All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.2cm,clip]{H4339F1.PS} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Plots showing the relationship between the logarithm of the timing noise parameter ( $\sigma _{{\rm R23}}$ ), obtained as described in text, and the logarithms of a) the absolute magnitude of the observed frequency second derivative ( $\vert\ddot{\nu}_{{\rm obs}}\vert$ ) and b) the model-predicted frequency second derivative ( $\ddot{\nu}_{{\rm pre}}$ ) for the current 27 HartRAO pulsars.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.2cm,clip]{H4339F2.PS} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: VPlots showing the relationship between the activity parameter A and the logarithms a) the absolute magnitude of the observed frequency second derivative ( $\vert\ddot{\nu}_{{\rm obs}}\vert$ ) and b) the expected frequency second derivative ( $\ddot{\nu}_{{\rm pre}}$ ) for the current HartRAO pulsars.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.2cm,clip]{H4339F2.PS} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: VPlots showing the relationship between the activity parameter A and the logarithms a) the absolute magnitude of the observed frequency second derivative ( $\vert\ddot{\nu}_{{\rm obs}}\vert$ ) and b) the expected frequency second derivative ( $\ddot{\nu}_{{\rm pre}}$ ) for the current HartRAO pulsars.
Open with DEXTER