next previous
Up: Colors of Minor Bodies System


Subsections

   
2 Dataset and general description of individual MBOSSes

2.1 Dataset - Average magnitudes and colors


   
Table 1: Average magnitudes and colors; online version at CDS, and an updated version is available on-line at http://www.sc.eso.org/~ohainaut/MBOSS.
Object (1)/(2) M11 $\pm\sigma$ Grt $\pm$ $\sigma$ B-V $\pm$ $\sigma$ V-R $\pm$ $\sigma$ R-I $\pm$ $\sigma$ I-J $\pm$ $\sigma$ J-H $\pm$ $\sigma$ H-K $\pm$ $\sigma$
2060 Chiron Cent/27 6.398 $\pm$ 0.049 0.642 $\pm$ 1.629 0.679 $\pm$ 0.039 0.359 $\pm$ 0.027 0.356 $\pm$ 0.037 0.472 $\pm$ 0.132 0.290 $\pm$ 0.082 0.064 $\pm$ 0.099
5145 Pholus Cent/36 7.158 $\pm$ 0.097 52.054 $\pm$ 2.105 1.299 $\pm$ 0.099 0.794 $\pm$ 0.032 0.814 $\pm$ 0.056 1.040 $\pm$ 0.051 0.375 $\pm$ 0.046 -0.037 $\pm$ 0.047
7066 Nessus Cent/17 -- 45.727 $\pm$ 2.567 1.090 $\pm$ 0.040 0.793 $\pm$ 0.041 0.695 $\pm$ 0.066 0.790 $\pm$ 0.122 0.309 $\pm$ 0.268 -0.089 $\pm$ 0.385
8405 Asbolus Cent/34 8.966 $\pm$ 0.057 15.075 $\pm$ 2.981 0.750 $\pm$ 0.040 0.513 $\pm$ 0.068 0.523 $\pm$ 0.045 0.690 $\pm$ 0.056 0.315 $\pm$ 0.142 0.095 $\pm$ 0.253
10199 Chariklo Cent/38 6.486 $\pm$ 0.033 13.677 $\pm$ 1.548 0.802 $\pm$ 0.049 0.479 $\pm$ 0.029 0.542 $\pm$ 0.030 0.730 $\pm$ 0.040 0.411 $\pm$ 0.044 0.093 $\pm$ 0.046
10370 Hylonome Cent/7 -- 10.667 $\pm$ 4.090 0.643 $\pm$ 0.082 0.464 $\pm$ 0.059 0.490 $\pm$ 0.122 0.390 $\pm$ 0.173 -- --
2P/Encke SPC/4 -- 3.770 $\pm$ 3.070 -- 0.388 $\pm$ 0.062 0.408 $\pm$ 0.060 -- -- --
6P/d'Arrest SPC/2 -- 15.138 $\pm$ 2.886 0.770 $\pm$ 0.040 0.565 $\pm$ 0.067 0.450 $\pm$ 0.040 -- -- --
10P/Tempel 2 SPC/2 -- -- -- 0.575 $\pm$ 0.048 -- -- -- --
22P/Kopff SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.533 $\pm$ 0.022 -- -- -- --
28P/Neujmin 1 SPC/6 -- 11.687 $\pm$ 3.947 -- 0.508 $\pm$ 0.079 0.440 $\pm$ 0.079 -- -- --
46P/Wirtanen SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.355 $\pm$ 0.073 -- -- -- --
53P/VanBiesbroek SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.328 $\pm$ 0.081 -- -- -- --
86P/Wild3 SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.116 $\pm$ 0.144 -- -- -- --
87P/Bus SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.543 $\pm$ 0.020 -- -- -- --
93K2P/Helin-Law. SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.267 $\pm$ 0.075 -- -- -- --
96P/Machholz 1 SPC/1 -- -- -- 0.429 $\pm$ 0.027 -- -- -- --
107P/Wilson-Harr. SPC/2 -- -- -- 0.406 $\pm$ 0.017 -- -- -- --
143P/Kowal-Mrkos SPC/2 -- 20.983 $\pm$ 1.167 0.820 $\pm$ 0.028 0.580 $\pm$ 0.020 0.560 $\pm$ 0.022 -- -- --
1992 QB1 QB1/8 6.864 $\pm$ 0.121 37.328 $\pm$ 6.651 0.836 $\pm$ 0.145 0.713 $\pm$ 0.098 0.672 $\pm$ 0.197 -- -- --
1993 FW QB1/8 6.533 $\pm$ 0.151 12.172 $\pm$ 5.517 0.932 $\pm$ 0.089 0.517 $\pm$ 0.101 0.431 $\pm$ 0.127 -- -- --
1993 RO Plut/6 8.488 $\pm$ 0.113 19.363 $\pm$ 7.579 0.933 $\pm$ 0.162 0.576 $\pm$ 0.128 0.515 $\pm$ 0.192 -- -- --
1993 SB Plut/4 8.024 $\pm$ 0.143 12.253 $\pm$ 4.554 0.802 $\pm$ 0.071 0.475 $\pm$ 0.077 0.514 $\pm$ 0.114 -- -- --
1993 SC Plut/14 6.711 $\pm$ 0.054 36.763 $\pm$ 3.488 1.012 $\pm$ 0.105 0.673 $\pm$ 0.065 0.738 $\pm$ 0.077 -- 0.400 $\pm$ 0.203 -0.040 $\pm$ 0.197
1994 ES2 QB1/2 7.525 $\pm$ 0.115 80.403 $\pm$ 7.434 0.710 $\pm$ 0.150 0.940 $\pm$ 0.150 0.970 $\pm$ 0.150 -- -- --
1994 EV3 QB1/4 7.108 $\pm$ 0.089 27.511 $\pm$ 7.555 1.500 $\pm$ 0.150 0.516 $\pm$ 0.124 0.840 $\pm$ 0.199 -- -- --
1994 GV9 QB1/1 6.815 $\pm$ 0.091 -- -- 0.740 $\pm$ 0.099 -- -- -- --
1994 JQ1 QB1/5 6.603 $\pm$ 0.127 -- -- 0.945 $\pm$ 0.097 -- -- -- --
1994 JR1 Plut/7 6.844 $\pm$ 0.071 24.825 $\pm$ 5.805 1.010 $\pm$ 0.180 0.656 $\pm$ 0.115 0.520 $\pm$ 0.120 -- -- --
1994 JS QB1/2 7.255 $\pm$ 0.062 -- -- 0.850 $\pm$ 0.070 -- -- -- --
1994 JV QB1/2 7.195 $\pm$ 0.058 37.024 $\pm$ 5.331 -- 0.771 $\pm$ 0.091 0.563 $\pm$ 0.133 -- -- --
1994 TA Cent/2 11.413 $\pm$ 0.126 35.801 $\pm$ 6.104 1.261 $\pm$ 0.139 0.672 $\pm$ 0.080 0.740 $\pm$ 0.210 -- -- --
1994 TB Plut/10 7.505 $\pm$ 0.080 39.035 $\pm$ 4.615 1.080 $\pm$ 0.132 0.706 $\pm$ 0.083 0.727 $\pm$ 0.108 -- -- --
1994 VK8 QB1/2 7.025 $\pm$ 0.144 32.582 $\pm$ 6.345 1.010 $\pm$ 0.060 0.659 $\pm$ 0.061 -- -- -- --
1995 DA2 QB1/7 7.964 $\pm$ 0.118 17.189 $\pm$ 7.292 1.310 $\pm$ 0.270 0.547 $\pm$ 0.131 0.515 $\pm$ 0.172 -- -- --
1995 DB2 QB1/2 8.112 $\pm$ 0.085 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1995 DC2 QB1/6 6.848 $\pm$ 0.148 36.530 $\pm$ 7.927 -- 0.770 $\pm$ 0.160 0.580 $\pm$ 0.160 -- -- --
1995 FB21 QB1/4 7.017 $\pm$ 0.099 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1995 HM5 Plut/7 7.881 $\pm$ 0.111 6.761 $\pm$ 4.993 0.649 $\pm$ 0.102 0.463 $\pm$ 0.096 0.370 $\pm$ 0.108 -- 1.200 $\pm$ 0.470 --
1995 QY9 Plut/6 7.487 $\pm$ 0.126 10.588 $\pm$ 4.022 0.696 $\pm$ 0.121 0.520 $\pm$ 0.093 0.400 $\pm$ 0.060 -- -- --
1995 QZ9 Plut/2 7.886 $\pm$ 0.400 15.709 $\pm$ 5.234 0.880 $\pm$ 0.040 0.515 $\pm$ 0.050 -- -- -- --
1995 SM55 QB1/3 4.333 $\pm$ 0.053 1.269 $\pm$ 2.875 0.645 $\pm$ 0.034 0.394 $\pm$ 0.052 0.310 $\pm$ 0.066 -- -- --
1995 TL8 Scat/1 4.585 $\pm$ 0.056 33.942 $\pm$ 3.051 1.045 $\pm$ 0.072 0.695 $\pm$ 0.051 0.641 $\pm$ 0.076 -- -- --
1995 WY2 QB1/3 6.861 $\pm$ 0.110 21.766 $\pm$ 9.753 1.004 $\pm$ 0.206 0.648 $\pm$ 0.190 0.458 $\pm$ 0.208 -- -- --
1996 RQ20 QB1/5 6.890 $\pm$ 0.104 21.258 $\pm$ 5.329 0.935 $\pm$ 0.141 0.553 $\pm$ 0.099 0.609 $\pm$ 0.120 -- -- --
1996 RR20 Plut/2 6.586 $\pm$ 0.133 40.209 $\pm$ 5.038 1.150 $\pm$ 0.094 0.707 $\pm$ 0.070 0.760 $\pm$ 0.160 -- -- --
1996 SZ4 Plut/2 8.181 $\pm$ 0.159 19.062 $\pm$ 4.832 0.783 $\pm$ 0.124 0.531 $\pm$ 0.062 0.620 $\pm$ 0.170 -- -- --
1996 TC68 QB1/1 6.734 $\pm$ 0.073 -- -- 0.600 $\pm$ 0.078 -- -- -- --
1996 TK66 QB1/2 6.281 $\pm$ 0.074 27.932 $\pm$ 3.716 1.002 $\pm$ 0.060 0.640 $\pm$ 0.050 0.590 $\pm$ 0.120 -- -- --
1996 TL66 Scat/10 5.227 $\pm$ 0.133 3.355 $\pm$ 3.011 0.694 $\pm$ 0.056 0.334 $\pm$ 0.052 0.428 $\pm$ 0.079 -- 0.350 $\pm$ 0.117 -0.040 $\pm$ 0.112
1996 TO66 QB1/16 4.544 $\pm$ 0.049 5.371 $\pm$ 2.467 0.666 $\pm$ 0.060 0.377 $\pm$ 0.047 0.375 $\pm$ 0.060 -- -0.210 $\pm$ 0.170 0.810 $\pm$ 0.158
1996 TP66 QB1/9 6.958 $\pm$ 0.063 32.326 $\pm$ 3.690 0.984 $\pm$ 0.109 0.654 $\pm$ 0.073 0.683 $\pm$ 0.075 -- 0.170 $\pm$ 0.078 0.020 $\pm$ 0.092
1996 TQ66 Plut/6 7.137 $\pm$ 0.078 35.809 $\pm$ 4.398 1.186 $\pm$ 0.118 0.655 $\pm$ 0.081 0.750 $\pm$ 0.100 -- -- --
1996 TS66 QB1/9 5.986 $\pm$ 0.112 28.922 $\pm$ 5.214 1.010 $\pm$ 0.082 0.635 $\pm$ 0.110 0.645 $\pm$ 0.097 -- 0.650 $\pm$ 0.071 --
1997 CQ29 QB1/5 6.763 $\pm$ 0.183 34.308 $\pm$ 5.942 0.990 $\pm$ 0.127 0.728 $\pm$ 0.120 0.605 $\pm$ 0.120 -- -- --
1997 CR29 QB1/2 7.076 $\pm$ 0.135 20.636 $\pm$ 8.257 0.750 $\pm$ 0.152 0.538 $\pm$ 0.157 0.620 $\pm$ 0.182 -- -- --
1997 CS29 QB1/10 5.065 $\pm$ 0.085 28.988 $\pm$ 2.815 1.049 $\pm$ 0.082 0.667 $\pm$ 0.053 0.592 $\pm$ 0.061 -- 0.300 $\pm$ 0.156 -0.100 $\pm$ 0.233
1997 CT29 QB1/2 6.498 $\pm$ 0.230 -- -- 0.744 $\pm$ 0.090 -- -- -- --
1997 CU29 QB1/4 6.206 $\pm$ 0.108 28.730 $\pm$ 3.680 1.157 $\pm$ 0.145 0.634 $\pm$ 0.058 0.638 $\pm$ 0.098 -- -- --
1997 GA45 QB1/1 7.744 $\pm$ 0.500 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1997 QH4 QB1/3 6.983 $\pm$ 0.133 28.694 $\pm$ 6.173 1.039 $\pm$ 0.131 0.628 $\pm$ 0.103 0.649 $\pm$ 0.159 -- -- --
1997 QJ4 Plut/3 7.424 $\pm$ 0.124 9.307 $\pm$ 6.115 0.700 $\pm$ 0.120 0.511 $\pm$ 0.119 0.362 $\pm$ 0.130 -- -- --
1997 RL13 QB1/1 9.361 $\pm$ 0.300 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1997 RT5 QB1/1 6.736 $\pm$ 0.030 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1997 RX9 QB1/1 7.800 $\pm$ 0.100 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1997 SZ10 QB1/1 8.145 $\pm$ 0.060 31.431 $\pm$ 3.246 1.140 $\pm$ 0.080 0.650 $\pm$ 0.030 -- -- -- --
1998 BU48 Cent/1 7.033 $\pm$ 0.057 26.985 $\pm$ 3.102 1.105 $\pm$ 0.074 0.648 $\pm$ 0.052 0.570 $\pm$ 0.078 -- -- --
1998 FS144 QB1/1 -- 20.767 $\pm$ 6.964 0.910 $\pm$ 0.076 0.560 $\pm$ 0.067 -- -- -- --
1998 HK151 Plut/3 6.879 $\pm$ 0.039 8.017 $\pm$ 3.404 0.510 $\pm$ 0.090 0.469 $\pm$ 0.065 0.398 $\pm$ 0.073 -- -- --
1998 KG62 QB1/2 6.065 $\pm$ 0.078 23.450 $\pm$ 3.122 1.000 $\pm$ 0.060 0.561 $\pm$ 0.074 0.640 $\pm$ 0.040 -- -- --
1998 QM107 Cent/1 10.226 $\pm$ 0.060 16.299 $\pm$ 3.246 0.730 $\pm$ 0.060 0.520 $\pm$ 0.030 -- -- -- --
1998 SG35 Cent/2 10.828 $\pm$ 0.023 12.259 $\pm$ 2.768 0.725 $\pm$ 0.089 0.456 $\pm$ 0.050 0.546 $\pm$ 0.063 -- -- --
1998 SM165 QB1/2 5.799 $\pm$ 0.190 33.103 $\pm$ 3.836 0.966 $\pm$ 0.091 0.687 $\pm$ 0.079 0.648 $\pm$ 0.073 -- -- --
1998 SN165 QB1/4 5.736 $\pm$ 0.410 7.311 $\pm$ 4.410 0.712 $\pm$ 0.095 0.446 $\pm$ 0.089 0.419 $\pm$ 0.088 -- -- --
1998 TF35 Cent/2 8.683 $\pm$ 0.193 34.880 $\pm$ 4.193 1.085 $\pm$ 0.111 0.697 $\pm$ 0.064 0.651 $\pm$ 0.119 -- -- --
1998 UR43 Plut/3 8.090 $\pm$ 0.130 9.494 $\pm$ 5.465 0.784 $\pm$ 0.101 0.565 $\pm$ 0.106 0.268 $\pm$ 0.117 -- -- --
1998 VG44 Plut/2 6.349 $\pm$ 0.057 24.105 $\pm$ 3.881 0.951 $\pm$ 0.055 0.567 $\pm$ 0.056 0.668 $\pm$ 0.116 -- -- --
1998 WH24 QB1/7 4.512 $\pm$ 0.108 23.435 $\pm$ 3.338 0.924 $\pm$ 0.063 0.602 $\pm$ 0.043 0.547 $\pm$ 0.111 -- -- --
1998 WV24 Plut/1 7.112 $\pm$ 0.040 14.117 $\pm$ 3.243 0.770 $\pm$ 0.010 0.500 $\pm$ 0.030 -- -- -- --
1998 WV31 Plut/1 7.643 $\pm$ 0.070 10.197 $\pm$ 4.283 0.834 $\pm$ 0.089 0.513 $\pm$ 0.069 0.357 $\pm$ 0.114 -- -- --
1998 WX24 QB1/1 6.232 $\pm$ 0.090 37.747 $\pm$ 5.234 1.090 $\pm$ 0.050 0.700 $\pm$ 0.050 -- -- -- --
1998 WX31 QB1/1 6.225 $\pm$ 0.075 26.201 $\pm$ 4.606 -- 0.602 $\pm$ 0.080 0.640 $\pm$ 0.112 -- -- --
1998 XY95 Scat/1 6.492 $\pm$ 0.167 36.230 $\pm$ 7.184 0.939 $\pm$ 0.238 0.645 $\pm$ 0.140 0.772 $\pm$ 0.153 -- -- --
1999 CC158 Scat/1 5.430 $\pm$ 0.074 20.293 $\pm$ 3.657 0.962 $\pm$ 0.098 0.571 $\pm$ 0.063 0.552 $\pm$ 0.088 -- -- --
1999 CD158 QB1/1 4.903 $\pm$ 0.066 13.430 $\pm$ 3.734 0.871 $\pm$ 0.077 0.477 $\pm$ 0.065 0.543 $\pm$ 0.089 -- -- --
1999 CF119 Scat/1 7.031 $\pm$ 0.077 13.450 $\pm$ 4.603 -- 0.557 $\pm$ 0.083 0.391 $\pm$ 0.107 -- -- --
1999 DE9 Scat/2 4.804 $\pm$ 0.056 20.506 $\pm$ 2.281 0.915 $\pm$ 0.058 0.572 $\pm$ 0.042 0.559 $\pm$ 0.049 -- -- --
1999 HB12 Scat/1 -- 8.150 $\pm$ 3.096 0.870 $\pm$ 0.060 0.500 $\pm$ 0.050 0.320 $\pm$ 0.080 -- -- --
1999 HR11 QB1/1 -- 29.372 $\pm$ 4.428 0.920 $\pm$ 0.120 0.530 $\pm$ 0.100 0.800 $\pm$ 0.070 -- -- --
1999 HS11 QB1/1 -- 30.142 $\pm$ 4.784 1.010 $\pm$ 0.160 0.680 $\pm$ 0.100 0.600 $\pm$ 0.090 -- -- --
1999 KR16 QB1/1 5.505 $\pm$ 0.020 44.581 $\pm$ 1.577 1.100 $\pm$ 0.050 0.740 $\pm$ 0.030 0.770 $\pm$ 0.030 -- -- --
1999 OX3 Cent/3 7.272 $\pm$ 0.196 28.215 $\pm$ 3.746 1.072 $\pm$ 0.117 0.692 $\pm$ 0.055 0.475 $\pm$ 0.109 -- -- --
1999 OY3 QB1/1 6.303 $\pm$ 0.040 0.952 $\pm$ 2.294 0.710 $\pm$ 0.010 0.370 $\pm$ 0.020 -- -- -- --
1999 RY215 QB1/1 -- -- 0.800 $\pm$ 0.100 -- 0.780 $\pm$ 0.080 -- -- --
1999 RZ253 QB1/2 5.428 $\pm$ 0.056 29.962 $\pm$ 3.002 0.820 $\pm$ 0.170 0.646 $\pm$ 0.058 0.647 $\pm$ 0.062 -- -- --
1999 TC36 Plut/5 4.920 $\pm$ 0.070 32.331 $\pm$ 2.382 1.008 $\pm$ 0.050 0.687 $\pm$ 0.041 0.625 $\pm$ 0.056 -- -- --
1999 TD10 Scat/2 8.706 $\pm$ 0.022 11.893 $\pm$ 1.908 0.770 $\pm$ 0.050 0.495 $\pm$ 0.040 0.470 $\pm$ 0.032 -- -- --
1999 TR11 Plut/1 8.058 $\pm$ 0.140 44.369 $\pm$ 7.259 1.020 $\pm$ 0.080 0.750 $\pm$ 0.070 -- -- -- --
1999 UG5 Cent/5 10.483 $\pm$ 0.134 25.886 $\pm$ 2.677 0.964 $\pm$ 0.085 0.607 $\pm$ 0.060 0.625 $\pm$ 0.042 -- -- --
2000 EB173 Plut/17 4.657 $\pm$ 0.110 22.884 $\pm$ 3.969 0.954 $\pm$ 0.050 0.565 $\pm$ 0.090 0.623 $\pm$ 0.061 -- -- --
2000 OK67 QB1/2 6.138 $\pm$ 0.063 15.972 $\pm$ 7.056 0.727 $\pm$ 0.108 0.517 $\pm$ 0.068 -- -- -- --
2000 PE30 Scat/1 -- 4.713 $\pm$ 2.049 0.710 $\pm$ 0.050 0.380 $\pm$ 0.040 0.450 $\pm$ 0.040 -- -- --
2000 QC243 Cent/1 7.949 $\pm$ 0.049 6.961 $\pm$ 2.724 0.724 $\pm$ 0.062 0.448 $\pm$ 0.044 0.397 $\pm$ 0.069 -- -- --
2000 WR106 QB1/1 3.048 $\pm$ 0.059 39.611 $\pm$ 3.536 1.017 $\pm$ 0.071 0.711 $\pm$ 0.071 0.730 $\pm$ 0.071 -- -- --


(1) Class: QB1 = Cubewano, Plut = Plutino, Cent = Centaur, SPC = Short Period Comet, LPC = Long Period Comet. (2) Number of epochs. Grt is the spectral gradient $\cal S$ (%/100 nm). M11 is the absolute R magnitude.


In order to get the most significant results, the statistical analysis presented in this paper were based on a complete compilation of all the TNO and Centaur colors that have been reported in the "Distant EKO'' web page (Parker 2001), as of 2001. Several additional papers, preprint and private communications about TNOs and Comets were also added. We realize that such a compilation can never be complete and up-to-date; the current database is frozen in its current state, and we plan to add new and missing papers in future versions. Refer to Appendix A for the references that were used for each object. Authors are encouraged to send us their measurements electronically (ohainaut@eso.org), so that we can include them in this database.

When available, the individual magnitudes were used, so that non-standard color indexes (i.e. not the traditional B-V, V-R...) can be computed (we hereby encourage the authors to publish these individual magnitudes). Where the magnitudes were not available, we used the published color indexes. In this compilation, no correction has been made for the different photometric systems used. Only the name of the filter is taken into account, so that $R_{\rm Bessel} = R_{\rm
KC}$, K=K'=Ks, etc. We assume that the errors introduced by these assumptions are small compared to the measurement errors. As all the TNO measurements were obtained after 1992, a large fraction of them were calibrated using the standard stars by Landolt (1992). If the authors computed the color term of their system and applied them, the magnitude they published are de facto in the Bessel system as described by Landolt, further reducing possible color discrepancies between the different filter system used.

For a given epoch (loosely defined as "within a few hours''), we computed all the possible colors and magnitudes based on the available colors and magnitudes. It is important to note that no additional color indexes were computed at that stage (i.e. if V is available at one epoch, and R at another, the V-R index is not computed mixing these epochs). Some publications list colors obtained by combining magnitudes obtained at different epochs. These were not entered in the database. We also checked for and removed multiple entries for the same measurements that appeared in different papers.

The magnitudes and colors from different epochs (and different authors) were combined in order to obtain one average magnitude and color set per object. However, no new color indexes are computed even if we now have enough data (e.g. if an author reported a R-I and another I-J, we do not compute nor use the resulting R-J), as these would not be obtained from simultaneous data. In this way, even if the object presents some intrinsic magnitude variability, we do not introduce any additional color artifacts. The average magnitude that we publish here corresponds to the average of the (possibly varying) magnitudes, and the average colors is the average of the measured colors. The variations of magnitude will not contribute to the color error.

For this combination, $\bar{x}$, the average magnitude or color is obtained by weighted average of the individual magnitudes and colors. We did not a priori reject any published measurement, nor give a stronger or lighter weight to the measurements from a given author or team. We did not give a larger weight to measurements obtained on a larger telescope. For this study, we fully trust and rely on the published error bars: the weight of a measurement is set to $1/\sigma$:

 \begin{displaymath}\bar{x} = \frac{ \sum_{i=1}^{N} x_i / \sigma_i }
{ \sum_{i=1}^{N} 1/\sigma_i }\cdot
\end{displaymath} (1)

Using this weight, very good measurements (trusting their small $\sigma$) will be given a strong weight compared to approximate values. In case of multiple measurements xi, i=1... N of an item (magnitude or color), the error $\sigma$ is computed as a combination of the individual errors $\sigma_i$ and of the dispersion of the measurements around their mean $\bar{x}$, using

 \begin{displaymath}\sigma = \sqrt{
\frac{ \sum_{i=1}^{N} \sigma_i}
{ \sum_{i=...
...ar{x})^2 / \sigma_i}
{(N-1)\sum_{i=1}^{N} 1/\sigma_i}
}\cdot
\end{displaymath} (2)

The first term in the root corresponds to the increase of the Signal-to-Noise ratio resulting from the multiple measurements, while the second term is the variance of the measurements (the N-1 is because we don't have a priori knowledge of the mean). With this combination, a measurement with a large error will have a small contribution to the final average and error. On the other hand, two equally good measurements having different values will have a resulting error that is larger than the individual ones, reflecting a possible variation and a definite uncertainty on the value. In case only one measurement is available, it is reported with its error bar in the final table. Some objects were measured several times. The dispersion of these measurements is similar to the error bars, suggesting that no dramatic systematic effects affect the different teams, and therefore indicating that the combined data are of better quality than the individual ones. The averaging program also includes a warning system checking for very different values of given color of an object (the limit corresponds to an incompatibility at the $3\sigma$level taking into account the sum of the considered error bars). The current database did not trigger this warning.

The classical color indexes are reported in Table 1. In this table, the un-named objects are identified by their temporary MPC designation (e.g. 1992 QB1), while the named objects are identified with their number and name. For uniformity, we don't use the number of numbered but still un-named object. In the case of the numbered comets, their IAU designation is used.

The table also lists the number of independent epochs that were combined for each object.

  
2.2 Absolute magnitude

For each epoch, we attempted to compute an absolute R magnitude: for this purpose, we used either the measured R magnitude, when available, or another magnitude and the corresponding color index with R. The helio- and geo-centric distances (r and $\Delta$, resp., [AU]) were computed using a two-body ephemerides program with the orbital elements available at MPC, and the absolute magnitude M(1,1) was computed using

 \begin{displaymath}M(1,1) = R - 5 \log (r \Delta).
\end{displaymath} (3)

Because i) the phase angle is usually small for MBOSS observations, ii) this angle does not change significantly from epoch to epoch, and iii) the phase function is unknown for most MBOSSes, we neglect the phase correction. Because of i) and ii), this correction would in any case not change significantly the result. The M(1,1) for all available epochs were averaged using the same procedure as described above; the error was also computed. The results are also listed in Table 1. Assuming a value for the surface albedo p, these absolute magnitude can be converted into the radius RN of the object [km] using the formula from Russell (1916)

 \begin{displaymath}p R_N^2 = 2.235 \times 10^{22} \times 10^{0.4(M_{\odot} - M(1,1))} ,
\end{displaymath} (4)

where $M_{\odot}$ is the R magnitude of the Sun and M(1,1) is the absolute R magnitude from Eq. (3). As the albedo p is not known (except for a couple of objects), and in particular because neutral-grey objects could either correspond to extremely old surfaces (with p as low as 0.02, Thompson et al. 1987) or to objects covered with fresh ice (therefore having a higher albedo, possibly as high as that of Pluto, 0.3, or Chiron, 0.1), we do not give a generic conversion of M(1,1) into a radius.

  
2.3 Spectral gradient

The information contained in the color indexes can be converted into a very low resolution reflectivity spectrum ${\cal R}(\lambda)$(Jewitt & Meech 1986), using

 \begin{displaymath}{\cal R}(\lambda) = 10^{-0.4(m(\lambda)-m_\odot(\lambda))},
\end{displaymath} (5)

where m and $m_\odot$ are the magnitude of the object and of the Sun at the considered wavelength. Normalizing the reflectivity to 1 at a given wavelength (in our case, the V central wavelength), we have

  \begin{displaymath}
{\cal R}(\lambda) =
10^{-0.4( (m(\lambda)-m(V)) - (m(\lambda)-m(V))_\odot)}.
\end{displaymath} (6)

The solar colors used are listed in Table 2. The reflectivity spectra are given in Fig. 1.

Boehnhardt et al. (2001) have compared such magnitude-based reflectivity spectra with real spectra (i.e. obtained with a spectrograph) for $\sim$10 objects observed quasi-simultaneously with a large telescope (one of ESO's 8 m VLTs) through broad-band filters and with a low resolution spectrograph. He found a excellent agreement between real and magnitude-based spectra.


 

 
Table 2: Solar colors used in this paper, from Hardorp (1980), Campins et al. (1985) and Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, Cox (2000).
Color Value
U-B 0.204
U-V 0.845
V-R 0.36
V-I 0.69
V-K 1.486
J-H 0.23
H-K 0.06



  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{hainaut_fig1_tnoGradSpecExample.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 1: Examples of reflectivity spectra, sorted by increasing gradient. The reflectivity is normalized to 1 for the V filter; the spectra have been arbitrarily shifted for clarity. For each object, the dotted line is the linear regression over the V, R, I range, corresponding to the gradient $\cal S$. Similar reflectivity spectra are available for all the objects of the database on our MBOSS web site.

We can introduce a description of the reflectivity spectrum: the reddening $\cal S$, also called slope parameter or spectral index, which is expressed in percent of reddening per 100 nm:

 \begin{displaymath}{\cal S}(\lambda_1,\lambda_2) =
100.\frac{{\cal R}(\lambda_2)-{\cal R}
(\lambda_1)}{(\lambda_2-\lambda_1)/100}\cdot
\end{displaymath} (7)

Boehnhardt et al. (2001) realized that all the objects observed with a high S/Ndisplay a linear reflectivity spectrum over the V-R-Irange. We can therefore introduce a global value for $\cal S$, describing the spectrum over the V-R-I range. We obtained the value of $\cal S$, together with its uncertainty, by linear regression of $\cal R$ as given in Eq. (6). We restricted this fit to the objects having at least two color indexes measured. The values of $\cal S$ and its error are listed in Table 3. We also restricted the fit to the V, R and I filters, excluding B, because the B reflectivity shows a systematic trend, as described below. The error on $\cal S$ is a combination of the error on each ${\cal R}(\lambda)$ (obtained by propagation of the errors on the colors) and on the linear regression. In order to further characterize the shape of the spectrum, we introduced d, the total deviation of the reflectivity with respect to the linear regression:

 \begin{displaymath}d = \sum_{\lambda=B, V, R, I}
{ ({\cal R}(\lambda) - {\cal R}_l(\lambda)) },
\end{displaymath} (8)

where ${\cal R}_l$ is the reflectivity expected from the linear fit. Positive values of d correspond to spectra with a global concavity, while negative values correspond to a convexity. The concavity d can be interpreted in two ways: either i) one considers that the result published by Boehnhardt et al. (2001) can be generalized to all MBOSSes; in that case, objects with a large |d|suffer from large uncertainties and should be re-measured with a better S/N, or ii) it is considered as real, and large values of |d| denote objects whose spectral characteristic are intrinsically different and worth a more detailed study. In both cases, observers should take a closer look at the objects identified by a large deviation |d| in Table 3. These objects are (7066) Nessus, 1991 QB1, 1993 SC, 1994 ES2, 1994 TB, 1996 RR20 and 1999 KR16.


  \begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{hainaut_fig2a_tno_B-...
...includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{hainaut_fig2f_tno_J-H_H-K.eps} }\end{figure} Figure 2: MBOSS color-color diagrams. The meaning of the different symbols is given in Fig. 4. The reddening line ranges gradients from -10 to 70%/100 nm; a tick mark is placed every 10 units. The outliers objects in the B-V, R-I are 1994 ES2 (top left), 1994 EV3(top right), 1998 HK151 (bottom left), and 1995 DA2 (middle right). All other combinations of colors are available on the MBOSS web site.


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{hainaut_fig3a_tnoOrbit_B-V...
...cm}
\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{hainaut_fig3f_tnoGrad.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 3: Visible color distributions as functions of the absolute magnitude M(1,1), the orbit semi-major axis a [AU], the eccentricity e, the inclination i and the orbit excitation $\cal E$ (see text for definition). The meaning of the different symbols is given in Fig. 4. Other colors are available electronically and on line at the MBOSS web site.

It is interesting to note that the coordinates $({\cal S}, d)$ of an object are very similar to the "principal components'' (PC1,PC2) that Barucci et al. (2001) have obtained from an analysis of the colors of 22 objects: the position of a MBOSS in a multi-dimensional color diagram is determined primarily by PC1 (which can physically be associated to $\cal S$) and to a much lesser extent by PC2 (which would be related to d). The additional dimension of the multi-dimensional color diagram contain little information. We intent to apply a similar analysis to this dataset.

  
2.4 Color-color diagrams

Figure 2 shows a selection of color-color diagrams; the whole collection, for all possible color indexes, is available on the MBOSS web site. To guide the eye, the reddening line is drawn on each diagram. This line is constructed computing the colors for an object of a given reddening $\cal S$ using Eq. (7), and then connecting all the points for $-10 < \cal S < +$70%/100 nm (a tick is placed every 10%). An object located directly on this line has a perfectly linear reflectivity spectrum, and its slope $\cal S$ can be estimated using the tick-marks on the line. Objects above the line have a concave spectrum (positive d), while objects below the line have a convex spectrum (negative d) over the spectral range considered.

As it was noted in Sect. 1.2, the three physical processes that are suspected to effect the color of a MBOSS surface independently produce linear reflectivity spectra (in first approximation, over the visible wavelength range). The average over the complete surface of an object will therefore also be a linear spectrum. Within that hypothesis, if no other physical processes plays an important role, and if the MBOSSes have the same original intrinsic composition, the objects should all lie on the reddening line. A young-surfaced object would have solar-like colors, and the aging will move the object up the reddening line, while collision and activity will move it back down. Similarly, an object left undisturbed long enough would evolve moving up the reddening line till it reaches the maximum possible reddening, then, the continued irradiation of its surface would cause it to further darken (Thompson et al. 1987), possibly moving back down on the reddening line. In that case, one could expect to find among the neutral objects some MBOSSes covered with fresh ice, together with objects with ancient ice, with a very dark albedo. This is tested later (cf. Sect. 3.4).

The diagrams from Fig. 2 are in agreement with this simple interpretation of the reddening line: the MBOSSes are clustered along that line. For the (B-V) and (V-R) colors, the deviations from the line are compatible with the error bars of the individual points, indicating that the spectra are linear over this wavelength range. The plots involving the (R-I) color, however, show a systematic deviation from the line for the reddest objects (particularly visible in the (B-R) vs. (R-I) diagram). This corresponds to the fact that the spectrum of the reddest objects flattens toward the IR, where it is typically flat/neutral (Davies 2000; McBride et al. 1999). One also notes a systematic deviation from the reddening line of the neutral to neutral-red points in the B-V vs. V-R diagram: the bulk of these points are significantly above the line; this corresponds to the bend observed around the B wavelength in many reflection spectra from Fig. 1. This bend is not observed in the "fresh ice'' laboratory spectra published by Thompson et al. (1987), suggesting that in spite of their low reddening, the surface of these objects could be significantly processed.

It is also interesting to note a small group of 5 objects clustered very near the solar colors in the $B-V\; {\rm vs.}\;V-R$ diagram, i.e. in the range corresponding to fresh ice surface. Two of these objects are either known or suspected to be cometary active, i.e. (2060) Chiron (Tholen et al. 1988; Meech & Belton 1989) and 1996 TO66 (Hainaut et al. 2000). A detailed study of the others (1995 SM55, 1996 TL66 and 1999 OY3) is well deserved.

In addition to the simple "reddening line'', it would be interesting to produce an evolution track of the color of laboratory ices, for increasing irradiation doses. Such work will be presented in another paper by the same authors.

The diagrams show notable outliers (i.e. isolated points, far from the reddening line and the general cluster of objects):

For all these objects, it seems that less accurate magnitudes from the early years of TNO photometry (before the VLT/Keck era) are the reason of the strange colors. We therefore encourage observers to acquire new colors for these objects. For instance, preliminary measurements of VLT data for 1994 ES2 and 1994 EV3 (Delsanti, priv. comm.) put these objects back in the main group.


next previous
Up: Colors of Minor Bodies System

Copyright ESO 2002