The reduced, flux-calibrated spectrum is shown in Fig. 3.
We limit ourselves to the wavelength range of 3800-7000 Å,
since at shorter wavelengths the flux calibration becomes unreliable,
while at longer wavelengths second-order light starts to contribute
significantly for objects as blue as star X (it is negligible
shortward of
and rises approximately linearly to 10%
at 7000 Å). We also removed 20 Å-wide regions around
H
,
H
,
and H
,
which are (or might be in case of
H
)
contaminated by nebular emission.
The spectrum does not contain any significant features. The best
limits to the equivalent width of any feature are obtained shortward
of
:
about 16 Åfor features with 50% depth
beneath the continuum, and about 60 Åfor features with 25%
depth.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Optical spectrum of RX J1856.5-3754. For the histogram, the data were
averaged in 3-pixel wide bins (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The spectrum is shown together with the photometry in Fig. 4. One sees that the spectrum is consistent with both the VLT and HST photometry. Indeed, integrating the spectrum over the B and F450W bandpasses, we infer B=25.22 and m450=25.25, which compares well with our photometry (Table 5), giving additional confidence in the calibration of all three data sets.
Both spectrum and photometry indicate a spectral energy distribution
close to that of a Rayleigh-Jeans tail, as would be expected for this
very hot source. Assuming an intrinsic Rayleigh-Jeans spectrum, we
determine the reddening to the source by fitting a reddened
spectral distribution to the photometry. We do not
include the spectrum in the fit, because we consider its absolute flux
calibration somewhat less reliable and also because we wish to use it
to verify the result from the photometry. We use the following
relation between Vega magnitude
and input spectrum
,
![]() |
Figure 4:
Optical/ultraviolet spectral energy distribution of RX J1856.5-3754.
The thick-set points indicate fluxes derived from VLT and HST
photometry. The vertical lines indicate the ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the fit to the photometry, we find
and
;
the fit is acceptable, with
for four degrees of
freedom (six bands and two parameters; note that for the uncertainties
we used the measurement errors with the zero-point uncertainties added
in quadrature; see Table 5). For the reddening curve used,
A5000/AV=1.138, and thus the unabsorbed flux is
,
where the error is
dominated by the uncertainty in AV. The fit is shown in
Fig. 4; it can be seen that it also is a good fit to the
optical spectrum (see also Fig. 3), with
for
49 degrees of freedom (no free parameters; also for other choices of
binning, one finds
).
The inferred reddening is consistent with the range
expected
from the range in X-ray column density
found from different model
fits to the X-ray and EUVE spectrum (Pons et al. 2001; Burwitz et al. 2001). It is
also consistent with the limit set by the total amount of reddening
along this line of sight, which we can infer from stars L, C, and F.
From the difference between the observed colours and the intrinsic
colours for these stars (inferred from their spectral types; see
Table <3), we infer
,
which corresponds to
.
Using this reddening, and assuming L, C, and F are
main-sequence stars with absolute magnitudes
,
5.4, and
5.8 (Cox 2000), respectively, their distances are 2.7, 2.8, and
1.6 kpc, respectively
. Thus, they are well in the
background relative to star X, as well as relative to the CrA cloud
complex, which, apparently, contributes very little extinction in this
line of sight, unlike what was suggested previously (Walter et al. 1996).
Copyright ESO 2001