Our observational results have been interpreted using detailed, chemical kinetic models of deuterium chemistry in dark clouds. The models, which are fully described in Roberts & Millar (2000a,b), now involve 298 species (135 of them containing deuterium) and 5550 reactions.
There are two basic models; the "gas-phase'' model considers only reactions between gaseous species (with the exception that H2 and HD can form on grain surfaces),
Source | N(c-C3H2)a | N(c-C3HD) |
![]() |
(![]() |
(![]() |
||
B5IRS1 | -- | 0.77 (![]() |
-- |
L1448mms | >11.2 | 1.58 (![]() |
<0.14 (![]() |
L1448NW | >9.9 | 1.59 (![]() |
<0.16 (![]() |
L1527 | >8.4 | 2.30 (![]() |
<0.27 (![]() |
In cold, dense gas, species which collide with dust grains are likely to stick; indeed, it is now well known that interstellar grains become encased in mantles of ice on a similar timescale to the dynamical and chemical evolution of molecular clouds (Willacy & Millar 1998; Rawlings 1999).
The deuterium fractionation, in particular, will be strongly affected. In cold clouds deuterium is extracted from its reservoir in HD by exothermic reactions such as
This theoretical expectation, first predicted by Brown & Millar (1989), has recently been confirmed observationally by the detection of large [DCO+]/[HCO+] ratios in L1544 in clumps in which CO is significantly depleted (Caselli et al. 1999). It may also prove important in explaining the large molecular D/H ratios observed towards IRAS16293 and L134N.
All models presented in this paper use standard depleted solar elemental abundances for dark clouds, as listed in Table 10.
Species | Abundance | Species | Abundance |
H2 | 5.00 ![]() |
H3+ | 1.00 ![]() |
He | 1.40 ![]() |
Si | 2.00 ![]() |
C+ | 7.30 ![]() |
Fe+ | 1.00 ![]() |
N | 2.14 ![]() |
S | 1.00 ![]() |
O | 1.76 ![]() |
HD | 3.20 ![]() |
Figure 5 shows the variation in [HDCO]/[H2CO] and [DCN]/[HCN] with temperature and density,
It appears, therefore, that the gas-phase model alone is insufficient to explain the observations. There are, however, uncertainties inherent in any chemical modelling of this type. In particular, HCN, HNC and CN are all formed via dissociative recombination of HCNH+ with electrons, where our model assumes that 50% of the reactions form CN, while 25% form HCN and 25% form HNC (Herbst 1978). Recent experimental and observational work now suggests that HCN and HNC will be formed in equal amounts, but CN will not be formed by this reaction (Semaniak et al. 2001; Dickens et al. 2000). As there are analogue reactions for forming DCN and DNC, with same rate coefficients and branching ratios, this means that the abundances of HCN, HNC, DCN and DNC would all increase if we adopted these new branching ratios. However, we are primarily interested in abundance ratios, rather than absolute abundances, and as the deuterated and non-deuterated species are being affected in the same way, the molecular D/H ratios will be largely unchanged. We estimate that altering the branching ratios for recombination of HCNH+ (and deuterated analogues) will not alter the predicted [DCN]/[HCN] ratio by more than 50%. It would still be too small to explain all the observations.
The accretion model, on the other hand, produces increased D/H ratios over the gas-phase model, as heavy species freeze out onto grain surfaces. Figure 6 compares results from the gas-phase and accretion models for [HDCO]/[H2CO], [DCN]/[HCN] and other key molecular D/H ratios.
The [DCN]/[HCN] ratio is particularly sensitive to accretion, rising from its steady-state gas-phase value of 0.016 to match the observed ratios of 0.04 in
yrs. The DCN abundance is enhanced by constant cycling between DCN and DCNH+, as DCNH+ forms via proton transfer from H3+ and H2D+ to DCN, and via deuteron transfer from H2D+ to HNC. There are similar reactions which form HCN, and so, as the abundance of H2D+ increases, relative to H3+, there is an increased chance of forming DCN rather than HCN.
HDCO and H2CO also react with H2D+ and H3+, forming the ions H3CO+ and H2DCO+ which may then recombine to H2CO and HDCO, the increasing [H2D+]/[H3+] ratio being reflected by the [HDCO]/[H2CO] ratio. However, this is not the only route to forming H2CO and HDCO, therefore, over the same time period the [HDCO]/[H2CO] ratio, is not so sensitive to accretion processes. The ratio rises from 0.05 to 0.063, and so remains consistent with the ratios we measured towards the low-mass cores.
These results assume a kinetic temperature of 10 K and an H2 density of
cm-3. [DCN]/[HCN] ratios are sensitive to temperature (see Fig. 5), so if we assumed
K, the initial [DCN]/[HCN] ratio would be lower and it would take twice as long (105 yrs) for the predicted ratios to reach the levels we observed. As [HDCO]/[H2CO] ratios increase with temperature for
K (see Fig. 5), predicted HDCO fractionation at this time would be much higher than was observed.
Changing the density in the accretion model primarily affects the timescale on which freeze-out occurs; increasing n(H2) from
to 105 cm-3 decreases the time it takes for the predicted [DCN]/[HCN] ratios to rise to agree with the observed values from
to
104 yrs,
Copyright ESO 2002