A&A 412, 35-44 (2003)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031425
A. Blanchard1 - M. Douspis 2 - M. Rowan-Robinson 3 - S. Sarkar 4
1 -
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées,
14 avenue E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
2 -
Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Dennis Wilkinson Building,
Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK
3 -
Astrophysics Group, Imperial College, Blackett Laboratory,
Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BW, UK
4 -
Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, UK
Received 14 April 2003 / Accepted 30 July 2003
Abstract
Precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background by
WMAP are believed to have established a flat -dominated
universe, seeded by nearly scale-invariant adiabatic primordial
fluctuations. However by relaxing the hypothesis that the fluctuation
spectrum can be described by a single power law, we demonstrate that
an Einstein-de Sitter universe with zero cosmological constant
can fit the data as well as the best concordance model. Moreover
unlike a
-dominated universe, such an universe has no strong
integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, so is in better agreement with the low
quadrupole seen by WMAP. The main concern is that the Hubble constant
is required to be rather low:
km s-1 Mpc-1; we discuss
whether this can be consistent with observations. Furthermore for
universes consisting only of baryons and cold dark matter, the
amplitude of matter fluctuations on cluster scales is too high, a
problem which seems generic. However, an additional small contribution
(
)
of matter which does not cluster on small
scales, e.g. relic neutrinos with mass of order eV or a "quintessence''
with
,
can alleviate this problem. Such models provide a
satisfying description of the power spectrum derived from the 2dF
galaxy redshift survey and from observations of the Ly-
forest. We conclude that Einstein-de Sitter models can indeed
accommodate all data on the large scale structure of the Universe,
hence the Hubble diagram of distant type Ia supernovae remains the
only direct evidence for a non-zero cosmological constant.
Key words: cosmology: theory - cosmology: cosmic microwave background - cosmology: large scale structure of Universe - cosmology: cosmological parameters
Measurements of cosmological parameters with reasonable accuracy are essential both to establish a robust picture of the standard Big Bang cosmology, and to provide insights into the fundamental processes, far beyond the Standard Model of particle physics, which determined its initial conditions. Since the pioneering work of Hubble, it has been recognised that cosmological tests based on astrophysical arguments can suffer from large systematic biases. Clearly one should as far as possible use methods which do not depend explicitly on assumptions concerning complex astrophysical phenomena.
In this respect, measurements of anisotopies in the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) appear to offer the most promise for accurate
determination of cosmological parameters, thanks to the high control
possible on systematic errors. Since the epochal discovery of
primordial fluctuations on large angular scales by COBE (Smoot et al.
1992), this field has witnessed a renaissance (Wright et al. 1992). The
first detections of fluctuations on degree scales (Netterfield et al.
1995; Scott et al. 1996) provided tantalizing evidence for the flatness
of the Universe (e.g. Lineweaver et al. 1997). The unambiguous
detection of the first and second acoustic peaks in the angular power
spectrum (de Bernardis et al. 2000; Hanany et al. 2000; Halverson et al.
2002) has confirmed this result. Taken together with studies of
large-scale structure (LSS) in the universe, these observations have
also confirmed the overall picture of structure formation through
gravitational instability. The recent results obtained by WMAP
represent a further major advance in the field. For the first time,
measurements of cosmological parameters are being quoted with
uncertainties of a few per cent, opening up the anticipated era of
"precision cosmology''. Our intention here is to examine whether such
determinations are in fact robust or depend crucially on underlying
assumptions or "priors''. Specifically we wish to test whether a
cosmological constant, ,
is really required by observations
of the CMB and LSS, independently of the indications from the
SN Ia Hubble diagram. We will do so by confronting Einstein-de Sitter
(E-deS) models with the same observations. It turns out that with a
different assumption concerning the spectrum of primordial
fluctuations generated by inflation, such models can fit the data even
better than models with non-zero
.
The physics of passive linear perturbations in the early Universe is
well understood and therefore their evolution can be computed
accurately (see Hu & Dodelson 2002). This is the basic reason why
precise measurements of the angular structure of the imprints left on
the CMB by primordial fluctuations can provide accurate information on
cosmological parameters. The ingredients necessary to compute the
amplitudes of the multipole moments ()
specifying the angular
power spectrum are both the nature and spectrum of the primordial
fluctuations (presumably arising from inflation), as well as
specification of the various contents of the universe which contribute
to its density and pressure. The imprint of a specific parameter can
be direct, through the influence on the dynamics of acoustic
oscillations before the epoch of last scattering (as for the baryonic
content
for instance), as well as indirect, through the
effect on the angular distance to the last scattering surface. A
non-zero
affects the
's primarily through the
distance effect (Blanchard 1984). There are also more subtle effects,
such as the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect which contributes at a
much weaker level. However such effects are harder to identify, as
they can easily be mimicked by a non-trivial primordial fluctuation
spectrum.
The first studies of the generation of density perturbations during
inflation established (see Linde 1990) that for the simplest models
involving a single "inflaton'' field, the spectrum is close to the
Harrison-Zel'dovich (H-Z) scale-invariant form,
with n = 1, which had been proposed earlier on grounds of
simplicity. Thus the H-Z spectrum became a standard input for
calculations of CMB anisotropies and the growth of LSS, e.g. in the
standard cold dark matter (SCDM) model (Davis et al. 1985). In fact
there are significant corrections to a H-Z spectrum even in
single-field models, in particular the spectrum steepens
logarithmically with increasing k (decreasing scale) as the end of
inflation is approached. This is usually accomodated by considering a
"tilted'' spectrum with n < 1, although it should be noted that the
index n is scale-dependent for any polynomial potential for
the inflaton, and is constant only for an exponential potential
(power-law inflation). Moreover n can be close to, and even exceed,
unity if inflation ends not through the steepening of the inflaton
potential but, for example, due to the dynamics of a second scalar
field (hybrid inflation). In such multi-field models, the spectrum may
not even be scale-free since features can be imprinted onto the
spectrum, e.g. when the slow-roll evolution of the inflaton is
interrupted by other background fields undergoing symmetry-breaking
phase transitions (Adams et al. 1997b).
The expectations for the spectral index n(k) in various inflationary
models has been reviewed by Lyth & Riotto (1999). Even small
departures from scale-invariance can be quite significant
for LSS
formation. For example after the SCDM model was found by Efstathiou
et al. (1992) to be in conflict with the observed power spectrum of
galaxy clustering (in being unable to simultaneously reproduce the
abundance of rich clusters (quantified by the variance
in a
top-hat sphere of radius 8h-1 Mpc) and the COBE measurement of
fluctuations on the scale of
Mpc), it was
noted by White et al. (1995) that invoking a tilted spectrum with
could save the model. Interestingly enough, such a
spectrum arises from natural supergravity
inflation
,
where the
leading term in the potential is cubic in the field (Ross &
Sarkar 1996; Adams et al. 1997a). This yields
n =
(N-2)/(N+2), where
is the
number of e-folds of expansion from the end of inflation, taking the
inflationary energy scale to be
1016 GeV as required by
the normalization to COBE, and the reheat temperature to be
109 GeV to avoid the thermal gravitino problem (see
Sarkar 1996). If the inflationary scale is significantly lower
(German et al. 2001) and/or if there was a late epoch of
thermal inflation (Lyth & Stewart 1996), then our present Hubble
radius may have exited the horizon only
20-30 e-folds from the
end of inflation. This yields a spectral index as low as
on cosmologically observable scales since
in
this model.
It is thus clear that the primordial spectrum may not have a trivial
form and lacking a "standard model'' of inflation, it is necessary to
consider a wide range of possibilities. Furthermore such complex
spectra could potentially confuse cosmological parameter estimation
from CMB data (e.g. Kinney 2001). This was explicitly demonstrated by
Barriga et al. (2001) using the COBE and BOOMERanG data (de Bernardis
et al. 2000) for the case of a primordial spectrum with a step-like
feature at a scale
Mpc, as in double inflation (Silk &
Turner 1987). In this paper we investigate the flexibility in the
determination of cosmological parameters using the much more precise
WMAP data, when the usual hypothesis of a single power law
spectrum is relaxed. Since the power-law index is related to the slope
and curvature of the inflaton potential, it can change suddenly
e.g. if the mass of the inflaton changes through its coupling to a
background field which undergoes spontaneous symmetry breaking during
inflation (Adams et al. 1997b).
The possible detection of a non-zero
through measurements of
the Hubble diagram of distant type Ia supernovae (Riess et al. 1998;
Perlmutter et al. 1999) is among the most significant developments in
modern cosmology (see Peebles & Ratra 2003), and has led to the
establishment of the "concordance model'' with
and
(Bahcall et al. 1999). This is quite
consistent with the WMAP data for an assumed power-law primordial
spectrum; for a spatially flat universe the cosmological parameters
are determined to be:
,
,
,
,
and
(Spergel
et al. 2003). This agreement has led to the widespread belief that
the
CDM concordance model is now established to high accuracy
through CMB measurements. However we wish to illustrate that this
agreement is crucially dependent on the underlying assumptions
concerning the primordial power spectrum and that CMB data do not yet
independently require a non-zero
.
Before addressing
this issue, let us first assess the status of the concordance model.
As mentioned already, SCDM with
,
h = 0.5 and n =
1 was found to disagree with the shape of the APM galaxy correlation
function (Maddox et al. 1990), as well as the high baryon fraction
measured in clusters, which together with the baryon fraction inferred
from primordial nucleosynthesis arguments, implied a lower matter
density of
in agreement with local dynamical
estimates (White et al. 1993). The subsequent measurements of CMB
fluctuations on degree scales however required the universe to be
spatially flat and ruled out such a low density matter-dominated
universe (Lineweaver & Barbosa 1998). Thus the possible detection of
cosmic acceleration in the Hubble expansion of distant supernovae,
implying a cosmological constant with
,
was
eagerly seized on as a mean of reconciling the CMB and LSS
data. However although this concordance model is consistent with most
cosmological observations, its first precision test has come with the
WMAP data. The agreement of the concordance model with data as
summarised by the WMAP team appears impressive (Spergel et al.
2003). However, there are two facts to keep in mind. First the global
on the temperature autocorrelation (TT) power spectrum is
rather poor - the probability that the model fits the data is only
3%, so strictly speaking the model is rejected at the
2
confidence level! However given possible systematic
effects not yet accounted for, the WMAP team concluded that this
should not be considered as a serious problem for the concordance
model. Allowing for "running'' of the spectral index with scale
improves the fit somewhat; the data suggest that
on the
largest scales and
on small scales.
There is another aspect of the WMAP data that is even more puzzling,
viz. the amplitudes of the low 's, particularly the quadrupole,
is rather small compared to the expectation in the concordance model
where the large cosmological constant should boost the anisotropy on
large angles. It is well known that the cosmic variance is high on
such large angular scales and that Galactic foreground subtraction
introduces further uncertainties. Spergel et al. (2003) concluded, from
Monte Carlo realisations following two different methods, that the low
signal on large scales cannot be obtained in over 99% of the cases.
However, statistical inferences from the quadrupole amplitude have to
be handled with caution. The measured value of
corresponds to a variance
(
)
of
(Bennett et al. 2003), so one might conclude that
e.g. an expected
is discrepant by about
,
which would be at the 95% c.l. for a Gaussian
distribution. In properly evaluating this probability however one
should take into account the foreground removal technique and its
uncertainty, in order to determine the likelihood distribution. Such a
distribution is likely to be non-Gaussian and it is therefore possible
that the estimation of the goodness-of-fit for the concordance model
might be significantly improved in this outlying region. If one
instead considers the best-fit concordance model derived by Spergel
et al. (2003) to be the true description of the CMB sky, the
probability of observing a low quadrupole can be directly
estimated. The log-likelihood of
can be well
approximated by (Bartlett et al. 2000):
As discussed already, the concordance model has been built up over time in order to match observations, thus its a posteriori agreement with much of the LSS data is not a test. Of course as the quality of data improves the model will be further tested, although the number of free parameters provides some room for adjustment.
Interestingly enough, WMAP has thrown new light on the masses of
galaxy clusters and therefore on the inferred baryon fraction
which, it had been argued (White et al. 1993), indicates a low matter
density universe. There has been some controversy in recent years
concerning the actual masses of X-ray emitting clusters, which are
determined by two different methods. One is the application of
hydrostatic equilibrium, while the second uses mass-temperature
relationships derived from numerical simulations. Systematic
differences between the two methods are significant (Markevitch 1998;
Roussel et al. 2000) and this translates into an appreciable difference
in the derived value of
(Reiprich & Böhringer 2002;
Seljak 2002). Furthermore similar differences arise from the use of
different theoretical mass functions. The Sheth & Tormen (1999)
expression is recognised as providing a satisfactory fit to the mass
function obtained from numerical simulations. Using this for an
universe, one finds
corresponding to the high mass estimates from numerical simulations,
and
for the low mass estimates from hydrostatic
equilibrium (Vauclair et al. 2003). Clearly the WMAP measurement of
(Spergel et al. 2003) favours the high mass
estimates. The implied baryon fraction (including stars) in clusters
is then rather low, slightly below 9% (for h = 0.7). This
conflicts with the universal baryon fraction of 15% required for
the best concordance model fit to the acoustic peaks! We note that
this discrepancy disappears for
,
which is about a
deviation from the WMAP determination.
Let us now examine whether it is possible to obtain an acceptable CMB
power spectrum in an E-deS universe. Clearly to do this we have to
deviate from the assumptions of the CDM concordance model
regarding the primordial power spectrum. Indeed the WMAP team (Peiris
et al. 2003) have already noted that the model fit can be significantly
improved (particularly to the outliers at
22, 40 and 200) by
allowing for oscillations in the primordial spectrum (Adams et al.
2001) such as might be induced by phase transitions occuring during
inflation (Adams et al. 1997b). However if we are not to
introduce too many new parameters, the simplest modification that can
be introduced is perhaps to consider a change in the slope of the
spectrum at a particular scale. It is important in this respect to
notice that the first and second acoustic peaks span a rather limited
range of scales,
-600, while the rising part of the
first peak covers a much bigger range,
-200. Without
advocating any specific scenario, it is interesting to examine how a
model with different power law indices for the primordial
fluctuations in these two regions compares to the observational
data. We therefore focus on models with
As we are primarily interested in examining the possible constraints
on the cosmological constant, we have restricted our search to models
with
but allow a reasonable range for other
cosmological parameters (including the optical depth
to last
scattering). The best model we find has h = 0.46,
,
,
k1 = 0.0096 Mpc-1,
n1 = 1.015,
n2 = 0.806. As seen in Fig. 1 the
calculated power spectrum does very well in fitting the WMAP data and
other observations at high
.
Interestingly enough a preferred
scale of
Mpc-1 was also found by Mukherjee & Wang
(2003) in attempting to reconstruct the primordial spectrum in the
context of a
CDM model (although Bridle et al. 2003 did not
detect this using a different method). We wish to emphasise that
inspite of having one additional parameter, our model has a better
(on the scalar
's) than the best concordance model,
because of its lower amplitude at low
(the
of the TE
spectrum being identical). In particular, the mean quadrupole C2has an amplitude of
,
which has a 13% probability of
yielding
.
The reason of course is that E-deS models
do not produce ISW effects as high as in flat models with low matter
density and a large cosmological constant. This is arguably a simpler
way to accomodate the observed low signal at
,
than to
invoke new physics (e.g. Spergel et al. 2003; Uzan et al.
2003; Efstathiou 2003a; Contaldi et al. 2003; Cline et al. 2003).
![]() |
Figure 1:
The temperature power spectrum for the best-fit
power-law ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
It might appear that our E-deS model with
,
and h = 0.46 must be in conflict with a number
of astronomical observations. However, several of these observations
which in fact support the
CDM concordance model have been
questioned. For example, the observed mass-to-light function from
galaxies to superclusters yields
(Bahcall et al. 2000) but such observations are mostly local and
possibly untypical. The abundance of high redshift X-ray selected
clusters, a global test rather than a local one, systematically leads
to high values of
,
well above the best WMAP value
(Henry 1997; Sadat et al. 1998; Viana & Liddle 1999;
Borgani et al. 1999; Reichart et al. 1999; Blanchard et al. 2000). This
points in the same direction as the observed absence of any
large-scale correlations between the COBE map of the CMB and the
HEAO-1 map of the 2-8 keV X-ray background which provides an
interesting upper limit of
at 95%
c.l. (Boughn et al. 2002)
.
The only direct evidence so far for a cosmological constant
comes from the Hubble diagram of distant type Ia supernovae, a method
which relies on the standard candle hypothesis and on empirical
corrections to the observed peak magnitudes on the basis of the
observed decay times. However there are systematic differences in
the corrections made for the same objects by the two groups
(Leibundgut 2000) which raises legitimate concerns about their
validity. Moreover, the distant SN Ia appear to be significantly bluer
than the nearby sample, suggesting that the derived reddening may have
been underestimated (Leibundgut 2001). Rowan-Robinson (2002) has
argued that when extinction and the luminosity-decay time relation
are treated in a self-consistent way, the significance of the evidence
for positive
is much reduced.
![]() |
Figure 2: Velocity versus luminosity-distance for type Ia supernovae (filled circles), S-Z clusters (open circles) and gravitational lens time-delay systems (filled triangles), with z>0.05. All curves shown correspond to flat models and are labelled with the Hubble parameter in km s-1 Mpc-1. |
Open with DEXTER |
A Hubble constant of H0 = 46 km s-1 Mpc-1 would seem to be completely
inconsistent with the Hubble Key Project (HKP) determination of km s-1 Mpc-1 (Freedman et al. 2001). However there are some details
of this work which might merit reexamination:
It is interesting that methods which are largely independent of
the LMC and Cepheid distance scales, do tend to give significantly
lower values for H0. For instance, Sunyaev-Zeldovitch (S-Z)
distances to 41 clusters give a value of
54+4-3 km s-1 Mpc-1 in an
E-deS universe (Reese et al. 2002); furthermore any clumping of the
X-ray emitting gas would lower the actual value by up to
20%. The 4 simple gravitational lens systems (PG1115+080,
SBS1520+530, B1600+434, HE2149-2745) for which time delays have been
reliably measured yield
km s-1 Mpc-1 if the lenses are
assumed to have isothermal halos of dark matter, while it would be
km s-1 Mpc-1 if the lenses instead had constant M/L (Kochanek &
Schechter 2003). However Koopmans et al. (2003) have recently obtained
H0 = 75+7-6 km s-1 Mpc-1 from a detailed reanalysis of the system
B1608+656, significantly higher than their previous estimate of
km s-1 Mpc-1 for this system (Fassnacht et al. 2002). We note that
Parodi et al. (2000) find
km s-1 Mpc-1 using SN Ia (see
also Branch 1998).
Figure 2 shows a compilation of distances to type Ia supernovae,
S-Z clusters and gravitationally lensed systems with z > 0.05. The
best-fit flat model (not shown) has
and
km s-1 Mpc-1. Models with
,
H0 = 60 km s-1 Mpc-1
and
,
,
H0 = 72 km s-1 Mpc-1 are shown
(solid lines); both fit the data well. The model
with
,
H0 = 46 km s-1 Mpc-1 (broken line) is clearly a
less good fit to the data.
In conclusion a Hubble constant in the range 55-65 km s-1 Mpc-1 seems
entirely plausible at the present time. The value we require, 46 km s-1 Mpc-1,
is still below this range, but perhaps only by
1-2
.
We believe the present paper provides a powerful
stimulus for further work on the cosmological distance scale.
![]() |
Figure 3:
CMB angular power spectra for models with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
There is however one observational constraint that our E-deS model
fails to reproduce quite badly, viz. the amplitude of matter
fluctuations on cluster scales (8h-1 Mpc). This model has an
amplitude of
,
which is much higher than required
to match the local abundance of clusters and weak lensing
measurements. The discrepancy is at least at the 5
level,
even taking into account the scatter in the determinations from
different analyses: current estimates for
from clusters and
from weak lensing range from 0.45 to 0.6 (for
). This is consistent with measurements of peculiar velocity
fields, e.g. the redshift-space distortion seen in 2dFGRS on scales
<10h-1 Mpc yields
for an E-deS universe, where
is the linear
bias parameter (Hawkins et al. 2002)
. As WMAP cannot probe very small scales, one might imagine
that further modification of the primordial spectrum could remove this
discrepancy. For example Barriga et al. (2001) invoked a "step'' in the
spectrum at
Mpc to decrease
significantly
below the corresponding value for a H-Z spectrum.
However, an examination of the CMB power spectrum
normalized to
for various power law indices (see
Fig. 3) reveals that the implied amplitude on the scale
is essentially constant. Thus the recent measurements on
this scale by ground-based CMB experiments
(Pearson et al. 2003; Kuo et al. 2002; Ruhl et al. 2002; Grainge 2003), if taken to be reliable, cannot be
matched if
is made significantly smaller than unity by
modifying the primordial spectrum. We conclude therefore that an
E-deS
model with CDM alone cannot accommodate both data sets,
independently of the shape of the primordial spectrum.
In this last section, we examine whether the above discrepancy can be
avoided if we do not restrict ourselves to pure CDM models but
modify the matter content. Specifically, we now have evidence that
all the known neutrinos have masses which are rather close to each
other, with
for the electron
and muon neutrinos and
for the
muon and tau neutrinos, indicated respectively by the oscillation
interpretation of the Solar and atmospheric neutrino anomalies (see
Gonzalez-Garcia & Nir 2003). Moreover the direct kinematic limit on
the neutrino mass from the Mainz and Troitsk tritium
-decay
experiments is 2.2 eV (see Weinheimer 2002). The addition of massive
neutrinos is known to damp the power spectrum on scales smaller than
their free-streaming length
Mpc,
and thus to lower
(see Primack & Gross 2000). We
have therefore introduced 3 quasi-degenerate neutrinos of mass 0.8 eV
each and find the following model provides an acceptable fit (see
Fig. 4): h = 0.46,
,
,
k1 = 0.009 Mpc-1,
n1 = 0.98,
n2 =
0.87,
.
The amplitude on clusters scales is
perhaps still too high at
,
but it is certainly
premature to rule out this model for this reason alone.
![]() |
Figure 4:
The temperature power spectrum for the best-fit
power-law ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
In a second model we introduce a small amount of "quintessence'' with
.
Such a possibility arises naturally as an attractor
solution of a simple exponential potential:
which is well motivated theoretically
(Ratra & Peebles 1988; Wetterich 1988) and has been argued to
give good agreement with
observations with
(Ferreira & Joyce 1997,
1998). Indeed, we find that the power at small scales is suppressed in
this model compared to pure cold dark matter, yielding an acceptable
fit to the CMB and LSS data (with
)
for the following
parameters: h = 0.45,
,
,
k1 = 0.012 Mpc-1,
n1 = 1.00,
n2 = 0.90,
(see Figs. 4-6).
![]() |
Figure 5:
The temperature-polarization (TE) cross
power-spectrum and the polarization (EE) power spectrum for our E-deS
models with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
For both cases, the optical depth to last scattering
is significantly smaller than the value of
obtained in the WMAP team's fit to the temperature-polarization
cross-correlation (TE) spectrum (Kogut et al. 2003). Nevertheless the
predicted TE spectra for our E-deS models are in reasonable agreement
with the WMAP data, although the predicted polarization
autocorrelation (EE) spectra differ (see Fig. 5). The baryonic
content
is at the upper end of
the range suggested by considerations of primordial nucleosynthesis
(Fields & Sarkar 2002). The cluster baryon fraction expected in these two
models is
-12% (keeping in mind that the "dark
energy'' component does not cluster on these scales); although low this
is consistent with recent estimates (Sadat & Blanchard 2001). It is
also necessary to examine the agreement of these models with LSS data,
in particular the power spectrum obtained from studies of galaxy
clustering and the Lyman-
forest. For this purpose we adopt a
bias parameter given by
.
As seen in
Fig. 6, both models are then in agreement with the APM
power spectrum (Baugh & Efstathiou 1993; Peacock 1997), the 2dFGRS
power spectrum (Percival et al. 2001; Tegmark et al. 2002) and
the Ly
forest (matter) power spectrum (Croft et al. 2002) which
has been used recently to set interesting constraints on models of
large scale structure (Douspis et al. 2001). The model
with massive neutrinos provides a particularly good description of LSS
data. Such a model has already been considered by Elgarøy & Lahav
(2003) as providing a good fit to the 2dFGRS data, but maintaining a
constant power law index on large scales as they do, then gives
a very poor fit to the WMAP data. We emphasise that although our model
is apparently in conflict with the upper bound of
quoted by Spergel et al. (2003), this latter bound was obtained
under more restrictive asumptions (in particular adopting "priors'' on
the bias parameter, matter density and Hubble parameter), hence is not
sufficiently conservative.
![]() |
Figure 6:
The power spectrum of large scale structure
at z=0 and z=2.3 for our E-deS models with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
It is important to devise means of breaking the
"
degeneracy'' and establish reliably whether we
do live in an low matter density universe, and also to devise further tests
for
independently of the SN Ia Hubble diagram.
Attempts to determine
from measurements of peculiar
velocity fields have relied on constraining the bias parameter by
examination of the statistical properties of the galaxy distribution
(e.g. Verde et al. 2002). More detailed examination of the clustering
properties of different galaxy populations in the ongoing Sloan digital
sky survey will sharpen this test further (Szapudi et al. 2002).
Another approach is based on measurement of the mean relative peculiar
velocity of galaxy pairs as a function of their separation (Juskiewicz
et al. 2000); a recent application of this method yields
,
without any
prior assumptions concerning the primordial fluctuations or
cosmological parameters (Feldman et al. 2003). However the inclusion of
a component of hot dark matter, as in our model, will affect peculiar
velocities on the relevant small scales, so simulations incorporating
non-linear effects are necessary to assess the robustness of this test
(J. Silk, private communication).
Measurements of "cosmic shear'' induced through gravitational lensing offer yet another possible way to determine the matter density and bias separately (see van Waerbeke et al. 2002). Again several ongoing and proposed large area surveys should allow adequate control of systematic uncertainties and enable cosmological parameters to be obtained without prior assumptions.
A complementary approach is to seek direct evidence in the CMB for the
presence of a cosmological constant. As mentioned earlier, the absence
of the expected ISW effect at large angular scales in the WMAP data
has been disappointing in this respect, but might be regarded as a
statistical fluctuation. The expected ISW correlations with other
tracers of large-scale structure are being sought but results are not
definitive as yet. The power spectrum of the E-mode polarization
offers an additional way to distinguish among models. As seen in
Fig. 5, the nominal EE spectra for our E-deS models differ
significantly from that of the concordance model since the best-fit
value of
is smaller. However the value of
for our E-deS
models can be raised to be closer to the WMAP value of 0.17 (thin
lines in Fig. 5) without significantly affecting the
or
P(k) fits. Hopefully analysis of further data from WMAP, as well as
other CMB experiments, can distinguish between these possibilities.
The most stable difference between our E-deS models and the
CDM concordance model is in fact the matter power spectrum
shape in the range
Mpc-1, which galaxy surveys
may be able to investigate, provided the possible biasing is reliably
understood on these scales (Durrer et al. 2003).
Given the need to suppress the amplitude of fluctuations on cluster scales in any model, we conclude that extant CMB and LSS data actually imply the existence of a dark component beyond cold dark matter, with a density contribution of about 10% of the critical density and an equation of state corresponding to conventional pressureless matter. Such models reproduce quite well the observed properties of the large scale structure of of universe without further adjustment.
The essential conclusion is that an Einstein-de Sitter universe is not yet ruled out, as seems to be generally believed. Although there is indeed conflict with some astronomical observations, we have argued that these data are not established beyond reasonable doubt. Given the severe coincidence problem associated with a classical cosmological constant as well as the profound implications of de Sitter space-time for fundamental physics (e.g. Witten 2001; Banks & Dine 2001; Dyson et al. 2002), it is surely worth investigating these issues further.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Referee for her critical and helpful comments. We also acknowledge useful discussions with David Spergel, Alain Riazuelo, Joe Silk and Ludovic Van Waerbeke. M.D. acknowledges the financial support provided throught the european community's human potential's programm under contract HPRN-CT-2002-00124, CMBNET.