All Tables

Table 1: Glossary of used symbols and units.
Table 2: Model parameters (L_*, $\ensuremath {T_{{\rm eff}}}$ and P) of both constant-opacity models (prefix "R'') and Planck mean models (prefix "P''). Columns 5 and 6 give the stellar radius, calculated from L_* and $\ensuremath {T_{{\rm eff}}}$ (Eq. (8)), and the gravitational acceleration at the location of the photosphere. The last column shows the fraction of the stellar mass contained in the model domain of the initial model for constant-opacity models and Planck mean models (the latter averaged over the carbon/oxygen ratios used), respectively. The stellar mass M_* is set to $1.0~M_{\odot}$ in all models. The remaining two (out of totally six) model parameters, the carbon/oxygen ratio $\ensuremath {\varepsilon _{{\rm C}}/\varepsilon _{{\rm O}}}$ and the piston velocity amplitude $\Delta {u}_{\rm p}$ are specified in Tables 4-6 (Sects. 4 and 5.1).
Table 3: Model comparison of drift $\ensuremath {_{1{\rm st}}}$ models (Cols. 2, 3) vs. drift $\ensuremath {_{2{\rm nd}}}$ models (Cols. 4, 5); completing Table 2 in Paper I (where the properties for the drift $\ensuremath {_{1{\rm st}}}$ models are taken). Only those models that give a wind are shown. All wind models show an irregular variability. Models that are not run for a longer time are marked with parentheses. See Sect. 3.3 for further information.
Table 4: Model quantities averaged at the outer boundary for constant-opacity models (cf. Sect. 4.1). The models are named by adding a suffix to the respective model name in Table 2. The suffix is a combination of two model parameters, the piston velocity amplitude $\Delta {u}_{\rm p}$ (Un, n in $\ensuremath{\,\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}}$ ) and the carbon/oxygen ratio $\ensuremath {\varepsilon _{{\rm C}}/\varepsilon _{{\rm O}}}$ (Cnn, nn is $10\cdot {\ensuremath {\varepsilon _{{\rm C}}/\varepsilon _{{\rm O}}} }$ ). The last but two column, $T_{{\rm tot}}$ , gives the total time-interval of each model calculation. The numbers associated with models run for a shorter time-interval are less reliable than the others as the means are taken over short time intervals. The last but one column gives the type of wind: i, irregular wind; l p, periodic wind; l q, quasi-periodic wind; t, transition model; --, no wind. l ( $\in{\mathbb{N}}$ ) shows the (multi-)periodicity of dust shell formation in the unit of the piston period P. A tilde (e.g. "2q'') in the last but one column indicates a correspondence with the characterization only during a part of the calculated time-interval. The values shown in bold face for the PC models indicate that the value differs from the corresponding value given by HD97 (by $\ge$ $10\%$ ). The symbols in the last column show whether the respective drift models show an increased/decreased ( $\ensuremath {\vartriangle }$ / $\ensuremath {\triangledown }$ ) mass loss rate, or new wind ( $\circledast$ ) when compared to the corresponding PC model. For the PC models an "H'' indicates that the same model parameters were used in a model in HD97. The symbol printed in subscript in the last column indicates how the respective (differing) model is illustrated in Figs. 2, 3, 6 and 7.
Table 5: Model quantities temporally averaged at the outer boundary for Planck mean models. The numbers printed in subscript in the $T_{{\rm tot}}$ column indicates the upper limit in the time-interval used in the calculation of the average quantities of the corresponding model (cf. Sect. 4.2.1). The values shown in bold face for the PC models indicate that the value differ from the corresponding value given by HJLA98 (by $\ge$ $10\%$ ). For the PC models an "H'' in the last column indicates that the same model parameters were used in a model in HJLA98. See the caption of Table 4 for further details.
Table 6: Results of drift models using two different P-L relations. F-models are indicated with an "F'' in the model name (first column), and G-models with a "G'', cf. Sects. 3.1 and 5.1. The symbols in the last column indicate whether the mass loss rates of the G-models have an increased/decreased ( $\ensuremath {\vartriangle }$ , $\ensuremath {\triangledown }$ ) value compared to the corresponding F-models. The values shown in bold face for the G-models indicate that the value differ from the corresponding F-model value (by $\ge$ $10\%$ ). The symbol printed in subscript for the F-models in the last column indicates how the respective model is illustrated in Figs. 2, 3 and 6. See the caption of Table 4 for further details.