The effective nuclear radius measurements derived here range from
,
and the upper limits derived span the range
(for an assumed albedo of 0.04). These values are typical for Jupiter-family comets.
The quoted errors for these values, as listed in Tables 2
and 3, are due to the photometry alone.
![]() |
Figure 4: Nuclear radius as a function of the assumed albedo for the unresolved comets of Sect. 3.2. The filled circles highlight the position of each of the unresolved comets on their respective radius/albedo curves for our adopted albedos. The region between the two vertical dashed lines represents the optimal range of assumed albedos, as the bulk of measured albedos reside within this region. The radius/albedo curves have been separated into two separate graphs for reasons of clarity. References: [a] A'Hearn et al. (1989), [b] Millis et al. (1988), [c] Campins et al. (1987), [d] Soderblom et al. (2002), [e] Keller et al. (1987), [f] Lamy et al. (2002), [g] Fernández et al. (2000), [h] Bus et al. (1989), [i] Cruikshank & Brown (1983). |
Following the discussion in Paper II, we have illustrated in Fig. 4 how the derived radius values vary as a function of the assumed albedo, for the unresolved comets. Filled circles highlight the position of each of the unresolved comets on their respective radius/albedo curves for the adopted albedos. Note that comets 2P/Encke and 49P/Arend-Rigaux have previously measured albedos of 0.05 (Fernández et al. 2000) and 0.03 (Millis et al. 1988) respectively.
Listed in Cols. 3 and 4 of Tables 2 and 3
are effective nuclear radii upper limits for the undetected and active comets
respectively (for assumed albedos of 0.04 and 0.02).
Upper limits based on the minimum measured albedo of 0.02
(A'Hearn et al. 1989) may be regarded as firm.
Even if one applies a maximum axis ratio of 2.6 (Meech et al. 1993)
and a minimum albedo of 0.02 to the undetected comets, their semi-major axes are all
constrained to be below 8.7 km. The uncertainty in the assumed phase
coefficient of
mag/degree
(as introduced in Sect. 3.1), will lead to an additional
uncertainty of no greater than 0.2 km for the derived nuclear radii values and
upper limits.
As with Papers I and II it is always appropriate to compare radius measurements and/or upper limits of those comets for which previous estimates exist. Such a comparison may allow additional constraints to be placed on nuclear axial ratios. With additional assumptions, this can lead to an estimate of the fractional active surface area present during previous apparitions. Table 5 lists those comets with previous nuclear radius measurements and upper limits derived from photometry, and lower limits derived from the amount of active area required to produce the measured OH production rates listed in A'Hearn et al. (1995).
Each of the 3
upper limits obtained from this work are consistent with
the previous measurements, with the exception of 137P/Shoemaker-Levy 2.
Licandro et al. (2000) observed this comet at a heliocentric
distance of 4.24 AU (post-perihelion). The comet appeared stellar on this
occasion and had a mean absolute V band magnitude of 14.5, which corresponds to a
mean radius of 4.2 km for an assumed albedo of 0.04.
A variation of 0.4 magnitudes was observed, which corresponds to a projected
axial ratio of 1.5. Our 3
upper limit of 3.4 km (also assuming
)
is still significantly lower than this previous estimate even if
one considers the lightcurve indicated by Licandro et al.
If we assume a typical (V-R) colour index of
for the nucleus
(Mueller 1992; Jewitt & Meech 1988;
Boehnhardt et al. 1999; Licandro et al. 2000), then
the absolute R band magnitude 3
lower limit of 14.42 derived here
increases
to
mag, which in turn implies a new axial ratio lower limit of
.
Considering that this comet had an observable coma during these
observations, it is inevitable that this lower limit will increase further.
In contrast to the case of 137P/Shoemaker-Levy 2, the nuclear radii
measurements for comets 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakova and
97P/Metcalf-Brewington are somewhat larger than the previous measurements.
Considering 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakova first, Lamy et al. (1999)
presents a mean radius value of 0.34 km based on a mean apparent R band
magnitude of 19.34 measured with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST).
The apparent R band magnitude ranged from approximately
19.30 to 19.43 throughout the two nights of observation. The corresponding
absolute R magnitude range is 19.98 to 20.25 for an assumed phase coefficient of
0.035 mag/degree (in order to be consistent with the measurements presented in this
paper). The axial ratio for this comet must therefore be at least 1.3.
Table 3 lists an apparent R band magnitude of
,
which corresponds to an absolute R magnitude value of
.
The absolute R magnitude 3
lower limit is therefore
19.06, and after subtraction from the Lamy et al. value of 20.25, provides a new
lower limit to
of 1.19, which in turn implies a new axial ratio lower
limit of
3.0. Some aspects of this result should be considered before it
can be considered reliable. If this comet possessed an unresolved dust coma, then
the nuclear absolute R magnitude 3
lower limit would be greater than 19.06. This
would then lower the
value to yield a smaller axial ratio lower
limit than the value presented here. However, it is reiterated
that this comet was observed at a heliocentric distance of 5.14 AU where the
sublimation of surface volatiles, particularly H2O, is usually low. Also,
Lamy et al. (1999) measured an extremely small
value of
3.7 cm at a heliocentric distance of just 0.96-0.97 AU. Furthermore,
A'Hearn et al. (1995) measured a similar
value of 3.5 cm when the comet was only 1.15 AU from the sun
(see Table 6). Hence it is highly probable
that the dust production levels were negligible during our
observations when the comet was over 5 AU from the sun. This value of
3.0, if confirmed, sets a new limit to the amount of elongation that
can be expected for cometary nuclei. The largest previously-measured projected
axial ratio was
2.6 (Meech et al. 1993).
For 97P/Metcalf-Brewington, the radius value of
km
derived here for an assumed albedo of 0.04 is significantly larger than the
value of 1.4 km presented in Licandro et al. (2000)
(also for an assumed albedo of 0.04). The comet appeared stellar and was at a
post-perihelion heliocentric distance of 3.67 AU. A mean absolute V band
magnitude of 16.9 was measured, with a peak-to peak amplitude of 0.7.
A
value of 0.7 implies an above average projected
axial ratio of
1.91. Based on this result, the possible range of
effective radius values is therefore 1.18-1.63 km. Our value of
km is actually consistent with this range at the 2
level.
49P/Arend-Rigaux was observed at an outbound heliocentric distance of 3.34 AU.
These observations were performed just over five months after the December
1998 observations that were obtained using the 4.2 m WHT (Paper II).
It is apparent that the transition region from an outgassing state to one of
complete inactivity may occur somewhere within the 2.1-3.3 AU zone. Of-course,
heliocentric lightcurves of comets tend to be asymmetric, hence
this finding only applies to the outbound leg of its orbit.
The radius measurement derived here of
,
for an assumed albedo of
0.03 (Millis et al. 1988), represents the bare nucleus value,
and is completely consistent with previous values that span the range
3.8-6.8 km (see Paper II and references therein).
The case of comet 43P/Wolf-Harrington is interesting in the sense that each
of the previous measurements are similar to the value derived here of
km. The previous measurements are
km (Paper II), and
2.9 km (Licandro et al. 2000). Similar effective radii
measurements and upper limits implies either the nucleus may be approximately
spherical, or that the measurements were performed at similar points in the
rotational lightcurve (excluding the Licandro et al. measurement).
The only clue towards an elongated
nucleus would be the fact that the Licandro et al. measurement was performed
when the comet was highly active. The 2.9 km upper limit will undoubtedly be a
significant overestimation of the effective radius, therefore the actual
effective radius would not be consistent (at the 3
level)
with our value.
Comet | ![]() |
Previous values![]() |
Ref. |
2P/Encke |
![]() |
0.25-5 | 1 |
![]() |
2 | ||
19P/Borrelly (Night 4) |
![]() |
4.4![]() |
3 |
![]() |
2 | ||
43P/Wolf-Harrington |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
4,5 |
![]() |
2 | ||
44P/Reinmuth 2 | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
6,7 |
45P/H-M-P |
![]() |
0.34 | 8 |
![]() |
2 | ||
46P/Wirtanen | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
9,10 |
![]() |
2 | ||
47P/Ashbrook-Jackson | ![]() ![]() |
3.0 | 5 |
49P/Arend-Rigaux |
![]() |
3.8-6.8 | 11 |
64P/Swift-Gehrels | ![]() ![]() |
1.5 | 5 |
67P/C-G | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
12 |
69P/Taylor | ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
2 | ||
97P/Metcalf-Brewington |
![]() |
1.4 | 5 |
![]() |
2 | ||
103P/Hartley 2 | ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
5,13,14 |
![]() |
2 | ||
137P/Shoemaker-Levy 2 | ![]() ![]() |
4.2 | 5 |
rN is the nuclear radius, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Several of the targets from this particular observing run are
possible or established targets of current and future spacecraft missions. Such
targets include 2P/Encke, 19P/Borrelly, and 46P/Wirtanen. Comet 2P/Encke
was one of the possible three or more targets of the recently failed
Comet Nucleus Tour (CONTOUR). This comet has been studied extensively in the
past with a range of nuclear radius values being published
(see Fernández et al. 2000 and references therein). The
effective radius value derived here of
km
falls within the total range of previous values (i.e. 0.25-5.00 km).
As with 49P/Arend-Rigaux, this comet is one of the few to have its nuclear
albedo measured. Using simultaneous visible and infrared observations,
Fernández et al. (2000) measured an albedo of
and an effective radius of
km.
If we consider the observed rotational lightcurve from Fernández et al.
(2000) then we can argue that our photometry is consistent with
their measurements. In other words, our observations may have taken
place near the peak of the rotational lightcurve.
Comet 19P/Borrelly was observed previously with the HST in November 1994
(Lamy et al. 1998). By assuming an albedo of 0.04 and that the
rotational axis is pointing in the direction determined by Sekanina
(1979), the semi-axis were shown to be
km
and
km. A rotational period of
hours was also
found. Recently, this comet was the flyby target of the
Deep Space 1 mission, the encounter occurring on September 22, 2001.
Imaging by the spacecraft resolved the nucleus and revealed an average
geometric albedo of
(Soderblom et al. 2002).
We observed this comet with the JKT on two separate nights. The
observations were separated in time by 48 hours, and on both
occasions an effective radius of
was found.
The comet was therefore observed on both nights near the same point in the
rotational lightcurve (i.e. at the brightness minimum in this case).
This acts as independent support for the above rotation period
at the 2
confidence level. It is also apparent that the rotational
state has remained virtually unchanged since the HST observations, despite
prolonged outgassing during this period.
Comet 46P/Wirtanen is the target of the upcoming ROSETTA comet orbiter mission,
scheduled for launch in January 2003. Previous observations show this cometary
nucleus to be an extremely small object with a radius of 0.6-0.7 km
(Lamy et al. 1998; Möhlmann 1999). An effective
radius upper limit of
2.6 km was found, which is consistent with the
previous work.
Brightness profile analysis revealed coma activity for only 4 of the 25
targeted comets. The
values obtained for these
active comets range from 5.6 cm
cm, whereas
the
upper limits obtained for the undetected and unresolved comets
range from 0.7 cm
cm.
The complete range of
values and upper limits observed on this occasion
is rather small relative to that observed in Papers I
and II. Poor seeing may explain why a large fraction of the
detected comets appeared stellar, but from the observed range of
values
(which are a measure of the actual dust production levels) it would appear that the reduced levels of
distant activity are real and not an artifact of instrumental or atmospheric
limitations.
Comet | ![]() |
![]() |
Previous ![]() |
![]() |
Ref. |
value [cm] | |||||
2P/Encke | ![]() ![]() |
3.93I | 28.84 | 0.86P | 1 |
19P/Borrelly | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5.36I | 645.7 | 1.38P | 1 |
43P/W-H | ![]() ![]() |
4.46O | 134.9 | 1.82I | 1 |
![]() ![]() |
4.87I | 2 | |||
44P/Reinmuth 2 | ![]() ![]() |
4.26I | ![]() ![]() |
4.73I | 3 |
45P/H-M-P | ![]() ![]() |
5.14I | 3.5 | 1.15I | 1 |
46P/Wirtanen | ![]() ![]() |
5.02O | 112.2 | 1.12O | 1 |
49P/Arend-Rigaux | ![]() ![]() |
3.34O | 107.2 | 1.56O | 1 |
![]() ![]() |
2.11O | 3 | |||
67P/C-G | ![]() ![]() |
5.72A | 208.9 | 1.38O | 1 |
69P/Taylor |
![]() |
4.03O | ![]() ![]() |
4.89I | 2 |
97P/M-B | ![]() ![]() |
4.76I | 275.4 | 1.61O | 1 |
103P/Hartley 2 |
![]() |
4.57O | 245.5 | 1.04O | 1 |
![]() |
3.63O | 3 |
Table 6 compares the present
values with
those listed in Paper I, Paper II, and
A'Hearn et al. (1995) derived at different heliocentric distances. Note that
the A'Hearn et al. measurements were performed when the comets were
at heliocentric distances
,
whereas the previous measurements
from Papers I and II were performed when the comets were
at heliocentric distances
3.63 AU (with the exception of comet
49P/Arend-Rigaux). For comets 19P, 43P, 46P, 49P, 67P, 97P, and 103P the
present
values or upper limits are very much less than the A'Hearn et al.
measurements, which is expected when one considers the difference in heliocentric distance.
None of the comets listed in Table 6 are obvious
candidates for continuous sublimation throughout their orbits, but it is
strongly suspected that several are inactive during aphelion. Such comets
include 19P, 44P, 45P, and 97P. This conclusion is based on the comets displaying
either, a) similar
values at widely different
heliocentric distances, indicating an inert body with a constant scattering
cross-section (i.e. comet 45P), b) small
upper limits at large
heliocentric distances (i.e. comet 44P), or c) small
upper limits at large heliocentric distances coupled with a rapid rate
of change of dust production with heliocentric distance (i.e. comets 19P and 97P).
Each of these four comets are detectable at large heliocentric distances, and given
that they are almost certainly inactive during aphelion, they are excellent
candidates for photometric studies of nuclear properties.
For comets 43P, 46P, 67P, 69P, and 103P, the level of activity during aphelion
remains uncertain, although their
values or upper limits remain small
at large heliocentric distances.
Multi-filter photometry was performed on a total of 6 comets (see Table 4). Where possible, both (V-R) and (R-I) colour indices
were obtained, but for others such as 19P/Borrelly and 103P/Hartley 2, only
V and R band photometry was performed. The photometric errors associated with
the bulk of these colour measurements are large, due to either low signal to
noise and/or the limited accuracy that can be achieved through the photometric
calibration of non-photometric data. Each of the active comets listed in Table 4 have colour indices consistent with the solar values
at the 1
confidence level.
The solar (V-R) and (R-I) colours, as transformed onto the photometric system
used here, are 0.36 and 0.28 respectively (Allen 1973; Fernie 1983).
For comet 14P/Wolf, the (R-I) colour index is similar to the solar value, but
the (V-R) value is rather small, indicating a blue colour at shorter
wavelengths. Such a small (V-R) colour index could be explained by a lack of
substantial mantle coverage, which acts to redden the surface.
In the case of comet 49P/Arend-Rigaux, good seeing, combined
with relatively high signal to noise resulted in reduced error bars. The
(V-R) and (R-I) colours are
and
respectively,
which are significantly redder than the solar values. Given that this comet was certainly
inactive on this occasion, it is clear that these colours represent the
actual colours of the nuclear surface. In-phase optical and infrared rotational
lightcurves have been observed for this comet (Millis et al. 1988), indicating
a uniform surface composition. Hence, the (V-R) and (R-I) colour indices
derived here should be unaffected by rotation. These colours are comparable to
some TNOs (Green et al. 1997; Barucci et al. 2000),
which are among the reddest known objects in the solar system.
49P/Arend-Rigaux has been studied extensively during past apparitions at
visible and infrared wavelengths (see Paper II and references therein),
and in each case the nucleus or dust coma was red in nature.
Luu (1993) presents a nuclear spectrum of 49P/Arend-Rigaux
at optical wavelengths and is also consistent with a
"Type 2" rubble mantle. We therefore conclude that there has been no significant
change in the nature of the mantle coverage since the previous investigations,
despite recent periods of low activity (Paper II).
Copyright ESO 2003