All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F1.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Illustration of the evolution of the vector potential. Solid lines represent positive A and dashed lines denote negative A.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=13cm,clip]{H4110F2.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: Spreading of the differential rotation into the radiative interior for $\eta=\nu=10^{10}~ \mbox{cm}^2/\mbox{s}$ . Left-hand panel: contours of the time-average of the rotation rate under one dynamo period, with contour spacing $8.75~\mbox{nHz}$ ; the solid lines represent the regions rotating faster and the dotted lines show the regions slower than $\Omega _0/2\pi =437$ nHz. Right-hand panel: the rotation rate at different latitudes as a function of radius. The peak amplitude of the poloidal magnetic field and the toroidal field are $B_p\sim 2400$ G and $B\sim12~000$ G, respectively.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{H4110F3.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: Latitudinal variation of the tachocline thickness for the case in Fig. 2. The solid line represents the thickness from the model and the dashed and dashed-dot lines show w from MDI and GONG data respectively (Basu & Antia 2001). The grey and the hatched areas show the error estimates on these.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F4.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Latitudinal variation of the radial jump in $\Omega$ for the case in Fig. 2. The solid line represents the thickness from the model and the dashed and dashed-dot lines show $\delta \Omega$ from MDI and GONG data respectively (Basu & Antia 2001). The dotted lines show the error estimates on these.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F5.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: The thickness of the tachocline at different latitudes as a function of time for the case in Fig. 2.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{H4110F6.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: Time-latitude diagram for the toroidal field ( shaded region) and the radial field ( contours) at the base of the convection zone. Equidistant contour levels of the radial field are separated by intervals of 30 G.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F7a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F7b.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 7: Same as in Fig. 2, but including the meridional circulation. In left-hand panel the circulation is counterclockwise, while in right-hand panel it is clockwise.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F8.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 8: Latitudinal variation of the tachocline thickness. The solid line represents the case shown in Fig. 2 and the dashed and dashed-dot lines respectively denote the thickness including the meridional circulation.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F9a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F9b.ps} \par\end{figure}$ Figure 9: Same as in Fig. 2. Left-hand panel: the diffusivity is varied with radius. Right-hand panel: the magnetic Prandtl number is varied with depth.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{H4110F10.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 10: The thickness of the tachocline at different latitudes as a function of time for the case in right-hand panel of Fig. 9 (varying the magnetic Prandtl number with depth).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F11.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 11: Latitudinal variation of the tachocline thickness. The solid line represents the case shown in Fig. 6 of Paper I, while the dashed and dashed-dot lines denote the results obtained by the present models.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F1.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Illustration of the evolution of the vector potential. Solid lines represent positive A and dashed lines denote negative A.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{H4110F3.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Latitudinal variation of the tachocline thickness for the case in Fig. 2. The solid line represents the thickness from the model and the dashed and dashed-dot lines show w from MDI and GONG data respectively (Basu & Antia 2001). The grey and the hatched areas show the error estimates on these.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F4.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: Latitudinal variation of the radial jump in $\Omega$ for the case in Fig. 2. The solid line represents the thickness from the model and the dashed and dashed-dot lines show $\delta \Omega$ from MDI and GONG data respectively (Basu & Antia 2001). The dotted lines show the error estimates on these.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F5.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: The thickness of the tachocline at different latitudes as a function of time for the case in Fig. 2.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{H4110F6.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: Time-latitude diagram for the toroidal field ( shaded region) and the radial field ( contours) at the base of the convection zone. Equidistant contour levels of the radial field are separated by intervals of 30 G.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F7a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F7b.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 7: Same as in Fig. 2, but including the meridional circulation. In left-hand panel the circulation is counterclockwise, while in right-hand panel it is clockwise.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F8.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 8: Latitudinal variation of the tachocline thickness. The solid line represents the case shown in Fig. 2 and the dashed and dashed-dot lines respectively denote the thickness including the meridional circulation.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F9a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{H4110F9b.ps} \par\end{figure}$	Figure 9: Same as in Fig. 2. Left-hand panel: the diffusivity is varied with radius. Right-hand panel: the magnetic Prandtl number is varied with depth.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{H4110F10.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 10: The thickness of the tachocline at different latitudes as a function of time for the case in right-hand panel of Fig. 9 (varying the magnetic Prandtl number with depth).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{H4110F11.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 11: Latitudinal variation of the tachocline thickness. The solid line represents the case shown in Fig. 6 of Paper I, while the dashed and dashed-dot lines denote the results obtained by the present models.
Open with DEXTER