Na/Fe] ratios, and suggest that there may be a group of stars significantly younger than the typical halo giants. In particular, recent abundances of giant stars in dwarf galaxies (Shetrone et al. 2003) show that these stars have underabundant [Na/Fe] and [Ni/Fe] and fit the [Na/Fe]-[Ni/Fe] relation found in Nissen & Schuster (1997). We thus investigate the abundance nature for 10 halo stars, most of which are on retrograde orbits.
In this paper we analyze the chemical composition of 10 halo stars based on the medium-resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio spectra obtained with the 6 m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory in Russia. These sample stars with high proper motion and the low mass ( ) contain information of chemical enrichment history of the Milky Way. The abundance analysis of -elements (O, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti), Na, Sc, iron-peak elements (Cr and Mn) and the neutron capture element Ba are given. Among these elements, we focused on a few elements, such as O, Na, Sc and Mn, which are not well studied or have no definitive results in metal-poor stars.
We selected a sample of 10 metal-poor stars with the metallicity range -2.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.4 from Schuster & Nissen (1989). All of these stars have high proper motions and slow rotatings that combine both kinematics and metallicity information of halo component (Nissen & Schuster 1991). The sample stars were observed using the 6 m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory with the ECHELLE spectrometer PFES equipped with the CCD ( pixels, the pixel size m2). The spectral wavelength coverage is of 4300-7980 Å with the resolving power of 15 000 and the signal-to-noise ratio is about 200. The basic parameters and observational data are summarized in Table 1. The Cols. 3-8 list the visual magnitude, colour indices and Hipparcos parallaxes of sample stars from SIMBAD database. The final two columns give the observational date and the signal-to-noise ratio.
The data reduction is processed with ECHELLE package of standard ESO MIDAS routines for order identification, background subtraction, flat-field correction, order extraction and wavelength calibration. Then the spectrum was normalized by a continuum function determined by fitting a spline curve to a set of pre-selected continuum windows which were estimated from the solar atlas after the correction for the radial velocity shift measured from at least 20 lines. Finally, the equivalent widths (EW) were measured by two methods: direct integration and Gaussian profile fitting.
The accuracy of the equivalent widths is estimated by comparing them with
the other measurements for stars in common. Zhao & Magain (1990) observed BD +023375
at the European Southern Observatory 3.6 m telescope using CASPEC (
). Stephens & Boesgaard (2002) observed BD +422667
using the KPNO Mayall 4 m telescope with CASPEC (
Figure 1 shows the comparisons of these two sets of data. The systematic difference
between the two sets of data are small and linear least squares fittings give:
|Figure 1: The comparison of equivalent widths with other works: a) with Zhao & Magain (1990) for BD +023375, b) with Stephens & Boesgaard (2002) for BD +422667.|
|Open with DEXTER|
For the establishment of the atmospheric model, we need to derive the values of four stellar atmospheric parameters: effective temperature, surface gravity, metallicity and microturbulence. The effective temperature was determined from the Strömgren photometric indices (b-y), c1and metallicity [Fe/H] using the calibration of Alonso et al. (1996). The typical error of effective temperature is estimated to be about 100 K. The gravities are determined from the abundance analysis by requiring that FeI and FeII lines give the same iron abundance. Another group of gravities calculated using Hipparcos parallaxes following Nissen et al. (1997) are nearly similar to these. Because the several program stars have large standard errors of Hipparcos parallaxes , we adopt the first group of gravities (Col. 3 of Table 2) and estimate the uncertainties as 0.3 dex. The metallicity was first derived from the Strömgren m1 index using the calibrations of Schuster & Nissen (1989), but the final metallicity was determined from the abundance analysis of Fe lines. The whole procedure of determining , and metallicity was repeated until consistency was reached. Finally, the initial microturbulence velocities for all stars were 1.5 km s-1 then adjusted from the abundance analysis by requiring a zero slope of [Fe/H] vs. EW. Uncertainties in the adopted microturbulences are likely to be about 0.3 km s-1. Stellar parameters of sample stars are presented in Table 2.
Table 2: The stellar parameters and kinematics.
As a check of the parameters used here, we compare our values with those determined by other studies. Alonso et al. (1996) used the InfraRed Flux Method (IRFM, Blacwell et al. 1990) to determine the mean values from J, H and K band for a large number of stars. Nissen et al. (1997) also determined values for a large number of stars using photometric indices (b-y). Fulbright (2000) adjusted so that the Fe I lines with high excitation potential (EP) give the same iron abundance as those with lower EPs. Tomkin et al. (1992) adopted values based on the red and near-infrared colors and the temperature-color calibration of Peterson & Carney (1979), and their data are used by Takeda (2003) to calculate non-LTE oxygen abundances. Figure 2 shows the comparison of this work with these studies. Our values agree well with the results of Nissen et al. (1997) and almost accord with Alonso et al. (1996) except for two stars, which have deviations larger than the standard deviation of calibration. In Fulbright (2000), there are two common stars having a large deviation than us. They determined from the excitation balance of Fe I lines. Takeda (2003) used systematically lower values than ours in the high temperature range.
The Cols. 8 to 10 of Table 2 list space velocities U, V and Wwith respect to the Local Standard of Rest (LSR), that are calculated based on the method of Johnson & Soderblom (1987), and the total space velocities in Col. 11. In the Toomre diagram Fig. 3 the location of sample stars are agreement with the criterion of Fuhrmann (2002) for halo stars, i.e. km s-1 . Moreover, most stars have km s-1; they are related on retrograde orbits, except for one star, BD +262606, which is a halo star with a thick-disk orbit. Particularly, five stars show km s-1 and are located outside the km s-1 circle in the Toomre diagram and they have definitively retrograde orbits which are shown by filled circles in this figure and the following figures.
The abundance analysis is based on flux constant, homogeneous and LTE model atmospheres taken from Kurucz (1993). The elemental abundances were derived by requiring that the calculated equivalent widths from the models should match the observed ones. Some accurate atomic line data such as oscillator strengths () and enhancement factors (f6) are required. The oscillator strengths used in this study are taken from the NIST database (http://www.nist.gov), and the enhancement factors are taken from the literatures (Chen et al. 2000, and see references therein). All atomic line data used in the present work and the EW values of program stars are available in electronic form at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (126.96.36.199) or via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/425/671
The abundance errors are mainly from two parts: the systematic errors include the uncertainty of stellar parameters and atmospheric models, the internal errors are derived from the measurement of equivalent widths and atomic data uncertainties. We estimate that the typical uncertainty of the EWs is about 3 mÅ that leads to an internal error of less than 0.1 dex on the derived abundances. Table 3 presents the systematic error for a typical star BD +422667.
|Figure 2: comparisons between this work and various literature studies. Circles: Nissen et al. (1997); triangles: Alonso et al. (1996); diamonds: Fulbright (2000); crosses: Takeda (2003).|
|Open with DEXTER|
|Figure 3: Toomre diagram: (U2+W2)1/2 versus rotational velocity (V). We divide sample stars to two groups: definitively regrograde orbit stars with km s-1 (filled circles) and remaining stars with km s-1 (asterisks).|
|Open with DEXTER|
Table 3: Abundance errors from atmospheric parameters.
We list the abundance comparison with other authors' results for eight common stars in Table 4. It shows that there is an agreement in iron abundances between this work and other works except for HD 149414, BD +262606 and BD +342476, with differences reaching 0.2 dex. It might be partially caused by the different parameters: lower microturbulent velocity for HD 149414 and lower temperature for BD +262606 adopted by Fulbright (2000, hereafter F00). For BD +342476, our temperature is higher (about 130 K) than Stephens & Boesgaard (2002, hereafter S02) who derived the effective temperature in the abundance versus excitation potential plot.
The [Mg/Fe] ratio in the present work is systematically lower than others. We use two weak Mg I lines 4571 Å and 5711 Å and two medium-strong lines 4703 Å and 5528 Å, and these four lines give almost consistent Mg abundance. We believe that these lower abundance of [Mg/Fe] is mainly caused by the higher oscillator strengths used in this study. The other elemental abundances [Si/Fe], [Ca/Fe], [Ti/Fe] and [Cr/Fe] are generally consistent with the compared data. The discrepancy can be explained by different parameters adopted.
There are large deviations of Ba abundance between our study and F00 for stars HD 149414 and BD +203603. In our study, four Ba II lines used for HD 149414 and two Ba II lines used for BD +203603 give almost consistent results. For BD +203603, the largest deviation between our [Ba/Fe] ratio and F00 is unexplained, but Carney et al. (1997) obtained [Ba/Fe based on the 4554 line, and [Ba/Fe based on the weaker Ba II lines. This result is closer to our [Ba/Fe] ratio than F00. For the remaining common stars the agreements of [Ba/Fe] ratios with F00 are reasonable.
The elements abundances in metal-poor stars as a function of the early history of the Galaxy will be used in the interpretation of Galactic evolution models and nucleosynthesis theory. Table 5 summarized the derived abundances in this study. Solar photospheric abundances were taken from Grevesse & Sauval (1998). As shown in Fig. 3, to investigate the abundance pattern for stars on retrograde orbits, we present different symbols in the following figures.
Table 4: The comparison of stellar parameters and abundances between this work and previous studies for common stars.
Table 5: Elemental abundances.
The oxygen abundances of metal-poor stars are very important for our understanding of stellar and Galactic evolution. The relation of [O/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] has been presented and discussed in many papers using different methods. All authors agree that [O/Fe] increases when [Fe/H] decreases from 0 to -1, but the slope of the [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] dependence and its behavior for metallicities below -1 are inconsistent.
Abia & Rebolo (1989) derived oxygen abundance by analysis of the O I infrared triplets in 30 unevolved field stars with metallicities in the range Fe/H and found that [O/Fe] reaches 1.0-1.2 at [Fe/H] =-2. That result is significantly higher than those in dwarfs using the forbidden line 6300 Å by Spite & Spite (1991). Recently, the study by Mishenina et al. (2000) derived oxygen abundance through the O I 7774 Å triplets from the non-LTE determination. The average [O/Fe] is dex, and they found a trend of increasing oxygen abundance with decreasing iron abundance in the range -2.5 < [Fe/H]< -0.5. However, Nissen et al. (2002) suggested a more or less flat trend of [O/Fe] in the metallicity range of -2.0 < [Fe/H]< -1.0 calculated using the 6300 Å forbidden line based on the new generation of 3D hydrodynamical model atmospheres (Asplund & García Pèrez 2001).
We have determined oxygen abundances from O I triplets at 7771, 7774 and 7775 Å by considering both LTE and non-LTE effects. The solar abundance of O is taken from Grevesse & Sauval (1998): (O) = 8.83. We use oscillator strengths of , 0.188 and -0.034 from the NIST database. The non-LTE corrections for O I triplets are calculated by Eq. (1) of Takeda (2003) using the EW and two coefficients (a, b) for each combination of ( , , ) which are summarized in Tables 4-6 of Takeda (2003). The absolute mean value of the correction is less than 0.1 dex with a maximum of 0.11 dex. The final results are given in Table 6. Our non-LTE [O/Fe] ratios are generally lower than the results ginven by Takeda (2003, Table 5) for the seven common stars (see Table 7). This is due to the discrepancy in both iron abundances and O abundances. Takeda (2003) used lower [Fe/H] but obtained large (O) based on the published equivalent-width data taken from the literature. We note that, for four common stars, our equivalent widths of O I triplets are significantly lower than those in Takeda (2003), as observed by Tomkin et al. (1992). This is the main reason for the higher [O/Fe] ratios in Takeda (2003). Figure 4 shows the spectra of the triplet for three program stars, and the comparison with Zhang & Zhao (2003) for the common star HD 108177 observed using the 2.16 m telescope at the National Astronomical Observatories (Xinglong, China). Note that the O I triplet lines are detectable in our spectra except for the third line 7775.395 Å which is comparable with the noise level in the comtinuum at this region. For HD 108177, the EWs of triplets from Zhang & Zhao (2003) are 33.5, 27.6 and 14.8 mÅ respectively. These values are close to ours. On the other hand, different stellar parameters and different line lists and oscillator strengths for iron also might be a reason for the [O/Fe] ratio deviation. Especially, the effective temperature adopted in this study is systematically higher than Takeda (2003) by about 100 K. It will systematically decrease our [O/Fe] ratio by about 0.07 dex (see Table 3).
Table 6: Equivalent widths and abundances of O.
Figure 5a shows our non-LTE results with the mean value of [O/Fe . It agrees well with Mishenina et al. (2000) but the trend is not consistent. In Fig. 5b, we compare our results with other oxygen abundances derived from different investigations. We can see that our stars (filled triangles) have nearly constant [O/Fe] of 0.6 dex in our metalicity range -2.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.4. This trend supports the flat trend by Nissen et al. (2002), although the mean [O/Fe] ratio is about 0.3 dex higher than theirs, and the metallicity coverage is not large enough.
The bulk of -elements was produced by type II supernovae originating from massive stars (Arnett 1978). The nearly constant ratios between the -elements and Fe in the metallicity range Fe/H are observed by Nissen et al. (1994). However, a more precise analysis of [/Fe] shows a pronounced scatter in the metal-poor stars that has been interpreted mostly as a consequence of the inhomogeneity of the matter making up the stars rather than a result of poor observational data (Audouze & Silk 1995). For all four -element ratios, Stephens & Boesgaard (2002) found high values at low metallicities that decrease to near-solar values at high metallicities for metal-poor halo dwarfs with unusual orbital properties (e.g. stars coming from the outskirts of the halo or stars on retrograde orbits).
Table 7: Oxygen abundance comparison with Takeda (2003).
|Figure 4: The spectra of O I triplet for three sample stars, and spectra comparison with Zhang & Zhao (2003) for HD 108177.|
|Open with DEXTER|
|Figure 5: a): The [O/Fe] ratio vs. [Fe/H] of our sample stars. b): Comparison with other studies. The open circles present the data from Beosgaard et al. (1999) using OH lines. The open triangles present O I triplets result from Mishenina et al. (2000), and the crosses present the forbidden line [O I] 6300 Å result from Nissen et al. (2002). The diamonds present reanalysed [O/Fe] ratio by Takeda (2003) for common stars. Our results are presented by filled triangles. The common stars are connected with solid lines.|
|Open with DEXTER|
|Figure 6: Abundance patterns for -elements (Mg, Si, Ca and Ti).|
|Open with DEXTER|
Our results for the -elements (Mg, Si, Ca and Ti) are found to be overabundant by , , , and dex respectively. As seen in Fig. 6, all of the four -elements show a slightly decreasing trend with increasing iron abundance [Fe/H] in our metallicity range with different slope, and there are no significantly different pattern between the two groups of halo stars with different kinematics, definitively retrograde stars (filled circles) and remaining stars (asterisks). For silicon, only fewer than five weak Si I lines are available and all EW values less than 10 mÅ, in the metallicity range of [Fe/H] < -1.9 dex. Moreover, these Si lines have not provided accurate oscillator strengths. This caused the larger scatter of Si abundance than other -elements. Ca and Ti are measured with more than 10 neutral lines, and the abundances relative to iron show a consistant trend with smaller scatter.
The odd-Z element Na was thought to be synthesized in massive stars like the -elements, but Na is primarily manufactured during supernova explosions (Timmes et al. 1995). Therefore, the [Na/Mg] ratio declines as a near mirror image of the increase of [Mg/Fe] with decreasing [Fe/H] in the disk and halo (Wheeler et al. 1989). Stephens & Boesgaard (2002) also found out that the ratios of [Na/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] increase together. Previous analysis of sodium under the assumption of LTE for metal-poor stars gave solar abundance (McWilliam et al. 1995). Recently, Baumüller et al. (1998, hereafter B98) analyzed the full non-LTE line formation of sodium to determine the non-LTE effect of neutral sodium. They derived the solar [Na/Fe] ratio by LTE analysis and obtained a lower [Na/Fe] when non-LTE line formation is taken into account. For the Na I D lines, the LTE abundances can be significantly different from their non-LTE with differences reaching 0.6 dex in extreme cases.
In this study, we only measured the strong Na I D 5889/95 Å lines to calculate sodium abundance. Their non-LTE corrections are calculated using profile fitting by the synthesis program SIU (see Shi et al. 2004, for details). The mean non-LTE correction reached -0.40 dex that reduces the nearly solar [Na/Fe] ratios based on LTE analysis down to underabundance (mean value dex) from nearly solar values. Table 8 lists the non-LTE correction for Na I D lines. Note that the non-LTE corrections increase significantly with effective temperature , and decrease with increasing metallicity in the range [Fe/H] > -2.0, but appear opposite to [Fe/H] < -2.0, as mentioned in Shi et al. (2004). This explains that the non-LTE effect of Na I D lines is stronger for hot and metal-deficient stars in the range [Fe/H] > -2.0. Figure 7 shows our non-LTE result of sodium abundance with B98's sample stars. It shows that there is no obvious trend of the [Na/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] diagram in the metallicity range of -2.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.4. This is not inconsistent with B98's study since we have no stars with [Fe/H] < -2.3: in B98, the tentative decreasing [Na/Fe] with [Fe/H] appears at [Fe/H] < -2.5. However, the [Na/Fe] values in the present work are statistically lower than that of B98 by order of 0.15 dex for the same metallicity range of -2.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.4. But this result needs further investigation because we notice that the non-LTE corrections between the present study and B98 are somewhat different although both works adopt the same profile fitting method. Observationally the lower [Na/Fe] in retrograde stars could be real. It has been suggested by Hanson et al. (1998) that some retrograde giants in the halo have low [Na/Fe] ratios (<-0.35 dex) which is confirmed in retrograde halo dwarfs by the present study if the comparison of [Na/Fe] between the present work and B98 is internally consistent. No obvious difference is found between definitive retrograde stars and the remaining stars based on the present work.
Table 8: Non-LTE corrections and results for Na I D lines.
|Figure 7: NLTE abundances of Sodium: filled symbols: this study, open triangles: Baumüller et al. (1998).|
|Open with DEXTER|
As an element between -elements and iron-peak elements, scandium abundance provides some special constraints on nucleosynthesis theory. However, the observational situation for scandium is not satisfactory at present. Additionally, the significance of the hyperfine structure (HFS) of Sc lines on the abundance pattern of Sc is not well established. Zhao & Magain (1990) derived the overabundance of Sc relative to Fe without consideration of HFS in metal-poor dwarfs. Gratton & Sneden (1991) considered HFS for Sc lines using synthetic spectrum computations and found nearly solar [Sc/Fe] ratios in metal-poor dwarfs and giants. A more detailed HFS effect for Sc lines is discussed by Nissen et al. (2000). They found that the HFS has a small influence on weak Sc II lines. Their [Sc/Fe] declines from an overabundance (0.2) at [Fe/H] =-1.4to zero at solar metallicity, except for the group of low- halo stars, which tend to have low values of [Sc/Fe].
|Figure 8: Scandium abundance versus metallicity.|
|Open with DEXTER|
Fewer than five Sc I I lines are measured in this study including 4400.390, 4670.413, 5239.823, 5526.821 and 5657.880 Å. Figure 8 shows Sc abundance results with respect to metallicity without considering the HFS effect. Our results also show that the -elements keep the overabundance and tend to decrease with the increasing metallicity in our range -2.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.4. This agrees with the result of Zhao & Magain (1990) and supports the investigation of Nissen et al. (2000) into the overabundances of metal-rich halo stars at [Fe/H] = -1.4. With different HFS data, Prochaska & McWilliam (2000) re-determined Sc abundances for stars in Nissen et al. (2000) but the enhanced [Sc/Fe] is the same. The present result on [Sc/Fe] extends the Nissen et al. (2000) work to lower metallicity until [Fe/H] = -2.3 and confirms a similar nucleosynthesis origin as the -elements.
The Fe-group elements are mainly produced by explosion of Type I supernova. Previous studies of chromium in stars with any metallicity have yielded the same result: [Cr/Fe (Wheeler et al. 1989). Zhao & Magain (1990) obtained nearly solar Cr abundance [Cr/Fe/ using six weak neutral lines for 20 metal-poor dwarfs. Gratton & Sneden (1991) obtained a slight underabundance of [Cr/Fe from Cr I lines and [Cr/Fe from Cr I I lines for the metal-poor dwarfs and giants. For the different abundances of Cr I and Cr I I lines they suggested that some overionization of Cr occurs in these stars. Our result from Cr I lines also give nearly solar values with mean [Cr/Fe , but the Cr I I lines give overabundance results that are higher than the Cr I result by 0.15 dex in extreme cases. We propose that the difference between abundances provided by neutral and singly ionized Cr lines may be caused by the distribution of the neutral and ionized Cr in different layers of the atmosphere, with different temperatures and gravities.
Some of the early contributions to stellar abundance studies suggested that the odd-Z elements of the Fe group (at least V and Mn) are deficient in metal-poor stars (Wheeler et al. 1989). It is confirmed by Gratton (1989); he derived a constant [Mn/Fe] ratio for [Fe/H] < -1 with a mean value of [Mn/Fe . Recently, Nissen et al. (2000) published a comprehensive study of [Mn/Fe] ratios for 129 dwarfs in the range -1.4 < [Fe/H] < +0.1 and found the same significant underabundance of [Mn/Fe dex at [Fe/H . In this study, we also obtained an underabundant of [Mn/Fe] ratio with the mean value [Mn/Fe (see Fig. 9). The HFS effect was not considered in our study. For weak lines the HFS treatment is not so critical because the lines are unsaturated (Prochaska & McWilliam 2000).
|Figure 9: Iron peak elements ratios as a function of metallicity.|
|Open with DEXTER|
|Figure 10: [Ba/Fe] vs. [Fe/H].|
|Open with DEXTER|
The elements heavier than iron are produced by neutron capture by two main mechanisms according to the strength of the neutron flux. Zhao & Magain (1995) have reduced barium abundances from two Ba I I lines 5853 Å and 6496 Å obtained that [Ba/Fe] values are 0.25 dex higher than solar for [Fe/H] > -1.8, then goes down with decreasing metallicity for [Fe/H] < -1.8. Mashonkina et al. (1999) analyzed non-LTE effects of Ba and point out that [Ba/Fe] abundance ratios are approximately solar above [Fe/H where they decrease rapidly by 0.5-0.6 dex, and suggest s-process dominated Ba production, at least for the metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] > -2.2. We measured four Ba I I lines including 4554, 5853, 6141 and 6496 Å for our sample stars. For -2.1 < [Fe/H] < -1.4, [Ba/Fe] abundance ratios remain constant within 0.05 dex, and decrease rapidly from [Fe/H] < -2.1 to -0.4 dex in [Fe/H (the Fig. 10). Note that HD 149414, which is a single-lined binary, has significantly a higher [Ba/Fe] ratio than nearby stars. Probably it can be explained as a result of mass transfer from its secondary.
We obtained the chemical composition of 10 halo stars for the 10 elements including -elements (O, Mg, Si, Ca and Ti), Na, Sc, iron peak elements (Cr and Mn) and the neutron capture element Ba. The overabundances of oxygen and other -elements in halo stars are explained by the interaction between the timescale of halo collapse and star formation with the supernova of different original masses. The kinematics indicate that most of the sample stars are on retrograde orbits. The main conclusions are:
We thank the referee Dr. Wako Aoki for useful suggestions. This work is supported by NKBRSF G1999075406, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. 10203002 and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research 01-02-16093.