A&A 419, 269-276 (2004)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040069
N. A. Webb 1 - J.-F. Olive 1 - D. Barret 1 - M. Kramer 2 - I. Cognard 3 - O. Löhmer 4
1 - Centre d'Étude Spatiale des Rayonnements, 9 avenue du Colonel Roche, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 04, France
2 -
University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK11 9DL, UK
3 -
LPCE/CNRS Orléans, 3A avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, 45071 Orléans Cedex 02, France
4 -
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
Received 7 May 2003 / Accepted 2 February 2004
Abstract
We present XMM-Newton MOS imaging and PN timing data of
the faint millisecond pulsars PSR J0751+1807 and
PSR J1012+5307. We find 46 sources in the MOS field of
view of PSR J0751+1807 searching down to an unabsorbed
flux limit of
ergs cm-2 s-1 (0.2-10.0 keV). We present, for the first time, the X-ray spectra
of these two faint millisecond pulsars. We find that a power law
model best fits the spectrum of PSR J0751+1807,
,
with an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV). A power
law is also a good description of the spectrum of PSR
J1012+5307,
,
with an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV). However, a blackbody model cannot be excluded as the best
fit to this data. We present some evidence to suggest that both of
these millisecond pulsars show pulsations in this X-ray band. We
find some evidence for a single broad X-ray pulse for PSR
J0751+1807 and we discuss the possibility that there are two
pulses per spin period for PSR J1012+5307.
Key words: X-rays: stars - stars: pulsars: individual: PSR J0751+1807, PSR J1012+5307 - radiation mechanisms: non-thermal - radiation mechanisms: thermal
X-ray emission from millisecond pulsars (MSPs) is thought to be from charged relativistic particles accelerated in the pulsar magnetosphere (non-thermal emission indicated by a hard power-law spectrum and sharp pulsations) and/or thermal emission from hot polar caps and/or emission from a pulsar driven synchrotron nebula or interaction of relativistic pulsar winds with either a wind from a close companion star or the companion star itself (see e.g. Becker & Aschenbach 2002, for a more thorough review). Until now, X-ray pulsations and spectra have often not been observable for faint MSPs e.g. PSR J0751+1807 (Becker et al. 1996) and PSR J1012+5307 (Halpern & Wang 1997). Thus it has been difficult to discriminate between competing neutron star models. However, taking advantage of the large collecting area of XMM-Newton (Jansen et al. 2001), it is becoming possible to observe not only the X-ray spectra but also put a limit on the presence of X-ray pulsations of these faint MSPs.
We have observed two faint MSPs with XMM-Newton.
PSR J0751+1807 was first detected in an EGRET source error box, in
September 1993 (Lundgren et al. 1993), using the radio telescope at Arecibo.
Lundgren et al. (1995) combined the mass function, eccentricity, orbital size
and age of the pulsar, determined from radio data, to predict the
expected type of companion star to the millisecond pulsar. They
proposed that the secondary star is a helium white dwarf, with a mass
between 0.12-0.6 ,
in a 6.3 h orbit with the pulsar. They
determined a 3.49 ms pulse period, but from the period derivatives,
the spin down energy indicated that the pulsar is not the source of
the
-rays that were originally detected by EGRET. PSR
J0751+1807 was subsequently detected in the soft X-ray domain by
Becker et al. (1996), using the ROSAT PSPC. However, there were too
few counts detected to fit a spectrum or detect pulsations. Using the
HI survey of Stark et al. (1992), they deduced an interstellar absorption of
cm
.
Then using their estimated
counts and assuming a powerlaw spectrum of
,
they determined an unabsorbed flux of
erg cm
s
(0.1-2.4 keV). The corresponding
X-ray luminosity was then calculated to be
erg s
,
for a distance of 2 kpc. The
distance they used was calculated using the radio dispersion measure
and the model of Taylor & Cordes (1993) for the galactic distribution of free
electrons.
PSR J1012+5307, a 5.26 ms pulsar, was discovered by
Nicastro et al. (1995) during a survey for short period pulsars conducted
with the 76-m Lovell radio telescope. From the dispersion measure
they found a distance of 0.52 kpc. Callanan et al. (1998), and references
therein, confirmed a white dwarf secondary of mass
in a 14.5 h circular orbit with the pulsar.
Halpern (1996) associated a faint (
ergs s
,
0.1-2.4 keV) X-ray source detected with the ROSAT
PSPC (
photons), with the radio MSP PSR J1012+5307.
However, the number of photons was insufficient to determine a
spectrum or any pulsations.
In this work we present the X-ray spectrum of both PSR J0751+1807 and PSR J1012+5307 for the first time. We also present some evidence for X-ray pulsation from both of these faint pulsars and we compare their nature with other millisecond pulsars, e.g. PSR J0437-4715 (Zavlin et al. 2002; Becker & Trümper 1993; Zavlin & Pavlov 1998).
PSR J0751+1807 was observed by XMM-Newton on October 1, 2000. The observations spanned 38 ks (MOS cameras) and 36.8 ks (PN camera), but a soft proton flare affected approximately 8 ks of these observations. The second of our faint MSPs, PSR J1012+5307, was observed on April 19, 2001. The MOS observations lasted 20.8 ks and the PN observations 19.2 ks. However the whole observation was strongly affected by a soft proton flare. The MOS data were reduced using version 5.4.1 of the XMM-Newton SAS (Science Analysis Software). For the PN data we took advantage of the development track version of the SAS. Improvements have been made to the oal (ODF (Observation Data File) access layer) task (version 3.106) to correct for spurious and wrong values, premature increments, random jumps and blocks of frames stemming from different quadrants in the timing data in the PN auxiliary file, as well as correcting properly for the onboard delays (Kirsch et al. 2003). Indeed several spurious jumps were corrected using this version. We have verified that this version improved our timing solution using the pulsar PSR J0218+4232 (see Webb et al. 2004).
We employed the MOS cameras in the full frame mode, using a thin filter (see Turner et al. 2001). The MOS data were reduced using "emchain'' with "embadpixfind'' to detect the bad pixels. The event lists were filtered, so that 0-12 of the predefined patterns (single, double, triple, and quadruple pixel events) were retained and the high background periods were identified by defining a count rate threshold above the low background rate and the periods of higher background counts were then flagged in the event list. We also filtered in energy. We used the energy range 0.2-10.0 keV, as recommended in the document "EPIC Status of Calibration and Data Analysis'' (Kirsch et al. 2002). The event lists from the two MOS cameras were merged, to increase the signal-to-noise.
The PN camera was also used with a thin filter, but in timing mode
which has a timing resolution of 30 s (Strüder et al. 2001). The PN data
were reduced using the "epchain'' of the SAS. Again the event lists
were filtered, so that 0-4 of the predefined patterns (single and
double events) were retained, as these have the best energy
calibration. We also filtered in energy. The document "EPIC Status
of Calibration and Data Analysis'' (Kirsch et al. 2002) recommends use of PN
timing data above 0.5 keV, to avoid increased noise. We used the data
between 0.6-10.0 keV as this had the best signal-to-noise. The times
of the events were then converted from times expressed in the local
satellite frame to Barycentric Dynamical Time, using the task
"barycen'' and the coordinates derived from observing the pulsar 4-8
times per month, over years, with the radio telescope at Nançay,
France, by one of us (IC), for PSR J0751+1807. For
PSR J1012+5307 we used the results from the high-precision
timing observations taken since October 1996, using the 100-m
Effelsberg radio telescope and the 76-m Lovell telescope by two of us
(MK and OL).
Table 1:
The best model fits to the MOS spectra of the source 52, and the MOS and PN spectra of PSR J0751+1807 and PSR J1012+5307. For PSR J0751+1807 the interstellar absorption ()
was fixed at
cm-2. For PSR J1012+5307 the
was fixed at
cm-2. For source 52, z was fixed at 0.255. All the errors shown are 1
confidence limits. The fluxes and luminosities are given for the 0.2-10.0 keV band.
We extracted the MOS spectra of PSR J0751+1807 using an
extraction radius of 1
and rebinned the data into 15 eV
bins. We used a similar neighbouring surface, free of X-ray sources
to extract a background file. We used the SAS tasks "rmfgen'' and
"arfgen'' to generate a "redistribution matrix file'' and an "ancillary
response file''. We binned the data to contain at least 20 counts/bin. The PN data were extracted in a similar way, following
the usual XMM-Newton timing data procedure. The data in the RAWY
direction were binned into a single bin and the spectrum was extracted
using a rectangle of
pixels, which included all the
photons from the pulsar, see e.g. Kuster et al. (2002). The background
spectrum was extracted from a similar neighbouring surface, free of
X-ray sources. Again we used the SAS tasks "rmfgen'' and "arfgen'' to
generate a "redistribution matrix file'' and an "ancillary response
file''. We then used Xspec (version 11.1.0) to fit the spectrum. We
tried to fit simple models to the combined PN and MOS spectra. We
found the model fits as given in Table 1 for the
spectrum between 0.2-10.0 keV, when the
was frozen at
,
(see Becker et al. 1996). The best
fitting spectrum is a single power law, with a similar photon index to
the X-ray spectrum of other millisecond pulsars e.g. PSR B1821-24
(Saito et al. 1997). The spectrum of PSR J0751+1807, plotted with
the power law fit, can be seen in Fig. 1.
Allowing the
to vary gives values compatible with the above
values. We determine an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV).
![]() |
Figure 1: The combined MOS and PN spectrum of PSR J0751+1807 fitted with a power law model. The fit parameters can be found in Table 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 2: Ephemeris of PSR J0751+1807 from the Nançay radio timing data.
We have reduced and analysed the timing data in the same way as
the timing analysis that we carried out on the MSP PSR J0218+4232 (Webb et al. 2004), which is an MSP that is known to show
pulsations in both the radio and X-rays. We corrected the timing
data for the orbital movement of the pulsar and the data were folded
on the radio ephemeris, see Table 2, taking
into account the time-delays due to the orbital motion. We used the
data between 0.6-7.0 keV, as we found that the majority of the
emission from PSR J0751+1807 was in this energy band (see
Sect. 3.1) and thus the signal-to-noise in this band
was the best. We tested the hypothesis that there is no pulsation in
the MSP PSR J0751+1807. We searched frequencies at and
around the expected frequency and we found the largest peak in the
versus change
in frequency from the expected frequency at the expected value, see
Fig. 2 where we have taken the resolution of the
data (n) and plotted 4n bins in the range
.
Testing the significance of the
peak (Buccheri et al. 1985), we find that it is significant at
1.7
.
However, as this is the largest peak when searching 700 frequencies about the expected frequency and it falls at the expected
value, we tried to fold the data on this frequency. The folded
lightcurve (0.6-7.0 keV), counts versus phase, is shown in
Fig. 3. We find one broad pulse per period.
Fitting the lightcurve with a Lorentzian (as Kuiper et al. 2002a) we find
that the FWHM of the pulse is
,
centred at
phase
(errors are 90% confidence). Fitting
with a Gaussian gives similar results. Using a Z22 test (Buccheri et al. 1983), which is independent
of binning, we determine a value of 5.5, which
corresponds to a probability that the pulse-phase distribution
deviates from a statistically flat distribution of 0.94. The pulsed
percentage is
%.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Lightcurve
of PSR J0751+1807 folded on the radio ephemeris and binned
into 6 bins, each of 0.58 ms. Two cycles are shown for clarity.
A typical ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Lightcurves of PSR J0751+1807 from different energy bands, folded on the
radio ephemeris and binned into 5 bins. Two cycles are shown for
clarity. a) 0.6-1.0 keV; b) 1.0-2.0 keV; c) 2.0-7.0 keV. A
typical ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Taking the counts above the background in our observation,
we are also able to analyse the variations in the lightcurves from
different energy bands. We chose the energy bands 0.6-1.0 keV,
1.0-2.0 keV and 2.0-7.0 keV. The data were folded as before and
binned into 5 bins, where two cycles in phase are presented for
clarity. These lightcurves can be seen in
Fig. 4. As can also be seen from the
spectral fitting, see Sect. 3.1, PSR
J0751+1807 emits mostly at lower energies. The lightcurves do not
vary dramatically, although the peak may be slightly narrower at lower
energies. The pulsed percentage is possibly less at lower energies. We
find
% for each of the energy bands: 0.6-1.0 keV; and
1.0-2.0 keV and
% for the 2.0-7.0 keV band.
We have detected 46 sources in total using the task "emldetect'', with
a maximum detection likelihood threshold of 4.5
and ignoring
those sources not found on both cameras (unless they lay outside the
FOV or were in a chip gap). These sources can be seen in
Fig. 5 and details such as their position, count
rates and likelihood of detection can be found in
Table 3. PSR J0751+1807 is labelled
as source 47. ROSAT detected 10 sources in the XMM-Newton
FOV (Becker et al. 1996). We calculate an unabsorbed flux limit of our
observation of
(0.2-10.0 keV), using PIMMS (Mission Count Rate Simulator) version
3.3a, with a power law,
(as in Hasinger et al. 2001).
Table 3: X-ray sources in the PSR J0751+1807 MOS field of view. Information includes the source identification number, right ascension and declination of the source, count rate and detection likelihood. The detection likelihood value is the value given by "emldetect'' for detection in the two MOS cameras, corrected for the coding error in versions 4.11.15 and earlier.
![]() |
Figure 5:
The MOS
field of view. The sources detected with a likelihood
>4.5![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The brightest source in the field of view is source 52, which was not
detected by ROSAT, where the deepest observation had a detection
limit of
(0.2-10.0 keV). We detect this source with an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV),
more than 13 times brighter than the ROSAT detection limit.
This source has been observed as a part of the AXIS (An XMM-Newton
International Survey) project (see
http://www.ifca.unican.es/~xray/AXIS/ and also Barcons et al. 2002). The
source identified as the optical counterpart of our source 52 in the
i-band photometry is elongated and the spectrum shows calcium H and K
lines and the G-band. From the spectral line shifts, a redshift of
z=0.255 has been determined by the AXIS group and they propose that
this source could be a galaxy. We extracted the MOS spectra of source
52 in the same way as described in Sect. 3.1. We
have fitted the spectrum with the extra-galactic origin in mind and
the results can be found in Table 1. The data
fitted with a power law model can be found in
Fig. 6. We investigated both models with the
redshift frozen at 0.255 and also models with the redshift as a free
parameter. We found that the fits for the frozen and the variable
redshift (z) were the same within the error bars, hence we present
only one set of results, those where the redshift was fixed at 0.255.
We find a reasonably hard X-ray spectrum, which cannot be fitted with
a black body. We have also investigated temporal variation, binning
the data into 1 ks and 5 ks bins. However, we find no significant
variation during our observation. From the X-ray spectral fitting and
short time scale temporal analysis, we cannot support nor disregard
the galaxy hypothesis.
![]() |
Figure 6: The spectrum of the source 52, in the PSR J0751+1807 field of view, fitted with a power law model. The fit parameters can be found in Table 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
Due to the observation of PSR J1012+5307 being affected by a soft proton flare during the whole of the observation, we detect only one source in the field of view. This source is at the centre, with the same coordinates as those of PSR J1012+5307 and is therefore supposed to be the MSP PSR J1012+5307. We have not carried out any filtering for periods of higher background, as the whole observation would be included. Thus the signal to noise is poor for this observation.
We extracted the spectra in the same way as described in
Sect. 3. We tried to fit simple models to the combined
PN and MOS spectra. We find the model fits as given in
Table 1 for the spectrum between 0.2-10.0 keV,
when the
was frozen at
(see Snowden et al. 1994). We cannot discriminate which of these
fits is the best, however we present the spectrum of PSR
J1012+5307 with a power law fit in Fig. 7.
Allowing the
to vary gives values compatible with the above
values. We determine an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV).
![]() |
Figure 7: The combined MOS and PN spectrum of PSR J1012+5307 fitted with a power law model. The fit parameters can be found in Table 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Upper panel: lightcurve folded on the radio ephemeris and
binned into 12 bins, each of 0.44 ms. Two cycles are shown for
clarity. A typical ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We corrected the timing data, as before, for the orbital
movement of the pulsar and the data were folded on new radio
ephemerides calculated to be correct for our observation (see
Table 4), taking into account the time-delays
due to the orbital motion. We used the data between 0.6-5.0 keV, as
the signal-to-noise was best in this band. From the spectral
fitting (see Sect. 4.1) we found that the majority
of the emission from PSR J1012+5307 was in this energy band.
We tested the hypothesis that there is no pulsation in the MSP PSR J1012+5307. The largest peak in the
versus change
in frequency from the expected frequency is at
,
see Fig. 8. This implies a
)
of
,
similar to the value that
we found for PSR J0218+4232 (Webb et al. 2004) (
)
and approaching the value of <10-9 determined from the
analysis of two revolutions of data of the MSP Crab
(Kirsch 2003; Kirsch et al. 2003). It
is also well inside the resolution of this dataset (
1/
),
which is
,
thus we can conclude that
the data reduction and analysis made on the dataset are reliable.
We find that the peak is significant at 3
(Buccheri et al. 1985). We folded the data on the radio period given in
Table 4. The folded lightcurve (0.6-5.0 keV),
counts versus phase, is shown in the top panel of
Fig. 9. We find some evidence for two pulses per
period. Fitting the lightcurve with two Lorentzians
(as Kuiper et al. 2002a) we find that the FWHM of the pulses is
,
centred at phase
and
,
centred at
phase
.
Fitting with two Gaussians gives
similar results. Using a Z
2
4 test (Buccheri et al. 1983) on the X-ray data, we determine a value of
13, which corresponds to a probability of 0.99 that the pulse-phase
distribution deviates from a statistically flat distribution.
We find a pulsed fraction of
%.
Table 4: Ephemeris of PSR J1012+5307 from the Effelsberg and the Lovell radio timing data. Errors on the last digits are shown in parenthesis after the values.
In the lower panel in Fig. 9 we have plotted the radio lightcurve from the timing observations taken using the Effelsberg and Lovell telescopes.
We have investigated the two faint millisecond pulsars PSR J0751+1807 and PSR J1012+5307 in the X-ray band 0.2-10.0 keV, to ascertain the nature of the X-ray spectra. There are only a handful of MSPs that have been seen to pulse in both the radio and in X-rays to date (Becker & Aschenbach 2002), thus we have also investigated whether these two MSPs show pulsations in X-rays.
Saito et al. (1997) showed that the MSP PSR B1821-24 has a similar
magnetic field value, at the light cylinder radius (), as
the Crab pulsar. If this value can be taken to indicate the
high-energy magnetospheric activity, they state that one can expect to
see similar pulses from pulsars with a similar value of
and thus such pulsars are good candidates amongst the MSPs in which to
look for magnetospheric X-ray pulsation in high energy bands. We have
calculated the
for PSR J0751+1807 and PSR J1012+5307, using the values for the magnetic field strength from
Zhang & Harding (2000). We find
and
G
respectively. The value calculated for PSR J0751+1807
indicates that it is amongst the top 10 values for a millisecond
pulsar. That of PSR J1012+5307 places it in the top half.
Thus if a high
indicates high-energy magnetospheric
activity this adds support to the detection of X-ray pulsations in our
observation of PSR J0751+1807 and possibly to that of
PSR J1012+5307.
We have also calculated the spin down energy ()
and the luminosity
in the 0.1-2.4 keV band of these two pulsars, to compare the results
with the correlation found between these two parameters by
Becker & Trümper (1997). Becker & Trümper (1997) suggest that pulsars that obey this
relationship emit X-rays produced by magnetospheric emission,
originating from the co-rotating magnetosphere. For PSR
J0751+1807 we find
)
of 34.35. To calculate the luminosity,
we have used the distance calculated using the radio dispersion
measure and the model of Taylor & Cordes (1993). This gives a value of
)
of
,
which places the point close to the
expected value of 31.2 using the correlation proposed by
Becker & Trümper (1997). However, using the more recent model of
Cordes et al. (2003b,a) diminishes the distance by almost a factor of 2,
to 1.1 kpc. This gives a
)
of
and thus
displaces the point further from the expected value. For the MSP
PSR J1012+5307 we find a
)
of 34.2 and a
)
of
,
where the expected
)
is approximately 31.1.
This places the point some distance from the expected value,
which may indicate that the relationship is not a hard and fast rule.
Indeed Pavlov et al. (2002) found recently that when analysing pulsars in the
2.0-10.0 keV band, this relationship does not hold true.
We find that the best fitting model to the X-ray spectrum of PSR J0751+1807 is a power law. This is indicative of a magnetospheric origin of the X-ray emission. We have shown evidence for a single broad pulse emitted from this MSP, where the pulsation appears to change only slightly with increasing energy (becomes slightly broader). The observations also indicate that the pulsed fraction possibly increases at higher energies. A broad pulsation can be observed from pulsars showing hard magnetospheric emission or soft thermal emission and thus we cannot yet discern the origin of the X-ray emission from PSR J0751+1807 with this data set. Indeed this pulsar may be best fitted by a multi-component model, as is the case with several other brighter MSPs e.g. PSR J0218+4232, (Webb et al. 2004) or PSR J0437-4715, (Zavlin et al. 2002; Zavlin & Pavlov 1998). Longer observations of PSR J0751+1807 will help to distinguish the true nature of the spectrum.
We cannot discriminate which of the model fits to the MSP PSR J1012+5307 is the best, however we find that the single power law has
a similar photon index to the X-ray spectrum of PSR J0751+1807 (see Sect. 3.1), which could indicate
a magnetospheric origin of the X-ray emission. However, the
temperature of the blackbody (
K) is
consistent with that emitted from the heated polar caps of a
millisecond pulsar (106-107 K e.g. Zavlin & Pavlov 1998; Zhang & Cheng 2003, and references
therein). Calculating the radius of the emission area
from the blackbody model fit, we find a radius of
km, which
is smaller than the expected radius of emission from polar
caps (
1 km e.g. Zavlin & Pavlov 1998; Zhang & Cheng 2003, and references therein).
Zavlin et al. (1996) state however, that spectral fits with simplified
blackbody models can produce higher temperatures and smaller sizes due
to the fact that the X-ray spectra emerging from light-element
atmospheres are harder than blackbody spectra. Alternatively,
Zavlin & Pavlov (1998) and Zavlin et al. (2002) suggest that the thermal emission
can be from non uniform polar caps and we may therefore be seeing the
emission from the hotter central region of the caps.
Folding the timing data on the radio frequency, we find evidence for two pulses emitted from this MSP, separated by approximately 0.4 in phase. This is similar to other millisecond pulsars, e.g. PSR J0218+4232 (Webb et al. 2004) and PSR B1821-24 (Saito et al. 1997).
We have presented XMM-Newton data of the faint millisecond pulsars
PSR J0751+1807 and PSR J1012+5307. Both of these
pulsars have a reasonably large magnetic field at the light cylinder
radius, which could indicate that both of these MSPs should show
pulsations in X-rays. We present for the first time the X-ray spectra
of these two faint millisecond pulsars. We find that a power law
model best fits the spectrum of PSR J0751+1807,
,
with an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV). A power law
is also a good description of the spectrum of PSR J1012+5307,
,
with an unabsorbed flux of
(0.2-10.0 keV). However, a
blackbody model cannot be excluded as the best fit to the data. We
have also shown evidence to suggest that both of these MSPs show X-ray
pulsations. PSR J0751+1807 appears to show a single pulse,
whereas PSR J1012+5307 may show some evidence of two pulses
per pulse period.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank A. Marcowith for his advice pertaining to the work in this manuscript. This article was based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and NASA. The authors also acknowledge the CNES for its support in this research.