Table 5: H $\gamma _{{\rm VA},\sigma }$ correspond to the $[\mbox{H}\gamma+1/2(\mbox{Fe~{\sc i}}+\mbox{Mg~{\sc i}})]_\sigma$ indices defined by Vazdekis & Arimoto (1999). Model references are W94: Worthey (1994); JW95: Jones & Worthey (1995); WO97: Worthey & Ottaviani (1997); and V99: Vazdekis & Arimoto (1999).
Index-index diagram $\log[\kappa]$ Models

H $\gamma_{\rm {HR}}$ vs. Fe4668 1.3 W94,JW95

H $\delta_{\rm {A}}$ vs. Fe4668 0.7 W94,WO96

H $\delta_{\rm {F}}$ vs. Fe4668 0.9 W94,WO96

H $\gamma_{\rm {A}}$ vs. Fe4668 0.7 W94,WO96

H $\gamma_{\rm {F}}$ vs. Fe4668 0.8 W94,WO96

H $\gamma_{{\rm VA,125}}$ vs. Fe4668 1.5 VA99

H $\gamma_{{\rm VA,200}}$ vs. Fe4668 1.7 VA99

H $\gamma_{{\rm VA,275}}$ vs. Fe4668 1.8 VA99

**Table 5:** H $\gamma _{{\rm VA},\sigma }$ correspond to the $[\mbox{H}\gamma+1/2(\mbox{Fe~{\sc i}}+\mbox{Mg~{\sc i}})]_\sigma$ indices defined by Vazdekis & Arimoto (1999). Model references are W94: Worthey (1994); JW95: Jones & Worthey (1995); WO97: Worthey & Ottaviani (1997); and V99: Vazdekis & Arimoto (1999).
Index-index diagram	$\log[\kappa]$	Models
H $\gamma_{\rm {HR}}$ vs. Fe4668	1.3	W94,JW95
H $\delta_{\rm {A}}$ vs. Fe4668	0.7	W94,WO96
H $\delta_{\rm {F}}$ vs. Fe4668	0.9	W94,WO96
H $\gamma_{\rm {A}}$ vs. Fe4668	0.7	W94,WO96
H $\gamma_{\rm {F}}$ vs. Fe4668	0.8	W94,WO96
H $\gamma_{{\rm VA,125}}$ vs. Fe4668	1.5	VA99
H $\gamma_{{\rm VA,200}}$ vs. Fe4668	1.7	VA99
H $\gamma_{{\rm VA,275}}$ vs. Fe4668	1.8	VA99

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text