Since old EROs have spectra consistent with being passively evolving ellipticals, we compared their density with different model predictions.
The total surface density of EROs with
and
in our sample is 0.88
0.13 arcmin-2, consistent with that derived
by D00 and Firth et al. (2001) over larger fields.
In marked contrast, the surface density of EROs (counted as old
plus dusty galaxies) predicted by the
hierarchical merging models at K=19.2 presented by Firth et al.
(2001) and Smith et al. (2001) are below the observed density by
factors of
4 and about an order of magnitude respectively.
From the minimum and maximum fractions of old EROs derived in
Sect. 3, the implied surface densities of ellipticals at the same
magnitude limit should be in the range 0.27-0.55 arcmin-2.
Within the uncertainties, such densities agree with those predicted
by the PLE models of Daddi et al. (2000b) with
0.3 Gyr
(0.24 and 0.54 arcmin-2 for
2.2 and
3.5 respectively),
suggesting a minimum formation redshift of
,
consistent with the age derived from the average spectrum.
The result does not significantly change if the 4 old EROs with
weak [OII]
3727 emission are excluded from the sample.
If
0.1 Gyr is adopted, or if the minimum fraction of old EROs
(31%) is applied to the
surface density of EROs derived by D00 in a much wider field
(0.67 arcmin-2 over 450 arcmin2), or if the 2MASS K-band
local luminosity function of early type galaxies is used (Kochanek
et al. 2001), the lower limit becomes
.
Taking into account the nominal lower redshift limit imposed by the
color cut and the upper boundary due to the
sensitivity of our spectroscopy (0.85
z
1.30),
we derive a comoving density of ellipticals in that redshift
range of (2.16
0.62)
Mpc-3.
Such a density can be considered a lower limit because some
ellipticals can escape the threshold of
due to the
dispersion of the observed R-Ks colors around the model color
prediction. Even so, the densities expected in the Daddi et al. (2000b)
PLE model with
Gyr are in the range of (1.8, 2.7)
Mpc-3 for
(2.2, 2.4), thus being
consistent with the observed densities.
Copyright ESO 2002