next previous
Up: H surface photometry of


Subsections

5 Results

The results of the present observations are listed in Table 5, arranged as follow:

The red continuum images of the detected galaxies with structure in their H$\alpha $emission are shown as contours plots superposed to the H$\alpha $+[NII] net image (grey levels) in Fig. 1.

The H$\alpha $+[NII] morphology is generally very different from the red continuum one. In only a few objects the spiral morphology can be seen in the H$\alpha $+[NII] image (see Col. 13 of Table 5), as in VCC 307, while in other galaxies the dominant star forming regions are located in the nucleus (see for example VCC 801) or in giant HII regions distributed non-uniformly throughout the disc of the galaxy, as in VCC 664. In some other objects the emission is diffuse (VCC 497).


   
Table 5: The results of the observations.

Virgo
                                 
  This work Literature
VCC ON OFF Tel Year T R(Ha) $n_{\rm\frac{ON}{OFF}}$ K H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Phot Morph Notes H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Ref. Notes
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18)
                                   
67 6561 6450 OHP 2000 60 0.78 0.98 1.00 27 $\pm$ 3 -12.69 $\pm$ 0.05 P H   - - -  
92 6561 6450 OHP 1998 30 0.79 1.00 1.00 9 $\pm$ 1 -11.53 $\pm$ 0.06 P DS   - -11.50 Ko *
145 6561 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.68 1.02 1.00 7 $\pm$ 1 - C DS   - -12.04 Y  
165 6561 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.77 1.02 1.00 0 $\pm$ 2 - C     - - -  
167 6561 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.78 1.02 1.00 3 $\pm$ 1 - C DS   - -11.52 Y  
222 6612 6561 OHP 2000 45 0.67 1.11 1.00 2 $\pm$ 1 -12.75 $\pm$ 0.07 P N   - - -  
234 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.80 1.10 0.64 13 $\pm$ 12 -12.31 $\pm$ 0.23 P ND   - - -  
267 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.85 1.11 0.66 11 $\pm$ 18 -12.83 $\pm$ 0.45 P S   16 $\pm$ 3   Hi  
307 6612 6561 OHP 1998 30 0.68 1.16 1.00 29 $\pm$ 1 -10.96 $\pm$ 0.05 P S   32 $\pm$ 1 -10.91 KK *
315 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.65 1.08 1.00 0 $\pm$ 1 - P     - - -  
341 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.68 1.08 1.00 2 $\pm$ 1 -12.86 $\pm$ 0.16 P ND   - - -  
371 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.75 1.16 0.63 2 $\pm$ 2 - P     - - -  
375 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.70 1.18 0.61 -1 $\pm$ 4 - P     - - -  
382 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.75 1.21 0.63 30 $\pm$ 4 -11.78 $\pm$ 0.05 P HN   - - -  
386 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.70 1.19 0.61 -1 $\pm$ 11 - P     - - -  
408 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.67 1.15 0.67 4 $\pm$ 3 -12.41 $\pm$ 0.20 P D   - - -  
483 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.16 0.64 31 $\pm$ 7 -11.61 $\pm$ 0.07 P S   17 $\pm$ 2 -11.81 R *
497 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.16 0.64 15 $\pm$ 8 -11.86 $\pm$ 0.14 P D   - - -  
524 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.42 1.14 1.00 5 $\pm$ 1 -12.52 $\pm$ 0.09 P D   - - -  
559 6561 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.78 1.03 1.00 2 $\pm$ 1 -12.86 $\pm$ 0.15 P N   - - -  
570 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.43 0.64 -1 $\pm$ 11 - C     - - -  
596 6612 6561 OHP 1998 30 0.64 1.18 1.00 18 $\pm$ 1 -11.01 $\pm$ 0.05 P S   18 $\pm$ 1 -11.05 KK *
608 6612 6561 OHP 1998 30 0.66 1.18 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 1 - P     - - -  
630 6612 6561 OHP 2000 45 0.64 1.10 1.00 7 $\pm$ 2 -12.62 $\pm$ 0.12 P SD   - - -  
634 6561 6612 OHP 1998 30 0.76 0.85 1.00 2 $\pm$ 2 - P     - - -  
656 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.43 1.13 1.00 9 $\pm$ 1 - P NDS   6 - GS  
657 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.27 1.13 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 1 - P     - - -  
664 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.17 0.64 101 $\pm$ 52 -12.12 $\pm$ 0.11 P H   164 - GS  
672 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.41 1.10 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 1 - P     - - -  
697 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.50 1.10 1.00 15 $\pm$ 8 -12.81 $\pm$ 0.21 P S   - - -  
792 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.43 1.11 1.00 10 $\pm$ 2 -12.02 $\pm$ 0.13 P DS   - -12.64 Ko *
794 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.40 1.11 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 2 - P     - - -  
797 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.28 1.06 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 13: - C   * - - -  
798 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.28 1.06 1.00 7 $\pm$ 1: -11.87 $\pm$ 0.12: N ND * - - -  
801 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.66 1.11 1.00 69 $\pm$ 2 -11.57 $\pm$ 0.12 P N   - -11.56 Ko *
836 6612 6561 OHP 2000 60 0.67 1.17 1.00 15 $\pm$ 1 -11.67 $\pm$ 0.13 P NS   64 - GS  
857 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.40 1.06 1.00 12 $\pm$ 4 - C S   - -12.25 Ko *
865 6561 6450 OHP 2000 40 0.78 1.04 1.00 34 $\pm$ 2 -12.12 $\pm$ 0.05 P SH * - - -  
873 6569 6744 CA 1999 20 0.85 1.19 0.65 10 $\pm$ 2 -12.18 $\pm$ 0.07 P S   16 $\pm$ 1 -11.97 B *
874 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.18 0.65 3 $\pm$ 3 -12.93 $\pm$ 0.26 P S   - -12.47 Ko *
905 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.52 1.29 1.00 39 $\pm$ 16: -12.64 $\pm$ 0.14: N S * - - -  
912 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.84 1.21 0.65 8 $\pm$ 10: -12.56 $\pm$ 0.31: Y NS * - -12.31 Ko *
916 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.20 0.64 -1 $\pm$ 7 - P     - - -  
939 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.51 1.29 1.00 40 $\pm$ 13: - C S   24 $\pm$ 5 -12.37 R *
958 6561 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.78 0.94 1.00 7 $\pm$ 1 - C NS   - -12.70 Ko *
979 6561 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.76 1.00 1.00 9 $\pm$ 1 - C N   - -12.22 Ko *
984 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.17 0.65 1 $\pm$ 4 - P   * - - -  
1003 6612 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.48 1.06 1.00 5 $\pm$ 3 -11.72 $\pm$ 0.13 P ND * - -13.15 Ko  
1145 6569 6744 CA 1999 20 0.82 1.16 0.64 11 $\pm$ 3 -11.73 $\pm$ 0.09 P H   - -11.91 Ko *
1182 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.82 0.86 1.00 42 $\pm$ 3 -13.08 $\pm$ 0.05 P HS   - - -  
1190 6561 6450 OHP 2000 45 0.76 0.96 1.00 3 $\pm$ 1 -12.49 $\pm$ 0.08 P ND   - - -  
1192 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.17 0.64 -1 $\pm$ 3 - P     - - -  
1203 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.17 0.64 3 $\pm$ 8 - P     - - -  
1205 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.75 1.17 0.63 11 $\pm$ 4 -12.50 $\pm$ 0.11 P S   38 - GS  
1375 6612 6561 OHP 2000 45 0.65 1.17 1.00 28 $\pm$ 3 - C S   33 $\pm$ 5 -11.69 KK  


 
Table 5: continued.
  This work Literature
VCC ON OFF Tel Year T R(Ha) $n_{\rm\frac{ON}{OFF}}$ K H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Phot Morph Notes H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Ref. Notes
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18)

1401
6612 6561 OHP 1998 20 0.68 1.17 1.00 6 $\pm$ 1 -11.48 $\pm$ 0.07 P S   6 $\pm$ 2 -11.50 KK *
1412 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.21 0.64 -1 $\pm$ 2 - P     - - -  
1450 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.84 1.13 0.65 69 $\pm$ 22 -11.89 $\pm$ 0.08 P H   72 - GS  
1453 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.13 0.65 1 $\pm$ 15 - P     - - -  
1540 6612 6561 OHP 2000 30 0.65 1.10 1.00 20 $\pm$ 1 - C S   - -11.35 Ko *
1552 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.85 1.20 0.65 2 $\pm$ 10 - P     3 - GS  
1555 6612 6561 OHP 1998 30 0.68 1.14 1.00 17 $\pm$ 4 -11.26 $\pm$ 0.11 P S   14 $\pm$ 3 -11.43 KK *
1562 6612 6561 OHP 1998 20 0.66 1.19 1.00 20 $\pm$ 2 -11.37 $\pm$ 0.06 P SN   18 $\pm$ 4 -11.48 KK *
1572 6612 6561 OHP 2000 30 0.66 1.10 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 2 - C     - - -  
1575 6561 6450 OHP 1998 30 0.73 1.02 1.00 13 $\pm$ 1 -12.73 $\pm$ 0.06 P H   54 - GS  
1588 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.16 0.64 3 $\pm$ 3 -12.56 $\pm$ 0.32 P S   - - -  
1673 6612 6561 OHP 1998 30 0.68 1.13 1.00 15 $\pm$ 1 -12.00 $\pm$ 0.05 P S   11 $\pm$ 3 -12.10 K *
1676 6612 6561 OHP 1998 30 0.68 1.13 1.00 19 $\pm$ 1 -11.74 $\pm$ 0.05 P S   20 $\pm$ 5 -11.70 K *
1690 6561 6612 OHP 1998 30 0.78 0.87 1.00 2 $\pm$ 1 -12.02 $\pm$ 0.25 P S   6 $\pm$ 2 -11.62 KK *
1730 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.20 0.64 4 $\pm$ 4 -12.62 $\pm$ 0.25 P SD   - -12.57 Ko *
1760 6612 6450 OHP 2000 40 0.38 1.11 1.00 5 $\pm$ 2 -12.46 $\pm$ 0.16 P NDS   - - -  
1859 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.82 1.24 0.64 -1 $\pm$ 12 - P     - -12.67 Ko  
1868 6569 6744 CA 1999 30 0.80 1.24 0.65 3 $\pm$ 9 - P     - - -  
1931 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.47 1.10 1.00 36 $\pm$ 20 -13.33 $\pm$ 0.32 P N   - - -  
1941 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.50 1.10 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 4 - P     - - -  
1943 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.44 1.10 1.00 24 $\pm$ 2 -11.67 $\pm$ 0.07 P S   19 -11.82 Kpc *
14063 6612 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.48 1.07 1.00 32 $\pm$ 2 -11.24 $\pm$ 0.10 P S   - - -  
71060 6612 6561 OHP 2000 30 0.66 1.12 1.00 44 $\pm$ 1 -11.97 $\pm$ 0.04 P NHS   55 - GS  

Coma/A1367 supercluster
  This work Literature
CGCG ON OFF Tel Year T R(Ha) $n_{\rm\frac{ON}{OFF}}$ K H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Phot Morph Notes H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Ref. Notes

160065
6744 6569 CA 1999 10 0.83 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 2 - P   * - - -  
160069 6744 6569 CA 1999 20 0.82 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 2 - P   * - - -  
160213 6744 6569 CA 1999 20 0.68 0.87 1.00 57 $\pm$ 3 -12.92 $\pm$ 0.05 P H * - - -  
160214 6744 6569 CA 1999 20 0.84 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 1 - P   * - - -  
160215 6744 6569 CA 1999 20 0.84 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 2 - P   * - - -  
160216 6744 6569 CA 1999 10 0.84 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 2 - P   * - - -  
160221 6744 6569 CA 1999 10 0.82 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 3 - P   * - - -  
160222 6744 6569 CA 1999 10 0.05 0.87 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 22 - P   * - - -  
161043 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.77 0.84 1.00 -1 $\pm$ 1 - P     - - -  
161069 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.82 0.84 1.00 24 $\pm$ 1 -12.66 $\pm$ 0.05 P H   - - -  

A2197/A2199
  This work Literature
CGCG ON OFF Tel Year T R(Ha) $n_{\rm\frac{ON}{OFF}}$ K H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Phot Morph Notes H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Ref. Notes

224008
6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.75 0.81 1.00 14 $\pm$ 2 -12.95 $\pm$ 0.07 P D   - - -  
224009 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.70 0.81 1.00 14 $\pm$ 2 -12.69 $\pm$ 0.07 P S   - - -  
224037N 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.70 0.84 1.00 6 $\pm$ 2 -13.40 $\pm$ 0.12 P N   - - -  
224037S 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.77 0.84 1.00 5 $\pm$ 1 -13.54 $\pm$ 0.08 P N   - - -  
224038 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.82 0.84 1.00 115 $\pm$ 2 -12.14 $\pm$ 0.04 P H   123 $\pm$ 3 -12.24 G  
224046 6744 6569 CA 1999 30 0.77 0.84 1.00 17 $\pm$ 2 -12.88 $\pm$ 0.07 P NDS   - - -  


 
Table 5: continued.

Nearby galaxies
  This work Literature
Name ON OFF Tel Year T R(Ha) $n_{\rm\frac{ON}{OFF}}$ K H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Phot Morph Notes H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ Ref. Notes
                                   
M51 6561 6450 OHP 2000 15 0.77 1.02 1.00 18.6 $\pm$ 1.6 -10.55 $\pm$ 0.05 P S * 24 $\pm$ 2 -10.52: KK *
M81 6561 6450 OHP 2000 10 0.78 0.96 1.00 9.7 $\pm$ 2.9 -10.30 $\pm$ 0.13 P SN M - -10.34 D *
M82 6561 6450 OHP 1998 15 0.77 0.93 1.00 42.3 $\pm$ 0.5 -10.22 $\pm$ 0.04 P N   - -10.04 Y *
M106 6561 6450 OHP 2000 15 0.76 0.95 1.00 12.3 $\pm$ 2.0 - C S M 11 -10.66 Kpc *
N925 6561 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.74 0.98 1.00 23.3 $\pm$ 4.1 - C S   - -11.10 Y  
N1637 6561 6450 OHP 2000 60 0.68 1.09 1.00 9.9 $\pm$ 1.7 - C S   16 $\pm$ 2 -11.68 KK  
N2403 6561 6450 OHP 2000 10 0.77 0.92 1.00 64.4 $\pm$ 11.8 - C S M 26 -10.34 Kpc  
N2541 6561 6450 OHP 2000 40 0.75 0.92 1.00 39.6 $\pm$ 8.0 - C S   46 $\pm$ 7 -11.64 R  
N2805 6612 6561 OHP 2000 60 0.65 1.07 1.00 52.3 $\pm$ 11.2 - C S   - - -  
N2903 6561 6450 OHP 2000 30 0.76 1.00 1.00 15.0 $\pm$ 1.3 -11.07 $\pm$ 0.08 P S * - -10.67 Y *
N5195 6561 6450 OHP 2000 15 0.77 1.10 1.00 3.5 $\pm$ 2.3 -12.18 $\pm$ 0.99 C N * 20: - K *

Notes:

M in notes indicates a mosaic of several frames; if not specified, the given data are alternative values in the literature with reference.

VCC 92: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.43$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y); H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=12$ Å  (GS). VCC 307: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=31\pm1$ Å  (H), H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=42\pm1$ Å  (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-10.89$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-10.95$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko).

VCC 483: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=11\pm2$ Å, H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=18\pm1$ Å  (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-12.02$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (KK), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.95$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.74$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 596: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=21\pm1$ Å  (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.13$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.09$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 792: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-12.28$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 797: at the border of the filter.

VCC 798: at the border of the filter; observed in non photometric conditions; flux calibrated on VCC 857 from Y.

VCC 801: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=52\pm3$ Å (GS).

VCC 857: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=-1\pm3$ Å (KK), H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=1\pm3$ Å (H), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.97$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 865: 2 coherent measurements.

VCC 873: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=11$ Å(Kpc), H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=14$ Å(GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-12.38$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Kpc).

VCC 874: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=10\pm3$ Å (GS).

VCC 905: observed in non photometric conditions; flux calibrated on VCC 939 from R.

VCC 912: vignetted; poor quality; H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=12\pm7$ Å (H), H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=24\pm7$ Å (GS), and $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-12.16$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 939: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-12.28$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko)

VCC 958: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.81$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y)

VCC 979: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-12.10$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y)

VCC 984: vignetted.

VCC 1003: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=1\pm3$ Å (GS).

VCC 1145: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=8\pm3$ Å (GS).

VCC 1401: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.21$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.14$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 1540: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.28$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 1555: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=3\pm3$ Å (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.21$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.26$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 1562: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.42$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.34$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 1673: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ in reference does not include the whole galaxy. Other references give: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=20\pm3$ Å (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.91$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko).

VCC 1676: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])$ in reference does not include the whole galaxy. Other references give: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=27\pm3$ Å (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.59$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko).

VCC 1690: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=5\pm3$ Å (GS), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.83$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.24$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

VCC 1730: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=9\pm3$ Å (GS).

VCC 1943: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.94$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Ko), $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-11.79$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

160065, 160069, 160213, 160214, 160215, 160216, 160221, 160222: affected by stray light from bright star.

M51: another image taken in non photometric conditions gives H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=18\pm5.4$ Å; other references give: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=28\pm4$ Å, $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-10.5$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (not including the entire galaxy) (K); $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-10.33$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Y).

M81: $F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])=-10.32$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Gr); H $\alpha EW=6$ Å, $F(H\alpha)=-10.49$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ (Kpc; no [NII] included).

M82: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=45$ Å (K92), H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=110$ Å (GS).

M106: [NII] not included in the reference values.

N2903: another image taken in non photometric conditions gives H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=12\pm3$ Å; alternative value in the literature: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=28$ Å  in K92.

N5195: another image taken in non photometric conditions gives H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=2\pm1$ Å; alternative value in the literature: H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW=3.5$ Å  in K92.

References: KK: Kennicutt & Kent (1983); K: Kennicutt et al. (1987); Y: Young et al. (1996); Hi: Hippelein et al., in preparation; R: Romanishin (1987); B: Boselli et al. (2002), Paper III; G: Gavazzi et al. (1998); D: Devereux et al. (1995); Gr: Greenawalt et al. (1998); K92: Kennicutt (1992) (spectroscopic survey drifting the telescope over the entire disc of the galaxy); Kpc: Kennicutt, private communication; Ko: Koopmann et al. (2001); GS: Gavazzi et al., in preparation (spectroscopic survey drifting the telescope over the entire disc of the galaxy).


5.1 Recalibrations

16 galaxies previously observed with the Calar Alto 3.5 m telescope (Hippelein et al., in preparation) in non photometric conditions were reobserved at the OHP with 5 min exposures in the ON band filter in order to achieve a flux calibration. If $n_{\rm\frac{ON_{CA}}{ON_{OHP}}}$ is the normalization constant between the ON band Calar Alto and OHP images (normalized to the same integration time), the ON band zero point for Calar Alto observations $Zp_{\rm ON_{CA}}$ is given by the relation:

\begin{displaymath}{Zp_{\rm ON_{CA}} = \frac {Zp_{\rm ON_{OHP}}}{n_{\frac{\rm ON_{CA}}{\rm ON_{OHP}}}}}
\end{displaymath} (1)

where $Zp_{\rm ON_{OHP}}$ is the OHP zero point determined for the galaxy at a given airmass. $Zp_{\rm ON_{CA}}$ does not need to be corrected for airmass.

The resulting fluxes are given in Table 6.


 

 
Table 6: Calibration of the Calar Alto 1993 observations.

VCC
Tel H$\alpha $+[NII]EW F(H$\alpha $+[NII]) F(H$\alpha $+[NII])$_{\rm L}$ Ref.

87
OHP $20 \pm 1$ $-12.83 \pm 0.25$: -12.94 GH
152 OHP $9 \pm 1$ $-12.63 \pm 0.26$ -  
159 OHP $19 \pm 1$ $-13.21 \pm 0.32$ -  
446 OHP $18 \pm 1$ $-13.47 \pm 0.15$ -  
641 OHP $20 \pm 1$ $-13.55 \pm 0.08$: -  
995 OHP $32 \pm 1$ $-12.98 \pm 0.13$ -  
1002 OHP $9 \pm 1$ $-12.10 \pm 1.00$: -  
1189 OHP $21 \pm 1$ $-12.66 \pm 0.19$ -  
1419 OHP $ 5 \pm 2$ $-13.06 \pm 0.79$ -  
1486 OHP $12 \pm 1$ $-13.17 \pm 1.00$: -  
1507 OHP $11 \pm 1$ $-13.51 \pm 0.24$ -  
1569 OHP $14 \pm 2$ $-13.45 \pm 0.31$ -  
1678 OHP $55 \pm 8$ $-12.56 \pm 1.00$: -  
1929 OHP $13 \pm 2$ $-12.75 \pm 0.45$ -  
1932 OHP $16 \pm 1$ $-12.32 \pm 0.49$ -  
2037 OHP $16 \pm 1$ $-13.82 \pm 0.62$ -13.53 B
2066 OHP $ 6 \pm 1$ $-12.47 \pm 1.00$: -  

Notes: 2037: also observed by GH ( $F(\rm H\alpha+[NII])=-13.47$ $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$).
References: B: Boselli et al. (2002), Paper III; GH: Gallagher & Hunter (1989).


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{MS2159f2.eps} \end{figure} Figure 2: Comparison with data in the literature: open dots are for KK, filled dots for Y, filled squares for H, x for R, + for Ko, $\curlywedge $ for K, open triangles for B, open squares for D, stars for Gr, filled triangles for G, filled pentagons for Kpc, open pentagons for GH, open exagons for K92 and filled exagons for GS.

5.2 Comparison with the literature

Fluxes and equivalent widths given in this paper are in general consistent with available measurements, as shown in Fig. 2. The average value of the difference between our measurements and those available in the literature is: ${\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW_{\rm TW}-{\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW_{\rm L}= 0 \pm 10$ Å and $-\log F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])_{\rm TW}$ + $\log F({\rm H}\alpha+[{\rm NII}])_{\rm L} = -0.04 \pm 0.32$  $\rm erg~ cm^{-2} ~s^{-1}$ [*] (in the comparison of the H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ we excluded those long slit spectra of Gavazzi et al. not including the entire galaxy). The outlying galaxy in the flux-flux relation is VCC 1003. Spectroscopic observations (GS) give an H $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ smaller than that obtained in this work; the flux given in Table 5 could thus be overestimated. The outlying galaxies in the equivalent width relation, whose $\alpha+[{\rm NII}] EW$ are significantly higher in this work with respect to the literature, are VCC 798 (open dot), VCC 857 (filled square) and VCC 1003 (filled exagon). As explained in the notes of Table 5, the value given for VCC 798 is highly uncertain. The H$\alpha $ image of VCC 857 shows emission in small, low surface brightness HII regions. We thus trust our value.


next previous
Up: H surface photometry of

Copyright ESO 2002