All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\psfig{figure=uncon.ps,width=8.8cm} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Comparison of various mass functions. The dotted line represents Sheth & Tormen (2002) prediction, the solid line that of Jenkins et al. (2001) and the dashed line that of Del Popolo (2000b).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} {\hbox{(a) \psfig{figure=FELLIS1.PS,height=5.3cm,width=5.5cm}\hsp... ...ace{1cm}(d) \psfig{figure=FGHENRY1.PS,height=5.3cm,width=5.4cm} }}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: a) The $68\%$ confidence contours for the parameters n, $k_{\rm o}$ and $\Omega _{\rm m}$ for the open model. The dashed lines are lines of constant $\sigma _8$ . b) $\Delta$ (likelihood) for the parameter $\Omega _{\rm m}$ . The solid line is obtained from the model of this paper while the dotted line is that calculated by Henry (2000). The dashed lines represent various confidence levels (65%, 90%, 95%, 99%). c) The $68\%$ confidence contours for the parameters $\sigma _8$ , and $\Omega _{\rm m}$ for the open model (see also Henry 2000, Fig. 9). d) Constraints on $\Omega _{\Lambda }$ and $\Omega _{\rm m}$ obtained using the same 25 clusters used in Henry (2000), for the local sample, while the high redshift sample is constituted from all the EMSS clusters with z>0.3 and RX J0152.7-1357 (see Henry 2002). The solid lines are the 1 and 2 $\sigma$ contours obtained using the mass function and the M-T relation of this paper, while the dashed line is the 1 $\sigma$ contour obtained using the PS mass function and the M-T relation of Pierpaoli et al. (2001).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} {\hbox{(a) \psfig{figure=figekef.ps,width=6cm} (b) \hspace{1cm} \psfig{figure=figeke1f.ps,width=6cm} }}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: $\Delta (-{\rm ln likelihood})$ for $\Omega _{\rm m}$ (left panel) and $\sigma _8$ (right panel), marginalized over the other two parameters (( $\Gamma$ , $\sigma _8$ ), left panel and ( $\Omega _{\rm m}$ , $\Gamma$ ), right panel). Solid lines are the prediction obtained from the model of this paper while the dotted lines those obtained from Eke et al. (1998). Dashed lines are 1 and 2 $\sigma$ significance and the 3 $\sigma$ corresponds to the top of each panel.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\psfig{figure=uncon.ps,width=8.8cm} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Comparison of various mass functions. The dotted line represents Sheth & Tormen (2002) prediction, the solid line that of Jenkins et al. (2001) and the dashed line that of Del Popolo (2000b).
Open with DEXTER