A&A 390, 501-510 (2002)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020727
M. A. T. Groenewegen1 - M. Sevenster2 - H. W. W. Spoon3 - I. Pérez2,4
1 - Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, PACS-ICC, Celestijnenlaan 200B, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
2 -
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatory, Cotter road, Weston ACT, Australia
3 -
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Postbus 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
4 -
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile
Received 1 March 2002 / Accepted 15 May 2002
Abstract
Millimetre observations of IRAS selected red carbon stars
are presented. About 260 stars have been observed with SEST and IRAM
in the CO (1-0) and CO (2-1) lines and partially in HCN (1-0) and SiO
(3-2). An overall detection rate, in at least one line, of about 80%
is achieved. The survey represents the second largest survey for AGB
stars, and the largest ever for carbon stars. Two new detections in
SiO (3-2) in carbon stars are reported. When available, the SiO/HCN
and HCN/CO (1-0) line ratios are consistent with the ratios expected
for carbon stars.
Key words: circumstellar matter - stars: mass-loss - stars: AGB and post-AGB
The orbits of stars, moving in the global potential of the Galaxy, are functions of the integrals of motion in that potential only. For an axisymmetric potential, under the assumption that the radial-velocity dispersion equals the vertical-velocity dispersion, these integrals are the binding energy E and the vertical angular momentum Lz. The dynamical behaviour of a particular sample of stars is then fully characterised by a distribution function in these two variables (see Sevenster et al. 1995, and references therein). This distribution function is found by comparing the moments of the observed distribution to the projected moments of model distributions on a grid in galactic coordinates l,b. The noise in the input moments is, naturally, dependent of the number of stars observed, and typically a few hundred stars are necessary to constrain models on an extended region of the sky. The comparison is performed with a quadratic-programming method (DeJonghe 1989). The spatial distribution and the kinematics of a certain population of stars will in general not be self-consistent, since the velocities are determined by the global potential rather than the potential derived from the spatial distribution via Poisson's equation. This is fully taken into account by the modelling method. The resulting analytic distribution functions can very easily be used for further analysis. For Galaxy studies, the technique has been successfully applied to Planetary Nebulae (Durand et al. 1996) and OH/IR stars (Sevenster et al. 1995).
Some time ago, we started a study into the dynamical behaviour of carbon stars. The aim of this project is to compare the dynamical behaviour of carbon stars to OH/IR stars and to test the hypothesis that the so-called "infra-red'' carbon stars form a more massive population than the traditional well-known "optical'' carbon stars (see e.g. Groenewegen et al. 1995). To investigate this, we acquired two samples. One sample of 700 optical carbon stars, for which radial velocities are available, was taken from Aaronson et al. (1989, 1990). The analysis was done on a smaller sub-sample of 500 that was selected to make the sample more homogeneous. First results are presented in Sevenster et al. (2000). As expected for such relatively low-mass AGB stars the scale height is large (650 vs. 200 pc for low-latitude OH/IR stars). There is no discontinuity between their dynamical distribution and that of the low-mass OH/IR stars, showing that, despite the very different radial ranges occupied by O-rich and C-rich stars, these do form one dynamical (AGB) population.
To ascertain that this applies to all AGB stars, a second sample of infrared carbon stars, to be compared to the more massive OH/IR stars, was selected from the literature, as discussed below. Since only part of those have known radial velocities, an observational program was initiated to obtain radial velocities for the other stars. As these stars, almost by definition, have weak or no optical counterparts and thick circumstellar shells, the most efficient way to obtain the radial velocity is through millimetre line spectroscopy.
The main aim of the paper is therefore to provide the radial velocities of a large sample of infrared carbon stars as input to further analysis of the dynamical properties of carbon stars. However, as a by-product, the expansion velocities and line strengths are also obtained of the stars. The sample is introduced in Sect. 2, and the observations are presented in Sect. 3. The results are briefly discussed in Sect. 4.
The new observations are combined with mm-data available in the literature and analysed in terms of the spatial dependence of the expansion velocity, dust and gas mass loss rate and replenishment of the interstellar medium in the accompanying paper (Groenewegen et al. 2002). The analysis of distribution functions and the comparison to the dynamical properties of other populations of evolved stars will be reported in a third paper (Sevenster et al. 2002, in preparation).
The sample of (very probable) infrared carbon stars was selected as
follows. In a first step, objects that fulfilled the following
criteria were selected from the IRAS Point Source Catalog version 2 (PSC): Flux
quality 3 at 12 and 25 m, and
2 at 60
m, flux ratios
S12/S25 < 3,
S25/S60 > 2.75, and finally
S12 >
20 Jy or IRAS LRS classification equal to 4n. The former flux-ratio
is used to select stars with an far-IR excess, while the latter
flux-ratio assures that red OH/IR stars and Planetary Nebulae are
excluded. Applying these criteria resulted in 2088 stars which
contains M- and S-stars as well.
In the next step, the following stars were removed: those which are associated in the PSC with the catalogue of S-stars, and stars with a spectral type M in the Michigan or SAO catalogue (as listed in the PSC).
In the next step, the IRAS LRS spectra (from the LRS catalogue, Volk & Cohen 1989, Volk et al. 1991) and the SIMBAD database were checked for the remaining stars. A detection in a SiO or OH thermal or maser line implied that the star would not be observed by us. The visual inspection of the LRS spectra ensured that stars with silicate emission, but nevertheless classified as 4n, were removed.
There are known infrared carbon stars which are not classified as LRS = 4n, namely the extremely red carbon stars (Group V in Groenewegen et al. 1992; also see Volk et al. 1992). From these papers we selected those stars that fullfilled the same criteria on flux-quality and flux ratios as above.
The total sample contains 379 stars. For those we searched in the literature (up to January 1997 when this program was originally initiated) for available radial velocities from CO line emission. Hundred twenty-four stars have a reliable radial velocity reported (from the Loup et al. 1993 catalogue, Kastner et al. 1993 and Groenewegen et al. 1996; also see Neri et al. 1998, Knapp et al. 1998, Josselin et al. 1998 for improved observations for a few of these stars). The remaining 255 were put on the observing list and here we report on millimetre observations of these stars.
IRAS | RA | Dec | Observed |
Name | (1950) | (1950) | |
00422+5310 | 0 42 16.7 | 53 10 24 | iram jul99 |
01022+6542 | 1 02 12.6 | 65 42 54 | iram apr98 |
01080+5327 | 1 08 02.3 | 53 27 38 | iram apr98 |
01443+6417 | 1 44 19.6 | 64 17 58 | iram apr98 |
02345+5422 | 2 34 34.6 | 54 22 19 | iram apr98 |
02596+6639 | 2 59 37.5 | 66 39 30 | iram jul99 |
03157+3258 | 3 15 42.9 | 32 58 40 | iram apr98; sest mar01 |
03238+6034 | 3 23 52.3 | 60 34 30 | iram apr98 |
03277+5120 | 3 27 44.5 | 51 20 09 | iram jul99 |
03293+6038 | 3 29 21.6 | 60 38 20 | iram apr98 |
03385+5927 | 3 38 34.1 | 59 27 30 | iram apr98 |
03557+4404 | 3 55 42.1 | 44 04 39 | iram apr98 |
04127+5030 | 4 12 45.9 | 50 30 09 | iram jul99 |
04179+5951 | 4 17 55.6 | 59 51 43 | iram apr98 |
04297+2941 | 4 29 45.2 | 29 41 49 | iram apr98; iram jul99; sest mar01 |
04365+6349 | 4 36 31.3 | 63 49 11 | iram oct97 |
04369+4501 | 4 36 55.0 | 45 01 44 | iram oct97; iram jul99 |
04449+4951 | 4 44 55.7 | 49 51 53 | iram jul99 |
05223+4704 | 5 22 23.6 | 47 04 55 | iram oct97; iram apr98 |
05261+4626 | 5 26 09.1 | 46 26 33 | iram oct97; iram jul99 |
05316+1757 | 5 31 40.1 | 17 57 56 | iram jul99 |
05428+1215 | 5 42 48.2 | 12 15 06 | iram jul99 |
05440+4311 | 5 44 01.7 | 43 11 49 | iram jul99 |
05447+1321 | 5 44 46.6 | 13 21 36 | iram apr98; iram jul99; sest mar01 |
06003+4747 | 6 00 21.7 | 47 47 52 | iram oct97; iram jul99 |
06088+1909 | 6 08 50.9 | 19 09 04 | iram jul99 |
06181+0406 | 6 18 07.3 | 04 06 36 | iram jul99 |
06183+1135 | 6 18 19.3 | 11 35 42 | iram jul99; sest oct99 |
06192+0722 | 6 19 15.7 | 07 22 30 | iram jul99; sest mar01 |
06315+1606 | 6 31 30.9 | 16 06 55 | iram jul99 |
06323+3015 | 6 32 19.1 | 30 15 14 | iram jul99; sest oct99 |
06344-0124 | 6 34 29.3 | -01 24 26 | iram jul99 |
06348+3114 | 6 34 50.9 | 31 14 23 | iram jul99; sest mar01 |
06378-0527 | 6 37 51.3 | -05 27 11 | sest mar98 |
06447+0817 | 6 44 42.5 | 08 17 18 | iram jul99 |
06462-4157 | 6 46 16.7 | -41 57 44 | sest mar99 |
06471+0301 | 6 47 08.3 | 03 01 43 | iram jul99 |
06528-4218 | 6 52 52.2 | -42 18 02 | sest mar98 |
06558+2853 | 6 55 52.2 | 28 53 02 | iram oct97; sest mar01 |
06585-4111 | 6 58 34.4 | -41 11 40 | sest oct99 |
06588-2138 | 6 58 48.3 | -21 38 46 | iram jul99; sest mar99; sest mar01 |
07073-1944 | 7 07 21.9 | -19 44 45 | sest mar99 |
07080-0106 | 7 08 02.5 | -01 06 27 | iram jul99 |
07085-0018 | 7 08 33.7 | -00 18 12 | sest oct99 |
07149-0046 | 7 14 59.5 | -00 46 26 | sest oct99 |
07161-0111 | 7 16 06.2 | -01 11 19 | iram jul99 |
07170+0721 | 7 17 03.9 | 07 21 32 | iram jul99 |
07220-2324 | 7 22 01.0 | -23 24 50 | iram jul99; sest mar99; sest oct99; sest mar01 |
07266-0541 | 7 26 41.2 | -05 41 21 | sest mar99 |
07336-1006 | 7 33 40.2 | -10 06 10 | sest mar98 |
07356-3549 | 7 35 37.6 | -35 49 20 | sest mar99; sest oct99 |
07368-2833 | 7 36 50.3 | -28 33 41 | sest mar98 |
07373-4021 | 7 37 22.1 | -40 21 49 | sest oct99 |
07546-2551 | 7 54 37.1 | -25 51 41 | iram jul99; sest oct99; sest mar01 |
07553-0907 | 7 55 27.3 | -09 07 51 | iram jul99; sest mar01 |
08086-3905 | 8 08 39.3 | -39 05 20 | sest mar98 |
Name | RA | Dec | Observed |
(1950) | (1950) | ||
08119-3627 | 8 11 55.7 | -36 27 47 | sest oct99 |
08129-1236 | 8 12 58.0 | -12 36 07 | iram jul99; sest mar99; sest oct99 |
08250-2605 | 8 25 05.8 | -26 05 38 | sest oct99 |
08276-5125 | 8 27 41.9 | -51 25 09 | sest mar98 |
08292-3828 | 8 29 14.4 | -38 28 01 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
08304-4313 | 8 30 27.7 | -43 13 29 | sest mar98; sest mar99; sest mar01 |
08305-3314 | 8 30 33.9 | -33 14 58 | sest mar98 |
08340-3357 | 8 34 04.3 | -33 57 08 | sest mar99 |
08353-3424 | 8 35 23.3 | -34 24 11 | sest oct99 |
08416-2525 | 8 41 40.4 | -25 25 48 | sest mar98 |
08439-2734 | 8 43 58.1 | -27 34 47 | sest oct99 |
08470-5710 | 8 47 05.6 | -57 10 20 | sest oct99 |
08534-5055 | 8 53 27.2 | -50 55 47 | sest mar99; sest oct99 |
08535-4724 | 8 53 30.4 | -47 24 26 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
08544-4431 | 8 54 29.5 | -44 31 44 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
08556-5717 | 8 55 41.3 | -57 17 09 | sest oct99 |
09164-5349 | 9 16 27.6 | -53 49 44 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
09176-5147 | 9 17 38.5 | -51 47 42 | sest oct99 |
09178-5556 | 9 17 51.9 | -55 56 13 | sest mar01 |
09238-5309 | 9 23 49.5 | -53 09 38 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
09317-5116 | 9 31 43.0 | -51 16 53 | sest mar99 |
09428-4341 | 9 42 50.8 | -43 41 51 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
09450-4716 | 9 45 02.0 | -47 16 44 | sest mar99 |
09485-4232 | 9 48 35.2 | -42 32 48 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
09496-5050 | 9 49 38.1 | -50 50 12 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
09533-6021 | 9 53 20.3 | -60 21 10 | sest oct99 |
09547-5522 | 9 54 47.7 | -55 22 54 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
09587-5056 | 9 58 47.6 | -50 56 59 | sest mar01 |
10002-4641 | 10 00 13.0 | -46 41 47 | sest mar01 |
10068-6341 | 10 06 49.0 | -63 41 20 | sest mar01 |
10098-5742 | 10 09 49.5 | -57 42 55 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
10231-5823 | 10 23 08.4 | -58 23 54 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
10249-2517 | 10 24 56.5 | -25 17 38 | sest mar01 |
10375-4802 | 10 37 33.2 | -48 02 10 | sest oct99 |
10558-6537 | 10 55 49.3 | -65 37 19 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
11073-6325 | 11 07 19.2 | -63 25 07 | sest oct99 |
11079-6211 | 11 07 58.3 | -62 11 33 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
11186-5528 | 11 18 37.4 | -55 28 09 | sest mar98 |
11272-6901 | 11 27 16.9 | -69 01 38 | sest mar01 |
11463-6320 | 11 46 22.0 | -63 20 47 | sest mar98 |
11514-5841 | 11 51 24.6 | -58 41 44 | sest mar98 |
12042-6355 | 12 04 13.0 | -63 55 45 | sest mar99; sest oct99 |
12142-6410 | 12 14 15.6 | -64 10 29 | sest mar01 |
12194-6007 | 12 19 26.2 | -60 07 38 | sest mar99; sest oct99 |
12195-6830 | 12 19 30.8 | -68 30 45 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
12195-5527 | 12 19 35.4 | -55 27 23 | sest mar99; sest mar01 |
12216-6118 | 12 21 37.1 | -62 18 12 | sest mar99 (observed at incorrect position); sest mar01 |
12227-5045 | 12 22 42.3 | -50 45 42 | sest mar99 |
12298-5754 | 12 29 52.6 | -57 54 57 | sest mar98 |
12397-6447 | 12 39 47.5 | -64 47 13 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
12419-6058 | 12 41 55.3 | -60 58 40 | sest oct99 |
12421-6217 | 12 42 08.4 | -62 17 10 | sest mar01 |
12464-6433 | 12 46 29.9 | -64 33 39 | sest mar01 |
12533-6118 | 12 53 23.4 | -61 18 25 | sest mar01 |
12550-7407 | 12 55 01.7 | -74 07 30 | sest mar99 |
12562-6003 | 12 56 13.3 | -60 03 13 | sest mar01 |
12569-6105 | 12 56 59.6 | -61 05 09 | sest mar01 |
12595-6035 | 12 59 31.9 | -60 35 45 | sest mar98; sest mar01 |
Name | RA | Dec | Observed |
(1950) | (1950) | ||
13031-5743 | 13 03 08.0 | -57 43 18 | sest mar01 |
13045-6404 | 13 04 33.4 | -64 04 21 | sest mar99 |
13053-6341 | 13 05 18.2 | -63 41 37 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
13064-6433 | 13 06 25.5 | -64 33 56 | sest mar99; sest oct99; sest mar01 |
13092-6026 | 13 09 16.3 | -60 26 56 | sest mar01 |
13208-6027 | 13 20 52.3 | -60 27 49 | sest mar01 |
13268-6226 | 13 26 51.7 | -62 26 22 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
13343-5613 | 13 34 21.7 | -56 13 21 | sest mar01 |
13343-5807 | 13 34 23.5 | -58 07 55 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
13359-6014 | 13 35 54.6 | -60 14 07 | sest mar01 |
13482-6716 | 13 48 15.4 | -67 16 08 | sest mar99 |
13509-6348 | 13 50 56.8 | -63 48 43 | sest mar99 |
13595-5254 | 13 59 34.4 | -52 54 22 | sest mar01 |
14010-5927 | 14 01 01.7 | -59 27 03 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
14122-5845 | 14 12 15.2 | -58 45 23 | sest mar99 |
14284-5245 | 14 28 25.5 | -52 45 41 | sest mar99; sest mar01 |
14309-5126 | 14 30 57.3 | -51 26 17 | sest mar01 |
14318-6107 | 14 31 52.5 | -61 07 25 | sest oct99 |
14358-6303 | 14 35 51.2 | -63 03 08 | sest mar99 |
14404-6320 | 14 40 25.1 | -63 20 45 | sest oct99 |
14443-5708 | 14 44 22.0 | -57 08 09 | sest mar98 |
14521-6058 | 14 52 06.1 | -60 58 33 | sest mar01 |
15043-5438 | 15 04 22.2 | -54 38 25 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
15054-5458 | 15 05 26.9 | -54 58 29 | sest mar99 |
15202-5539 | 15 20 15.9 | -55 39 05 | sest oct99 |
15261-5702 | 15 26 06.3 | -57 02 27 | sest mar98 |
15330-5537 | 15 33 01.6 | -55 37 30 | sest oct99 |
15471-5644 | 15 47 06.3 | -56 44 24 | sest mar98 |
15488-4928 | 15 48 50.2 | -49 28 27 | sest mar98 |
16035-5330 | 16 03 33.6 | -53 30 35 | sest mar99; sest mar01 |
16047-5449 | 16 04 45.6 | -54 49 27 | sest mar01 |
16093-4808 | 16 09 18.8 | -48 08 58 | sest oct99 |
16123-4654 | 16 12 20.2 | -46 54 54 | sest oct99 |
16171-4759 | 16 17 09.5 | -47 59 44 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
16265-5100 | 16 26 33.5 | -51 00 59 | sest mar98; sest mar99; sest mar01 |
16296-4417 | 16 29 42.0 | -44 17 34 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
16298-5349 | 16 29 52.2 | -53 49 39 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
16304-3831 | 16 30 29.3 | -38 31 38 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
16469-4753 | 16 46 55.3 | -47 53 53 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
16508-4620 | 16 50 49.0 | -46 20 58 | sest oct99 |
16545-4214 | 16 54 34.3 | -42 14 50 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
16555-4456 | 16 55 30.5 | -44 56 26 | sest mar01 |
16562-5039 | 16 56 12.3 | -50 39 30 | sest mar01 |
17047-2848 | 17 04 46.4 | -28 48 13 | sest mar98 |
17050-4642 | 17 05 01.7 | -46 42 23 | sest mar99 |
17079-6554 | 17 07 59.4 | -65 54 33 | sest mar98 |
17103-3551 | 17 10 19.6 | -35 51 53 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
17105-3746 | 17 10 35.8 | -37 46 48 | sest oct99 |
17130-3907 | 17 13 04.8 | -39 07 28 | sest mar99 |
17155-4917 | 17 15 32.8 | -49 17 32 | sest oct99 |
17199-3512 | 17 19 59.5 | -35 12 53 | sest mar01 |
17209-3318 | 17 20 59.8 | -33 18 37 | sest mar01 |
17222-2328 | 17 22 15.8 | -23 28 09 | iram oct97; sest mar98 |
17278-3937 | 17 27 49.5 | -39 37 33 | sest mar98; sest oct99; sest mar01 |
17309-3412 | 17 30 54.8 | -34 12 52 | sest mar99; sest oct99 |
17375-3652 | 17 37 30.4 | -36 52 10 | sest mar98 |
17515-2407 | 17 51 33.2 | -24 07 25 | iram oct97; sest mar98; sest mar01 |
Name | RA | Dec | Observed |
(1950) | (1950) | ||
17547-3249 | 17 54 43.0 | -32 49 08 | sest mar99 |
17556+5813 | 17 55 37.4 | 58 13 22 | iram apr98 |
17599-4556 | 17 59 55.8 | -45 56 45 | sest oct99; sest mar01 |
18030-1707 | 18 03 04.6 | -17 07 54 | iram jul99; sest mar01 |
18038-1614 | 18 03 50.9 | -16 14 00 | sest mar98; sest mar99 |
18061-2739 | 18 06 10.0 | -27 39 13 | iram oct97; sest mar99 |
18082-2454 | 18 08 12.9 | -24 54 29 | sest mar98 |
18092-0437 | 18 09 17.5 | -04 37 10 | iram oct97; iram jul99 |
18147-2215 | 18 14 42.0 | -22 15 50 | sest mar98 |
18230+0544 | 18 23 01.8 | 05 44 18 | iram oct97 |
18234-2206 | 18 23 27.7 | -22 06 07 | sest mar98; sest oct99 |
18244-0108 | 18 24 27.4 | -01 08 03 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
18276-4717 | 18 27 37.7 | -47 17 48 | sest mar98 |
18289+0420 | 18 28 54.8 | 04 20 37 | iram apr98; sest mar01 |
18356-0951 | 18 35 40.3 | -09 51 42 | iram oct97; iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19008+0726 | 19 00 53.1 | 07 26 15 | iram oct97; sest mar98 |
19029+2017 | 19 02 57.4 | 20 17 26 | iram oct97 |
19108+1155 | 19 10 53.1 | 11 55 02 | iram oct97; iram apr98 |
19136+6727 | 19 13 40.3 | 67 27 08 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19238+1159 | 19 23 53.6 | 11 59 03 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19248+0658 | 19 24 48.5 | 06 58 03 | sest mar98 |
19253+1918 | 19 25 22.0 | 19 18 39 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19276-0056 | 19 27 39.8 | -00 56 31 | iram apr98; sest mar98 |
19285+1808 | 19 28 35.7 | 18 08 48 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19289+1931 | 19 28 56.5 | 19 31 49 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19296+2227 | 19 29 37.7 | 22 27 17 | iram apr98 |
19304+2529 | 19 30 27.0 | 25 29 41 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19358+0917 | 19 35 49.0 | 09 17 15 | iram apr98; iram jul99; sest mar98 |
19381+3315 | 19 38 06.9 | 33 15 23 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19417+3053 | 19 41 43.4 | 30 53 09 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19419+3222 | 19 41 56.1 | 32 22 11 | iram jul99 |
19455+0920 | 19 45 32.4 | 09 20 40 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19455+2319 | 19 45 31.2 | 23 19 06 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19457+2346 | 19 45 42.5 | 23 46 58 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19485+3235 | 19 48 32.6 | 32 35 52 | iram apr98 |
19523+2414 | 19 52 21.9 | 24 14 25 | iram apr98 |
19524+2130 | 19 52 25.0 | 21 30 37 | iram apr98 |
19537+2212 | 19 53 47.5 | 22 12 57 | iram apr98 |
19552+3142 | 19 55 13.7 | 31 42 17 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
19558+3333 | 19 55 53.3 | 33 33 11 | iram apr98 |
19559+3301 | 19 55 57.5 | 33 01 26 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20004+2943 | 20 00 29.1 | 29 43 14 | iram jul99 |
20014+2830 | 20 01 24.4 | 28 30 10 | iram apr98 |
20081+3228 | 20 08 12.7 | 32 28 22 | iram oct97; iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20084-1425 | 20 08 29.3 | -14 25 05 | sest mar99; sest oct99; sest mar01 |
20159+3134 | 20 15 58.9 | 31 34 50 | iram jul99 |
20171+3519 | 20 17 06.6 | 35 19 21 | iram oct97; iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20200+3624 | 20 20 00.5 | 36 24 00 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20204+2914 | 20 20 29.1 | 29 14 01 | iram apr98 |
20253+3814 | 20 25 22.3 | 38 14 48 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20277+2958 | 20 27 42.3 | 29 58 33 | iram apr98 |
20282+3604 | 20 28 12.2 | 36 04 31 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20323+3153 | 20 32 22.9 | 31 53 15 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20331+4621 | 20 33 07.3 | 46 21 16 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20350+5954 | 20 35 04.0 | 59 54 56 | iram jul99 |
20351+2618 | 20 35 10.7 | 26 18 46 | iram jul99; sest mar01 |
20369+5131 | 20 36 57.4 | 51 31 03 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
20461+4817 | 20 46 09.1 | 48 17 49 | iram jul99 |
Name | RA | Dec | Observed |
(1950) | (1950) | ||
20546+6405 | 20 54 38.1 | 64 05 48 | iram jul99 |
20564+1857 | 20 56 29.2 | 18 57 18 | iram jul99; sest oct99; sest mar01 |
20596+3833 | 20 59 36.4 | 38 33 29 | iram apr98 |
21006+4720 | 21 00 40.1 | 47 20 12 | iram apr98 |
21027+3704 | 21 02 42.1 | 37 04 42 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
21070+4711 | 21 07 00.8 | 47 11 53 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
21088+4546 | 21 08 51.7 | 45 46 28 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
21160+5546 | 21 16 05.9 | 55 46 57 | iram jul99 |
21197-6956 | 21 19 46.9 | -69 56 55 | sest mar98 |
21262+7000 | 21 26 15.1 | 70 00 11 | iram jul99 |
21265+5042 | 21 26 30.7 | 50 42 17 | iram jul99 |
21324+5537 | 21 32 24.7 | 55 37 55 | iram apr98 |
21366+4529 | 21 36 37.9 | 45 29 10 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
21377+5042 | 21 37 46.9 | 50 42 49 | iram apr98; iram jul99 |
21383+4513 | 21 38 18.5 | 45 13 40 | iram apr98 |
21424+5821 | 21 42 24.7 | 58 21 57 | iram apr98 |
21444+5053 | 21 44 26.8 | 50 53 33 | iram apr98 |
22039+5328 | 22 03 57.9 | 53 28 03 | iram jul99 |
22236+5002 | 22 23 39.8 | 50 02 59 | iram jul99 |
23174+6810 | 23 17 29.9 | 68 10 14 | iram apr98 |
23234+6434 | 23 23 29.2 | 64 34 55 | iram apr98 |
23491+6243 | 23 49 09.1 | 62 43 57 | iram apr98 |
23516+6430 | 23 51 41.8 | 64 30 48 | iram apr98 |
Observations were performed with IRAM on 3 different occasions and
with the SEST on 4 different occasions. The stars that were observed
during the different runs are listed in Table 1; some stars were
observed more than one time. Table 1 also lists the coordinates used
in the observations which have been taken from the IRAS database. The
accuracy of these coordinates is of order 10-15
which is
comparable to the smallest beam size used here (CO 2-1 beam at IRAM).
However the detection rate at IRAM is 90%, and of the non-detections
5% are likely inhibited by interstellar contamination so that
non-detections due to incorrect input coordinates are a minor issue.
The IRAM data were taken between 18 and 22 October 1997 (observers MG and HS), 22 and 28 April 1998 (observer MG) and between 23 and 27 July 1999 (observers MG and MS). In October 1997 the 12CO (2-1), HCN (1-0) and SiO (3-2) lines were observed simultaneously using the 1.3 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm SIS receivers. Detection of the HCN or SiO line could confirm or deny the carbon star character. Both the two 1 MHz filter banks (for CO and SiO) and the auto correlator (for HCN, set to a channel spacing of 320 KHz) were used as back-ends.
In April 1998 the same configuration of front-ends, back-ends and
observed lines was used for the first four observing slots. For the
final two slots both 3 mm receivers were tuned to the 12CO (1-0)
lines, and both 1.3 mm receivers were tuned to the 12CO (2-1)
line. The 1 MHz back-end was split and connected to the 1.3 mm
receivers, and the auto correlator was split and connected to the 3 mm
receivers (channel spacing 320 kHz). The brightest sources had
preferentially been observed first and based on the results, it seemed
unlikely to detect HCN in the weaker sources. On the other hand, with
the new set-up a theoretical gain of
in signal-to-noise
could be obtained on the CO lines, which turned out to be useful as
many of our detections are quite faint.
In July 1999, HCN, 12CO (1-0) and 12CO (2-1) were observed simultaneously. The 1 MHz back-end was used on the CO (2-1) line, and the auto correlator was set to a channel spacing of 320 KHz and used for CO (1-0) and HCN.
On all occasions the targets were observed using wobbler switching
with throws between 90 and 150
in azimuth; pointing and focus
were checked every few hours.
The SEST data were taken between 10-12 and 14 March 1998 (observer
MG), 9 and 14 March 1999 (observer MG), 23 and 28 October 1999
(observer MG), and between 25 and 31 March 2001 (observers MG and IP).
On all occasions, 12CO (1-0) and 12CO (2-1) were observed
simultaneously using the 1.3 mm and 3 mm SIS receivers. The dual beam
switching mode was used with a throw of
in
azimuth. One of two available acousto-optical spectrometers was split
and connected to the two receivers. The channel separation is 0.7 MHz. Focus and pointing were checked every few hours, and almost always
found to be within twice the rms values of the last pointing model
used by the telescope control software.
The data reduction consisted of several steps. First the individual
measurements were reduced. Baselines were removed and all temperatures
were put on a main-beam scale (the same applies for all temperatures
presented in this paper). The conversion of observed antenna
temperature into main-beam temperature requires knowledge of the
forward and main beam efficiencies (listed in Table 2 together with
the FWHM beam widths) and involves a comparison with calibration
sources (e.g. Mauersberger et al. 1989 for IRAM). The comparison with
the calibration sources (supplemented by consistency checks from stars
observed more than once and from published results obtained with IRAM)
indicate that the data are consistent. We estimate the final
calibration for all observed lines to be accurate to 10%
(1). Then, the data of the same stars observed during
different runs were co-added for IRAM and SEST separately.
The results are outlined in Table 3, available at the CDS, which lists
the name of the object, the transition, the channel spacing, the rms
noise, the peak temperature, the integrated intensity, the central
velocity with respect to the local standard of rest and half the
velocity width at zero intensity which equals the expansion velocity
of the circumstellar shell. These determined quantities were
determined either directly from the profiles or from fits to the
profiles made with the reduction program CLASS.
Typical uncertainties in the central velocity and the expansion
velocity are 1 km s-1. The uncertainties in the peak temperature
and the integrated intensity are dominated by the calibration
uncertainties. Values flagged with a colon are uncertain. Upper limits
are 3
values. The last column contains some relevant remarks,
for example when the spectrum was severely contaminated by
interstellar contamination, or the system temperature when the weather
was bad.
The calibrated profiles are shown in the Fig. 1, available in electronic form. Some of the strong interstellar spikes that appear on top of or near the stellar emission profiles and that may be several Kelvin strong have artificially been cut for display purposes. Some panels are intentionally left blank too facilitate comparison of different lines of the same object; the figures are ordered top to bottom, left to right.
Line | Frequency | Teles. |
![]() |
![]() |
FWHM |
(MHz) | (![]() |
||||
12CO(1-0) | 115271.204 | IRAM | 0.92 | 0.67 | 20.9 |
SEST | 0.70 | 45 | |||
12CO(2-1) | 230537.990 | IRAM | 0.86 | 0.39 | 10.4 |
SEST | 0.60 | 23 | |||
HCN(1-0) | 88631.602 | IRAM | 0.92 | 0.76 | 27.0 |
SiO (3-2, v=0) | 130268.702 | IRAM | 0.90 | 0.58 | 18 |
name | transition | ![]() |
rms |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
remarks |
km s-1 | K | K | K km s-1 | km s-1 | km s-1 | |||
00422+5310 |
2-1 | 1.30 | 0.016 | 0.16 | 2.7 | 19.4 | 14.1 | |
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.04 | 0.081 | 1.5 | 19.4 | 13.1 | ||
HCN | 1.06 | 0.011 | <0.025 | 0.4: | ||||
01022+6542 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.087 |
![]() |
||||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.024 | ||||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.022 | ||||||
01080+5327 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.048 | 0.47 | 15.0 | -20.0 | 22.6 | |
HCN | 2.11 | 0.051 | 0.15: | 4.3 | ||||
SiO | 2.60 | 0.024 | 0.05: | 1.1: | ||||
01443+6417 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.061 | 0.42 | 16.2 | -68.1 | 30.5 | |
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.033 | 0.11: | 3.2: | -70: | 28: | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.044 | 0.08: | 3.4: | data corrupted blue wards of -110 km s-1 | |||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.022 | 0.3: | |||||
02345+5422 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.067 | 1.22 | 29.0 | -66.0 | 19.8 | |
HCN | 2.11 | 0.070 | 0.25 | 5.3 | ||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.024 | 0.3: | |||||
02596+6639 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.019 | 0.15 | 2.7 | -41.8 | 15.8 | |
1-0 | 0.81 | 0.024 | 0.048 | 0.9 | -40: | |||
HCN | 1.06 | 0.010 | 0.2: | |||||
03157+3258 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.064 | iram;
![]() |
||||
HCN | 1.06 | 0.092 | ||||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.026 | ||||||
2-1 | 1.82 | 0.015 | 0.10 | 1.4 | -17.5 | 13.5 | sest | |
1-0 | 1.80 | 0.016 | 0.09: | 1.5 | -15.7 | 17.0: | ||
03238+6034 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.078 | 1.06 | 19.6 | -85.5 | 15.3 | |
HCN | 2.11 | 0.073 | <0.12 | 1.2: | ||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.035 | <0.10 | 0.5: | ||||
03277+5120 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.031 | 0.11 | 2.3 | -30.2 | 17.9 | |
1-0 | 0.81 | 0.047 | 0.11 | 2.6 | -28.9 | 16.3 | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.007 | 0.02: | 0.3: | ||||
03293+6038 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.081 | 0.84 | 22.2 | -61.9 | 21.0 | |
HCN | 2.11 | 0.068 | 2.7: | |||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.038 | 0.8: | |||||
03385+5927 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.059 | 0.32 | 6.2 | -74.5 | 15.7 | |
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.031 | 0.21 | 4.8 | -74.9 | 17.2 | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.063 | 0.8: | |||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.021 | ||||||
03557+4404 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.039 | 0.36 | 6.0 | -49.2 | 14.7 | |
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.031 | 0.39 | 6.8 | -47.6 | 15.0 | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.017 | 0.05: | 0.8: | ||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.018 | 0.2: | |||||
04127+5030 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.022 | 0.23 | 6.5 | -0.1 | 17.9 | |
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.016 | 0.066 | 1.4: | -0.2: | 16.8: | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.008 | 0.048 | 1.1: | 1.3 | 17.1 | ||
04179+5951 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.055 | 0.65 | 20.3 | 4.2 | 23.4 | |
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.033 | 0.28 | 9.4 | 4.4 | 22.5 | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.017 | 0.09 | 2.6 | 6.9 | 19.6 | ||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.024 | 0.6: | |||||
04297+2941 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.045 | <0.12 | 1.6: | iram;
![]() |
||
1-0 | 1.63 | 0.018 | 0.11 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 17.7 | ||
HCN | 2.11 | 0.011 | 0.048 | 1.1 | 5.4 | 17.2 | ||
2-1 | 1.82 | 0.018 | sest; interstellar contamination | |||||
1-0 | 1.80 | 0.019 | 0.05: | |||||
04365+6349 | 2-1 | 1.30 | 0.124 | 0.43 | 7.1 | -47.0 | 14.2 |
![]() |
HCN | 1.06 | 0.045 | 0.1: | 1.7: | ||||
SiO | 2.30 | 0.025 | 0.5: |
![]() |
Figure 1: Plotted are the velocity w.r.t. the LSR, and the main-beam temperature in Kelvin. The figures are ordered top to bottom, left to right. Some panels are intentially left blank in order to always have the observations of the same stars below each other so that the velocity scales are lined up for easy comparison. |
Open with DEXTER |
The present survey is among the largest conducted for AGB stars in the CO lines and one with the highest detection rate. The largest single survey targeting IRAS objects (AGB stars, PNe, post-AGB, also some YSOs) is that by Nyman et al. (1992), who observed 519 objects in the CO (1-0) line with SEST and detected 163 objects. Compared to their survey the present one uses more sensitive receivers and has the benefit of also observing CO (2-1) that is usually the stronger line. The present survey is probably the second largest aiming at AGB stars, and the largest specifically targeting carbon stars. A smaller survey, concentrating on carbon stars in the Galactic plane, is that by Kastner et al. (1993) who detected 47 out of 58 stars observed in CO (1-0) and (2-1) with IRAM. Olofsson et al. (1993) detected 68 out of 99 observed bright (K<2 mag) optically identified carbon stars with OSO, IRAM and SEST in CO (1-0) and (2-1). Kerschbaum et al. (1999) observed 109 O-rich SR and Irregular variables in several CO lines with several telescopes, detecting 66. Numerous smaller surveys in CO, or mapping observations of previously CO detected objects, or surveys aimed at obtaining molecular abundances in previously CO detected objects exist.
In the end, all 252 stars on the observing list were observed. Of the 96 stars observed only with IRAM, 86 were detected in at least one line. Five of the non-detections may be inhibited by strong interstellar contamination. Of the 134 stars observed only with SEST, 101 were detected in at least one line, with 31 non-detections possibly inhibited by strong interstellar contamination. Twenty-one stars were observed with both telescopes, with 10 detected by IRAM and 13 by SEST in at least one line. Many of these sources observed with SEST had been observed with IRAM first (because of the expected higher sensitivity) under adverse weather conditions (the system temperatures have been listed in the `remarks' column to mark these objects as candidates to be re-observed with IRAM under improved weather conditions). Overall 80% of the observed sources have been detected in at least one line. Many of the non-detections are sources in the Galactic plane observed with SEST which is less sensitive than IRAM to point sources and picks up more interstellar emission in its larger beam.
Since in almost all cases the SEST observations were only performed because the IRAM observations had been made under adverse weather conditions, or to obtain CO (1-0) data when the IRAM 1.3 mm receiver had been tuned to HCN, only five stars have good data obtained with both telescopes. In these cases the ratio of the CO (1-0) and/or CO (2-1) integrated intensities between IRAM and SEST is between 3.2 and 4, what is approximately the expected ratio given the respective beam sizes.
Of the 68 objects also observed in the SiO line, only one was convincingly detected (IRAS 19008+0726) and two marginally (IRAS 01080+5327, 20596+3833). These three are all optically identified carbon stars, being respectively number 4162, 180, and 5089, in the General Catalog of Cool Carbon stars (GCCCS, Stephenson 1989). Their carbon star nature is beyond any doubt.
The presence of oxygen-rich molecules in the envelopes around carbon stars is well documented (Bujarrabal et al. 1994; Olofsson et al. 1989; Bieging et al. 2000 and references therein) and integrated intensities or line-ratios between two species are usually used to discriminate between O- and C-rich sources. Bujarrabal et al. (1994) quote a lower limit of 2.8 for O-rich and an upper limit of 0.33 for C-rich sources for the SiO (3-2)/HCN (1-0) ratio of the integrated intensities.
In the three stars just mentioned the ratio of the line intensities is 1.1/4.3 = 0.26, 9.4/66.0 = 0.14 and 1.1/1.5 = 0.73 in IRAS 01080+5327, 19008+0726, 20596+3833, respectively. In the last case, both HCN and SiO integrated intensities are uncertain, and for the first two cases the ratio is in agreement with the upper limit derived by Bujarrabal et al. (1994).
The ratio HCN (1-0)/CO (1-0) is known to be as low as 0.17 in C-rich objects (Olofsson et al. 1998) and none of the twenty-four objects with reliable detections in both lines have an integrated intensity ratio lower than this.
In summary, the observations of the SiO and HCN lines give results that are in agreement with the line ratios expected for carbon stars.
Acknowledgements
This program was initiated, and part of the observations were obtained, when MG was a research fellow at the Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik, Garching, Germany. We would like to thank the program committees of ESO and IRAM for their continuing support. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. René Oudmaijer is thanked for commenting upon an earlier version of the manuscript.
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |