A&A 406, 87-103 (2003)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030755
T. Böker1,
- U. Lisenfeld2
- E. Schinnerer3,
1 -
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
2 -
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Camino Bajo de Huetor 24, 18080 Granada, Spain
3 -
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 0, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Received 11 March 2003 / Accepted 15 May 2003
Abstract
Using the IRAM
telescope, we have surveyed an unbiased sample of
47 nearby spiral galaxies of very late (Scd-Sm) Hubble-type for emission
in the
and (2-1) lines. The sensitivity of our data (a few mK)
allows detection of about 60% of our sample in at least one of the CO lines. The median detected
mass is
within the
central few kpc, assuming a standard conversion factor.
We use the measured line intensities to complement existing studies
of the molecular gas content of spiral galaxies as a function of
Hubble-type and to significantly improve the statistical significance
of such studies at the late end of the spiral sequence.
We find that
the latest-type spirals closely follow the correlation between molecular
gas content and galaxy luminosity established for earlier Hubble types.
The molecular gas in late-type galaxies seems to
be less centrally concentrated than in earlier types.
We use Hubble Space Telescope optical images to correlate the
molecular gas mass to the properties of the central galaxy disk and the
compact star cluster that occupies the nucleus of most late-type spirals.
There is no clear correlation between the luminosity of the nuclear star cluster
and the molecular gas mass, although the CO detection rate is highest for
the brightest clusters. It appears that the central surface brightness of the
stellar disk is an important parameter for the amount of molecular gas at
the galaxy center. Whether stellar bars play a critical role for
the gas dynamics remains unclear, in part because of uncertainties in the
morphological classifications of our sample.
Key words: galaxies: spiral - galaxies: ISM - galaxies: nuclei
Spiral galaxies of the latest Hubble types (between Scd and Sm)
are considered dynamically simple systems: they are "pure'' disk
galaxies, often with only weak spiral arm structure, ill-defined
stellar bars, and no obvious central bulges. Their stellar disks often
are extremely
thin, as evidenced by a large ratio of radial to vertical disk scale
lengths in edge-on images (Dalcanton & Bernstein 2000). In many cases the thin disks
are embedded in a red stellar envelope that most plausibly formed
before the thin disk (Dalcanton & Bernstein 2002). The undisturbed morphology
of these systems indicates that they have not experienced any
significant merger events after the formation of the red envelopes
(
ago). Late-type spirals thus provide important
constraints on galaxy formation scenarios that invoke hierarchical
merging.
In addition, the featureless stellar disks, shallow
surface brightness profiles, and lack of bulge-like structures apparent in optical
images of many such galaxies (Böker et al. 2003; Matthews & Gallagher 1997) suggest
an uneventful star formation history within their central few kpc.
It is unclear whether this lack of past star formation activity
in the central region is simply due to a lack of cold molecular
gas (which provides
the raw material for star formation), or whether dynamical effects
prevent the gas from reaching a critical density. Unfortunately, late-type
spirals are under-represented in many samples because of observational
biases. This is especially true for surveys of their molecular gas content.
For example, a literature compilation of the CO emission
in 582 galaxies by Casoli et al. (1998) contains only 55 spirals with Hubble type Scd or later, only 26 of which have actual detections. With the data
presented in this paper, we more than double the amount of available
CO observations of late-type spirals.
More specifically, we present spectra of the
emission
from 47 objects in both the (1-0) and (2-1) lines, 30 of which
have reliable detections in at least one of the CO lines.
Our study is further motivated by an apparent conundrum that has recently emerged from high-resolution images of this galaxy class. Over the last few years, Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images have revealed that the photocenter of many late-type spirals is occupied by a compact, luminous stellar cluster (Phillips et al. 1996; Carollo et al. 1998; Matthews et al. 1999). In a recent paper (Böker et al. 2002, hereafter Paper I), we have shown that at least 75% of spiral galaxies with Hubble types later than Sc harbor such a nuclear star cluster. It thus appears that even in the most shallow disks, the nucleus is a well-defined location. This is difficult to explain, given the fact that the slowly rising rotation curves observed in most late-type spirals indicate a nearly homogenous mass distribution over much of the central disk (e.g. Matthews & Gallagher 1997), and hence gravity does not provide a strong force towards the nucleus.
Even more surprising is the fact that many of the nuclear clusters for which
spectroscopic information exists are dominated by a relatively young
(
)
stellar population (Davidge & Courteau 2002; Böker et al. 2001,1999; Gordon et al. 1999).
The dynamical masses for
these nuclear star clusters are in the range
(Matthews & Gallagher 2002; Walcher et al. 2003; Kormendy & McClure 1993; Böker et al. 1999), and it is unclear how the high
gas densities required for the formation of such dense and massive
star clusters could have been achieved in the centers of late-type spirals.
One possible scenario is that the clusters are formed over time
by a series of modest starburst events, rather than in a single,
massive collapse. This model is difficult to confirm observationally,
because the cluster spectrum is always dominated by the youngest
stellar population which contains the most massive and brightest stars.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a "sanity check'' of this
scenario by quantifying the amount of molecular material in the central
few kpc of late-type spirals. Clearly, if repetitive starbursts
are a viable model for nuclear cluster formation, one would expect
to find a central reservoir of molecular gas from which gas can be
transported into the central few pc.
In Sect. 2, we describe our galaxy sample, the details of the CO observations, and the data reduction procedure. The resulting CO spectra and their quantitative analysis are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, we compare the results for our sample to those derived for early-type disk galaxies. In addition, we use the HST images of Paper I to investigate possible dependencies between the molecular gas content and galaxy parameters such as luminosity, bar class, or surface brightness, as well as the luminosity of the nuclear star clusters. We summarize and conclude in Sect. 5.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
Galaxy | RA | Dec | d | Type | mB | W20 | d25 | ![]() |
M
![]() |
(J2000) | (J2000) | [Mpc] | [mag] | [
![]() |
[arcmin] | [
![]() |
|||
NGC 337a | 01 01 33.90 | -07 35 17.7 | 14.3 | SAB(s)dm | 13.38 | ![]() |
5.0 | 19.9 | -10.02 |
MCG 1-3-85 | 01 05 04.88 | -06 12 45.9 | 14.6 | SAB(rs)d | 12.62 | ![]() |
4.3 | na | na |
NGC 428 | 01 12 55.60 | -00 58 54.4 | 16.1 | SAB(s)m | 12.03 | ![]() |
3.6 | 18.7 | -13.15 |
UGC 3574 | 06 53 10.60 | +57 10 39.0 | 23.4 | SA(s)cd | 14.59 | ![]() |
3.4 | 18.4 | -11.90 |
UGC 3826 | 07 24 32.05 | +61 41 35.2 | 27.8 | SAB(s)d | 15.00 | ![]() |
3.5 | 19.1 | -10.76 |
NGC 2552 | 08 19 20.14 | +50 00 25.2 | 9.9 | SA(s)m? | 12.81 | ![]() |
3.4 | 19.7 | -12.04 |
UGC 4499 | 08 37 41.43 | +51 39 11.1 | 12.5 | SAdm | 14.82 | ![]() |
2.4 | 19.8 | -8.59 |
NGC 2805 | 09 20 24.56 | +64 05 55.2 | 28.1 | SAB(rs)d | 11.93 | ![]() |
5.9 | 18.0 | -13.32 |
UGC 5015 | 09 25 47.89 | +34 16 35.9 | 25.7 | SABdm | 15.60 | ![]() |
1.8 | 19.1 | -11.37 |
UGC 5288 | 09 51 17.00 | +07 49 39.0 | 8.0 | Sdm: | 15.55 | ![]() |
0.8 | 19.8 | nc |
NGC 3206 | 10 21 47.65 | +56 55 49.6 | 19.7 | SB(s)cd | 13.94 | ![]() |
2.8 | 18.8 | nc |
NGC 3346 | 10 43 38.90 | +14 52 18.0 | 18.8 | SB(rs)cd | 12.72 | ![]() |
2.7 | 18.1 | -11.78 |
NGC 3423 | 10 51 14.30 | +05 50 24.0 | 14.6 | SA(s)cd | 11.59 | ![]() |
3.9 | 17.4 | -11.84 |
NGC 3445 | 10 54 35.87 | +56 59 24.4 | 32.1 | SAB(s)m | 12.90 | ![]() |
1.5 | 17.6 | -13.42 |
NGC 3782 | 11 39 20.72 | +46 30 48.6 | 13.5 | SAB(s)cd: | 13.13 | ![]() |
1.6 | 18.2 | -10.07 |
NGC 3906 | 11 49 40.46 | +48 25 33.3 | 16.7 | SB(s)d | 13.72 | ![]() |
1.6 | 18.6 | -10.01 |
NGC 3913 | 11 50 38.77 | +55 21 12.1 | 17.0 | SA(rs)d: | 13.37 | ![]() |
2.4 | 17.6 | -9.96 |
UGC 6931 | 11 57 22.79 | +57 55 22.5 | 20.7 | SBm: | 15.14 | ![]() |
1.3 | 20.1 | -9.72 |
NGC 4204 | 12 15 14.51 | +20 39 30.7 | 13.8 | SB(s)dm | 14.01 | ![]() |
3.8 | 19.4 | -10.26 |
NGC 4242 | 12 17 30.10 | +45 37 07.5 | 10.5 | SAB(s)dm | 11.69 | ![]() |
4.8 | na | -11.33* |
NGC 4299 | 12 21 40.90 | +11 30 03.0 | 16.8 | SAB(s)dm: | 13.01 | ![]() |
1.6 | 17.7 | -11.73 |
NGC 4395 | 12 25 48.92 | +33 32 48.4 | 7.1 | SA(s)m | 11.40 | ![]() |
12.2 | na | -12.33* |
NGC 4416 | 12 26 46.72 | +07 55 07.9 | 20.7 | SB(rs)cd: | 13.24 | ![]() |
1.6 | 17.9 | -8.81 |
NGC 4411B | 12 26 47.30 | +08 53 04.5 | 19.1 | SAB(s)cd | 13.24 | ![]() |
2.4 | 16.9 | -12.57 |
NGC 4487 | 12 31 04.36 | -08 03 13.8 | 14.6 | SAB(rs)cd | 12.21 | ![]() |
3.7 | 17.0 | -12.97 |
NGC 4496A | 12 31 39.32 | +03 56 22.7 | 25.3 | SB(rs)m | 12.12 | ![]() |
3.8 | 18.6 | -11.99 |
NGC 4517A | 12 32 28.15 | +00 23 22.8 | 22.2 | SB(rs)dm: | 13.19 | ![]() |
3.8 | 19.8 | nc |
NGC 4519 | 12 33 30.27 | +08 39 17.0 | 18.5 | SB(rs)d | 12.50 | ![]() |
2.9 | na | na |
NGC 4534 | 12 34 05.44 | +35 31 08.0 | 14.2 | SA(s)dm: | 13.04 | ![]() |
2.9 | na | na |
NGC 4540 | 12 34 50.90 | +15 33 06.9 | 19.8 | SAB(rs)cd | 12.54 | ![]() |
2.1 | 17.6 | -12.29 |
NGC 4618 | 12 41 32.74 | +41 09 03.8 | 10.7 | SB(rs)m | 11.45 | ![]() |
4.3 | 18.0 | -11.45 |
NGC 4625 | 12 41 52.61 | +41 16 26.3 | 11.7 | SAB(rs)m pec | 13.08 | ![]() |
2.2 | 16.8 | -10.61 |
NGC 4688 | 12 47 46.77 | +04 20 08.8 | 14.9 | SB(s)cd | 13.52 | ![]() |
3.7 | na | na |
NGC 4701 | 12 49 11.71 | +03 23 21.8 | 11.0 | SA(s)cd | 12.91 | ![]() |
2.6 | 15.9 | -13.45 |
NGC 4775 | 12 53 45.79 | -06 37 20.1 | 22.4 | SA(s)d | 12.20 | ![]() |
2.2 | 16.8 | -13.77 |
UGC 8516 | 13 31 52.50 | +20 00 01.0 | 16.5 | Scd: | 14.37 | ![]() |
1.1 | 18.1 | -10.97 |
NGC 5477 | 14 05 31.25 | +54 27 12.3 | 8.1 | SA(s)m | 14.62 | ![]() |
1.4 | 20.4 | nc |
NGC 5584 | 14 22 23.65 | -00 23 09.2 | 24.2 | SAB(rs)cd | 12.51 | ![]() |
3.3 | 17.7 | -9.47 |
NGC 5669 | 14 32 44.00 | +09 53 31.0 | 21.2 | SAB(rs)cd | 13.11 | ![]() |
4.1 | 18.5 | -10.03 |
NGC 5668 | 14 33 24.30 | +04 27 02.0 | 23.8 | SA(s)d | 12.51 | ![]() |
2.8 | 17.8 | -13.10 |
NGC 5725 | 14 40 58.30 | +02 11 10.0 | 24.4 | SB(s)d: | 14.73 | ![]() |
1.0 | na | na |
NGC 5789 | 14 56 35.52 | +30 14 02.5 | 28.6 | Sdm | 14.44 | ![]() |
1.1 | 19.9 | nc |
NGC 5964 | 15 37 36.30 | +05 58 26.0 | 22.2 | SB(rs)d | 13.23 | ![]() |
4.1 | 18.4 | -12.62 |
NGC 6509 | 17 59 25.36 | +06 17 12.4 | 27.5 | SBcd | 13.37 | ![]() |
1.5 | 17.4 | -13.08 |
UGC 12082 | 22 34 11.54 | +32 52 10.3 | 13.9 | Sm | 14.14 | ![]() |
2.8 | 20.7 | nc |
UGC 12732 | 23 40.39.80 | +26 14 10.0 | 12.4 | Sm: | 14.26 | ![]() |
3.3 | 20.1 | -11.29 |
NGC 7741 | 23 43 53.65 | +26 04 33.1 | 12.5 | SB(s)cd | 12.09 | ![]() |
4.1 | 18.6 | nc |
Columns 1-3: galaxy name and coordinates. Column 4:
galaxy distance (in Mpc), calculated from the measured recession velocities,
corrected for Virgo-centric infall, and assuming
![]() ![]() |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
Galaxy | I10 | I21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
|
NGC 337a | <0.46 | <1.01 | - | - | <4.0 | <14.4 | 4.6 |
MCG 1-3-85 | 1.39 ![]() |
1.39 ![]() |
67![]() |
1092 | 12.7 | 22.2 | 3.6 |
NGC 428 | <0.74 | <1.23 | - | - | <8.2 | <7.6 | 5.0 |
UGC 3574 | 1.16 ![]() |
<0.78 | 123![]() |
1426 | 27.2 | 30.7 | 5.8 |
UGC 3826 | <0.26 | <0.98 | - | - | <8.6 | <12.1 | 5.0 |
NGC 2552 | <0.79 | <0.99 | - | - | <3.3 | <6.2 | 0.7 |
UGC 4499 | <0.44 | <1.53 | - | - | <2.9 | <6.6 | 1.1 |
NGC 2805 | 2.34 ![]() |
3.28 ![]() |
29![]() |
1742 | 79.2 | 37.7 | 18.5 |
UGC 5015 | <0.71 | <0.95 | - | - | <20.1 | <42.1 | 1.3 |
UGC 5288 | <0.53 | <0.47 | - | - | <1.5 | <6.2 | 0.3 |
NGC 3206 | <0.52 | <1.08 | - | - | <8.6 | <8.8 | 3.2 |
NGC 3346 | 3.58 ![]() |
1.57 ![]() |
81![]() |
1244 | 54.2 | 53.6 | 1.4 |
NGC 3423 | 2.70 ![]() |
2.67 ![]() |
66![]() |
1002 | 24.7 | 21.8 | 2.3 |
NGC 3445 | 0.89 ![]() |
1.41 ![]() |
40![]() |
2042 | 39.3 | 29.4 | 4.7 |
NGC 3782 | 0.68 ![]() |
1.05 ![]() |
56![]() |
753 | 5.3 | 9.4 | 1.3 |
NGC 3906 | 0.37 ![]() |
<0.86 | 19![]() |
969 | 4.4 | 7.6 | 0.3 |
NGC 3913 | 1.88 ![]() |
1.98 ![]() |
24![]() |
961 | 23.3 | 34.6 | 0.9 |
UGC 6931 | <0.50 | <1.23 | - | - | <9.2 | <18.3 | 0.6 |
NGC 4204 | 0.50 ![]() |
<1.65 | 34![]() |
849 | 4.1 | 6.5 | 1.5 |
NGC 4242 | <0.90 | <0.98 | - | - | <4.3 | <4.6 | 1.2 |
NGC 4299 | 0.48 ![]() |
0.54 ![]() |
24![]() |
223 | 5.8 | 7.7 | 1.1 |
NGC 4395 | <0.58 | <0.70 | - | - | <1.3 | <1.4 | 3.7 |
NGC 4416 | 5.08 ![]() |
4.58 ![]() |
78![]() |
1391 | 93.3 | 114.5 | 0.5 |
NGC 4411B | 0.88 ![]() |
<0.56 | 37![]() |
1268 | 13.8 | 16.5 | 1.2 |
NGC 4487 | 3.23 ![]() |
3.74 ![]() |
80 ![]() |
1026 | 29.5 | 34.4 | 1.8 |
NGC 4496A | 2.17 ![]() |
2.23 ![]() |
48![]() |
1734 | 59.5 | 37.1 | 7.2 |
NGC 4517A | <0.65 | <1.03 | - | - | <13.7 | <14.6 | 5.1 |
NGC 4519 | 2.93 ![]() |
2.31 ![]() |
92![]() |
1231 | 43.0 | 41.9 | 3.9 |
NGC 4534 | <0.42 | <1.31 | - | - | <3.6 | <5.7 | 3.1 |
NGC 4540 | 5.57 ![]() |
5.25 ![]() |
75![]() |
1303 | 93.6 | 89.5 | 0.6 |
NGC 4618 | 0.72 ![]() |
0.80 ![]() |
19![]() |
534 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.3 |
NGC 4625 | 3.78 ![]() |
4.32 ![]() |
37![]() |
615 | 22.2 | 41.5 | 1.0 |
NGC 4688 | 0.44 ![]() |
<0.41 | 20![]() |
983 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 1.9 |
NGC 4701 | 2.90 ![]() |
3.02 ![]() |
99![]() |
704 | 15.0 | 28.3 | 1.6 |
NGC 4775 | 1.63 ![]() |
1.18 ![]() |
31![]() |
1562 | 35.1 | 27.6 | 3.7 |
UGC 8516 | 1.20 ![]() |
<1.35 | 69![]() |
1026 | 14.0 | 30.5 | 0.3 |
NGC 5477 | <0.43 | <0.40 | - | - | <1.2 | <5.7 | 0.2 |
NGC 5584 | <0.50 | 2.1![]() |
14![]() |
1637* | 13.2* | 11.4* | 4.0 |
NGC 5669 | 2.28 ![]() |
3.02 ![]() |
86![]() |
1369 | 43.9 | 33.3 | 4.7 |
NGC 5668 | 1.78 ![]() |
1.52 ![]() |
41![]() |
1602 | 43.2 | 31.7 | 6.1 |
NGC 5725 | 1.12 ![]() |
<3.90 | 45![]() |
1648 | 28.6 | 47.9 | 0.5 |
NGC 5789 | <0.74 | <3.90 | - | - | <25.9 | <45.4 | 1.4 |
NGC 5964 | 0.89 ![]() |
<0.67 | 43![]() |
1471 | 18.8 | 17.3 | 5.1 |
NGC 6509 | 5.97 ![]() |
4.85 ![]() |
118![]() |
1830 | 193.5 | 180.9 | 6.2 |
UGC 12082 | <0.46 | <1.76 | - | - | <3.8 | <10.0 | 1.4 |
UGC 12732 | <0.40 | <0.94 | - | - | <2.6 | <6.7 | 2.5 |
NGC 7741 | 1.63 ![]() |
1.75 ![]() |
114![]() |
767 | 10.9 | 12.3 | 1.9 |
Columns 2 and 3: velocity integrated intensity of the
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Our galaxy sample was selected according to the criteria described in Paper I:
We point out that the sample selection criteria are unbiased (within the limits of the catalogs that form the basis of NED) with respect to galaxy size, stellar or gaseous mass, total magnitude, star formation efficiency, or any other quantity that might reasonably be expected to favor or disfavor nuclear star formation. It should therefore be well suited to provide a representative measure of the molecular gas content in late-type galaxies in the local universe.
Of the 47 IRAM targets, all but 7 (MCG-1-3-85, NGC 4242, NGC 4395, NGC 4519, NGC 4534, NGC 4688, and NGC 5725) have HST I-band observations that were presented in Paper I. We use these images to search for possible correlations of the molecular gas content both with the central surface brightness of the stellar disk and the luminosity of the nuclear star cluster (Sects. 4.2 and 4.3). The spatial resolution afforded by HST is essential for this purpose because the emission from the luminous central star cluster is difficult to separate from the underlying disk, even in the best seeing conditions.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Calibrated
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All objects were observed with the IRAM
telescope on Pico Veleta,
Spain between December 2001 and August 2002.
We used dual polarization receivers at the (redshifted) frequencies of the
and
lines at 115 and
,
respectively, employing the
filterbanks for the (1-0) line and the autocorrelator
for the (2-1) line. All observations were done in wobbler switching mode
with a wobbler throw of
in azimuth. The galaxies were observed at
their central positions listed in Table 1, with one beam position
per galaxy. The telescope pointing accuracy was monitored on nearby quasars
every 60-90 min, the rms offset being
.
Due to relatively
poor weather conditions and anomalous refraction during most of our
observations, the pointing accuracy is less than optimal. However, given the
half-power beam width (HPBW) of the
telescope of
at
and
at
,
this is adequate to measure the nuclear CO emission.
At the median distance of our galaxy sample (
), the beam size
corresponds to
(
)
at
(
).
Typical on-source integration times were 0.5-1 h per object,
divided in scans of 6 min. The individual scans were averaged
after flagging of bad channels, and linear baselines were subtracted.
Typical rms noise levels were in the range
for the
(1-0) line and
for the (2-1) line (after smoothing
to a velocity resolution of
). The reduced sensitivity of some
of the (2-1) observations is due to the fact that during part of the
observations, only one of the two receivers was functional.
The data are calibrated to the scale of corrected antenna temperature,
,
by measuring loads at ambient and cold temperature, as in the
conventional "chopper wheel'' calibration for millimeter wavelength observations.
A calibration measurement was carried out every 15-20 min during an
integration and every time a new object was acquired.
Typical system temperatures were in the range
at
and
at
on the
scale.
The IRAM forward efficiency,
,
was 0.95 and 0.91 at 115 and
and the beam efficiency,
,
was 0.75 and 0.50,
respectively. All CO spectra and luminosities are
presented in the main beam temperature scale (
)
which is
defined as
.
The conversion factor from main beam temperature to flux densities
for the
telescope is
.
In Fig. 1, we show the calibrated
and (2-1) spectra of all observed galaxies. The spectra were smoothed to a
velocity resolution of
.
We detect 29 galaxies in the
line, 21 of which also show evidence for (2-1) emission.
One object (NGC 5584) is detected only in (2-1).
The
detections for most galaxies are more than 5
above
the noise, except for NGC 3906, NGC 4204 and NGC 4299 for which
the detections are only at a level of
.
The quantitative analysis of the spectra is summarized in Table 2.
For all detected galaxies, we list widths (at the 50% level) and
central velocities of the (1-0) emission as well as the integrated
line intensities.
Except for one case (NGC 7741), the galaxies in our sample show no clear evidence for
double-horn profiles. The CO lines are well-fitted by single Gaussians;
both widths and central velocities listed in Table 2 are
derived from these fits. The only exception is NGC 7741 for which
these numbers were determined from the spectrum itself.
For non-detections, we report upper limits for the CO intensities which
were derived according to
![]() |
(1) |
For detections, both line intensities were integrated over the
(1-0) line width, except for NGC 5584 which was only detected in the
(2-1) line.
In general, the CO line positions agree well with those of the
line.
The errors for the line intensities were calculated as
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
Figure 2:
a) Comparison of observed line intensities for the
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For our galaxy sample, the CO line width is systematically smaller
than the HI line width, as demonstrated in Fig. 2b.
This result differs from that obtained by Sakamoto et al. (1999) who find that
the CO line width reaches about 95% of the W20 value within
from the center in a sample of 20 CO-luminous,
mostly early- to intermediate-type spirals. However, given that
the bulge-less, disk-dominated systems in our sample have slowly
rising rotation curves, and the beam size of our observations only
covers
at the median distance of our galaxy sample (
),
this difference is not surprising. The smaller CO line width also
argues against the presence of strong non-circular motion
associated with prominent stellar bars in the inner
.
The amount of molecular hydrogen in external galaxies can not be
measured directly from
emission, but has
to rely on indirect methods. The most common of these uses the
line emission as a tracer for
,
assuming proportionality between
the abundances of the two species. Driven mostly by the lack of a clear
theoretical understanding of the relative abundances, many studies have
assumed that the conversion factor
is
universal, i.e. applies to all environments.
Keeping in mind the shortcomings of this approach, we can
estimate
the
mass within the central
by
applying a generic conversion factor of
(Strong et al. 1988) which yields:
The resulting molecular gas masses for the detected galaxies
(Col. 6 of Table 2)
span the range between
and
.
We emphasize that these mass estimates represent only lower limits
to the total molecular gas content, since the galaxies were only
observed at their center position (on average, the IRAM beam diameter is only about 10% of d25).
There is general agreement, both from models (Kaufman et al. 1999; Maloney & Black 1988) and from observations that X is not constant but in fact depends on environmental parameters such as metallicity, density, or the radiation environment. Unfortunately, observations have not yet yielded a unique prescription for these dependencies. Studies of nearby galaxies provide evidence for a strong dependence of X on metallicity, but the various authors report different slopes (Arimoto et al. 1996; Israel 1997; Boselli et al. 2002; Wilson 1995).
In order to test the robustness of our analysis resulting from
the use of Eq. (3), we also apply a galaxy-dependent X.
Specifically, we use the relation suggested by Boselli et al. (2002) which was
derived from a sample of 14 well-studied nearby galaxies. Their relation
between X and the metallicity agrees well with the result of
Arimoto et al. (1996), with a slope that is stronger than the one found by
Wilson (1995), and weaker than that derived by Israel (1997).
For our purposes, we use the relation between X and the blue
magnitude of Boselli et al. (2002):
In order to compare the mass of the molecular gas component to that of the atomic one, we calculate the total HI mass for our galaxy sample from the 21 cm flux (as listed in LEDA) following the approach described in de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991), Eqs. (74-77). The HI masses derived in this fashion represent the total HI mass of the galaxy, they are listed in Col. 8 of Table 2.
One of the goals of this program is
to complement existing studies of the molecular gas content of
spiral galaxies with a sample of "pure'' disk galaxies with Hubble
types around Sd. These galaxies are underrepresented in existing
samples, and it is important to adress the question whether they
follow the same trends as intermediate- to early-type spirals,
or whether they might have intrinsically different gas properties.
We have therefore compared our results to those obtained by
Braine et al. (1993) for a sample of 81 predominantly early-type spiral galaxies.
Their dataset is particularly suited for comparison with ours
because both samples have nearly identical distance distributions
(Fig. 3a) and were observed with the IRAM
telescope.
In particular, the
intensities of the Braine et al. (1993) sample
also refer to the central position of the galaxies only, and are
therefore directly comparable to our data.
The Braine et al. (1993) sample was selected
to include nearby spiral galaxies with
.
In contrast, our sample mostly contains fainter galaxies
(42 out of 47 galaxies have
).
Figure 3b shows that the angular diameter of the major
axis, d25, of the Braine et al. (1993) galaxies is on average larger
than for our targets, although both samples have nearly identical distance
distributions. This is to be expected, because late-type spirals have on
average lower total luminosities and lower surface brightness (Roberts & Haynes 1994),
both of which likely reduce the isophotal diameter.
![]() |
Figure 3:
a) Normalized histogram of galaxy distances for the Braine et al. (1993)
(dashed line) and our sample (solid line). The distance distributions
are very similar.
b) Intensity of the
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 4:
a) ![]() ![]() |
As evident from Fig. 3b, neither sample shows an
obvious trend between the angular size of the galaxy disk and I10.
We have also verified that there is no correlation between
the angular size and
or
(var).
This indicates that the CO observations are not significantly biased by the
ratio of the optical disk size to the IRAM beam.
Since the optical diameters in both samples are much larger than
the IRAM (1-0) beam of
,
it is likely that in both studies,
the observations miss a non-negligible fraction of the total CO emission.
This is confirmed for those 6 galaxies in our sample for which wide-beam
data are listed in the GOLDMine database (Gavazzi et al. 2003). For these 6 objects,
the IRAM beam detects only between 15 and 60% of the total I10.
In principle, the undetected CO fraction should increase with
galaxy diameter because the size of the CO-emitting region and the
diameter of the optical disk are correlated
(
Young et al. 1995).
However, the fact that the central I10 is on average
larger for the Braine et al. (1993) sample demonstrates that typically,
early type spirals have more CO within their central few kpc than
late type spirals.
In Fig. 4a, we add the results of our survey
to the well-known relation between molecular gas mass (here calculated
with the generic value for X, but using Eq. (4)
yields equivalent results) and the far-infrared (FIR) luminosity
(e.g. Young & Scoville 1991). The galaxies of our sample closely follow
the relation defined by the earlier-type spirals, and extend it towards
lower FIR-luminosities.
The slope of the correlation is consistent with 1, indicating
direct proportionality between the two quantitites. The average
value of
/
is about 40. This is higher than in
nearby normal spirals (
/
)
and even starburst
galaxies (
/
)
(Sanders & Mirabel 1996), another indication
that measurements with a single IRAM pointing miss a substantial
fraction of total molecular gas.
It is interesting that after normalization of the two quantities
to the optical diameter of the galaxy, the two samples overlap and
cover a similar range (Fig. 4b).
This suggests that the latest-type spirals follow the same physical
processes that intimately link the molecular gas with star formation activity.
At least in this context,
the latest-type spirals are not a distinct class of objects, but rather
constitute the low-luminosity end of the galaxy distribution.
A similar conclusion can be reached from the
relation between mass and total magnitude MB shown in
Fig. 5: optically fainter galaxies have less molecular gas
in their central regions.
This result holds also when calculating the molecular mass according
to Eq. (4), although this increases the
scatter and reduces the dynamical range of
.
A similar, albeit weaker, correlation
exists between optical luminosity and molecular-to-atomic gas mass ratio.
Using Eq. (4) for X again
increases the scatter, so that only a weak trend remains
(Fig. 5c,d). Here, as well as in Fig. 6c
and d, we have excluded three galaxies (NGC 2681, NGC 4274, and NGC 4438)
with anomalously
low HI content from the Braine et al. (1993) sample.
![]() |
Figure 5:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We find that the latest-type spirals have on average less molecular
gas and lower molecular gas mass fractions in their central regions than
their early-type cousins. This is demonstrated in Fig. 6
which plots the
mass and
/
ratio versus Hubble-type.
This result seems robust against variations in X, although
using a luminosity-dependent conversion factor increases the scatter and
decreases the slope of the correlations (Figs. 6b,d). The dependency of molecular gas mass fraction on Hubble-type
and luminosity apparently contradicts the results of Boselli et al. (2002)
who find that the fraction of molecular gas is independent of Hubble type or
luminosity. It should be kept in mind that for our survey - as well as
for the Braine et al. (1993) data - the IRAM beam is generally much smaller than
the optical or HI disk of the galaxy. This probably explains the fact that
typical gas mass fractions in Fig. 6c
and d are only a few percent, much smaller than the
15% found by
Boselli et al. (2002). However, effects related to beam size cannot explain the
reduced
fraction at the late end of the Hubble sequence in
Fig. 6c and d because both samples were observed
in the same way with the same instrument and have
similar distance distributions (Fig. 3a).
Furthermore, Fig. 3b shows that the optical diameter d25
is on average smaller for late-type spirals than for earlier Hubble types, and
the
IRAM beam therefore covers a larger fraction of the optical disk.
If the extent of molecular gas scales with the optical diameter
in a way that is common to all galaxies, one would expect our sample
to have a higher molecular gas fraction than the Braine et al. (1993) sample.
The fact that we observe the opposite result therefore indicates that the
molecular gas in late-type spirals is less centrally concentrated relative
to the HI distribution than in early-type spirals if indeed the overall
/HI ratio is the same for all types of spirals, as indicated by
the results of Boselli et al. (2002).
This is in qualitative agreement with the result of Young et al. (1995)
who find that the ratio between the CO and optical isophotal radius
increases with Hubble type.
As discussed by Böker et al. (2003), one should not place too much emphasis on the exact Hubble classification in the range Scd-Sm
because at arcsecond resolution, the prominent nuclear star cluster is
easily mistaken as a compact "bulge'', and hence any morphological
classification based on ground-based images is inaccurate at best.
Nevertheless, it is clear from Fig. 6a and b that
late-type galaxies are rather inefficient in accumulating molecular
gas in their central regions.
Similar results have been found by a number of earlier studies
(e.g. Sage 1993; Casoli et al. 1998; Young & Knezek 1989). Young & Knezek (1989) have suggested
that the deep gravitational well of a prominent bulge facilitates
the formation and/or accumulation of molecular gas. While this might
well be true, it is certainly not the whole story. Our sample
has been selected to be devoid of stellar bulges, yet it shows a wide
range of masses. In the next section, we use the high-resolution
HST images to investigate the impact of the shape of the stellar disk
on the amount of molecular gas that accumulates in the center.
The results presented in this section depend to some degree on the
assumptions made for X, in particular the variation with
metallicity and/or luminosity which is still a matter of debate.
For example, a much stronger dependence of X on metallicity than
the one derived by Boselli et al. (2002) has been suggested by Israel (1997).
Using Fig. 2 of Boselli et al. (2002), we can infer that the variation in Xacross the range of MB covered by the galaxies discussed here
(
)
is equivalent to that caused by
metallicity differences of about 1 dex. According to Israel (1997),
X would vary by a factor of 500 over this metallicity range.
While such a high variance in X seems somewhat unlikely, it
would eliminate (or even reverse) the trends of
or
/
with MB and Hubble type in Figs. 5 and 6.
In order to measure the central surface brightness of the galaxy disk
underlying the nuclear cluster we have used the results of the elliptical
isophote fits presented in Paper I. Here, we have adopted the average
of the two inward extrapolations of the disk shown in Fig. 3 of
Paper I. In Fig. 7, we compare the so-derived
central disk surface brightness
which is directly
proportional to the average molecular gas surface density I10 within the beam.
Both quantities are independent of galaxy distance, as long as the CO is
more extended than the IRAM beam, which - based on the observed
CO line ratio discussed in Sect. 3 - is most likely
true for the majority of our sample.
![]() |
Figure 7:
The
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The most direct result of Fig. 7 is that there
appears to be a threshold surface brightness for detection at the
sensitivity limit of our observations:
we detect all 25 galaxies with
,
but only 1 out of 15 galaxies with
.
This trend cannot plausibly be explained by anomalously
high values of X in the undetected galaxies, because their absolute
magnitudes span a wide range (
).
Figure 7 therefore indicates that the stellar density
in the central regions
of late-type spirals is intimately linked to the molecular gas abundance,
even in the absence of a massive stellar bulge. It is difficult to
assess whether there is a direct correlation between
and I10.
To address this issue, deeper CO observations for a larger galaxy
sample which expands the range of surface brightness levels would be
required. Nevertheless, this result might help to explain the low success
rate in detecting molecular gas in low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies.
This class of galaxies, defined to have
or
for typical disk colors (de Jong 1996),
has only been successfully detected in 3 out of 34 attempts
(see compilation by O'Neil et al. 2003).
The typical CO intensity of the detected LSB galaxies (
)
is similar to that of our sample (both datasets were obtained with
the
telescope, and are thus directly comparable).
However, the upper limits
reported by O'Neil et al. (2003) for non-detections (<
)
fall
well below our sensitivity limit. It is therefore possible that
LSB galaxies would extend the correlation between central surface
brightness and CO intensity to fainter levels.
Our survey has shown that the latest-type spirals are not entirely
devoid of molecular gas. With a median
mass of
inside the IRAM beam, there is
enough raw
material within the central kpc to support a number of modest (
in stars) starburst episodes assuming a
star formation efficiency of 10%.
This is an important
result because recent spectroscopy of nuclear clusters has shown that
the spectral energy distribution (SED) of a large fraction of these objects
is dominated by a relatively young population of stars with an age of
a few hundred Myrs (Walcher et al. 2003). Because it is unlikely that we
witness the first nuclear starburst in such a large number of
galaxies, it is reasonable to assume that star formation episodes
within the central few pc occur repetitively. If true, there must be a
reservoir of molecular gas to support these events. While it is
comforting that our observations have demonstrated the presence of
reasonable amounts of molecular gas in the central regions of late-type
spirals, much has to be learned about the details of nuclear cluster
formation. Recent high
resolution (
)
CO observations of the barred late-type spiral
IC 342 demonstrate that gas can indeed accumulate inside the central
few pc (Schinnerer et al. 2003). In the case of IC 342, rough estimates of
the gas inflow rates suggest that repetitive nuclear starbursts can
be supported with duty cycles between
and
.
However, IC 342 presents only a case study, and it is uncertain
whether similar processes are common in late-type galaxies.
As we have discussed in the last section, the stellar density over
the central kiloparsec appears tightly linked to the molecular gas
abundance (or vice versa). On the other hand, the luminosity of the
nuclear star cluster appears largely independent of
,
as demonstrated in Fig. 8.
Again, this result is independent on the exact recipe to calculate
the
mass: using Eq. (4) for the X does not
significantly change Fig. 8.
This result is not too surprising because the cluster luminosity is
mostly determined by the age of the youngest population, and hence
is not a reliable indicator of cluster mass (which one might expect to
be more tightly correlated with CO luminosity).
![]() |
Figure 8:
![]() |
However, it is interesting to note that 90% of the galaxies
with nuclear clusters of
MI < -11.5 are detected in CO, whereas
the detection rate is about a factor of three lower for less
luminous clusters. In addition, out of the 7 galaxies without a nuclear star cluster only one (NGC 7741) is detected in CO.
This result underlines the notion that the lack of molecular gas is
the main reason for the uneventful star formation history in the
central regions of these galaxies. A more thorough study of the connection
between molecular gas supply and nuclear starbursts requires reliable mass
and age estimates for the nuclear clusters. Such measurements - which
are now possible from high-resolution optical spectroscopy with large ground-based
telescopes (Walcher et al. 2003) - will undoubtedly provide new insights into the
formation mechanism of nuclear clusters. In the meantime, it is not
unreasonable to speculate that the frequency and efficiency of nuclear
starbursts is governed by the supply of molecular gas which in turn is
regulated, at least in part, by the gravitational potential of the host
galaxy disk.
As discussed so far, the gravitational potential of the stellar mass distribution appears to play an important role for the gas flow towards the nucleus. In this paragraph, we discuss whether our observations provide evidence that dynamical effects such as gas flow in a non-axisymmetric potential are also important. A way to gauge the impact of stellar bars on (circum)nuclear star formation is to measure the amount of molecular gas in the central kiloparsec in barred and unbarred galaxies. A number of studies have shown that the nuclear gas concentration in barred galaxies is indeed higher than in galaxies without bars (e.g. Sakamoto et al. 1999; Sheth 2001; Sheth et al. 2003), thus confirming the theoretical picture that bars drive molecular gas toward the galaxy center (e.g. Athanassoula 1992). However, the (few) galaxies with late Hubble types in these studies were selected to be luminous in the blue or the FIR, i.e. they are biased towards high star formation rates.
Our sample, on the other hand, has been selected only for Hubble type, inclination, and distance (see Sect. 2.1). It should therefore provide an unbiased look at the impact of stellar bars on the molecular gas abundance in the latest Hubble-type spirals. Our sample is evenly divided in barred, mixed, and unbarred galaxies following the RC3 (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991) classification scheme (morphological type SB, SAB, or SA, respectively). In Table 3, we summarize the CO statistics for the three subsamples. We detect 80% of the barred galaxies in our sample, compared to 63% of mixed and 44% of unbarred galaxies. Taken at face value, this result supports the notion that bars are indeed an important factor for the transport of molecular gas towards the central few kiloparsec, even in very late Hubble types. However, we caution that the morphological classification of late-type galaxies is somewhat uncertain. For example, the bar classes reported in the LEDA database are different from those in the RC3 in about 20% (10 out of 47) of the cases. Using the LEDA classification scheme, we only find a slightly higher detection rate in barred galaxies (Table 3).
The average value of I10 in barred galaxies appears slightly higher
than in unbarred galaxies, but given the large standard deviations
(Col. 7 of Table 3) in the respective subsamples,
this is not significant. We have included upper limits for undetected
galaxies in the averaging, but excluding these values does not change the
result. For completeness, we point out that the median absolute galaxy
magnitude (MB) of the unbarred subsample is about 1 mag fainter
than for the barred subsample (Col. 8 of Table 3) which
potentially causes a bias towards lower molecular gas masses
in the unbarred sample due to the correlation between MB and
.
To summarize, our observations provide little evidence for enhanced
molecular gas masses in the centers of barred late-type spirals.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
Database | Class | Total | Det. | Undet. | Mean I10 | ![]() |
median MB |
[
![]() |
[
![]() |
||||||
unbarred (SA) | 16 | 7 | 9 | 1.13 | 0.83 | -17.3 | |
RC3 | mixed (SAB) | 16 | 11 | 5 | 1.56 | 1.50 | -18.2 |
barred (SB) | 15 | 12 | 3 | 1.80 | 1.80 | -18.4 | |
full sample | 47 | 30 | 17 | 1.49 | 1.42 | -17.8 | |
unbarred | 12 | 7 | 5 | 1.30 | 0.90 | -17.3 | |
LEDA | barred | 35 | 23 | 12 | 1.56 | 1.57 | -18.2 |
full sample | 47 | 30 | 17 | 1.49 | 1.42 | -17.8 |
Whether stellar bars are a significant ingredient in the recipe to form compact stellar nuclei is an even more difficult question. Recent observations have not found much evidence for enhanced star formation in the very nuclei of barred galaxies (Ho et al. 1997), in apparent contradiction to the results from molecular gas surveys mentioned above. This notion is confirmed by the fact that nuclear clusters are found just as often in barred galaxies as in unbarred ones (Paper I; Böker et al. 2003, in preparation). In addition, the topic is complicated by the fact that bars do not live forever. In fact, numerical simulations have shown that build-up of a central mass concentration (such as a supermassive black hole or a compact nuclear cluster) can dissolve stellar bars via dynamical instabilities (Norman et al. 1996). Because the bar destruction happens within just a few dynamical times, it is possible that a stellar bar might have been present in the past, leading to nuclear star formation until enough mass has been collected at the center to render the bar unstable. Without a more accurate isophotal analysis or even kinematic information on the central disks of late-type spirals, this question will remain open.
We have presented
and
spectra of the central
in 47 spiral galaxies with Hubble-types between Scd and Sm. Of these,
we detect 30 objects in at least one of the lines. Our survey thus
significantly increases the number of available CO data for very late-type
disk galaxies. The main results of our analysis can be summarized as follows:
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the referee, A. Boselli, for his helpful comments. UL ackowledges support from DGI Grant AYA2002-03338 and the Junta de Andalucía (Spain). This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), both of which are operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It has also benefited greatly from use of the Lyon-Meudon Extragalactic Database (LEDA, http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr).