We model the actual surface magnetic field by superposition of
the star-centered global dipole
and a crust-anchored
dipole moment
,
whose influence results in small-scale
deviations of the surface magnetic field from the global dipole, as
presented in Fig. 1. The technical details of the calculations of
the resultant surface magnetic field are presented in the Appendix.
Here we discuss the main results and their consequences. For
simplicity, in this paper we mostly consider an axially symmetric
case in which both
and
are directed
along the z-axis (parallel or antiparallel), thus
(see Fig. 1). Also, for
convenience "
'' is expressed in units of
.
We use normalized units in which d=P=R=1 and
.
(see
caption of Fig. 2 for the normalization convention). All
calculations are carried out in three-dimensions, although, for
clarity of graphic presentation, in the figures we present only
two-dimensional cuts of the open field line regions.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Structure of
the surface magnetic field for a superposition of the global star-centered
dipolar moment ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As mentioned above, the formation of the VG inner accelerator requires
a very high magnetic field
G on the surface of
the polar cap (Usov & Melrose 1995, 1996; Gil & Mitra 2001). This can be achieved not
only in pulsars with high dipolar field
G. In
fact, some of the low-field pulsars with
G can
have a surface field
G if
(thus
d). We discuss such normal, low-field
pulsars later in this paper. Presently let us consider the HBP
with a dipolar surface field at the pole
G exceeding the photon splitting
limit
.
If all photon splitting modes operate,
such a pulsar should be radio-quiet. Alternatively these pulsars
could be radio-loud if the effective surface field is reduced
below
.
Such a scenario can be achieved if the polarities of
magnetic moments
and
are opposite, that is
and
are antiparallel. Figure 2 presents
a case with
and
.
The
actual surface values of
as
well as radial components of
and
are presented in the lower panel
of Fig. 2 (note that all radial components are positive
and that the total
is almost equal to
in this case). At
the pole (radius r=R and polar angle
)
the ratio
and thus
.
As one can see from this figure,
all surface field lines between
and
are
open, but the ratio
increases towards the polar cap
edge, reaching a value of about 0.5 in the region between polar
angles
and
.
The ratio
is also
about 0.5 in this region. Thus, the global dipolar field (
in our units) is effectively reduced by between 2 and 5 times in
different parts of the polar cap (defined as the surface area from
which the open magnetic field lines emanate). This means that the
ratio
ranges from 0.5 to 0.8 across the polar cap. The
actual polar cap is broader than the canonical dipolar polar cap
(two dashed vertical lines correspond to the last open dipolar field
lines emanating at the polar angles
radians
for a typical period P=1 s). The ratio of actual to dipolar polar
cap radii is
in this case. Thus, using
the argument of magnetic flux conservation of the open field
lines, one can say that an effective surface magnetic field of the
polar cap is about 2.8 times lower than the dipolar surface field
measured from the values of P and
.
If the estimated
dipole field
G (like in the case of PSR
J1814-1744, Table 1) then the actual surface field at the pole
is only
G, well below the photon
splitting death line
G. Such a pulsar can
be radio-loud without invoking the lengthened SCLF accelerator
proposed by ZH00. As shown by Gil & Mitra (2001), in such a strong surface
magnetic field the vacuum gap accelerator can form, which implies
low altitude coherent radio emission
(Melikidze et al. 2000, see Sect. 3 in this paper) at altitudes
(for a typical
pulsar with P=1 s) in agreement with observational constraints
on radio emission altitudes (Cordes 1978, 1992; Kijak & Gil 1997, 1998; Kijak 2001).
![]() |
Figure 3:
As in
Fig. 2 but for
![]() |
Figure 3 presents another case of opposite polarities
,
with magnitude of
being two
times stronger than in the previous case (Fig. 2). Again
for
,
at
the pole (r=R and
)
and
.
The
negative sign of the ratio
means that the surface
magnetic field
is directed opposite to
near the pole, that is the circumpolar field lines with polar
angles
(where
)
are closed. The last open surface field lines (solid)
emanating at polar angles
(where
)
reconnect with the last open dipolar field
lines (dashed) at altitudes
(thus about 2 km above
the surface). The actual polar cap, which is the surface through
which the open magnetic field lines emanate, has the shape of a ring
located outside the
circle of the dipolar polar cap with angular radius
(or diameter
cm).
Again, the magnetic flux conservation argument leads to
,
thus
is about
within the ring of the open field
lines (note that
in this region). The actual values
of the surface magnetic field (radial
and total
)
are shown as solid lines in
the lower panel of Fig. 3, in comparison with radial
components of the dipolar field
(dashed horizontal line). As one
can see,
and
is negative
for
.
If the dipolar surface component of the pulsar
magnetic field is
G (like PSR
J1726-3530 given in Table 1), then the actual surface magnetic field
G, is below the photon splitting threshold.
![]() |
Figure 4:
As in
Fig. 3 but for
![]() |
Figure 4 presents a case with
in which both magnetic moments have the same polarity.
Obviously, in such a case the surface magnetic field will be
stronger as compared with pure dipole (m=0). The flux conservation
argument gives a surface magnetic field
(the ratio
). Thus the actual
surface field is about 3 times stronger than the inferred dipolar
field
G.
Such cases of
increasing an effective magnetic field can be important in normal
pulsars with low dipolar field
G (Gil & Mitra 2001).
![]() |
Figure 5:
As in
Fig. 4 but for
![]() |
It is then interesting to examine how different polarities of
and
would influence normal pulsars with
.
If
thus
then of course
can be slightly lower than
,
as in the
case of HBPs (Fig. 2). In such a case, however, the VG
cannot form. In fact, as argued by Gil & Mitra (2001), the formation of
the VG requires that
is close to 1013 G or even above, thus
is required in normal pulsars (see also
Gil et al. 2001). Figure 5
illustrates a case of high surface magnetic field with
,
in which the VG can apparently form. As one can see from this
figure, the values of
at the ring-shaped polar cap are close
to dipolar values
.
One can show
that this is a general situation, that is,
no matter
by how much
exceeds
at the pole. This follows from the
fact that the angular location
of the polar cap ring
increases with increasing ratio
.
For example, in the case
presented in Fig. 5
and
the last open field lines emanate at polar angles
radians, or at polar cap radii
cm (for P=1 s). Thus, the narrow polar
cap ring is located far from the local dipole
,
whose
influence is weak at this distance. The circumpolar field lines
between polar angles -0.053 to +0.053 are closed.
Thus, we conclude that the actual pulsar surface magnetic field
can significantly differ (say by an order of magnitude) from
the inferred dipolar field
only in the case when the
polarities of the global
and local
dipole
(Fig. 1) are the same, as illustrated in Fig. 4.
If this is the case, then
can largely exceed
,
which
seems to be important from the viewpoint of vacuum gap formation,
which requires
G (see Gil & Mitra 2001). Therefore, in
normal VG-driven radio pulsars the polar cap should be circular,
or at least filled - if the axial symmetry does not hold. A
ring-shaped polar cap can occur only in normal pulsars with
and in radio-loud HBPs with
.
In the accompanying paper Gil et al. (2002) explored consequences of
the vacuum gap model interpretation for drifting subpulses observed
in PSR B0943+10, in which 20 sparks move circumferentially around the
perimeter of the polar cap, each completing one circulation in 37
pulsar periods (Deshpande & Rankin 1999, 2001). Gil et al. (2002) considered both
the curvature radiation (CR) and resonant inverse Compton
radiation (ICS) seed photons as sources of electron-positron
pairs and determined the parameter space for the surface magnetic
field structure in each case. For the CR-VG the surface magnetic
field strength
G and the radius of
curvature of surface field lines
,
while for the resonant ICS-VG
G and
(of
course, in both caseS
G). The
CR-VG with such a curved surface magnetic field does not seem likely
(although it cannot be excluded), while the ICS-VG gap supported
by the magnetic field structure determined by the parameter space
specified above guarantees a system of 20 sparks circulating
around the perimeter of the polar cap by means of the
drift in about 37 pulsar periods.
Further, Gil et al. (2002) modelled the magnetic field structure
determined by the ICS-VG parameter space (specified above), using
the numerical formalism developed in this paper. Since
G in this case, to obtain
G one
needs
and the same
polarity of both components. Following the symmetry suggested by
the observed patterns of drifting subpulses in PSR B0943+10, the
local dipole axis was placed at the polar cap center. A number of
model solutions corresponding to
and
d and satisfying the ICS-VG parameter space, was
then obtained. As a result of this specific modelling
Gil et al. (2002) obtained a number of interesting and important
conclusions: (i) The conditions for the formation of the ICS-VG
are satisfied only at the peripheral ring-like region of the polar
cap, which can just accommodate a system of 20 sparks performing
drift. (ii) The surface magnetic field lines
within the actual gap are converging, which stabilizes the
drifting sparks by preventing them
from rushing towards the pole, as opposed to the case of a diverging
dipolar field (e.g. Fillipenko & Radhakrishnan 1982). (iii) No model solutions with
G and
cm, could be obtained which corresponding to the
CR-VG parameter space, which in turn favors the ICS-VG in PSR B0943+10.
Copyright ESO 2002