next previous
Up: The planet search program spectrometer


Subsections

2 The Coudé Echelle Spectrometer planet search program at La Silla

The search for extrasolar planets in the southern hemisphere using the Coudé Echelle Spectrometer at ESO La Silla was started in November 1992 (Kürster et al. 1994; Hatzes et al. 1996). At the beginning, the CES survey was a "classical'' RV planet search program in the sense that at a time when no extrasolar planet had been found, the common expectation was to discover planets similar to Jupiter. Thus the observing strategy was tailored for long-period and low amplitude signals. Observations were performed on an irregular temporal basis, starting with 2-night runs performed every other month. The sampling density was later increased, after the discovery of the short-period planet around 51 Peg by Mayor & Queloz (1995), to assure also detection capability for planets of this type.

2.1 The target sample

At the beginning of the survey targets were selected according to the following criteria: stars with V < 6 (with few exceptions) to attain a sufficient S/N-ratio, spectral type F8V-M5V, stars with declination < $10^{\circ}$ to avoid overlap with surveys in the northern hemisphere (again with some exceptions), known (at that time) close binaries were rejected (with the $\alpha $ Centauri system being another exception) and known active stars were neglected.

The final target list consists of 37 bright late-type stars (mostly) in the southern hemisphere: 6 F-, 21 G-, 7 K-, and 3 M-type stars. Table 1 summarizes all targets with their HR, HD and GJ catalogue number, spectral classification, V-magnitudes, distance in parsecs, chromospheric emission indices (log  $R^{/}_{\rm HK}$) and their X-ray luminosity ($L_{\rm X}$). Distances are based on the Hipparcos parallaxes (ESA (1997)), the log  $R^{/}_{\rm HK}$-values are taken from the survey of Ca II H&K emission in southern solar-type stars by Henry et al. (1996) and the $L_{\rm X}$ values are coming from the RASS (ROSAT All Sky Survey) results (Hünsch et al. 1998, 1999). Chromospheric emission in the cores of the Ca II H&K lines and the X-ray luminosities serve as stellar activity indicators since increased chromospheric Ca II H&K and coronal X-ray emission is a common sign of active stars. Stellar activity can produce intrinsic RV variability and adds an additional noise source into the RV measurement (e.g. Saar & Donahue 1997). It can even mimic the RV signature of a short-period planet like in the case of HD 166435 (Queloz et al. 2001). In 1992 the Ca II and X-ray results were not known, which would have probably led to the exclusion of stars like $\kappa $ For, $\iota $ Hor, $\alpha $ For and HR 8883. Figures 1 and 2 show the V-magnitude and distance histograms of the CES target sample.

Not all targets were monitored since November 1992: three targets, HR 753, HR 5568 and GJ 433, were added to the sample in May 1997 as Hipparcos candidates for having short-period substellar companions (H.-H. Bernstein & U. Bastian priv. comm.), while HR 7373 was only observed for a short time in 1996 and 1997 searching for a short-period planetary companion.

Although listed as a target, $\tau $ Cet was mainly included as a reference object since it is a known long-term RV-constant star (Campbell et al. 1988; Walker et al. 1995) and two other stars with known extrasolar planets, 51 Peg (Mayor & Queloz 1995) and 70 Vir (Marcy & Butler 1996), were also observed after 1995 to serve as RV precision check stars.


 

 
Table 1: Target list of the CES planet search program. HR, HD and GJ catalogue numbers, spectral type, visual magnitude V, distance in parsec (based on Hipparcos parallaxes), chromospheric emission index from Henry et al. (1996) and X-ray luminosity $L_{\rm X}$ from Hünsch et al. (1998, 1999) are given.

HR
HD GJ Name Sp.type V d log $R^{/}_{\rm HK}$ $L_{\rm X}$
          [mag] [pc]   $10^{27}~{\rm [erg/s]}$

77
1581 17 $\zeta $ Tuc F9V 4.2 8.59 -4.85  
98 2151 19 $\beta $ Hyi G2IV 2.8 7.47 -4.99 6.4
209 4391 1021   G1V 5.8 14.94 -4.55 55.8
370 7570 55 $\nu $ Phe F8V 4.96 15.05 -4.95 14.3
448 9562 59.2   G2IV 5.76 29.66 -5.10  
506 10647 3109   F9V 5.52 17.35    
509 10700 71 $\tau $ Cet G8V 3.5 3.65 -4.96 1.1
695 14802 97 $\kappa $ For G0V 5.19 21.93   397.1
753 16160 105A   K3V 5.82 7.21 -4.85 1.8
810 17051 108 $\iota $ Hor G0V 5.41 17.24 -4.65 68.3
963 20010   $\alpha $ For F8V 3.87 14.11   524.6
1006 20766 136 $\zeta ^{1}$Ret G2.5V 5.54 12.12 -4.65 5.8
1010 20807 138 $\zeta ^{2}$ Ret G1V 5.24 12.08 -4.79  
1084 22049 144 $\epsilon $ Eri K2V 3.73 3.22 -4.47 20.9
1136 23249 150 $\delta $ Eri K0IV 3.51 9.04 -5.22 0.9
2261 43834 231 $\alpha $ Men G6V 5.1 10.15 -4.94 2.9
2400 46569 1089   F8V 5.58 37.22    
2667 53705 9223A   G3V 5.54 16.25 -4.93  
3259 69830 302   G7.5V 5.95 12.58   3.0
3677 79807     G0III 5.86 192.31    
4523 102365 442A   G3V 4.91 9.24 -4.95  
4979 114613 9432   G3V 4.85 20.48 -5.05 23.0
5459 128620 559A $\alpha $ Cen A G2V -0.01 1.347 -5.00 2.2
5460 128621 559B $\alpha $ Cen B K1V 1.33 1.347 -4.92 2.2
5568 131977 570A   K4V 5.74 5.91 -4.48 3.5
6416 156274 666A   G8V 5.47 8.79 -4.94 1.9
6998 172051 722   G4V 5.86 12.98 -4.89 4.3
7373 182572 759   G8IV 5.16 15.15   3.9
7703 191408 783A   K3V 5.31 6.05 -4.99  
7875 196378 794.2 $\phi ^{2}$ Pav F8V 5.12 24.19    
8323 207129 838   G0V 5.58 15.64 -4.80 11.2
8387 209100 845 $\epsilon $ Ind K4.5V 4.69 3.63 -4.56 1.6
8501 211415 853A   G3V 5.33 13.61 -4.86 12.2
8883 220096     G4III 5.66 100.81   34175
    699 Barnard M4V 9.54 1.82   0.1
    433   M2V 9.79 9.04    
    551 Prox Cen M5Ve 11.05 1.29   1.7



  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[angle=270,width=7.9cm,clip]{MS2400f1.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 1: Histogram of V-magnitudes of the CES targets. The distribution peaks in the magnitude range of 5-6 mag while the 3 M-dwarfs form the faint "tail'' on the right side.


  \begin{figure}
\includegraphics[angle=270,width=7.5cm,clip]{MS2400f2.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 2: Histogram of the distances in the CES sample. Not shown are the two stars with distances of more than 100 pc: HR 3677 (192.3 pc) & HR 8883 (100.8 pc). The rest of the targets are located within 50 pc, with the bulk lying closer than 20 pc. Distances are based on Hipparcos parallaxes (ESA 1997).

2.2 Observations

All stars were observed with the 1.4 m Coudé Auxiliary Telescope (CAT) on La Silla which fed the CES via a direct beam from the telescope. All spectra were taken in a single echelle order centered at a wavelength of $5389~{\rm\AA}$. The Long Camera yields a resolving power of R=100 000 and a small spectral range of 48.5 Å. After the installation of the Very Long Camera in April 1998 the resolving power of the CES was raised to R=230 000 but the spectral coverage was even reduced (depending on which CCD was used). The results presented in this work all refer to the Long Camera configuration (R=100 000) prior to this modification, which thus form a homogeneous data set.

In order to assure the necessary high long-term precision for RV measurements all CES spectra are self-calibrated by a superimposed absorption spectrum of molecular iodine (I2) vapor. This is achieved by passing the starlight through a temperature controlled cell filled with I2 (see also Kürster et al. 1994).

Typical exposure times of the CES survey were 10 to 15 min, and the S/N-ratios of the obtained spectra were in the range of 100 to 250. For the brightest targets exposure times were much shorter (in the order of 10 to 30 s), while for the faint M-dwarfs we set a maximum exposure time of 30 min, in order to minimize timing uncertainties and subsequent systematic errors in the barycentric velocity correction.

2.3 Data analysis

To extract the RV information from I2 self-calibrated spectra it is necessary to perform a full spectral modeling. For the analysis of the CES planet search data we employ the Austral code which establishes a model of the observation based on high resolution templates of the stellar and the I2 spectrum. For a detailed description of this analysis technique we refer the reader to Paper I of this series (Endl et al. 2000). The modeling process includes the reconstruction of the shape and asymmetry of the spectrograph instrumental profile (IP) as well as Maximum Entropy Method deconvolution to obtain a higher resolved stellar template spectrum. All computations are carried out on an oversampled sub-pixel grid and a multi-parameter $\chi ^{2}$-optimization is performed to achieve a best-fit model. The algorithm follows in general the modeling idea first outlined by Butler et al. (1996) and IP reconstruction techniques by Valenti et al. (1995).

The main limiting factor for the achievable RV precision with the CES is the small spectral bandwidth of $48.5~{\rm\AA}$. Using different test scenarios we demonstrated in Endl et al. (2000) that a long-term RV precision of 8- $15~{\rm m~s}^{-1}$ was attained.


next previous
Up: The planet search program spectrometer

Copyright ESO 2002