Table 2: Numerical estimate of $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle$ in the 5 AU region, for a swarm of grains produced in the whole 1-10 AU region, as a function of $\beta _k$ (see text for details). Note that for low $\beta$ , e_k might become lower than the average eccentricity for the parent bodies in the disc (see Sect. 2.1). In such a case, the radiation pressure effect is neglected for all $e_{k}<\langle e_{0}\rangle$ and the values of $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle$ rescaled so that $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle =1$ for $e_{k}=\langle e_{0}\rangle$ .
$\beta _k$ e_k $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle$

0.49 0.96 0.038

0.39 0.63 0.344

0.31 0.45 0.521

0.24 0.32 0.665

0.19 0.24 0.753

0.15 0.18 0.812

0.12 0.14 0.849

0.10 0.11 0.887

0.08 0.09 0.930

**Table 2:** Numerical estimate of $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle$ in the 5 AU region, for a swarm of grains produced in the whole 1-10 AU region, as a function of $\beta _k$ (see text for details). Note that for low $\beta$ , e_k might become lower than the average eccentricity for the parent bodies in the disc (see Sect. 2.1). In such a case, the radiation pressure effect is neglected for all $e_{k}<\langle e_{0}\rangle$ and the values of $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle$ rescaled so that $\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle =1$ for $e_{k}=\langle e_{0}\rangle$ .
$\beta _k$	e_k	$\langle f_{i(k)}\rangle$
0.49	0.96	0.038
0.39	0.63	0.344
0.31	0.45	0.521
0.24	0.32	0.665
0.19	0.24	0.753
0.15	0.18	0.812
0.12	0.14	0.849
0.10	0.11	0.887
0.08	0.09	0.930

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text