Figure 1 shows the Chandra (0.7-2 keV) image of
the highly structured southwest corner of the SNR G 315.4-2.30.
Two point X-ray sources are clearly visible at the northwest of
the image at
and
.
For both sources we measured a
FWHM of
,
which is consistent with the Chandra
point spread function at the off-axis angle
.
Figure 2 shows a close-up of the region around the
sources, labelled S (southern source) and N (northern source).
![]() |
Figure 1: Chandra image of the southwest region of the SNR G 315.4-2.30. Both X-ray sources are surrounded by a circle. North is up and east is to the left. |
![]() |
Figure 2: The enlarged view of the region around the point X-ray sources, labelled S (southern) and N (northern). |
Figure 3 shows the image of the hemispherical optical nebula
to the southwest of the SNR G 315.4-2.30 from the Digital Sky Survey (DSS-2, red plates). Figure 4 shows an enlarged
view of the region around the point X-ray sources. The source S is
in good positional agreement with a point-like object immersed in
a diffuse optical filament. This object is indicated in the HST
Guide Star Catalog as non-stellar, with a photographic magnitude
of
.
We believe, however, that it was misclassified
due to the effect of the background diffuse emission and in fact
it is a star.
![]() |
Figure 3: The DSS-2 image of the optical nebula southwest of the SNR G 315.4-2.30. The position of both point X-ray sources is surrounded by a circle. |
![]() |
Figure 4: The enlarged DSS-2 image of the region around the point X-ray sources. The circles are centered at the position of X-ray sources. |
The spectra of the point sources were extracted from circular
regions with radii of 1.5 arcsec. The background spectrum was
taken from a circle with a radius of 4.5 arcsec at 6.5 arcsec
northeast of the point sources. The PSF model shows that the
fraction of the source flux in the background region is
negligible. The spectral modeling was performed in the 0.5-10 keV energy range using the XSPEC spectra fitting package. The
estimates of the interstellar absorption, ,
towards
G 315.4-2.30 are quite uncertain (cf. e.g. Vink et al.
1997 with Vink et al. 2002), so the spectra were
fitted with
as a free parameter. In one case, however,
we used the fixed value of
(see below).
The spectrum of the source S is shown in Fig. 5;
![]() |
Figure 5: The background-subtracted Chandra ACIS spectrum from the source S. The solid line represents the best fit optically thin plasma model. |
The spectrum of the source N (shown in Fig. 6) can be fitted almost equally well with a power law (PL), two-temperature blackbody (BB+BB), or blackbody plus power law (BB+PL) models. A simple BB model gives unacceptable fits. The best fit spectrum predicted by the BB+PL model is shown in Fig. 6 by the solid line.
We note that the best fit PL model requires
(we
consider this fact as an indication of the galactic origin of the source
N), although models with
up to
(presented in Table 1) also give acceptable fits.
![]() |
Figure 6: The background-subtracted Chandra ACIS spectrum from the source N. The solid line corresponds to the best fit blackbody plus power law model. |
The results of a spectral analysis for the source N are summarized in Table 1.
Model | Photon index | Temperature, |
![]() |
Luminosity, | ![]() ![]() |
keV |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
PL |
![]() |
1.5 (fixed) | 0.44 (
![]() |
51.5/27 | |
B+B |
![]() |
![]() |
1.32 (bolometric) | 47.3/25 | |
![]() |
0.35 (bolometric) | ||||
BB+PL |
![]() |
![]() |
112 (bolometric) | 38.9/25 | |
![]() |
0.67 (
![]() |
Note that a single point near the Chandra mirror edge contributes
to the
in all cases.
Copyright ESO 2003