We used the TAURUS II camera in scanning Fabry-Perot
mode, at the Cassegrain focus of the 4.2 m William Herschel Telescope at the
ORM observatory La Palma, during the nights of March 26th and 27th 1996. The
125
etalon, and f/2.11 camera were employed, together with a TeK CCD,
windowed to a size of
pixels, each pixel
having an effective size of 0.56
![]()
0.56
.
The nights were photometric, and the seeing had a mean value of 1.1
.
The observations with TAURUS take the form of a series of images each
in a narrow wavelength interval, the whole set covering the emission line in
H
emitted by the galaxy. A narrow-band filter with the appropriate red-shift
(
Å,
Å) isolates the H
emission line; the
wavelength was selected according to the recession velocity of the galaxy
(1426 km s-1 from RC3), and the filter serves not only to cut out
contributions from the nearby lines of the [NII] doublet, but also to
eliminate other orders of the interferometer. The whole "data cube"
comprising 55 wavelength planes, with 140 s exposure time per plane,
covered a full spectral range of 17.22 Å or the equivalent of
790 km s-1. A "calibration cube" using a CuNe emission lamp was
taken at the beginning of the night, and "calibration rings" before
and after the data cube exposure on the galaxy. These were later
used for phase and wavelength calibration of the data cube using the
TAUCAL software package. After calibration the raw data cube, in
which the surfaces of constant wavelength are paraboloids, was
converted to a Cartesian cuboid of 55 planes, separated by 0.34 Å each of
pixels. After this we subtracted
off the sky emission from each plane separately, and the planes
were aligned using field stars. The next step was the astrometric
relation of the positions of the H II regions
with respect to these stars, using a high resolution H
image of NGC 6951
taken previously (Rozas et al. 1996a). The final reduced data cube had an
effective angular resolution of 1.3
.
With the reduced cube, we could apply MOMENTS, a set of tasks in the GIPSY
suite of programmes, to produce moment maps which contain desired information
about the intensity and velocity distributions implicit in the individual
channel maps (i.e. the plane by plane information shown in Fig. 2). MOMENTS enabled
us to calculate the zero, first and second order moments of the intensity in each
pixel, which yield the intensity, velocity and velocity dispersion maps respectively.
In performing these procedures we rejected as signal any bright
pixel which was not reproduced in at least three adjacent wavelength planes.
An initial inspection of the moment maps first obtained in this way revealed
that the integration over the full velocity range had resulted in noise peaks,
so that we had to revise the original data cube to find a method to minimize
the effects of this noise.
The procedure used for cleaning the cube is exactly that used for the equivalent data in
NGC 3359, as described in detail in Rozas et al. (2000), using derived cubes at angular
resolution 10
,
6
and 3
.
The emission in H
as a function of wavelength channel, i.e. as
a function of velocity, for the high resolution cube is shown in Fig. 2, as a
set of "channel maps", following radioastronomical practice. The emission
is presented in the central 40
![]()
40
(4.2 kpc
4.2 kpc).
We detected
significant H
emission in 33 channels, corresponding to a velocity range
from 1214 to 1646 km s-1. This range is comparable to that detected in
CO and HCN by Kohno et al. (1999), although the H
emission is much stronger
in the centre, i.e. in the circumnuclear zone, than the CO or HCN emission.
The intensity, velocity, and velocity dispersion maps, obtained as
moments of the data cube as outlined above, were the key results of the initial
reduction. The high resolution (1.3
)
intensity and velocity maps are
shown respectively in Figs. 3 and 7. There are in fact two possible approaches to produce these maps, one via the moments method, and the other by fitting
the data within a given resolution element by a Gaussian in the velocity
dimension. The resulting velocity maps were essentially the same for both
methods, but there were notable differences in the intensity maps and above
all in the velocity dispersion maps obtained using the two different techniques.
This is because the moments method can lead to significant information loss
in the line wings if these have low intensity and high velocity dispersion
(van der Kruit & Shostak 1982). This is a result of the noise threshold,
a fixed multiple of the measured rms noise, which leads to
a cut-off level below which the information is deemed not to be significant.
In the Gaussian profile method, the cut-off applied is a function of the
signal strength itself, and is not a fixed level, which allows more sensitive
detection of line wings, but may lead to a problem of treating noise as
low level spurious signal in noisy images. In the present study we have chosen
to use the moments method, knowing its limitations. A fuller analysis of the
map of velocity dispersion, investigating the internal kinematics of the H II regions, and comparing both methods to obtain the full spectra of velocities
over the full H II region population, together with the relation of the
velocity dispersion in the principal component to the H II region luminosity
will be presented in Relaño et al. (2001).
Copyright ESO 2002