Stellar photometry was done inside the DIGIPHOT.DAOPHOT package
in IRAF. In particular we found the stars using DAOFIND on
the deep, new F555W images, then aperture and psf-photometry were
obtained using PHOT and ALLSTAR on the same images. For
the aperture photometry we used an aperture of 2 pixels. For the
psf-photometry psfs variable over the chips, constructed from the
images themselves, were used and the output statistics, i.e. and sharpness, were used to weed out non-stellar sources.
This created a list of stars that were then used for obtaining aperture photometry from the new F814W images, which together with the F555W data gave a first colour-magnitude diagram. The positions of the stars making up the colour-magnitude diagram provided our source list of objects to find proper motions for.
For the images with short exposures we performed aperture photometry on the first epoch images for each filter and then merged the F555W and F814W data into a colour-magnitude diagram. Keeping only stars detected in both F555W and F814W this provided a master list for bright objects to find the proper motions for in the short exposures.
The final colour-magnitude diagrams are all based on the aperture photometry.
We obtained instrumental ((counts/s),) magnitudes from both
the old, short and new, long exposure data. These magnitudes were
corrected to the HST/WFPC2 magnitude system, and merged to form a
final single photometry set as described below.
The final stellar magnitudes within the HST/WFPC2 system i.e. V555 and I814, were obtained by applying a number of corrections to the instrumental magnitudes, essentially following Holtzmann et al. (1995b).
The photometry was obtained from drizzled images. The drizzling procedure removes the geometric distortion from the images, therefore no geometric distortion correction was required for the photometry.
Aperture corrections to a 0.5 arcsec aperture were obtained from our
own images. These corrections were allowed to vary with distance from
the centre of the chip i.e. correction
distance The
values of the constants a and b are given in Table
3. For the WF4 long data there were not enough stars
to obtain both a and b from our data. In this case we used the
value of b from Gonzaga et al. (1999) and only fit the value of afrom our data.
F555 W | F814 W | |||
a | b | a | b | |
Short | ||||
WF2 | 0.17 | 1.70e-4 | 0.21 | 1.78e-4 |
WF3 | 0.21 | 1.47e-4 | 0.23 | 1.90e-4 |
WF4 | 0.27 | 2.21e-4 | 0.23 | 1.59e-4 |
Long | ||||
WF2 | 0.24 | 5.42e-5 | 0.27 | 4.35e-5 |
WF3 | 0.24 | 2.16e-4 | 0.28 | 1.84e-4 |
WF4 | 0.24 | 1.17e-4 | 0.23 | 1.07e-4 |
The zero-points used to transform to HST/WFPC2 magnitudes are from Baggett et al. (1997).
![]() |
Figure 1:
Colour-magnitude diagram for all three WF.
All stars measured in both the new and old
images and which satisfied the cuts imposed in ![]() |
To make the final colour magnitude diagrams we have merged the photometry from the long and short exposures. We compared the magnitudes of the same stars from the short and long exposure data, and found no evidence for any offsets. Further, we found that the long exposure data were saturated for V555<16.8 and I814<15.
The two sets of long and short photometry were then merged according to the following rules
Our final colour-magnitude diagram is shown in Fig. 1.
This includes all stars selected according to our selection criteria
for
and sharpness. We also require the stars to all have good
positions according to the photometric routines in DAOPHOT. No
corrections for differential reddening have been applied.
Copyright ESO 2002