![]() |
Figure 1:
The comparison of equivalent widths with other works:
a) with Zhao & Magain (1990) for BD +02![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Toomre diagram:
(U2+W2)1/2 versus rotational velocity (V).
We divide sample stars to two groups: definitively regrograde orbit stars
with
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: The spectra of O I triplet for three sample stars, and spectra comparison with Zhang & Zhao (2003) for HD 108177. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: a): The [O/Fe] ratio vs. [Fe/H] of our sample stars. b): Comparison with other studies. The open circles present the data from Beosgaard et al. (1999) using OH lines. The open triangles present O I triplets result from Mishenina et al. (2000), and the crosses present the forbidden line [O I] 6300 Å result from Nissen et al. (2002). The diamonds present reanalysed [O/Fe] ratio by Takeda (2003) for common stars. Our results are presented by filled triangles. The common stars are connected with solid lines. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Abundance patterns for ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: NLTE abundances of Sodium: filled symbols: this study, open triangles: Baumüller et al. (1998). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Scandium abundance versus metallicity. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Iron peak elements ratios as a function of metallicity. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: [Ba/Fe] vs. [Fe/H]. |
Open with DEXTER |