A&A 423, 1017-1021 (2004)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040290
Research Note
M. Emprechtinger1 - T. Forveille2,3 - S. Kimeswenger1
1 - Institut für Astrophysik der Universität Innsbruck,
Technikerst. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2 -
Observatoire de Grenoble, BP 53X, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 3, France
3 -
CFHT, PO Box 1597, Kamuela, HI 96743, USA
Received 18 February 2004 / Accepted 11 May 2004
Abstract
We present a spectroscopic investigation of two
hitherto unstudied galactic planetary nebulae (MeWe 1-10
and MeWe 1-11) and one candidate object (MeWe 2-5).
The candidate object clearly has been identified as a bipolar
hourglass-shaped PN. The galactic foreground extinction was
derived and using photoionization models with CLOUDY the two round
objects were classified as highly evolved nebulae.
Key words: ISM: planetary nebulae: individual: MeWe 1-10, MeWe 1-11, MeWe 2-5
We present here a spectroscopic investigation and photoionization models of these targets.
Planetary nebulae (PNe) have for a long time been known as representing an inescapable bottleneck in late stellar evolution for stars of intermediate masses. Many studies focus either on a few well-known prototypes or only give a very coarse overview (see the statistics in Acker 1997). We contribute to the sample of individual studies to get better statistics for larger PNe samples. A number of the most evolved of them were used as a probe of PNe-interstellar matter (ISM) interaction (Rauch et al. 1999; Kerber et al. 2000a,b). The spectroscopy presented here shows that MeWe 1-10 and 1-11 also might be good probes for a detailed deeper study of the ISM interaction, which is beyond the scope of this research note.
The data was obtained on July 16th 1998 using the Danish
1.54 m telescope with the DFOSC spectrograph at ESO La Silla,
Chile. A LORAL 2k 2k CCD detector and Grism #4 with a
resolution of 3.1 nm/pixel and a usable range from 450 nm to
700 nm were attached. The calibration was done using usual
procedure in MIDAS and the calibration data from the DFOSC manual.
The standard star EG 274 (Hamuy et al. 1992) was used for
flux calibration. For slit centering purposes a narrow band
[O III] image was taken before each spectrum.
![]() |
Figure 1: Spectrum ( left) and image ( right) of PN MeWe 1-10. The exposure time was 900 s for the spectrum as well as for the image. The arrows in the image mark the stars used as astrometric calibrators. The images are given in sky orientation (E is left, N is up). The inner circle encloses the central star of the PN and the outer circle shows the almost perfectly round shape of this nebula. The NE enhancement might be due to ISM interaction, but as the slit of the spectrum does not cover this region, we cannot be sure. The offset of the outer ring with respect to the CSPN strongly encourages this interpretation. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Spectrum ( left) and image ( right) of PN MeWe 1-11. The exposure times were 900 s for the spectrum and for the image. The marks are as described in Fig. 1. The western edge is clearly enhanced. This is most likely due to ISM interaction. But including the somewhat weaker SE dip implies that it might be a signature of a cylindrical structure (see Fig. 5). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Spectrum ( left) and image ( right) of PN MeWe 2-5. The exposure times were 900 s for the spectrum and for the image. The marks are as described in Fig. 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
To obtain accurate astrometry of the PNe the narrow band
[O III] image was used. In the case of MeWe 1-10 and
MeWe 1-11 the stars selected by Melmer & Weinberger
(1990) as candidates for the central stars of the PN
(CSPNe) were selected. Our spectra indeed show them as very hot
blue objects with very weak lines typical of CSPNe. For MeWe
2-5 the geometric center of the central bar at the [OIII] direct
imaging frame was selected. The DFOSC has, according to the
manual, a resolution of
per pixel. We measure
.
The FWHM on the images used
for the astrometry were within the range of
to
.
We used only the central part of the image with a
radius of 2
around the target. This provides us with a
highly distortion-free image. Astrometric calibrators were taken
from the USNO CCD Astrometric Catalogue (Zacharias et al.
2000). This catalogue contains southern sources with an
accuracy of about 20 mas in the red magnitude range 10
and still has an accuracy of about 70 mas
at the limit of 16
.
We used the two most nearby stars
for each target to obtain the astrometry (marked in
Figs. 1-3). The results
are presented in Table 1. According to Andersen &
Kimeswenger (2001) the error of our coordinates is assumed
to be 110 mas. Thus our coordinates are more accurate than the one
given by Kimeswenger (2001) that had an rms of about 1
and had due to the GSC reference frame up to 2
of systematic effects.
Table 1: Basic data for the PNe investigated.
All three objects are not associated with a known radio survey
source nor have IRAS counterparts been found. The relative errors
of the individual lines and the error of the line ratios were
estimated using different regions of the spectrum along the slit
and the accuracy of the standard star. As the variations lie
within a few percent, a conservative estimate gives an error of
10-15% for the line ratios. Since the H
and
[N II] lines are not detached in our spectra, we had to
deconvolve them. We derived the line profile from the isolated
night-sky-line at 630 nm. Using this profile, the known positions
of the lines and the quantum mechanically fixed line ratio of the
[N II] lines a restricted fit, only having the ratio H
/
[N II] as a free parameter, was applied. The
resulting fit is given in Fig. 4. The fit quality
gives an error estimate comparable to that of the isolated lines
for H
and [N II]658.4.
![]() |
Figure 4:
The "deconvolution'' of the H
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
To deredden the frames we used the interstellar extinction curve
of Savage & Mathis (1979). The error estimate for the
lines results in an error in the reddening. The statistical
distance and the radius of the nebulae have been calculated from
the 5 GHz surface brightness data (Schneider & Buckley
1996). We estimated the 5 GHz data from the Hsurface brightness along the slit (Cahn et al. 1992),
because no radio data were available.
MeWe 1-10 (Fig. 1, Table 2)
is a roughly round PN and its central star is well centered. From
the Balmer decrement we find considerable interstellar reddening
of
,
as is not unexpected for this galactic
region. The ratio of the [S II] doublet, which is very
faint and also not well detached, indicates a density of
clearly showing that the object is in a late stage of
evolution.
Table 2: PN MeWe 1-10 Line identifications.
MeWe 1-11 (Fig. 2, Table 3)
is a box-shaped PN. It shows a pronounced brightness enhancement
to the north-west in [N II], that is less prominent in the
[O III] image (Fig. 2). A possible explanation for
this peculiarity is that MeWe 1-11 is interacting with the
interstellar medium. As shown in Fig. 5 the spectrum
changes there significantly towards partly deionized stages. While
the ionization stage, defined by [OIII] / H,
does not
change [NII] and [SII] are enhanced abruptly. This is typical of
ISM interacting regions (Furlan 1999; Kerber et al.
2000b). In the diagnostic diagram of Garcia Lario et al.
(1991) it strongly moves towards the regions of shocked gas
(see e.g. Zanin & Weinberger 1997), but it still carries the
signature of a mainly photoionized PN. The Balmer decrement gives
no interstellar reddening. As the line of sight leaves the
galactic plane and as the Gould Belt clouds are above the plane in
this direction this low reddening is possible. The [S II]
doublet is not detectable, but we estimate from the surface
brightness, that is comparable to that of MeWe 1-10 at a similar
distance, that the density is also
.
Table 3: PN MeWe 1-11 Line identifications.
![]() |
Figure 5: The spectrum of PN MeWe 1-11 at the western edge. The spectrum changes abruptly with respect to the other parts of the nebula (see text). |
Open with DEXTER |
MeWe 2-5 (Fig. 3, Table 4) is
a bipolar PN. The interstellar reddening has been found to be
.
According to the lower galactic latitude of the
object, this is to be expected. The ratio of the [S II]
doublet, also very faint and not well detached in this object,
indicates a density of
.
This indicates that the
object is in a late stage of evolution, like the other two
nebulae. The features at 589 nm and 630 nm seem to be relicts of
the night-sky-lines.
Table 4: PN MeWe 2-5 Line identifications.
To get an idea of the temperature and the luminosity of the
central star we modelled these nebulae with the CLOUDY code
(Ferland 1996). The abundances were used as in the
standard PN of CLOUDY. Only sulphur had to be lowered to the solar
value. Since the [S II] doublet is very faint we based our
modelling on the relative line fluxes of [O III]500.7and [N II]658.4. We used the NLTE central star models
of Rauch (1997, 2003). As found by Armsdorfer et
al. (2002) the use of real stellar photosphere models is
critical for the parameters of the central stars. Assuming that
the density is between 100 and 200 cm-3 according to the
observed ratio
,
we used
densities of 100, 150 and 200 cm-3. Since the radius
calculated by the method of Schneider & Buckley (1996) is
quite large, we varied also the radius from 0.5 to 1 times the
calculated radius (resp. varied the distance).
![]() |
Figure 6:
The fit of a CLOUDY model (MeWe 1-10). On the abscissa is
the luminosity in units of [![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We have spectroscopically confirmed the nature of three PNe, especially of the possible PN MeWe 2-5. Even this small sample already shows that each PN is unique. In particular the old, extended PNe found in the optical surveys tend to be intresting due to their late evolutionary stage; for an ever-increasing number of these PNe, signs of an interaction with the ISM are being discovered.
The photoionisation models suggest a significantly smaller distance to the objects than those found using statistical distances.
The nebulae MeWe 1-10 and MeWe 1-11 lie below the domain of the tracks from Bloecker (1995) and Vassiliadis & Wood (1994). This results in low mass CSPN and thus suggests low mass progenitors. Our model does not lead us to a low abundance of at least CNO elements. This thus does not support the hypothesis of Soker (2002) that round PNe may be formed only from low abundance progenitors.
Further detailed high-resolution spectroscopic investigations of
these central stars, so as to be able to model them as in
Napiwotzki (1999 and 2001) are strongly encouraged
to fix the CSPN parameters. This then will allow us to study the
nebula in more detail by fixing parameters like
and
distance.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referee for her/his careful reading of the original manuscript and for useful comments.