All Figures

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig1.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$ Figure 1: The intensity ratio $\langle u_r'^2\rangle/\langle u_{\phi}'^2\rangle$ in the box simulations for different colatitudes. The colatitudes are $\theta =0^\circ$ (poles, solid), $30^\circ$ (dashed) and $60^\circ$ (dot-dashed), ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig2.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$ Figure 2: The correlation ${\cal C}$ in the box simulations for various latitudes after both horizontal and temporal averaging vs. depth for ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig3.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$ Figure 3: Comparison of computed $\langle {\rm DIV}\cdot{\rm CURL}\rangle$ with observational data for ${\rm Ta}=10^3$ (triple-dot-dashed), ${\rm Ta}=10^5$ (solid) and ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ (dashed); the numerical values are taken near the top of the convection zone (z=-0.3). The shaded area covers the range of the observed data.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig4.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Horizontally- and time-averaged kinetic helicity ${\cal H}_{\rm kin}$ vs. depth for different latitudes in the box simulations for ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ . Note the close relation of this quantity to the simulated correlation ${\cal C}$ given in Fig. 2. The shape of the helicity curve is very close to results of Miesch et al. (2000, their Fig. 22).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig1.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$	Figure 1: The intensity ratio $\langle u_r'^2\rangle/\langle u_{\phi}'^2\rangle$ in the box simulations for different colatitudes. The colatitudes are $\theta =0^\circ$ (poles, solid), $30^\circ$ (dashed) and $60^\circ$ (dot-dashed), ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig2.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$	Figure 2: The correlation ${\cal C}$ in the box simulations for various latitudes after both horizontal and temporal averaging vs. depth for ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig3.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Comparison of computed $\langle {\rm DIV}\cdot{\rm CURL}\rangle$ with observational data for ${\rm Ta}=10^3$ (triple-dot-dashed), ${\rm Ta}=10^5$ (solid) and ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ (dashed); the numerical values are taken near the top of the convection zone (z=-0.3). The shaded area covers the range of the observed data.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} { \psfig{figure=0531fig4.ps,width=7cm,clip=} } \end{figure}$	Figure 4: Horizontally- and time-averaged kinetic helicity ${\cal H}_{\rm kin}$ vs. depth for different latitudes in the box simulations for ${\rm Ta}=10^6$ . Note the close relation of this quantity to the simulated correlation ${\cal C}$ given in Fig. 2. The shape of the helicity curve is very close to results of Miesch et al. (2000, their Fig. 22).
Open with DEXTER