Table 3: Line identification and equivalent widths (given in Å) between $\sim$ 1.1-1.8 $\mu$ m for AFGL 2298 between 2001 August (PC02) and 2002 May. We estimate errors to be $\pm$ 20 per cent of the quoted EW. Note that within the observational uncertainty no variability was apparent over the 3.5 month period between 2002 May-July.
Date 08/01 05/02

Transition

Pa $\beta$ - 250

Br13 - 20

Br12 10 31

Br11 + 50 120

Fe II(z⁴F₉ - c⁴F₇) 1.6787 bl bl

Br10 25 80

**Table 3:** Line identification and equivalent widths (given in Å) between $\sim$ 1.1-1.8 $\mu$ m for AFGL 2298 between 2001 August (PC02) and 2002 May. We estimate errors to be $\pm$ 20 per cent of the quoted EW. Note that within the observational uncertainty no variability was apparent over the 3.5 month period between 2002 May-July.
Date	08/01	05/02
Transition
Pa $\beta$	-	250
Br13	-	20
Br12	10	31
Br11 +	50	120
Fe II(z⁴F₉ - c⁴F₇) 1.6787	bl	bl
Br10	25	80

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text