A&A 387, 725-732 (2002)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020409
R. Ouyed - F. Sannino
Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Received 28 January 2002 / Accepted 14 March 2002
Abstract
A model for
Gamma ray bursts inner engine based on quark stars
(speculated to exist in nature) is presented.
We describe how and why these objects
might constitute new
candidates for GRB inner engines.
At the heart of the model is the onset of
exotic phases of quark matter at the surface of such stars,
in particular the 2-flavor color superconductivity.
A novel feature of such a phase
is the generation of
particles which are unstable to photon decay providing
a natural mechanism for a fireball
generation; an approach which is
fundamentally different from models
where the fireball is generated during
collapse
or conversion of neutron star
to quark star processes.
The model is capable of reproducing
crucial features of Gamma ray bursts, such as the episodic
activity of the engine (multiple and random shell emission)
and the two distinct categories of the bursts
(two regimes are isolated in the model with 2 s and
81 s
burst total duration).
Key words: dense matter - gamma rays: bursts - stars: interior
A central problem contributing to the Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) mystery is the unknown nature of the engine powering them (Kouveliotou et al. 1995; Kulkarni et al. 1999; Piran 1999a; Piran 1999b). Many have been suggested but it is fair to say that we are still far from a definite answer. Regardless of the nature of the engine, however, it is widely accepted that the most conventional interpretation of the observed GRBs result from the conversion of the kinetic energy of ultra-relativistic particles to radiation in an optically thin region. The particles being accelerated by a fireball mechanism (or explosion of radiation) taking place near the central engine (Goodman 1986; Shemi & Piran 1990; Paczynski 1990).
The first challenge is to conceive of circumstances that would create a sufficiently energetic fireball. Conversion of neutron stars to quark stars (Olinto 1987; Cheng & Dai 1996; Bombaci & Datta 2000) has been suggested as one possibility. Other models also involve the compact object element; such as black holes (Blandford & Znajek 1977) and coalescing neutron stars (Eichler et al. 1989; Ruffert & Janka 1999; Janka et al. 1999). We show in this work that the plausible existence of quark stars combined with the onset of a newly revived state of quark matter - called color superconductivity - in these objects offers a new way of tackling the GRB puzzle (Ouyed 2002). Here we will argue that quark stars might constitute new candidates for GRB inner engines.
Quark matter at very high density is
expected to behave as a color superconductor (see Rajagopal & Wilczek 2000
for a review).
Associated with
superconductivity is the so-called gap energy inducing the quark-quark pairing and the
critical temperature
(
)
above which thermal fluctuations will
wash out the superconductive state.
A novel feature of such a phase is the generation of glueball like particles
(hadrons made of gluons) which as demonstrated
in Ouyed & Sannino (2001) immediately decay into photons.
If color superconductivity sets in at the surface
of a quark star the glueball decay
becomes a natural mechanism for a fireball
generation.
The paper is presented as follows: In Sect. 2 we briefly describe the concept of color superconductivity in quark matter. Glueball formation and their subsequent two-photon decay is described. Section 3 deals with quark stars and the onset of color superconductivity at their surface. In Sect. 4, we explain how GRBs are powered in this picture and show that variability (multiple shell emission) is inherent to the inner engine. We isolate two GRB regimes in Sect. 5 associated with small and massive quark stars. The model's features and its predictions are summarized in Sect. 6 while a discussion and conclusion follows in Sect. 7 where the model's assumptions and limitations are highlighted.
While in this paper we deal mostly with the astrophysics aspect of the model, we nevertheless give a brief overview of color superconductivity and the glueball-to-photon decay process which leads to the fireball. The interested reader is referred to Ouyed & Sannino (2001) for the underlying physics. For a recent review see Sannino (2002).
A reasonable Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD)
phase diagram (in the
plane, where
is the chemical potential simply related
to matter density) is shown in
Fig. 1. At high
temperature and density, matter is believed to be
in a quark-gluon plasma phase (QGP).
The hadronic phase lies in the region of low
temperature and density. At high densities
but low temperatures, when nuclei melt into each other,
it is now believed that a color superconductive
phase sets in.
This phase is characterized by the formation
of quark-quark condensate. In the
2-flavor
color superconductivity (2SC) the
up and down quark come into play during pairing.
Furthermore, 2SC is characterized by five out of the
eight gluons acquiring mass.
We refer the interested reader
to Rajagopal & Wilczek (2000)
for a review of the dynamical properties
of 2SC.
The 3 massless gluons in the 2SC phase which bind into light glueballs (LGBs) together with the quarks up and down constitute the 2SC phase mixture. In Ouyed & Sannino (2001) we studied certain properties of these LGBs. Among the properties relevant to our present study we found, i) the LGBS decay into photons with an associated lifetime of the order of 10-14 s; ii) the mass of the LGBs is of the order of 1 MeV.
![]() |
Figure 1: A schematic representation of a possible QCD phase diagram (Rajagopal & Wilczek 2000). At high temperature and density, matter is believed to be in a quark-gluon plasma phase (QGP). The hadronic phase lies in the region of low temperature and density. At very high density but low temperature, when nuclei melt into each other, it has been suggested that a color superconductive phase might set in. 2SC denotes a 2-flavor color superconductive regime. The arrow depicts a plausible cooling path of a HQS surface leading to the onset of color superconductivity. |
Open with DEXTER |
We now turn to study the astrophysical consequences when such a state sets in at the surface of quark stars. As such, we first assume that quark stars exists in nature (further discussed in Sect. 7.1) and constitutes the first major assumption in our model.
We are concerned with quark stars
born with surface temperatures above .
We shall refer to these stars as "hot'' quark stars
(HQSs) in order to avoid any confusion with strange stars
which are conjectured to exist even at zero pressure if strange matter
is the absolute ground state of strong interacting matter rather than
iron (Bodmer 1971; Witten 1984; Haensel et al. 1986; Alcock et al. 1986;
Dey et al. 1998).
We borrow the language of the MIT-bag model
formalism at low temperature
and high density to describe HQSs (Farhi & Jaffe 1984).
This gives a simple equation of state
Features of HQSs
are - to a leading order in
- identical
to that of strange stars. The latter have been studied
in details (Alcock et al. 1986;
Glendenning & Weber 1992; Glendenning 1997).
Of importance to our model:
i) The "surface" of a HQS is very
different from the surface of a neutron star, or any other type of stars.
Because it is bound by the strong force, the density at the
surface changes abruptly from zero to
.
The abrupt change
(the thickness of the quark surface) occurs within
about 1 fm, which is a typical strong
interaction length scale.
ii) The electrons being
bound to the quark matter by the electro-magnetic
interaction and not by the strong
force, are able to move freely across the quark surface
extending up to 103 fm above the surface of the star.
Associated with this electron layer is a
strong electric field (
V/cm) - higher than the critical
value (
V/cm) to make the vacuum region unstable
to spontaneously create
pairs.
iii) The presence of normal matter (a crust made of ions) at the surface of the quark star is subject to the enormous electric dipole. The strong positive Coulomb barrier prevents atomic nuclei bound in the nuclear crust from coming into direct contact with the quark core. The crust is suspended above the vacuum region.
iv) One can show that the maximum
mass of the crust cannot exceed
set by the requirement that if the density in the inner
crust is above the neutron drip
density (
g/cc),
free neutrons will gravitate to the surface of
the HQS and be converted to quark matter.
This is due to the fact
that neutrons can easily penetrate the
Coulomb barrier and are
readily absorbed.
The HQS surface layer might enter the 2SC phase
as illustrated in Fig. 1.
In the QCD phase diagram (Fig. 2),
(
,
)
is the critical point beyond
which one re-enters the QGP phase
(the extent of the 2SC layer into the star).
The star consists of a QGP phase surrounded by
a 2SC layer where the photons (from
the LGB/photon decay) leaking from the
surface of the star
provides the dominant cooling
source.
This picture, as illustrated in Fig. 2, is only valid
if neutrino cooling in the 2SC phase is heavily
suppressed as to become slower than the
photon cooling.
Unfortunately,
the details of
neutrino cooling in the 2SC phase is still a topic
of debate and studies (Carter & Reddy 2000; Schaab et al. 2000
to cite only few). One can only assume such a scenario which
constitutes the second major assumption
in our model.
In Sect. 7.2,
we discuss the remaining alternative when
photon cooling is dwarfed by neutrino cooling.
The photons from LGB decay are generated
at energy
and find themselves immersed in a
degenerate quark gas. They quickly gain energy via
the inverse Compton process and become thermalized
to
.
We estimate the photon mean free path to be smaller
than few hundred Fermi (Rybicki & Lightman 1979; Longair 1992)
while the 2SC layer is measured in meters (see
Sect. 5.2). A local thermodynamic equilibrium is thus reached
with the photon luminosity given by that of a black body radiation,
The fireball stems from the LGB
decay and photon thermalization.
The photons are emitted from the star's surface into
the vacuum region beneath the inner crust (103 fm in
size). Photon-photon interaction occurs in a much longer
time than the vacuum region crossing time. Also, the cross-section
for the creation of pairs through interactions with
the electrons in the vacuum region is negligible
(Rybicki & Lightman 1979; Longair 1992). The
fireball energy is thus directly deposited in the crust. If its energy
density,
(with a being the radiation density constant),
exceeds that of the gravitational energy density
in the crust, energy outflow in the form
of ions occurs.
One can show that
the condition
![]() |
Figure 2:
The episodic emission
as illustrated in the QCD phase diagram.
The 2SC front spreads deep inside the star
and stops at
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The star's surface pressure is reduced following photon emission.
A heat and mass flux is thus triggered from the QGP phase
to the 2SC layer re-heating (above
)
and destroying
the superconductive phase.
The entire star is now in a QGP phase (5 gluons
8 gluons
at the surface) and
hence the cooling process can start again.
This corresponds to the transition
in the QCD phase diagram (thermal adjustment).
The stage is now set
for the 2SC/LGB/photon process to start all over again
resulting in another emission.
For the subsequent emission, however,
we expect the system to evolve to point
generally located at different densities
and temperatures than
(see Fig. 2).
The cycle ends after N emissions when
.
The time it takes to consume most of the star (the glue
component) by this process is
The episodic behavior of the star
together with the resulting loaded
fireball (we call shell) offers a natural mechanism
for multiple shell emission if
MeV.
Indeed from Eq. (6) a higher
value would imply
extraction of the entire crust in a single emission
and no loading of the subsequent fireballs.
Clearly,
MeV must be
considered if multiple ejections are to
occur
.
The fraction (f) of the crust
extracted in a single event is,
The Lorentz factor for the
shell is
When the inner crust density is the neutron drip value, one finds
a minimum mass star of 0.015
.
For
masses above this critical value, the corresponding
crusts are thin and light.
They do not exceed few kilometers in thickness.
Matter at the density of such crusts
is a Coulomb lattice of iron and nickel
all the way from the inner edge to the surface of the
star (Baym et al. 1971). For masses below
0.015
,
the crust can extend up to thousands of kilometers with
densities much below the neutron drip.
This allows us to identify two distinct emission regimes
for a given
(<30 MeV).
These are objects whose average density is
(
).
The 2SC front extends deeper inside
the star (
).
The star can be represented by a system close
to
in Fig. 2.
Each of the few emissions (defined by
)
is thus capable of consuming a big portion of the star.
Furthermore, the entire crust material
can be extracted in a few 2SC/LGB/photon cycles
(
).
Using Eq. (7), the few emissions lead to
The surface density of a massive star being
that of a light star (
given
by P=0 in Eq. (1)), defines
a standard unit in our model.
In other words, the mass of the 2SC layer
in a massive star case is
The total observable time in our simplified approach
is thus,
(i) Light stars
short emissions.
(ii) Massive stars
long emissions.
It appears, according to BATSE
(Burst and Transient Source Experiment
detector on the COMPTON-GRO satellite), that the bursts can be
classified into two distinct categories: short (<2 s) bursts
and long (>2 s, typically 50 s) bursts (Kouveliotou et al. 1993).
The black body behavior
(
)
inherent to our
model puts stringent constraints on the value
of
which best comply with these observations.
Using
MeV, from Eq. (11)
and Eq. (16)
we obtain in the star's rest frame
When
MeV, Eq. (6) gives
.
For an appropriate crust density profile
(using the equation of state given in Baym et al. 1971), from
Eq. (8) we find
.
This implies (making
use of Eq. (14))
(i) Light stars
short and hard bursts.
(ii) Massive stars
long and soft bursts.
Equation (17) and Eq. (18) is simply Eq. (7)
rescaled to the appropriate object size.
We separated two regimes due to intrinsic
differences in the engine and the crust.
From the engine point of view,
massive stars generate many more emissions when compared
to light ones, and no substantial
reduction of the engine time is expected because
of the omni-presence of the crust.
Another important difference is
related to the physics of the multiple re-adjustments
following each event which is more
pronounced for very massive stars.
The latter among other
factors is related to
which can vary from
one event to another.
The maximum available
energy is when the heaviest HQS
(
)
is entirely consumed.
That is,
Since
we conclude that,
From Eqs. (17) and (18) we have
Our estimate of the duration time for the massive star case should be taken as a lower limit. As we have said, a complete model should take into account star re-adjustments. Nevertheless, we can still account for a wide range in GRB duration by an appropriate choice of different values of the mass and radius.
The peak duration ()
is related
to the time measured by a clock on the shell
via (Fenimore & Ramirez-Ruiz 1999),
Take a shell of thickness
to be extracted from the
crust. The upper surface of the shell is extracted first while its lower
surface lags behind by
(t is the time
to eject the entire shell in the star's rest frame).
Taking into account mass conservation and the fact that
,
it
is straightforward to show
In the last few years, thanks to the large amount of fresh
observational data collected by the new generation of X-ray and
-ray satellites, new observations suggest that the compact
objects associated with the X-ray pulsars, the X-ray bursters,
particularly the SAX J1808.4-3658, are good quark stars candidates (see Li
et al. 1999). While these observations/measurements
are hints that such objects
might exist in nature it remains to explain their formation.
More importantly to our model, the bimodal mass distribution
remains to be explained.
For the massive stars the conversion of neutron stars to quark stars is one plausible scenario (Cheng & Dai 1996; Ma 1996; Bombaci & Datta 2000). They could also form via the direct mechanism following a supernova collapse where the core collapsed to a stable quark matter instead of neutron matter (Gentile et al. 1993; Dai et al. 1995). Both mechanisms would lead to the formation of quark stars (strange stars to be more specific) with masses in the solar mass range.
The formation of small quark stars has already been
discussed (early discussions can be found in
Alpar 1987; Glendenning et al. 1995;
see also Chapter 10.5 in Glendenning 1997)
although these remain less understood than the massive ones.
In the case of 4U 1728-34
(where a mass of much less than 1.0
was derived; Bombaci
1999), it seems that
accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs is a favored
formation mechanism. If the
quark star formed via the direct conversion mechanism then it
required too much mass (at least
0.8
to be ejected
during the conversion).
How and why stars in the 0.01 range would form remains to be explained.
Our arguments were solely based on theoretical
considerations related to the critical density in the
inner crust (neutron drip) as to differentiate
between small stars with thick and heavy crust versus
stars with thinner and lighter crusts.
If neutrino cooling is shown to remain efficient in the 2SC phase (for comparison of cooling paths between quark stars and neutron stars and the plausible effects of 2SC on cooling we refer the interested reader to Schaab et al. 1997; Blaschke et al. 2000; Blaschke et al. 2001), we would be left with the scenario where the entire HQS enters the 2SC phase, in which case the 2SC/LGB/photon process (the fireball) occurs only once and inside the entire star. Here, one must involve more complicated physics (such as that of the crust) to account for the episodic emissions so crucial to any model of GRBs. It is not clear at the moment how to achieve this and is left as an avenue for future research.
The 2SC/LGB/photon process might proceed until
one is left with an object made entirely of 2SC. We name such
objects 2SC-II stars which are still
bound by strong interactions (their density is constant
).
2SC-II stars carry
an Iron/Nickel crust left over from the GRB phase. The crust
mass range is
depending on the efficiency of crust extraction/ejection during the GRB
phase.
BATSE observes on average one burst per day. This corresponds,
with the simplest model - assuming no cosmic evolution of the rate - to
about once per million years in a galaxy (Piran 1999a).
In the Milky way we thus expect up to 105 of 2SC-II stars.
Nevertheless, they are tiny enough (
,
km) to be difficult to detect.
![]() |
Figure 3:
The mass-radius
plane derived in our model using few existing GRBs with known
energies and total duration. The solid curve shows the
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Take observed GRBs with
known energies and total duration.
From the burst total energy
we derive the mass while
the burst total duration (
)
gives us the radius (using Eq. (16)
with
MeV).
In Fig. 3 we plot the resulting Mass-Radius.
Note that while neutron stars,
can only exists above a certain mass (
0.1
;
Baym et al. 1971),
there is no lower limit to the mass of quark stars.
These would be bound by the
strong interaction even in the absence of gravity.
The solid curve shows the
equation which is a reasonable
approximation for quark stars.
While the GRB data set used is limited nevertheless
it seems to support the idea that extremely compact objects (
)
are behind GRBs activity within our model.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank J. Schechter, K. Rajagopal, I. Bombaci, and F. Weber for interesting and helpful discussions.