Table 3: Abundance differences between NLTE and LTE obtained by fitting calculated LTE equivalent widths of Na I lines using the same parameters for various stellar model atmospheres based on the line-blanketed model grid. Results refer to $\Delta \mbox{[Na/Fe]} = \mbox{[Na/Fe]} _{\rm NLTE}-$ [Na/Fe] $_{\rm LTE}$ . No entries are given for extremely weak lines. The calculations all refer to $\xi = 1$ km s^-1 and [Na/Fe] = 0.
$T_{\rm eff}$ $\log g$ [Fe/H] 5682 5688 5890 5896 6154 6160 8183 8194 $\overline{\Delta{\rm [Na/Fe]}}$

5200 4.50 0.0 -0.08 -0.07 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.05 -0.15 -0.15 -0.08 $\pm$ 0.05

5200 4.50 -1.0 -0.06 -0.06 -0.07 -0.08 -0.04 -0.04 -0.24 -0.24 -0.10 $\pm$ 0.07

5200 4.50 -2.0 -0.14 -0.17 -0.15 $\pm$ 0.02

5200 4.50 -3.0 -0.17 -0.17 -0.17 $\pm$ 0.00

5200 3.50 0.0 -0.14 -0.14 -0.04 -0.06 -0.06 -0.06 -0.31 -0.31 -0.14 $\pm$ 0.09

5200 3.50 -1.0 -0.14 -0.16 -0.42 -0.46 -0.29 $\pm$ 0.15

5200 3.50 -2.0 -0.31 -0.34 -0.32 $\pm$ 0.02

5200 3.50 -3.0 -0.36 -0.28 -0.32 $\pm$ 0.04

5780 4.50 0.0 -0.08 -0.08 -0.05 -0.06 -0.04 -0.05 -0.20 -0.21 -0.10 $\pm$ 0.05

5780 4.50 -1.0 -0.06 -0.07 -0.16 -0.18 -0.05 -0.05 -0.27 -0.29 -0.14 $\pm$ 0.08

5780 4.50 -2.0 -0.05 -0.05 -0.34 -0.32 -0.05 -0.05 -0.10 -0.12 -0.13 $\pm$ 0.10

5780 4.50 -3.0 -0.23 -0.16 -0.19 $\pm$ 0.04

5780 3.50 0.0 -0.17 -0.18 -0.10 -0.10 -0.06 -0.08 -0.43 -0.43 -0.19 $\pm$ 0.12

5780 3.50 -1.0 -0.11 -0.11 -0.33 -0.35 -0.39 -0.43 -0.29 $\pm$ 0.12

5780 3.50 -2.0 -0.56 -0.52 -0.54 $\pm$ 0.02

5780 3.50 -3.0 -0.27 -0.17 -0.22 $\pm$ 0.05

6500 4.50 0.0 -0.07 -0.09 -0.11 -0.15 -0.03 -0.04 -0.28 -0.30 -0.13 $\pm$ 0.08

6500 4.50 -1.0 -0.38 -0.41 -0.25 -0.30 -0.33 $\pm$ 0.06

6500 4.50 -2.0 -0.45 -0.38 -0.41 $\pm$ 0.04

6500 4.50 -3.0 -0.13 -0.10 -0.11 $\pm$ 0.02

6500 3.50 0.0 -0.12 -0.13 -0.22 -0.31 -0.05 -0.06 -0.47 -0.52 -0.23 $\pm$ 0.15

6500 3.50 -1.0 -0.64 -0.61 -0.32 -0.40 -0.49 $\pm$ 0.02

6500 3.50 -2.0 -0.54 -0.43 -0.49 $\pm$ 0.06

6500 3.50 -3.0 -0.13 -0.09 -0.11 $\pm$ 0.02

**Table 3:** Abundance differences between NLTE and LTE obtained by fitting calculated LTE *equivalent widths* of Na I lines using the same parameters for various stellar model atmospheres based on the line-blanketed model grid. Results refer to $\Delta \mbox{[Na/Fe]} = \mbox{[Na/Fe]} _{\rm NLTE}-$ [Na/Fe] $_{\rm LTE}$ . No entries are given for extremely weak lines. The calculations all refer to $\xi = 1$ km s^-1 and [Na/Fe] = 0.
$T_{\rm eff}$	$\log g$	[Fe/H]	5682	5688	5890	5896	6154	6160	8183	8194	$\overline{\Delta{\rm [Na/Fe]}}$
5200	4.50	0.0	-0.08	-0.07	-0.04	-0.04	-0.04	-0.05	-0.15	-0.15	-0.08 $\pm$ 0.05
5200	4.50	-1.0	-0.06	-0.06	-0.07	-0.08	-0.04	-0.04	-0.24	-0.24	-0.10 $\pm$ 0.07
5200	4.50	-2.0			-0.14	-0.17					-0.15 $\pm$ 0.02
5200	4.50	-3.0			-0.17	-0.17					-0.17 $\pm$ 0.00
5200	3.50	0.0	-0.14	-0.14	-0.04	-0.06	-0.06	-0.06	-0.31	-0.31	-0.14 $\pm$ 0.09
5200	3.50	-1.0			-0.14	-0.16			-0.42	-0.46	-0.29 $\pm$ 0.15
5200	3.50	-2.0			-0.31	-0.34					-0.32 $\pm$ 0.02
5200	3.50	-3.0			-0.36	-0.28					-0.32 $\pm$ 0.04
5780	4.50	0.0	-0.08	-0.08	-0.05	-0.06	-0.04	-0.05	-0.20	-0.21	-0.10 $\pm$ 0.05
5780	4.50	-1.0	-0.06	-0.07	-0.16	-0.18	-0.05	-0.05	-0.27	-0.29	-0.14 $\pm$ 0.08
5780	4.50	-2.0	-0.05	-0.05	-0.34	-0.32	-0.05	-0.05	-0.10	-0.12	-0.13 $\pm$ 0.10
5780	4.50	-3.0			-0.23	-0.16					-0.19 $\pm$ 0.04
5780	3.50	0.0	-0.17	-0.18	-0.10	-0.10	-0.06	-0.08	-0.43	-0.43	-0.19 $\pm$ 0.12
5780	3.50	-1.0	-0.11	-0.11	-0.33	-0.35			-0.39	-0.43	-0.29 $\pm$ 0.12
5780	3.50	-2.0			-0.56	-0.52					-0.54 $\pm$ 0.02
5780	3.50	-3.0			-0.27	-0.17					-0.22 $\pm$ 0.05
6500	4.50	0.0	-0.07	-0.09	-0.11	-0.15	-0.03	-0.04	-0.28	-0.30	-0.13 $\pm$ 0.08
6500	4.50	-1.0			-0.38	-0.41			-0.25	-0.30	-0.33 $\pm$ 0.06
6500	4.50	-2.0			-0.45	-0.38					-0.41 $\pm$ 0.04
6500	4.50	-3.0			-0.13	-0.10					-0.11 $\pm$ 0.02
6500	3.50	0.0	-0.12	-0.13	-0.22	-0.31	-0.05	-0.06	-0.47	-0.52	-0.23 $\pm$ 0.15
6500	3.50	-1.0			-0.64	-0.61			-0.32	-0.40	-0.49 $\pm$ 0.02
6500	3.50	-2.0			-0.54	-0.43					-0.49 $\pm$ 0.06
6500	3.50	-3.0			-0.13	-0.09					-0.11 $\pm$ 0.02

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text