![]() |
Figure 1:
IR
transmission spectra of magnesium silicates in the binary system
MgO |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2: Comparison between the calculated reflection spectra (solid lines) and the measured reflection spectra (dashed lines) demonstrated for two silicates. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3: Optical constants of amorphous magnesium silicates of varying composition derived from reflection measurements by KKR and Lorentz oscillator fit methods. The n- and k-data files can be taken from the internet homepage of the Astrophysical Institute and University Observatory Jena (http://www.astro.uni-jena.de/Laboratory/Database/silicates.html). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4: Comparison of the optical data of Mg2SiO4 and MgSiO3 produced by the sol-gel method with those of iron-containing proxene- and olivine glasses. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5: Comparison of the optical constants of amorphous Mg2SiO4 produced by sol-gel method (solid line) and optical data of Mg2SiO4 films (dotted line) derived by Scott & Duley (1996). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparison of the absorption cross section of amorphous Mg2SiO4 produced by sol-gel method with that of Mg2SiO4 films calculated from the n and k data by Scott & Duley (1996). The solid lines stand for spherical particles, whereas the dotted lines represent the results for a continuous distribution of ellipsoids. The cross sections derived from our data have been offset by a factor of 10. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Powder transmission spectra of Mg2SiO4 (in KBr
pellets) with varying Si-OH content. All the samples have been
annealed for 1h. The spectra clearly show the correlation between
crystallization and the appearance of the characteristic
vibrational band of isolated Si-OH bonds located at 2.7 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: Comparison of our sol-gel-produced magnesium silicates with the observed ISO-SWS spectrum of TY Draconis. In the second line of the insert the full silicate formulae have been truncated in order to save space. The mixture of Mg1.5SiO3.5, Mg2SiO4, and Mg2.4SiO4.4 (for a CDE) gives the best reproduction of the dust emissivity reached so far. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9:
The effect of metallic iron impurities on the absorption
efficiency
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10: Reproduction of the mean spectra of AGB star groups A, B, C and supergiants group 1 (Speck et al. 2000) with sol-gel magnesium silicates of different stoichiometry. The solid lines represent the star spectra and the dashed or dotted lines stand for either single or mixtures of magnesium silicates. The AGB stars group C profile (lowest panel) equal portions of all magnesium silicates have been mixed. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Difference between the normalized dust emissivities of R
Cas and TY Dra. The broad maximum around 13 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12: Calculated absorption cross sections per unit volume of the magnesium silicates for spheres (solid lines) and CDE (dashed lines). |
| Open with DEXTER | |