next previous
Up: An XMM-Newton observation of Centauri


Online Material


 

 
Table 1: XMM-Newton sources detected within the half mass radius. A flag indicates whether the source belongs to the core. Most sources were detected by the most sensitive EPIC-PN camera (a flag indicates whether it is detected also by MOS1 and MOS2). The ones which were missed by EPIC-PN are labeled as MOS in that table. The source ID increases with decreasing maximum likelihood. The sources are sorted in declination. The statistical error on the position is given at the 90% confidence level, as estimated from the srcmatch task, and is given in arcseconds. For PN sources, the rates are from the PN data. For MOS sources, the rates are an average between the MOS1 and MOS2 cameras. All rates are corrected for the vignetting of the mirrors and are given in units of 10-2 count s-1. In EPIC-PN, for indications a count rate of 10-2 counts s-1 corresponds to an unabsorbed flux of $\sim $ $ 2.7\times 10^{-14}$ ergs s-1 cm-2 for a 0.6 keV blackbody model absorbed through the cluster $N_{\rm H}$ ( $8.4\times 10^{20}$ cm-2). This flux translates to a luminosity of $\sim $1032 ergs s-1 at the distance of $\omega $ Cen (5.3 kpc).
Instrument Source RA Dec Position Rate MOS1 MOS2 Core
  ID h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ Error ( $^{\prime\prime}$)   detection detection source
PN 122 13: 26: 48.9 -47: 24: 52.2 7.32 0.13 $\pm$ 0.03 No No No
PN 80 13: 26: 30.7 -47: 26: 04.4 4.76 0.14 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes No No
PN 49 13: 26: 28.7 -47: 26: 33.3 5.28 0.15 $\pm$ 0.03 No Yes No
PN 103 13: 26: 45.4 -47: 26: 53.6 4.92 0.15 $\pm$ 0.03 No No Yes
PN 44 13: 26: 52.6 -47: 27: 15.9 3.89 0.25 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes Yes
PN 24 13: 26: 40.8 -47: 27: 38.6 2.35 0.54 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes Yes
PN 61 13: 26: 52.5 -47: 27: 39.1 4.08 0.18 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes Yes Yes
PN 42 13: 26: 59.2 -47: 28: 16.5 4.41 0.35 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes Yes
PN 111 13: 26: 50.2 -47: 28: 40.1 4.47 0.14 $\pm$ 0.03 No No Yes
PN 92 13: 26: 44.3 -47: 28: 57.4 4.89 0.17 $\pm$ 0.03 No No Yes
PN 5 13: 26: 53.5 -47: 29: 01.3 1.17 1.74 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes Yes
PN 101 13: 26: 37.9 -47: 29: 11.3 5.06 0.16 $\pm$ 0.03 No No Yes
PN 2 13: 26: 52.2 -47: 29: 36.1 0.74 3.56 $\pm$ 0.11 Yes Yes Yes
PN 72 13: 26: 34.5 -47: 29: 57.3 3.84 0.25 $\pm$ 0.04 No No Yes
PN 60 13: 26: 34.2 -47: 30: 34.7 4.08 0.25 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes No No
PN 127 13: 27: 04.5 -47: 30: 38.2 5.43 0.12 $\pm$ 0.03 No No No
PN 20 13: 26: 37.4 -47: 30: 52.9 2.32 0.53 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes No
PN 88 13: 27: 04.9 -47: 31: 10.2 6.88 0.13 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes No No
PN 38 13: 26: 55.0 -47: 31: 13.2 3.73 0.29 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes No
PN 9 13: 26: 48.7 -47: 31: 26.2 1.72 1.46 $\pm$ 0.10 Yes Yes No
PN 108 13: 26: 46.6 -47: 31: 40.5 5.79 0.16 $\pm$ 0.03 No No No
PN 36 13: 26: 50.8 -47: 31: 47.5 3.91 0.33 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes No
PN 35 13: 26: 49.6 -47: 31: 53.2 7.26 0.17 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes Yes No
PN 57 13: 26: 49.6 -47: 32: 13.4 2.95 0.35 $\pm$ 0.05 No No No
PN 16 13: 26: 43.9 -47: 32: 31.0 2.71 0.68 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes No
MOS 96 13: 26: 47.7 -47: 25: 52.6 4.71 0.05 $\pm$ 0.02 Yes Yes No
MOS 50 13: 26: 29.2 -47: 28: 13.8 2.99 0.13 $\pm$ 0.02 Yes Yes No



 

 
Table 2: XMM-Newton sources detected outside the half mass radius. As in Table 1 most sources were detected by the most sensitive EPIC-PN camera (a flag indicates whether it is detected also by MOS1 and MOS2). The ones which were missed by EPIC-PN are labeled as MOS in that table. The source ID increases with decreasing maximum likelihood. The sources are sorted in declination. The statistical error on the position is given at the 90% confidence level, as estimated from the srcmatch task and is given in arcseconds. For PN sources, the rates are from the PN data. For MOS sources, the rates are an average between the MOS1 and MOS2 cameras. All rates are corrected for the vignetting of the mirrors and are given in units of 10-2 count s-1. In EPIC-PN, for indications a count rate of 10-2 counts s-1 corresponds to an unabsorbed flux of $\sim $ $ 2.7\times 10^{-14}$ ergs s-1 cm-2 for a 0.6 keV blackbody model absorbed through the cluster $N_{\rm H}$ ( $8.4\times 10^{20}$ cm-2). This flux translates to a luminosity of $\sim $1032 ergs s-1 at the distance of $\omega $ Cen (5.3 kpc).
Instrument Source RA Dec Position Rate MOS1 MOS2
  ID h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ Error ( $^{\prime\prime}$)   detection detection
PN 119 13: 26: 37.8 -47: 16: 00.8 7.59 0.31 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 54 13: 26: 56.4 -47: 17: 15.4 3.77 0.53 $\pm$ 0.07 No Yes
PN 65 13: 26: 18.3 -47: 17: 28.6 5.31 0.43 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 29 13: 26: 53.3 -47: 18: 24.4 3.60 0.63 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 97 13: 27: 05.8 -47: 18: 35.1 5.02 0.30 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 132 13: 26: 31.0 -47: 18: 48.5 26.59 0.21 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 3 13: 27: 27.7 -47: 19: 08.8 0.83 7.39 $\pm$ 0.24 Yes Yes
PN 17 13: 26: 23.5 -47: 19: 27.9 3.00 0.89 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 56 13: 27: 02.8 -47: 19: 29.9 5.59 0.38 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes Yes
PN 28 13: 26: 46.3 -47: 19: 47.4 2.64 0.80 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 31 13: 26: 38.5 -47: 20: 01.7 2.43 0.66 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 95 13: 27: 08.4 -47: 20: 25.9 7.41 0.16 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes No
PN 43 13: 26: 03.8 -47: 20: 42.9 3.86 0.54 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 73 13: 26: 35.7 -47: 20: 57.4 9.14 0.26 $\pm$ 0.05 No Yes
PN 68 13: 27: 10.2 -47: 21: 29.2 4.06 0.31 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes No
PN 145 13: 28: 08.7 -47: 21: 36.8 48.16 0.54 $\pm$ 0.09 No No
PN 133 13: 27: 58.4 -47: 22: 03.6 24.29 0.30 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 32 13: 26: 54.5 -47: 22: 04.7 2.73 0.46 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes Yes
PN 15 13: 26: 41.5 -47: 22: 16.5 2.34 0.66 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes Yes
PN 77 13: 26: 48.6 -47: 22: 18.7 4.95 0.15 $\pm$ 0.03 No Yes
PN 129 13: 27: 33.3 -47: 22: 48.1 6.29 0.18 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 39 13: 26: 23.2 -47: 22: 52.7 2.70 0.52 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes No
PN 70 13: 28: 01.9 -47: 23: 16.5 4.68 0.68 $\pm$ 0.09 No No
PN 18 13: 27: 21.2 -47: 23: 24.4 1.92 0.92 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 41 13: 27: 07.9 -47: 23: 35.3 3.28 0.42 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes
PN 99 13: 25: 51.0 -47: 23: 40.6 5.60 0.33 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 118 13: 26: 27.3 -47: 24: 00.2 17.34 0.20 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 67 13: 26: 41.3 -47: 24: 05.0 6.67 0.17 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes Yes
PN 79 13: 26: 12.8 -47: 24: 16.6 5.92 0.19 $\pm$ 0.04 No Yes
PN 110 13: 27: 12.1 -47: 24: 22.9 5.66 0.17 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 94 13: 27: 28.5 -47: 24: 25.2 4.86 0.23 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 126 13: 26: 37.0 -47: 24: 30.5 6.26 0.12 $\pm$ 0.03 No No
PN 59 13: 26: 31.4 -47: 24: 43.6 5.14 0.24 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes
PN 86 13: 27: 57.9 -47: 25: 12.0 6.47 0.29 $\pm$ 0.06 No Yes
PN 75 13: 25: 39.7 -47: 25: 23.4 6.02 0.35 $\pm$ 0.06 No Yes
PN 82 13: 27: 06.3 -47: 25: 37.8 7.52 0.17 $\pm$ 0.03 No Yes
PN 106 13: 25: 44.8 -47: 25: 54.7 7.58 0.31 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 6 13: 27: 29.4 -47: 25: 55.4 1.18 2.35 $\pm$ 0.11 Yes Yes
PN 146 13: 27: 39.3 -47: 25: 57.1 7.76 0.15 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 144 13: 27: 59.4 -47: 26: 09.5 7.58 0.22 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 26 13: 25: 55.9 -47: 26: 19.6 2.53 0.85 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 131 13: 25: 42.3 -47: 26: 36.1 9.30 0.25 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 105 13: 25: 51.3 -47: 26: 44.9 5.92 0.26 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 115 13: 26: 21.3 -47: 27: 08.2 4.93 0.14 $\pm$ 0.03 No No
PN 138 13: 25: 58.0 -47: 27: 32.0 6.95 0.16 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 135 13: 25: 32.6 -47: 27: 37.8 8.22 0.25 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 76 13: 26: 04.2 -47: 27: 41.6 7.24 0.15 $\pm$ 0.04 No Yes
PN 140 13: 27: 48.5 -47: 28: 01.0 47.60 0.20 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 102 13: 27: 17.0 -47: 28: 18.7 5.41 0.12 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes No
PN 136 13: 26: 00.8 -47: 28: 21.5 10.83 0.17 $\pm$ 0.04 No No



 
Table 2: Continued.
Instrument Source RA Dec Position Rate MOS1 MOS2
  ID h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ Error ( $^{\prime\prime}$)   detection detection
PN 47 13: 27: 14.5 -47: 28: 31.3 4.40 0.28 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes
PN 33 13: 25: 52.7 -47: 28: 55.4 3.11 0.71 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 98 13: 25: 57.3 -47: 28: 58.6 6.54 0.27 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 4 13: 26: 19.7 -47: 29: 11.5 0.78 3.42 $\pm$ 0.12 Yes Yes
PN 91 13: 26: 13.5 -47: 29: 13.5 6.09 0.21 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 62 13: 26: 01.0 -47: 29: 13.2 5.70 0.31 $\pm$ 0.05 No Yes
PN 51 13: 26: 06.2 -47: 29: 18.7 5.21 0.53 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 64 13: 28: 14.1 -47: 29: 24.0 5.99 0.92 $\pm$ 0.10 No No
PN 123 13: 25: 54.7 -47: 29: 32.9 11.31 0.20 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 78 13: 26: 07.9 -47: 29: 55.1 4.43 0.27 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 27 13: 25: 44.7 -47: 29: 58.5 3.42 0.67 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 107 13: 27: 16.1 -47: 29: 59.7 5.76 0.17 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 100 13: 27: 45.8 -47: 30: 00.8 7.85 0.17 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes No
PN 137 13: 26: 15.5 -47: 30: 15.1 47.94 0.13 $\pm$ 0.03 No No
PN 104 13: 26: 13.3 -47: 30: 19.8 5.20 0.18 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 84 13: 27: 40.0 -47: 30: 24.0 5.91 0.22 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes No
PN 109 13: 27: 48.5 -47: 30: 26.0 4.44 0.23 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 87 13: 26: 07.4 -47: 30: 26.8 5.88 0.25 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 117 13: 26: 23.5 -47: 30: 49.4 6.53 0.15 $\pm$ 0.03 No No
PN 124 13: 26: 10.2 -47: 31: 13.8 27.02 0.16 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 12 13: 27: 27.4 -47: 31: 33.7 2.14 0.93 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 121 13: 25: 50.9 -47: 31: 38.9 25.26 0.23 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 114 13: 27: 14.9 -47: 31: 50.0 5.49 0.15 $\pm$ 0.03 No No
PN 74 13: 27: 21.7 -47: 32: 07.3 7.32 0.15 $\pm$ 0.04 No Yes
PN 139 13: 26: 18.9 -47: 32: 07.2 15.62 0.28 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 8 13: 26: 25.1 -47: 32: 28.7 1.12 2.10 $\pm$ 0.10 Yes Yes
PN 11 13: 27: 11.9 -47: 32: 41.4 1.86 0.82 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 21 13: 25: 57.2 -47: 32: 51.6 2.34 0.86 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 116 13: 27: 23.0 -47: 33: 05.4 7.07 0.18 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 1 13: 26: 01.5 -47: 33: 07.4 0.69 6.94 $\pm$ 0.20 Yes Yes
PN 34 13: 27: 10.0 -47: 33: 21.8 3.34 0.36 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes
PN 14 13: 28: 09.1 -47: 33: 27.0 2.42 2.39 $\pm$ 0.16 Yes No
PN 130 13: 25: 58.9 -47: 33: 48.2 46.71 0.22 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 37 13: 25: 53.5 -47: 33: 49.3 3.58 0.62 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 90 13: 25: 41.3 -47: 33: 58.0 8.28 0.28 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes No
PN 25 13: 26: 11.5 -47: 34: 04.2 2.43 0.78 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 40 13: 26: 26.9 -47: 34: 09.1 3.88 0.33 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes
PN 22 13: 26: 13.6 -47: 34: 43.2 2.44 0.88 $\pm$ 0.08 Yes Yes
PN 30 13: 26: 27.4 -47: 34: 54.9 2.94 0.50 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes Yes
PN 23 13: 27: 12.7 -47: 34: 56.4 2.38 0.77 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 52 13: 26: 59.2 -47: 34: 59.0 3.58 0.31 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes
PN 93 13: 26: 10.8 -47: 35: 07.3 4.89 0.27 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 85 13: 27: 53.7 -47: 35: 07.6 6.17 0.28 $\pm$ 0.06 Yes No
PN 141 13: 27: 23.4 -47: 35: 22.2 8.37 0.16 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 120 13: 26: 13.0 -47: 35: 56.3 8.64 0.22 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 143 13: 25: 52.5 -47: 36: 12.2 6.88 0.19 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 46 13: 26: 23.8 -47: 36: 13.5 4.16 0.36 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes
PN 45 13: 26: 39.1 -47: 36: 33.5 3.76 0.33 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes Yes
PN 10 13: 26: 11.4 -47: 37: 11.3 1.35 2.51 $\pm$ 0.13 Yes Yes
PN 142 13: 26: 26.6 -47: 37: 12.7 9.22 0.17 $\pm$ 0.04 No No
PN 134 13: 27: 25.0 -47: 37: 15.1 11.10 0.21 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 113 13: 27: 00.3 -47: 37: 15.2 7.51 0.15 $\pm$ 0.04 No Yes
PN 81 13: 26: 36.4 -47: 37: 30.2 5.59 0.25 $\pm$ 0.05 Yes No



 
Table 2: Continued.
Instrument Source RA Dec Position Rate MOS1 MOS2
  ID h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ Error ( $^{\prime\prime}$)   detection detection
PN 128 13: 26: 24.1 -47: 37: 45.7 9.76 0.23 $\pm$ 0.05 No No
PN 19 13: 26: 07.4 -47: 38: 01.3 2.31 1.15 $\pm$ 0.10 Yes Yes
PN 69 13: 27: 33.4 -47: 38: 35.0 5.55 0.48 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes No
PN 58 13: 26: 32.4 -47: 38: 50.7 4.94 0.38 $\pm$ 0.06 No Yes
PN 83 13: 27: 22.5 -47: 39: 46.4 5.07 0.45 $\pm$ 0.07 No No
PN 53 13: 27: 01.2 -47: 40: 55.9 4.34 0.57 $\pm$ 0.07 Yes Yes
PN 66 13: 26: 57.9 -47: 41: 22.4 6.22 0.54 $\pm$ 0.07 No Yes
PN 125 13: 26: 33.1 -47: 41: 29.2 49.94 0.29 $\pm$ 0.06 No No
PN 112 13: 27: 03.3 -47: 42: 41.9 8.30 0.46 $\pm$ 0.07 No No
MOS 7 13: 25: 52.1 -47: 19: 09.5 0.91 2.30 $\pm$ 0.09 Yes Yes
MOS 63 13: 25: 40.6 -47: 22: 08.4 4.28 0.23 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes
MOS 48 13: 25: 34.5 -47: 25: 58.5 3.58 0.28 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes
MOS 13 13: 26: 20.4 -47: 30: 03.8 1.57 0.40 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes Yes
MOS 89 13: 26: 25.7 -47: 39: 04.5 4.63 0.12 $\pm$ 0.03 Yes Yes
MOS 55 13: 26: 10.4 -47: 39: 10.8 3.67 0.27 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes
MOS 71 13: 26: 10.6 -47: 40: 28.5 5.08 0.21 $\pm$ 0.04 Yes Yes



 

 
Table 3: The XMM-Newton sources correlated with the Chandra and ROSAT sources. The error on the Chandra position is given at the 90% confidence level, as provided by the wavdetect task. The ROSAT source numbers are taken from Johnston et al. (1994); Verbunt & Johnston (2000). The EINSTEIN sources are labeled as in Hertz & Grindlay (1983). The source list is declination sorted.
Source RA Dec Chandra Chandra Position Previous
ID     RA Dec error ( $^{\prime\prime}$) ID
  h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (RA/Dec)  
3 13: 27: 27.7 -47: 19: 08.8 ... ... ... 4,D
7 13: 25: 52.1 -47: 19: 09.5 ... ... ... 3,A
17 13: 26: 23.5 -47: 19: 27.9 13: 26: 23.5 -47: 19: 24.1 0.52/0.45 ...
28 13: 26: 46.3 -47: 19: 47.4 13: 26: 46.2 -47: 19: 45.9 0.68/0.39 18
31 13: 26: 38.5 -47: 20: 01.7 13: 26: 38.5 -47: 19: 58.3 0.68/0.48 ...
73 13: 26: 35.7 -47: 20: 57.4 13: 26: 35.2 -47: 20: 52.8 1.28/0.64 ...
68 13: 27: 10.2 -47: 21: 29.2 13: 27: 09.9 -47: 21: 27.7 0.78/0.47 ...
32 13: 26: 54.5 -47: 22: 04.7 13: 26: 54.5 -47: 22: 04.6 0.24/0.10 ...
15 13: 26: 41.5 -47: 22: 16.5 13: 26: 41.5 -47: 22: 16.3 0.52/0.31 ...
39 13: 26: 23.2 -47: 22: 52.7 13: 26: 23.1 -47: 22: 51.2 0.73/0.80 ...
18 13: 27: 21.2 -47: 23: 24.4 13: 27: 21.1 -47: 23: 24.5 0.63/0.38 19
41 13: 27: 07.9 -47: 23: 35.3 13: 27: 08.0 -47: 23: 33.6 0.65/0.39 ...
67 13: 26: 41.3 -47: 24: 05.0 13: 26: 41.2 -47: 24: 00.9 0.87/0.58 ...
79 13: 26: 12.8 -47: 24: 16.6 13: 26: 12.8 -47: 24: 13.6 0.79/0.59 ...
110 13: 27: 12.1 -47: 24: 22.9 13: 27: 12.4 -47: 24: 24.9 1.04/0.78 ...
94 13: 27: 28.5 -47: 24: 25.2 13: 27: 28.4 -47: 24: 22.2 0.89/0.58 ...
126 13: 26: 37.0 -47: 24: 30.5 13: 26: 37.3 -47: 24: 31.3 1.07/0.62 ...
59 13: 26: 31.4 -47: 24: 43.6 13: 26: 31.3 -47: 24: 39.4 0.62/0.53 ...
82 13: 27: 06.3 -47: 25: 37.8 13: 27: 06.4 -47: 25: 39.5 0.56/0.69 ...
6 13: 27: 29.4 -47: 25: 55.4 13: 27: 29.3 -47: 25: 54.8 0.28/0.15 6
49 13: 26: 28.7 -47: 26: 33.3 13: 26: 28.7 -47: 26: 27.3 0.64/0.23 ...
103 13: 26: 45.4 -47: 26: 53.6 13: 26: 45.4 -47: 26: 52.4 1.05/0.65 ...
44 13: 26: 52.6 -47: 27: 15.9 13: 26: 52.9 -47: 27: 15.7 1.17/0.52 ...
24 13: 26: 40.8 -47: 27: 38.6 13: 26: 40.5 -47: 27: 38.7 1.60/0.91 ...
61 13: 26: 52.5 -47: 27: 39.1 13: 26: 52.6 -47: 27: 38.5 1.01/0.50 ...
76 13: 26: 04.2 -47: 27: 41.6 13: 26: 04.4 -47: 27: 42.1 0.65/0.78 ...
47 13: 27: 14.5 -47: 28: 31.3 13: 27: 14.5 -47: 28: 28.8 1.01/0.77 ...
33 13: 25: 52.7 -47: 28: 55.4 ... ... ... 8
92 13: 26: 44.3 -47: 28: 57.4 13: 26: 44.3 -47: 28: 56.2 0.71/0.68 ...
5 13: 26: 53.5 -47: 29: 01.3 13: 26: 53.5 -47: 29: 00.8 0.16/0.07 9a,C
4 13: 26: 19.7 -47: 29: 11.5 13: 26: 19.7 -47: 29: 11.2 0.15/0.12 7,B
101 13: 26: 37.9 -47: 29: 11.3 13: 26: 38.0 -47: 29: 10.7 1.28/0.79 ...
51 13: 26: 06.2 -47: 29: 18.7 13: 26: 05.9 -47: 29: 22.3 0.70/0.74 ...
2 13: 26: 52.2 -47: 29: 36.1 13: 26: 52.2 -47: 29: 36.1 0.15/0.04 9b,C
72 13: 26: 34.5 -47: 29: 57.3 13: 26: 34.4 -47: 29: 55.8 0.20/0.18 ...
13 13: 26: 20.4 -47: 30: 03.8 13: 26: 20.4 -47: 30: 04.0 0.19/0.19 ...
137 13: 26: 15.5 -47: 30: 15.1 13: 26: 16.7 -47: 30: 56.3 1.42/0.52 ...
84 13: 27: 40.0 -47: 30: 24.0 13: 27: 39.6 -47: 30: 24.4 1.30/0.90 ...
60 13: 26: 34.2 -47: 30: 34.7 13: 26: 34.4 -47: 30: 34.5 0.46/0.33 ...
127 13: 27: 04.5 -47: 30: 38.2 13: 27: 04.6 -47: 30: 37.0 0.78/0.68 ...
117 13: 26: 23.5 -47: 30: 49.4 13: 26: 23.5 -47: 30: 44.2 0.70/0.59 ...
20 13: 26: 37.4 -47: 30: 52.9 13: 26: 37.4 -47: 30: 54.5 0.38/0.22 ...
38 13: 26: 55.0 -47: 31: 13.2 13: 26: 55.0 -47: 31: 13.7 0.59/0.28 ...
9 13: 26: 48.7 -47: 31: 26.2 13: 26: 48.8 -47: 31: 26.0 0.43/0.20 21
12 13: 27: 27.4 -47: 31: 33.7 13: 27: 27.4 -47: 31: 33.2 0.41/0.43 ...
121 13: 25: 50.9 -47: 31: 38.9 13: 25: 48.9 -47: 31: 27.4 0.66/0.66 ...
108 13: 26: 46.6 -47: 31: 40.5 13: 26: 46.5 -47: 31: 44.4 1.25/0.70 ...
36 13: 26: 50.8 -47: 31: 47.5 13: 26: 51.1 -47: 31: 45.8 0.27/0.28 ...
114 13: 27: 14.9 -47: 31: 50.0 13: 27: 14.7 -47: 31: 49.6 1.09/0.46 ...
74 13: 27: 21.7 -47: 32: 07.3 13: 27: 21.5 -47: 32: 05.9 1.20/0.40 ...
35 13: 26: 49.6 -47: 31: 53.2 13: 26: 49.5 -47: 31: 47.8 1.22/0.46 ...
57 13: 26: 49.6 -47: 32: 13.4 13: 26: 49.5 -47: 32: 13.6 0.43/0.15 ...



 
Table 3: Continued.
Source RA Dec Chandra Chandra Position Previous
ID     RA Dec error ( $^{\prime\prime}$) ID
  h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ h m s $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (RA/Dec)  
8 13: 26: 25.1 -47: 32: 28.7 13: 26: 25.1 -47: 32: 28.3 0.229/0.20 10
16 13: 26: 43.9 -47: 32: 31.0 13: 26: 44.1 -47: 32: 32.3 0.315/0.23 ...
11 13: 27: 11.9 -47: 32: 41.4 13: 27: 11.7 -47: 32: 41.6 0.249/0.22 ...
21 13: 25: 57.2 -47: 32: 51.6 13: 25: 57.2 -47: 32: 50.8 0.373/0.38 ...
1 13: 26: 01.5 -47: 33: 07.4 13: 26: 01.5 -47: 33: 06.3 0.164/0.15 11
34 13: 27: 10.0 -47: 33: 21.8 13: 27: 10.0 -47: 33: 21.8 0.568/0.34 ...
14 13: 28: 09.1 -47: 33: 27.0 ... ... ... 12
25 13: 26: 11.5 -47: 34: 04.2 13: 26: 11.5 -47: 34: 03.4 0.401/0.34 ...
40 13: 26: 26.9 -47: 34: 09.1 13: 26: 26.7 -47: 34: 09.5 0.794/0.45 ...
22 13: 26: 13.6 -47: 34: 43.2 13: 26: 13.6 -47: 34: 41.5 0.561/0.44 ...
30 13: 26: 27.4 -47: 34: 54.9 13: 26: 27.6 -47: 34: 56.9 0.361/0.29 ...
23 13: 27: 12.7 -47: 34: 56.4 13: 27: 12.9 -47: 34: 57.1 0.324/0.19 ...
52 13: 26: 59.2 -47: 34: 59.0 13: 26: 59.3 -47: 34: 58.2 0.744/0.48 ...
45 13: 26: 39.1 -47: 36: 33.5 13: 26: 39.2 -47: 36: 32.3 0.727/0.46 ...
10 13: 26: 11.4 -47: 37: 11.3 ... ... ... 13
113 13: 27: 00.3 -47: 37: 15.2 13: 27: 00.4 -47: 37: 15.2 0.998/0.64 ...


Note - We have indicated in this table only the sources correlated with other X-ray observations. There are three OGLEGC sources which are associated with X-ray sources (OGLEGC 15 and 22 with two Chandra sources, OGLEGC 30 with XMM-Newton source 29). Their positions from Kaluzny et al. (1996) are:
OGLEGC15 13h 26m 47.42s -47 $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ 36$^\prime$ 00.4 $^{\prime\prime}$
OGLEGC22 13h 26m 08.33s -47 $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ 30$^\prime$ 33.0 $^{\prime\prime}$
OGLEGC30 13h 26m 53.33s -47 $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$ 18$^\prime$ 22.9 $^{\prime\prime}$.



 

 
Table 5: Best fit spectral parameters for the brightest sources of the field of view. We have selected those sources which have more than 100 net counts in EPIC-PN and limited our analysis to the 16 sources within twice the half mass radius. Simple models have been used: Power Law (PL), Blackbody (BB), Thermal Bremsstrahlung (TB). For source 3, which has an optical counterpart (Cool et al. 1995), we used a two temperature Raymond-Smith model (2T). The model parameters are either the photon index or the temperature in keV. Whenever allowed by the statistics, we left the $N_{\rm H}$ as a free parameter of the fit. Otherwise it was frozen at the optical value ( $8.4\times 10^{20}$ cm-2). We used either the $\chi ^{\scriptscriptstyle 2}$ or Cash statistics in the fit. The bolometric luminosity is computed between 0.5 and 10 keV and is given in units of 1031 ergs s-1.

Source
Best fit $N_{\rm H}$ Model $\chi^{\scriptscriptstyle 2}_{\scriptscriptstyle \nu}$ Degree of Bolometric
ID model (1020 cm-2) parameter   freedom luminosity
1 BB $62^{\scriptscriptstyle +21}_{\scriptscriptstyle -21}$ $1.2^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.1}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.1}$ 1.08 55 191 $\pm$ 7
  TB $167^{\scriptscriptstyle +31}_{\scriptscriptstyle -31}$ $10.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +11.1}_{\scriptscriptstyle -4.0}$ 1.00 55 302 $\pm$ 11
  PL $183^{\scriptscriptstyle +35}_{\scriptscriptstyle -35}$ $1.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.3}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.3}$ 1.03 55 339 $\pm$ 12
             
2 TB (8.4) $23.0^{\scriptscriptstyle +29.9}_{\scriptscriptstyle -10.1}$ 0.72 31 67 $\pm$ 3
  PL (8.4) $1.4^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.2}$ 0.68 31 72 $\pm$ 3
             
3 2T $30^{\scriptscriptstyle +11}_{\scriptscriptstyle -17}$ $0.2^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.1}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.1}$ 1.08 28 136 $\pm$ 7
      $0.9^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.1}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.2}$      
5 TB (8.4) $18.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +65.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -10.0}$ 0.78 17 27 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $1.4^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.2}$ 0.80 31 30 $\pm$ 2
             
6 TB (8.4) $4.5^{\scriptscriptstyle +4.7}_{\scriptscriptstyle -1.9}$ 0.83 17 27 $\pm$ 3
  PL (8.4) $1.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.3}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.3}$ 0.81 17 32 $\pm$ 3
             
8 TB (8.4) $5.8^{\scriptscriptstyle +7.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -2.5}$ 0.98 19 28 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $1.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.3}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.3}$ 0.81 19 32 $\pm$ 3
             
9 TB $21^{\scriptscriptstyle +16}_{\scriptscriptstyle -16}$ $4.4^{\scriptscriptstyle +6.3}_{\scriptscriptstyle -2.1}$ 0.58 10 23 $\pm$ 3
  TB (8.4) $8.3^{\scriptscriptstyle +17.0}_{\scriptscriptstyle -3.9}$ 0.79 11 23 $\pm$ 3
  PL $31^{\scriptscriptstyle +24}_{\scriptscriptstyle -13}$ 2.0 $\pm$ 0.6 0.51 10 29 $\pm$ 4
  PL (8.4) $1.5^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.2}$ 0.96 11 29 $\pm$ 4
             
12 BB (8.4) $0.3^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.1}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.1}$ 1.54 9 5 $\pm$ 1
  TB (8.4) $1.2^{\scriptscriptstyle +1.7}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.6}$ 1.22 9 7 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $2.4^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.6}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.6}$ 1.10 9 9 $\pm$ 2
             
15 PL (8.4) $1.0^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.5}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.5}$ 0.42 6 21 $\pm$ 4
             
18 TB (8.4) $3.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +11.0}_{\scriptscriptstyle -2.1}$ 1.12 5 10 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $1.8^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.5}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.5}$ 1.01 5 12 $\pm$ 2
Source Best fit $N_{\rm H}$ Model C statistic Number of Bolometric
ID model (1020 cm-2) parameter   PHA bins luminosity
11 TB (8.4) $3.2^{\scriptscriptstyle +7.7}_{\scriptscriptstyle -3.2}$ C 8.29 11 8 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $1.9^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.7}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.7}$ C 8.96 11 10 $\pm$ 2
             
13 PL (8.4) $0.9^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.3}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.3}$ C 1.16 8 33 $\pm$ 5
             
20 BB (8.4) $0.6^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.2}$ C 16.37 11 6 $\pm$ 2
  TB $52^{\scriptscriptstyle +70}_{\scriptscriptstyle -40}$ $2.0^{\scriptscriptstyle +4.2}_{\scriptscriptstyle -1.3}$ C 16.70 11 9 $\pm$ 2
             
22 PL (8.4) $1.6^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.4}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.4}$ C 9.18 11 12 $\pm$ 2
             
23 TB (8.4) $0.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +1.1}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.4}$ C 12.58 10 5 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $2.8^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.9}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.9}$ C 12.77 10 6 $\pm$ 2
             
24, high state PL (8.4) $1.2^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.4}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.4}$ C 16.2 14 18 $\pm$ 2
low state PL (8.4) $1.7^{\scriptscriptstyle +1.4}_{\scriptscriptstyle -1.4}$ C 10.2 11 4 $\pm$ 2
             
25 TB (8.4) $1.4^{\scriptscriptstyle +5.6}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.8}$ C 2.50 5 6 $\pm$ 2
  PL (8.4) $2.2^{\scriptscriptstyle +0.8}_{\scriptscriptstyle -0.8}$ C 1.81 5 8 $\pm$ 2



next previous
Up: An XMM-Newton observation of Centauri

Copyright ESO 2003