Table 4: Mass-loss rate comparison. The values for $v_{\rm o}$ come from Knapp et al. (1998). Data from Danchi et al. were re-evaluated at HIPPARCOS distance (see Table 1) following $\dot{M}\propto v_{\rm o}~ d$ .
Star $v_{\rm o}$ Mass-loss rate ( $10^{-7}~M_{\hbox{$\odot$ }}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ )

( ${\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$ ) $\dot{M}_{\rm Knapp~et~al.}$ $\dot{M}_{\rm Danchi~et~al.}$ $\dot{M}_{\rm Present~paper}$

$\alpha$ Ori 14.2 3.1 14 17

SW Vir 7.8 1.7 - 1.4

R Leo 6.8 0.94 0.60 0.77

**Table 4:** Mass-loss rate comparison. The values for $v_{\rm o}$ come from Knapp et al. (1998). Data from Danchi et al. were re-evaluated at HIPPARCOS distance (see Table 1) following $\dot{M}\propto v_{\rm o}~ d$ .
Star	$v_{\rm o}$	Mass-loss rate ( $10^{-7}~M_{\hbox{$\odot$ }}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ )
	( ${\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$ )	$\dot{M}_{\rm Knapp~et~al.}$	$\dot{M}_{\rm Danchi~et~al.}$	$\dot{M}_{\rm Present~paper}$
$\alpha$ Ori	14.2	3.1	14	17
SW Vir	7.8	1.7	-	1.4
R Leo	6.8	0.94	0.60	0.77

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text