A&A 403, 205-215 (2003)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030308
I. Yu. Alekseev - O. V. Kozlova
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, P/O Nauchny, 98409 Crimea, Ukraine; and Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, Crimean Branch, Ukraine
Received 27 November 2002 / Accepted 28 February 2003
Abstract
The quasisimultaneous electrophotometric, polarimetric and spectroscopic
observations of the chromospherically active binary MS Ser are presented. The
photometric variability of the star can be described completely by a zonal
spottedness model. Spotted regions occupy up to 21% of the total stellar
surface. The temperature difference between the unspotted photosphere and
starspots is about 1300 K. Starspots are localized at the middle latitudes. We
detected the broad-band linear polarization of the stellar light and its
rotational modulation connected with the local magnetic region on the stellar
surface. We suspect that there is a space connection between plages, magnetic
regions and the mostly spotted stellar longitudes.
Key words: stars: activity - stars: chromospheres - stars: magnetic fields - stars: starspots
In our previous papers we obtained complex information about active regions on surfaces of some chromospherically active variables: V775 Her (Alekseev & Kozlova 2000), VY Ari (Alekseev & Kozlova 2001), and LQ Hya (Alekseev & Kozlova 2002). In these papers we carried out the uniform constructions of spottedness models for program stars on the basis of the total set of published and original photometric observations. We also considered the connection between starspots, chromospheric activity and magnetic regions. In present paper we extend our investigation on the chromospherically active binary system MS Ser.
MS Ser (
=
=
)
is a SB2 chromospherically
active star. Griffin (1978) first calculated the orbital elements for this system
and proposed K2V/K6V as spectral types of the components. Later, Osten & Saar
(1998) revised the stellar parameters for MS Ser and suggested K2IV/G8V as
a better classification. Sanz-Forcada et al. (1999) have also found that the
primary component may have a luminosity class IV or higher. The earliest
photometric data for MS Ser were published by Eggen (1964). The photometric
variability was found by Rucinski (1981) and Bopp et al. (1981). Bopp et al.
(1981) also observed a variable filled-in H
line and calculated a
photometric period of 9.60 days, slightly different from the orbital one. Later
the photometric observations were continued by Bopp et al. (1983); Miller &
Osborn (1996); Alekseev & Shakhovskaya (1995); and Alekseev (2000, 2003).
Alekseev (2000, 2003) obtained first linear polarimetric observations of MS Ser.
Strassmeier et al. (1993) observed strong emission in the Ca II H & K
composite spectrum. Dempsey et al. (1993) noted some filling-in in the Ca II IRT
lines, but not reverse emission. Montes et al. (2000) observed nearly total
filled-in H
and H
lines, a clear emission in Ca II HK and
Ca II IRT lines and a very small absorption in the He I D3 line on the base of
three spectra obtained in 1995 and 1998.
![]() |
Figure 1: Light curves of MS Ser in the V band. Our data are denoted as filled circles, Miller & Osborn (1996) data denoted as open circles. The continuous lines are the 2nd order weighted Fourier fits. The beginning and the end of non-duplicated data marked by dashed lines. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
(1) |
Table 1: UBVRI photometric observations of MS Ser.
![]() |
Figure 2: Long-term light curve of MS Ser in the V band. The vertical bars indicate the peak-to-peak amplitudes of the light curves. The filled circles indicate the isolated measurements. |
Open with DEXTER |
The long-term light curve of MS Ser was built first by Alekseev (2000, 2003).
Now we extended the total time coverage to the year 2002 (Fig. 2). From
Fig. 2, we can see that the rotational modulation amplitude
varies from
in 1996 to
in 1995. The mean brightness of the star changed
significantly: the amplitude of its variations is equal to about
.
The
star was in the brightest state in 1980 with
,
which we assumed to be an unspotted magnitude. Taking in account the Hipparchos
distance r = 87.7 pc (Perryman et al. 1997) we see that the absolute brightness
is
for the MS Ser system and
for its primary
component.
We compared values of the stellar brightness in UBRI Johnson bands with the
V band ones. From this comparison we can see that the brightnesses in the
UBRI bands depend linearly on V band magnitude. Such dependences are typical
for all spotted variables. The corresponding linear regression coefficients
are:
,
,
and
.
Taking into account these values and the maximum
brightness value
we can obtain the color indices
of the MS Ser unspotted photosphere:
,
,
,
for the
primary component. These color indices and absolute magnitude correspond to a
K2IV star.
The results of the linear polarimetric observations in 1996 and 1997 were
published by Alekseev (2000). In Tables 2a-c we list an averaged results of the
UBVRI linear polarimetric observations of MS Ser in 2000-2002. For each
passband we give the averaged Stokes parameters Px and Py with their
deviations, the results of the standard
test (the reduced
values with N-1 degrees of freedom), and the probability
that the
Stokes parameters are variable from night to night. The
value should
then provide an estimate of the significance of the observed variations. Also we
give the average of the most significant polarization degree deviations from
zero in each passband. These are values
of average polarization degree
greater than zero. This definition of
correctly determines the
degree of linear polarization for stars with a large net P (Huovelin et al. 1988).
We can see from the Tables 2a-c and from Alekseev (2000), that the star shows
significant linear polarization ()
and variations of the Stokes parameters
(
)
in all
passbands in 2000 and 2002, and in UBV passbands in 2001. The growth of the
average polarization degree from I band to U is clearly seen. The largest
amplitudes of the Stokes parameter variations were obtained in the U band:
0.22%
for Px and 0.33% for Py in 1996, 0.48% for Px and 0.47% for Pyin 1997, 0.74% for Px and 0.60% for Py in 2000, 0.67% for Px and
0.47% for Py in 2001, and 0.20% for Px and 0.56% for Py in
2002 respectively.
In Figs. 3a-c the linear polarization degree and the position angle in Uband are presented as a function of the photometric phase. One can see for all
seasons that the photometric minimum corresponds to the polarization degree
maximum with some phase shift. The differences between the phase of the maximum
polarization and the phase of the minimum brightness (i.e. maximum spottedness)
are 0.25 of the rotation period in 1996 and 2001, 0.28 in 1997, 0.07 in 2000,
and 0.05 in 2002. These differences depend on the
spot size and are typical of local magnetic fields which are localized near the
most spotted longitudes (Huovelin & Saar 1991).
Table 2: (a). Linear polarization of MS Ser in 2000.
Table 2: (b). Linear polarization of MS Ser in 2001.
Table 2: (c). Linear polarization of MS Ser in 2002.
We can estimate a filling factor of the magnetic region using any assumption
about the broad-band linear polarization origin. In this paper we shall consider
the magnetic intensification (MI) effect above all, because the contribution of
the Thompson scattering is negligible, and Rayleigh scattering gives for K2IVstar an effect three - four times less than MI one (Huovelin & Saar 1991; and
Fig. 4). Saar & Huovelin (1993) showed that the maximum polarization degree
for the MI effect is proportional to coefficient A which depends from the
spot area S as
![]() |
(2) |
In Fig. 4 the comparison of observed maximum polarization values
with
the maximum possible polarization for magnetic intensification (solid line) and
Rayleigh scattering (dashed line) models in UBVRI bands are shown. One can see
that in U band the maximum observed polarization degree
corresponds to
the magnetic region filling factors varied from S = 6% in 1996 to S = 24%
of the total stellar surface in 2000. These values agree with our estimations of
starspot area in the same years (see below). In the B band the maximum observed
polarization degree
corresponds to the maximum possible value. In the
VRI bands the observed
values are greater than the theoretical
polarization degrees for the adopted model.
![]() |
Figure 3:
a). Light curve of MS Ser in the V band in 1996 and 1997, polarization
degree P and position angle ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
b). Light curve of MS Ser in the V band in 2000 and 2001,
polarization degree P and position angle ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
c). Light curve of MS Ser in the V band in 2002,
polarization degree P and position angle ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
All obtained spectra are presented in Figs. 5a-c (thin lines).
In the 2000 observing run we can see in all spectra a filled-in Hline. In the spectrum taken in 04.05.00 we see a small absorption, in
06.06.00 spectrum there is a weak emission and in 08.05.00 and 09.05.00 spectra
one can see both absorption and emission weak features.
In the 2001 observing run we see for two spectra (27.04.01 and 11.06.01) a
filled-in Hline while in one spectrum (11.06.01) there is a weak absorption, and in other
spectrum there is a small emission line. For the others six spectra we clearly
see H
emission line well above the continuum. In these spectra we see
the emission core with a central reversal at the rest wavelength. This
feature is typical for active red stars and formed by the optically thick
chromosphere.
The same picture we see in 2002. Most spectra show a filled-in line, but in four spectra (12.03.02, 09.04.02, 10.04.02, 19.06.02) there is a clear emission core.
On the Fig. 6 we give the radial velocity curves of MS Ser. For the primary
component radial velocities determination we used following lines: Fe I
6533.929, 6546.239, 6551.678, 6569.216, 6574.228, 6575.016,
6581.210, 6592.914, 6593.870 Å; Ti I
6554.223, 6556.026 Å; and Ca I 6572.779 Å. The typical accuracy in the primary component
radial velocity determination is about 2 km s-1. We found that most of our spectra
show weak lines of the secondary component, first of all, H
absorption
line, and Fe I
6546.239, 6569.216, 6575.016, 6592.914,
6593.870 Å, and Ca I 6572.779 Å lines. On the base of these lines we
constructed the radial velocity curve for the secondary component. In this case
the typical accuracy in the radial velocity determination is about 4 km s-1. The
results of our observations appended with Griffin (1978) data yielded the
following orbital parameters: the orbital period
days, the
baricentric radial velocity
km s-1,
and the radial velocity amplitudes
K1 = 52.04 km s-1 and
K2 = 71.48 km s-1.
As well as Griffin (1978) we supposed that the orbit is circular.
Thus, we obtained that the mass ratio is about
MA/MB = 1.37, whereas
Griffin (1978) estimated it as 1.22. This mass ratio also confirm the Osten &
Saar (1998) spectral classification.
The best way to obtain the chromosphere contribution to some spectral line
in the chromospherically active binaries is to subtract the underlying
photospheric contribution. It is espetially urgent for the H
line
which is observing frequently as a filled-in absorption line. We use the
method which is based on the subtraction of a synthesized stellar spectrum
constructed from corresponding Kurucz atmospheric models.
For each observed spectrum we calculated a synthetic one obtained with the
help of the SYNTH and ROTATE programs of Piskunov (1992), and the
VALD database of atomic spectral-line parameters (Piskunov et al. 1995, 1999).
Each resulting synthetic spectrum is represented by composition of two
synthetic spectra calculated for the following models:
K,
,
km s-1,
km s-1,
km s-1 for the primary component and
,
,
km s-1,
km s-1,
km s-1 for the secondary
one. The synthetic spectrum of the secondary component was reduced according to
the luminosity ratio of components 9.60 which is a typical for K2IV/G8V system,
and moved according to the radial velocity curve. The equivalent widths of
synthetic photospheric profiles show a good agreement with results of Montes et al. (2000).
Residual pure chromospheric emission spectra shown in Figs. 5a-c as dashed
lines. The width
of all these spectra indicate gas motion on the line of the sight with typical
velocities up to
.
The spectra taken in 2002 observing run show
blue asymmetry of
the H
pure emission profile. This asymmetry is seen as extend blue
emission wing reaching the value
,
whereas the red wing reaching in
the same spectra the value
.
Thus, we can suspect a large-scale motions
of gas (outflow) in the stellar chromosphere.
In Table 3 we give the main characteristics of the H
line: Julian
Date HJD of the spectrum and the corresponding phase; ratios
of the peak emission flux to the continuum flux for real spectra and the same
for the pure emission; the distance between the "blue" and the "red" peaks
;
the
ratio of the peak fluxes; the
width of the pure emission profile FWHM and the equivalent width of the pure
emission value.
![]() |
Figure 4:
Wavelength dependence of the polarization degree. Different symbols
show observational
estimations of the maximum polarization degree ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
a). H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
b). H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
c). H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: The radial velocity curves for MS Ser. The filled symbols denote data for the primary component, and the open symbols denote data for the secondary one. The circles show our data, the diamonds show Griffin (1978) data, and the squares show Osten & Saar (1998) data. |
Open with DEXTER |
We may roughly estimate physical parameters for the lower chromospheres of
MS Ser given by the model of Cram & Mullan (1979) assumptions. It is a model
of an optically thick isothermal chromosphere. The optical depth of the
isothermal chromosphere is
![]() |
(3) |
![]() |
(4) |
Table 3:
Spectroscopic observations of MS Ser in H
region.
An algorithm to obtaining the starspots parameters from the photometric observations
is described in many papers (Dorren 1987). To find the area and temperature of
the spotted region, we must know the brightness of the unspotted photosphere and
the relations between the
values at different wavelengths which can
be estimated from the observations. In our calculations we use the
value
and the coefficients
,
and
.
We must also make some initial
assumptions about the spotted region configurations.
Table 4: Spottedness parameters of MS Ser.
Traditional algorithms lead to large near-pole circular spots on all stars of any spectral type. This conclusion contradicts the solar spottedness picture. On the other hand, Eaton et al. (1996) showed that the aggregate of many (5-40) low-latitude starspots can fit the photometric behaviour of any real spotted star.
Alekseev & Gershberg (1996a,b, 1997) showed that the spotted regions on
cool stars can be represented by two spotted belts located symmetrically about
the equator. These belts occupy regions with latitudes from
to
and have a spot coverage that varies linearly with
longitude from 1 at the minimum brightness phase to some value
at the
maximum brightness phase, where
.
Such a zonal model can fit
any light curve without the second humps. The model was applied to several
spotted stars with the spectral classes from G0 to M4.5 and rotation
velocities up to 25 km s-1 (Alekseev 2000, 2003; Alekseev & Kozlova 2000, 2001,
1996) and these results were in qualitative agreement with the pattern of solar
spots. Later the same model was applied by Unruh et al. (2001) to the solar
spottedness simulations. It should be noted that our algorithm did not impose
any restriction on definable spot latitudes with the exception of a natural limit
,
where it produces a polar spot. Thus the spot
latitudes are the definable variables depending on the
,
and
coefficients (the value
increasing with the
growth and anticorrelating with
and
(Alekseev &
Gershberg 1996b)).
In our calculations we use two input variables. They are the brightness rotational
modulation amplitude ,
and the difference between the maximum stellar
brightness in every season and the brightness of the unspotted photosphere
.
The five input parameters of the spot modelling are the following:
the coefficients
,
and
,
the inclination of the stellar
rotation axis i and the stellar photosphere temperature
.
The
limb-darkening coefficients were taken from van Hamme (1993).
To estimate the inclination angle
,
we use the values of the
rotation velocity
,
the stellar radius
(Osten & Saar 1998) and the photometric period
(Bopp et al.
1981). The photospheric temperature
was estimated by using
the calibration of Johnson (1966) from the (V-R) and (V-I) color indices of
the unspotted photosphere. This value agrees with the estimations of Osten &
Saar (1998) and our stellar atmosphere model choise. The starspots models for
MS Ser are given in the Table 4.
According to this table, the photometric behaviour of MS Ser can be explained
by a zonal model where the distance from the spotted belts to the stellar equator
varies from
to
.
The spotted belt width
varies from
to
.
The coverage parameter
varies from 0.00 to 0.68, which yields a total spot area
up to 21% of
the total stellar surface. The ratio of the brightnesses of the spots and the
quiet photosphere
is relatively small: 0.11-0.13 corresponding to
a temperature difference
of about
.
The previous results
of MS Ser starspot simulation were published by Alekseev (2000, 2003).
In 2000 we obtained four observational points. It is not enough to draw
any conclusion about H
variability.
In 2001 and 2002 we see a clear variability of the relative chromospheric
emission intensity
,
which growth with the stellar brightness
decreasing. The equivalent width EW show the similar picture in 2002, whereas
in 2001 its correlation with the spottedness is more weak. The width
of the pure emission profile FWHM demonstrate a possible anticorrelation with
the light curve in 2002, but in 2001 the FWHM maximum do not agree with the
light curve minimum. Thus we see in 2002 the presence of chromospherically
active regions with higher electron density (plages) associated with the
most spotted longitude, whereas in 2001 the presence of plages is more
questionable.
In Fig. 8, we present the dependence of the pure H
emission equivalent
width on the stellar brightness and the dependence of the H
luminosity
on the total spot area on MS Ser constructed from 1995 to 2002 on the basis of
our observations and literature data (Montes et al. 2000).
![]() |
Figure 7:
a). V band light curve of MS Ser in 2000 year and H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
b). V band light curve of MS Ser in 2001 year and H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
c). V band light curve of MS Ser in 2002 year and H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
a). The H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
(5) |
We can see from Fig. 8b, that the spot area growth from 8 to 13% of the visible
hemisphere corresponds to
variations from
to
erg/s, which are not correlated with the spottedness (a
correlation koefficient r = 0.14). We can see from Fig. 7, that the
presence of chromospheric plages associated with the starspots can have a place
in some epochs but not in others. Thus, the changes in the H
emission
can be due to the plages or to a change in the physical parameters of the
chromosphere. This can be the reason of the absence of correlation between
chromospheric emission and spottedness. The bolometric luminosity deficit
caused by starspots varies from
to
erg/s. Thus, the chromosphere of MS Ser radiates from 5 to 13% of the total
stellar luminosity blocked by the starspots.
![]() |
Figure 8: b). The chromospheric emission on MS Ser as a function of the stellar spottedness. |
Open with DEXTER |
Acknowledgements
This work has been partially supported by Ukrainian SFFD grant No. 02.07/00300. We thank an anonymous referee for constructive comments.