In an earlier investigation, based on
smaller samples of high-redshift galaxies, we noticed an
apparent anticorrelation between redshift and the strength of
the C IV 1550 Å doublet (Mehlert et al. 2001, 2002).
According to Walborn et al. (1995)
high-excitation lines like C IV and Si IV are produced mostly in stellar
photospheres and winds and their strengths depend sensitively on the stellar
metallicity. Although in a few cases a non-negligible (50%)
contamination of
the C IV and Si IV features by interstellar absorption could not be excluded,
Heckman et al. (1998) find for their sample of 45 nearby starburst
galaxies that the C IV and Si IV absorption
is normally produced by photospheric and stellar wind lines of the
unresolved stars. We found further evidence for a close relation
between the strength of these resonance lines
and the metallicity of the observed starburst galaxies
by measuring the equivalent widths
of the C IV 1550 Å and Si IV 1398 Å doublets
in synthetic spectra of starburst galaxies with different
metallicities taken from Leitherer et al. (2001)
(see Fig. 2). According to Fig. 2
for ages
10 Myr the measured equivalent widths
depend strongly on the metallicity but are almost independent
of the age of the starburst.
Therefore, we measured for those galaxies with
reliable spectroscopic redshifts z>1.35 (i.e. galaxies where
the C IV doublet was redshifted into our observed spectral range)
the rest-frame equivalent widths W0 of this feature, which is defined by
![]() |
(1) |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Measured C IV (a) and Si IV (b) equivalent width of the
synthetic spectra of Leitherer et al. (2001) as a function of the starburst
age.
The model spectra are based on continuous star formation (1 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For objects with z>1.7, where in addition the Si IV doublet
(
Å) became
visible, we also measured W0(Si IV) with the same bandwidth and
continuum window
definitions as for C IV.
The same measurements were also carried out in the IUE spectra of the
comparison sample of
starburst galaxies.
Statistical mean errors of the individual W0
measurements were calculated from the S/N of the individual spectra
and the errors of the continuum fits (
10%). Equivalent width
measurements in the spectra of faint objects can be affected severely
by errors in the sky background subtraction. Therefore, during the reduction of
our FORS spectra a particular effort was made to keep these errors low.
Various tests showed that for all FORS spectra used in this study the
errors in determining the continuum level remained below
5% (see Noll et al. 2002). Hence, systematic errors in the measured
equivalent widths due to an incorrect sky subtraction are
well below the statistical errors in most cases.
Another source of systematic errors in our W0 measurements is our low spectral resolution, which in most cases did not allow us to resolve the line profiles. However, since equivalent widths measurements of strong isolated lines are in principle independent of the spectral resolution and since all our conclusions are based on differences between measurements carried out with the same procedure in spectra of the same resolution, these systematic errors are expected to cancel out and therefore are not expected to affect the results of this paper significantly. On the other hand, since the C IV doublet is not a truly isolated feature, our numerical results for the equivalent widths should not be directly compared to results obtained from spectra with a different spectral resolution.
The results of our
measurements
are listed in Table 1 and plotted
in Fig. 3. In order to avoid a crowding
of data points at
,
we plotted
for the local (IUE) starburst galaxies only the average value and indicate
the
scatter of the individual values by a bar.
For the high-redshift galaxies the individual
data points and their mean errors are given.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Measured C IV ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No. | z | I |
![]() |
d
![]() |
![]() |
d
![]() |
MB |
[mag] | [Å] | [Å] | [Å] | [Å] | [mag] | ||
FDF-1208 | 2.18 | 23.68 | 3.92 | 0.41 | 3.31 | 0.44 | -22.45 |
FDF-1331 | 3.39 | 23.89 | 1.80 | 0.90 | - | - | -23.30 |
FDF-1555 | 3.26 | 23.88 | 1.16 | 0.74 | 1.29 | 0.69 | -22.36 |
FDF-1578 | 2.71 | 24.25 | 3.545 | 0.90 | 2.97 | 0.81 | -21.98 |
FDF-1691 | 2.34 | 23.89 | 3.65 | 0.57 | 4.30 | 0.60 | -21.53 |
FDF-1709 | 1.67 | 24.33 | 6.07 | 0.75 | - | - | -20.46 |
FDF-1744 | 2.37 | 24.10 | 2.34 | 0.58 | 4.27 | 0.56 | -22.21 |
FDF-1922 | 1.83 | 23.36 | 3.62 | 0.28 | 0.95 | 0.38 | -21.64 |
FDF-2033 | 2.75 | 24.08 | 5.51 | 0.65 | 4.05 | 0.52 | -21.62 |
FDF-2274 | 2.25 | 23.34 | 1.62 | 0.31 | 2.66 | 0.33 | -21.66 |
FDF-2418 | 2.33 | 23.16 | 6.57 | 0.47 | 6.36 | 0.46 | -23.19 |
FDF-2495 | 2.45 | 23.31 | 3.98 | 0.32 | 3.24 | 0.32 | -22.32 |
FDF-2636 | 2.25 | 23.43 | 5.21 | 0.63 | 6.41 | 0.70 | -22.77 |
FDF-3005 | 2.25 | 23.51 | 6.95 | 0.38 | 8.18 | 0.43 | -22.63 |
FDF-3163 | 2.44 | 23.35 | 4.80 | 0.33 | 5.45 | 0.33 | -22.97 |
FDF-3173 | 3.27 | 23.91 | 2.59 | 0.48 | 4.24 | 0.44 | -22.51 |
FDF-3300 | 2.37 | 23.91 | 2.14 | 0.42 | 2.16 | 0.41 | -21.79 |
FDF-3374 | 2.38 | 23.34 | 5.05 | 0.30 | 5.21 | 0.27 | -22.65 |
FDF-3810 | 2.37 | 22.67 | 4.95 | 0.25 | 5.59 | 0.26 | -23.18 |
FDF-3874 | 2.48 | 23.30 | 2.66 | 0.43 | 3.83 | 0.43 | -23.15 |
FDF-3875 | 2.24 | 24.53 | 4.19 | 0.51 | 3.38 | 0.52 | -20.73 |
FDF-3958 | 2.13 | 23.87 | 4.40 | 0.53 | 1.43 | 0.57 | -20.98 |
FDF-3999 | 3.39 | 24.00 | 3.74 | 0.65 | 7.89 | 0.56 | -22.70 |
FDF-4049 | 1.48 | 23.00 | 4.42 | 0.53 | - | - | -21.76 |
FDF-4795 | 2.16 | 23.31 | 5.80 | 0.36 | 5.93 | 0.39 | -22.35 |
FDF-4871 | 2.47 | 23.39 | 7.14 | 0.35 | 6.05 | 0.34 | -22.62 |
FDF-4996 | 2.03 | 23.25 | 3.35 | 0.37 | 1.19 | 0.44 | -21.77 |
FDF-5058 | 2.03 | 23.34 | 4.82 | 0.25 | 3.40 | 0.27 | -21.57 |
FDF-5072 | 1.39 | 22.45 | 3.27 | 0.57 | - | - | -21.88 |
FDF-5135 | 2.34 | 23.62 | 2.31 | 0.71 | 1.99 | 0.77 | -22.73 |
FDF-5152 | 1.37 | 22.65 | 3.91 | 0.50 | - | - | -21.55 |
FDF-5165 | 2.35 | 23.26 | 5.73 | 0.55 | 6.02 | 0.53 | -23.02 |
FDF-5190 | 2.35 | 24.39 | 2.73 | 0.68 | 2.65 | 0.64 | -22.74 |
FDF-5215 | 3.15 | 22.98 | 2.54 | 0.47 | 2.45 | 0.40 | -23.18 |
FDF-5227 | 2.40 | 23.85 | 4.73 | 0.72 | 2.02 | 0.79 | -21.79 |
FDF-5504 | 3.38 | 23.63 | 3.29 | 1.00 | 7.19 | 0.73 | -23.65 |
FDF-5550 | 3.38 | 23.12 | 2.44 | 0.41 | 5.23 | 0.31 | -23.23 |
FDF-5903 | 2.77 | 22.33 | 4.02 | 0.21 | 4.32 | 0.16 | -23.23 |
FDF-6024 | 2.37 | 22.00 | 4.93 | 0.20 | 5.71 | 0.19 | -23.34 |
FDF-6063 | 3.40 | 22.56 | 1.36 | 0.49 | 4.24 | 0.42 | -23.35 |
FDF-6069 | 2.68 | 24.22 | 5.36 | 0.81 | 3.45 | 0.70 | -21.74 |
FDF-6287 | 2.68 | 24.11 | 1.61 | 0.82 | - | - | -22.04 |
FDF-6372 | 2.35 | 23.38 | 3.20 | 0.37 | 3.43 | 0.35 | -22.18 |
FDF-6407 | 2.16 | 23.59 | 5.29 | 0.59 | 4.26 | 0.72 | -22.31 |
FDF-6864 | 1.39 | 23.41 | 4.93 | 0.71 | - | - | -20.87 |
FDF-6934 | 2.44 | 22.90 | 4.71 | 0.56 | 3.01 | 0.60 | -23.05 |
FDF-6947 | 2.36 | 23.83 | 5.91 | 0.42 | 4.90 | 0.45 | -21.94 |
FDF-7029 | 2.37 | 23.63 | 6.88 | 0.42 | 5.82 | 0.42 | -23.07 |
FDF-7307 | 2.44 | 24.07 | 2.51 | 0.60 | 3.05 | 0.62 | -21.20 |
FDF-7342 | 2.37 | 23.80 | 6.13 | 0.76 | 4.58 | 0.75 | -22.06 |
FDF-7539 | 3.29 | 23.51 | 1.92 | 0.46 | 4.22 | 0.41 | -22.41 |
ES0657-A | 2.34 | 24.50 | 5.88 | 0.48 | 3.98 | 0.45 | - |
ES0657-C | 3.08 | 24.89 | 2.30 | 1.00 | 7.07 | 0.62 | - |
ES0657-J | 2.61 | 22.98 | 3.81 | 0.42 | 2.41 | 0.26 | - |
ES0657-Core | 3.24 | 24.31 | 2.01 | 0.63 | 3.45 | 0.53 | - |
HDFS-047 | 2.79 | - | 2.50 | 0.30 | 4.40 | 0.17 | - |
AXAF-028 | 3.13 | - | 2.84 | 1.00 | 3.45 | 0.97 | - |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Averages of the measured C IV ![]() ![]() |
As demonstrated by Fig. 3 our high-redshift galaxies with z<2.5 show about the same average C IV equivalent widths and about the same scatter around the average as the local starburst galaxies. However, for redshifts larger than about 2.5 the average C IV equivalent widths and their scatter clearly decrease with zin our sample. As described in Sect. 2 this decrease is not driven by any selection effect since the spectroscopic redshift distribution of the included FDF galaxies is in good agreement with the photometric redshift distribution.
Figure 3 obviously
confirms the effect suspected by Steidel et al. (1996a) quantitatively.
In order to estimate (in view of the observed scatter) the statistical
significance of the effect, we calculated averages and their mean errors
of the W0(C IV) values for selected redshift bins. The results are
listed in Table 2 and plotted in
Fig. 4. The table confirms that there is no
statistically significant difference between the results for the
first three bins while the difference between the local sample and
our starburst galaxies with z>3.0 is highly
significant (>). Tests with other bin sizes and binning intervals
showed that the high significance of the result persists for any reasonable
bin distribution.
In Fig. 5 we present analogously to Fig. 3 the observed Si IV equivalent width values as a function of redshift. Similarly as in the case of the C IV doublet the average Si IV strength does not change with redshift for z<2.5. However, unlike the average C IV strength the average Si IV W0 values remain at the local value even beyond z>2.5. As a result, the ratio between the Si IV and C IV resonance doublets, which is practically constant for low z, varies for high redshifts in our sample. This is demonstrated quantitatively by Table 3 and Fig. 6.
z interval | <z> |
![]() |
m.e.(C IV) | N |
[Å] | [Å] | |||
0.00 - 0.02 | 0.01 | 6.31 | 0.41 | 36 |
1.00 - 1.99 | 1.52 | 4.37 | 0.41 | 6 |
2.00 - 2.49 | 2.32 | 4.51 | 0.27 | 32 |
2.50 - 2.99 | 2.71 | 3.77 | 0.53 | 7 |
![]() |
3.28 | 2.33 | 0.22 | 12 |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Measured Si IV ![]() |
As noted above, for local starburst galaxies the C IV doublet as well as
the Si IV doublet are good metallicity indicators. Since both elements are
produced during the evolution and explosion of massive stars, a greatly
different relative chemical abundance of C and Si in the high-zstarburst galaxies appears very unlikely. In spite of the
unsatisfactory state of present SN II models and the remaining large
uncertainties concerning the intermediate mass element yields for
different initial stellar masses, it seems very difficult to enhance
Si production relative to C. On the other hand, it is well known that
individual hot stars of the same metallicity show a wide range of
C IV to Si IV line ratios.
Strong C IV absorption is well known to be
universally present in O stars of all luminosity classes,
while
is luminosity dependent and decreases
rapidly from supergiant stars to dwarfs (Walborn & Panek 1984;
Pauldrach et al. 1990; Leitherer et al. 1995).
This line is, therefore, used as a luminosity indicator in UV stellar
classification schemes. Moreover, Si IV has a pronounced maximum
in early B stars
while C IV changes monotonically with temperature.
Finally the Si IV strength is more strongly affected by population
differences (i.e. stellar age differences) than the C IV doublet.
A scatter in these population differences can easily mask any
metallicity dependence in the Si IV line strength.
Hence, assuming that the observed absorption lines are dominated by
contributions of the stellar photospheres and winds,
the
ratio can, in
principle, be used to derive informations on the star formation history
(instantaneous or continuous) and/or the stellar mass distribution
(see also Mas-Hesse & Kunth 1991).
Therefore, Fig. 6 can possibly be
understood by assuming that at the epochs corresponding to z>3 (i.e. during the first two Gyrs of the universe) instantaneous star
bursts played an important role while "continuous star formation''
is the normal mode for local and lower redshift starburst galaxies.
However, since the different parameters which determine the
value of
cannot be disentangled
reliably without including additional lines in the analysis,
spectra of higher resolution and higher S/N are required to finally settle
this issue.
The investigation of the purely interstellar lines of lower ionisation
like e.g. Si II
1260, O I/Si II
1303 and
C II
1335 is in progress and the results will be published in a separate paper.
![]() |
Figure 6: Averages of the ratios between the measured Si IV and C IV rest frame equivalent widths as a function of redshift for all galaxies shown in Fig. 5. The mean error of each average, calculated from the scatter of the individual values, is indicated by a bar. |
<z> |
![]() |
m.e.(Si IV/C IV) | N |
0.00 | 0.76 | 0.04 | 36 |
2.30 | 0.94 | 0.06 | 33 |
2.72 | 0.95 | 0.18 | 6 |
3.27 | 1.95 | 0.22 | 11 |
Copyright ESO 2002