The observations with the ISOPHOT (Lemke et al. 1996)
photometer onboard the ISO satellite (Kessler et al. 1996)
were performed in January 1998 in raster mode (AOT PHT22) with the
C200 detector, a
pixel array of stressed Ge:Ga with a pixel
size of
,
in conjunction with the C_160 broad band filter
(reference wavelength 170
,
equivalent width
89
m). Due to the rather large area of the SMC on the
sky, the ISOPHOT observations had to be split into a mosaic of nine
separate parts, each of
which was accompanied by two observations of the ISOPHOT Fine
Calibration Source (FCS). Adjacent parts of the whole map were
designed to be slightly overlapping, while the raster step size of each part was a
full detector size without any overlap.
Since there was little redundancy in the data, cosmic ray hits could mimic compact sources in the map. Therefore, instead of the standard ramp slopes from first-order polynomial fits, the pairwise differences of consecutive ramp readouts were used to derive the detector signals. This allowed a larger distribution to be analysed, leading to considerably more robust results.
To get rid of pairwise differences affected by cosmic ray hits, the robust outlier-insensitive myriad estimator (Kalluri & Arce 1998) was computed and 20% of the most deviant signals as measured by the absolute deviation were cut off. This outlier removal is similar to a median absolute deviation trimming, but instead of the initial median, the sample myriad is used to determine the outliers. The sample myriad value in turn is a robust estimator of the mode (most common value) of a distribution but does not require binning of the actual data set, and is easily computed by simply minimizing a particular cost function with a tuning constant set to a small value (for details see Kalluri & Arce 1998). After rejecting the outliers, the trimmed set of pairwise differences was linearly interpolated to a ten times finer grid and the value giving the minimum value for the myriad cost function accepted as the final signal for each raster point. This interpolation scheme was used as an approximation to a full numerical minimization of the myriad cost function.
The derived detector signals at each raster position were subsequently
corrected for signal dependence on ramp integration times to be
consistent with calibration observations (Laureijs et al. 2000),
dark-current subtracted, and finally flux calibrated
with PIA Version 9.1/Cal G Version 6.0 (Gabriel et al. 1997).
For the conversion to an absolute flux level,
the observations of the ISOPHOT Fine Calibration Source (FCS) obtained at
the beginning and end of each raster in each filter were used.
The flux calibrated data streams of the detector pixels still showed differences in the overall levels of up to 20%, mostly due to inappropriately corrected pixel-to-pixel sensitivities (flat field). If not removed, these varying brightness levels would lead to striping and chessboard-like patterns in the maps. Robust morphological filtering techniques (Sternberg 1986) were used to extract the overall level of the four data streams, which were then brought to a common mean level, thereby giving the relative pixel scaling factors.
Eventually, a complete map of the whole SMC was produced from the
flatfielded flux-calibrated data streams of all pixels by using the
Drizzle Mapping Method (Hook & Fruchter 2002) within
IRAF,
which took into account the pixel sizes and inter-pixel distances of
the C200 detector and the detector roll angle. The pixel size used
for the final full map was
,
the smallest possible size
which did not produce uncovered holes. This final map was restored using
the modified Richardson-Lucy-Algorithm (Hook et al. 1994) with an
additional subsampling of two pixels and a point spread
function approximated by a Gaussian with a FWHM of
,
giving a final restored map with
pixel size. This map is shown in
Fig. 1.
To allow for a direct comparison with the shorter wavelength IRAS HiRes
maps (see below), restored ISOPHOT (sub-)maps with the same center and size as the
IRAS sub-fields were created as well as with a pixel size of
.
This is
twice the IRAS HiRes pixel size, so that IRAS maps exactly aligned
with the ISO sub-fields could be constructed by a simple
pixel
block-averaging.
Although a more quantitative analysis of the FIR properties of the SMC
will be performed in subsequent paper, Table 1 lists some preliminary
global quantities. Remarkable are the numbers found for the
global star formation rate, and the gas-to-dust ratio resulting from the additional cold dust
component entering the total dust mass.
F40-220 |
![]() |
F1-1000 |
![]() |
L1-1000 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Although source catalogs for this wavelength range were
published in the past already (for an extensive comparison of IRAS
SMC source catalogs with other wavelength bands see, e.g., SI89),
we decided to re-analyse the IRAS
high resolution (HiRes hereafter) data in order to treat ISO results and
IRAS data in an identical and reproducible way.
Since the area in the sky covered by the SMC is comparably large
(
in the optical) and IRAS HiRes data can be
requested with maximum field sizes
of
only, we split up the
SMC field into 9 single
fields with the central one covering most of
the central body of the SMC in the FIR (for the orientation of the fields in the sky see
Fig. 2). This ensured that the borderlines between two
adjacent fields (though covered
by a small overlap) would not be located in the brightest parts of the
SMC.
The central coordinates for the requested
fields (equinox
B1950.0) are given in Table 2. Pixel sizes were 15''for all fields.
Field | RA | DEC |
---|---|---|
0 | 13.320000 | -72.937271 |
1 | 20.093601 | -72.937271 |
2 | 20.093601 | -70.949771 |
3 | 13.320000 | -70.949771 |
4 | 6.5463982 | -70.949771 |
5 | 6.5463982 | -72.937271 |
6 | 6.5493982 | -74.924771 |
7 | 13.320000 | -74.924771 |
8 | 20.093601 | -74.924771 |
The data reduction for the IRAS scans at IPAC comprises several steps:
first, the calibrated,
reconstructed detector data is deglitched (which removes spurious
non-source-like signals originating from radiation impacts on the
detector) and destriped (which corrects for different detector
responsivities during different scans, i.e., additive offsets of
certain strips). The zodiacal emission model was then subtracted from
all data scans individually. For the HiRes data fields a maximum
correlation method (MCM) for the reconstruction of the original image is
applied to the single scans which not only iteratively builds a
reliable model of the sky brightness, but also
enhances the resolution to 15'' pixel size. For a more detailed description of
IRAS data reduction routines see Assendorp et al. (1995), Bontekoe et al. (1994),
and Aumann et al. (1990).
All resulting IRAS maps are calibrated in
MJy/sr, two of them (central 60 m and 100
m) are shown in Fig. 3.
The visual inspection of all nine fields yielded the result that
only in five of them objects belonging to the SMC are located. These fields are
oriented in a cross-like pattern in the sky with numbers 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 (see
Fig. 2). All other fields were neglected for the
subsequent analysis.
![]() |
Figure 3:
IRAS HiRes maps of the SMC. Left: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Copyright ESO 2003