We next attempt to model SgrA* with an ADIOS. The modeling
approach is exactly the same as with the ADAF, except that the
accretion rate is assumed to be described by
.
We solve the full set of
coupled radiation hydrodynamical accretion equations to obtain the
spectra and the structures of the accretion flow consistently. Note
that this is an improvement compared to Quataert & Narayan (1999)
where some dynamical quantities such as radial velocity and sound
speed obtained in corresponding ADAFs (with
)
are
used in calculating the spectra of the ADIOS. Following Quataert &
Narayan (1999), we assume that the wind does not radiate.
We first assume that the fraction of viscous heating of electrons is
.
We set
but treat
and
as
free in order to find the best set of parameters to
fit the submm bump and the X-ray spectrum. The dashed line
in Fig. 2 shows our best
model results. The parameters are
,
p=0.28,
,
but
(not 0.9
since otherwise the predicted radio flux is too low compared to the
observation). The outer boundary conditions are
,
and
at
.
Compared to the ADAF model,
both the slope of the X-ray spectrum and the submm bump are now fitted better.
However, there are two serious problems for this fit. The first one is that the
required mass accretion rate is over 5 times higher than the upper limit
estimated in Baganoff et al. (2001a) mentioned above. The second problem
is that the X-ray spectra are produced by thermal bremsstrahlung
emission alone, therefore this model cannot explain the short timescale
variability. In fact, the introduction of a wind makes the
variability timescale even longer because the decreasing density of
accretion flows (e.g. Di Matteo et al. 2000) makes things worse.
The very rapid variability observed by Chandra indicates that the X-ray emission comes from a very small spatial region. This points towards SSC occurring in the inner region of the disk. In the case of the existence of strong winds, the density of the accretion flow in the innermost region is very low. When the flow is tenuous, SSC will show some spectral peaks as a result of different scattering orders. To make SSC dominate over bremsstrahlung in the X-ray band, the first order of SSC is more promising due to the rapid decrease of Compton scattering probability with increasing scattering orders. To make the first order SSC component reach the Chandra band, the electron temperature in the emission region must be very high.
An effective way to increase the electron temperature in the accretion
flow is to increase .
In the ADAF we generally assume that
is as as small as
or 10-2, i.e., the viscous
dissipation mainly heats the ions. However, because of the
uncertainty in the microphysics of the ADAF, it is possible that for
some reasons, such as magnetic reconnection, the viscous dissipation may
prefer heating electrons, i.e.,
may be much larger
(Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Lovelace 1997, 2000; Gruzinov 1998; Quataert &
Gruzinov 1999; Blackman 1999). In this case, the temperature of the
electrons will be greatly increased.
We try to model the spectrum using various values for .
We
find that only when
,
i.e., almost all of the
viscous dissipation heats only electrons, can we get a high enough
electron temperature to make the first order SSC dominate the X-ray
emission. The solid line in Fig. 2 shows such an example. Other
parameters in this model are
,
and p=0.4. The outer boundary conditions are
,
.
The
temperature of electrons is as high as 1011 K for the accretion
flow within
and the highest temperature is
K. This model is then very similar to the model proposed by Melia
et al. (2001) for SgrA* in the sense that a high-temperature inner disk
forms, with
K. Synchrotron emission
in this hottest region produces the
submm bump, synchrotron self-Compton dominates the X-ray band and
gives a very soft spectrum. The thermal bremsstrahlung radiation only
contributes a small part as shown by the dotted line, where SSC is
neglected. In this case a very short X-ray variability timescale can
be expected.
Putting aside the reality of such a high ,
the fit is not
satisfactory on the following points: first, it under-predicts
the low-frequency radio spectrum. Second, the predicted X-ray slope is
much steeper than the best fit of Baganoff et al. (2001b).
The third problem is that this
model over-predicts the flux above
100 GHz by a factor of 4-6.
We cannot get a better fit no matter how we adjust the
parameters. Because of the strong self-absorption of synchrotron
emission, the radio spectrum is the result of a super-position of
blackbody radiation from the different parts of the ADAF with
different temperatures. So, comparing this model with an ADAF (or ADIOS
with small
), we can understand that the main reason for the
over-prediction is its too extreme temperature making the flux
of the blackbody radiation stronger. Thus we conclude that, if we do
not consider the possible radiation of winds, the ADIOS model is not
favored for SgrA*.
However, the approximation that the wind does not radiate may be an over-simplification. For example, the part of the wind originating from the supersonic region of the accretion disk will possibly be shocked when it is ejected out of the disk. Thus it would reach very high temperatures and its radiation could not be neglected. In this sense, the wind within the sonic radius will present itself as radiative, outflowing plasma - i.e., like the plasma jets typically observed in AGN. The model would then possibly become similar to our jet-disk model presented below.
Copyright ESO 2002