The Ritter observation obtained in 1994 revealed a weak emission in the
H
line similar to that detected by Coté & van Kerkwijk
(1993) in 1990. The line profile is shown in Fig. 1a along with
a theoretical one, calculated with the code SYNSPEC (Hubeny et al.
1995) for the atmospheric parameters from Heasley et al. (1982),
the rotational velocity from Brown & Verschueren (1997), and the
solar chemical composition. The equivalent width (EW) of the emission part (after
the theoretical profile subtraction) is 0.24 Å, while the peak separation is
350 kms-1. The emission component in the SAAO 1998 spectrum is hardly
recognizable.
The presence of an emission component in the He I 5876 Å line is
dubious in 1994 and is not seen in 1998 (see Fig. 1b). Its absorption
component is deeper than the theoretical one for the described atmospheric
parameters, as was noticed by Heasley et al. (1982) for other early
B-type stars (including Sco).
This difference might also be due to the presence of a shell component
or to an effect of microturbulence (see Leone & Lanzafame 1998).
In fact, the He I line EW in the 1994 and 1998 spectra is almost the
same as the value reported by Heasley et al. (1982),
Å vs. 0.69 Å. Thus, there is no evidence for a growth in the amount of
circumstellar matter around
Sco during a significant portion of the
last binary cycle.
All our spectra of Sco obtained during the 2000/1 campaign contain
emission lines.
All emission lines detected in our high-resolution spectra have double-peaked
profiles (Fig. 2) with a mean separation of the blue and red peak of
250 kms-1 (He I and Si II lines) and 150 kms-1(H
). Such a profile shape suggests that the lines are formed in a
circumstellar disk, typical for classical Be stars. The peak separation difference
can be explained by the fact that the He and Si lines are formed closer to the
star, where the disk rotates faster.
The normalized H
profiles obtained at CAO are systematically weaker and
narrower than those obtained at Ritter.
This might be due to the narrower spectral region observed at CAO, which contains
a small area useful for continuum determination, and a stronger contamination of the
CAO data by the telluric lines.
However, this does not affect the RVs and has no impact on our conclusions.
Parameters of the H
line profiles are presented in Table 3.
Our ESO spectrum covers the whole optical range and contains information about both photospheric and circumstellar features. The double-peaked emission is present in all hydrogen lines up to H8 and in most of the He I lines (see Fig. 3). Other species detected (e.g., O II, He II, N II, N III, Si IV) show typical photospheric absorption profiles, which are consistent with the mentioned fundamental parameters. No clear signs of the secondary were found in the spectrum. This might imply that the components' temperature difference is not large enough to produce additional detectable spectral features. However, this suggestion needs to be verified by higher-resolution future observations.
Our results obtained for the H,
He I 5876 Å, and Si II 6347 and 6371 Å lines showed
that their intensities were increasing until September 12 and decreasing
after that time. The H
line FWHM displays a similar behaviour.
The EWs of all 4 mentioned lines showed anti-correlation with
the visual brightness of the system. Their RVs, measured by matching the
direct and reversed line profiles, were shifting to the blue
when the system was fading and vice versa (Figs. 2a,b and 4).
At the same time, the He I 6678 Å line exhibited a small
variability of the peak strengths between August 9 and 13, but was not
detected at all on August 20 (Fig. 2c). No sign of the Fe II 5317 Å line was detected in the 2000 Ritter spectra. It appeared first in the ESO
spectrum and is seen in the 2001 Ritter spectra with a larger strength (Fig. 2d).
Other Fe II lines, most of which have weak emission components, are also
seen in the ESO spectrum. The Na I D lines are purely interstellar in origin
and exhibit no change in strengths or positions.
Date | HJD | Obs. | H![]() |
||||||
2000 | 2451000+ | EW | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
FWHM | |
Å | kms-1 | kms-1 | kms-1 | ||||||
07/19 | 745.264 | Ski | 2.92 | 1.41 | 1.40 | ||||
07/20 | 746.302 | Ski | 3.15 | 1.41 | 1.41 | ||||
07/25 | 751.313 | BOL | 3.00 | 1.35 | |||||
07/28 | 754.286 | CAO | 2.59 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 1.30 | -17.0 | 150 | 272 |
07/29 | 755.320 | BOL | 3.40 | 1.42 | |||||
08/04 | 761.575 | Rit | 3.37 | 1.55 | 1.53 | 1.39 | -19.5 | 152 | 295 |
08/07 | 764.246 | CAO | 2.64 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.33 | -18.5 | 151 | 283 |
08/07 | 764.568 | Rit | 3.28 | 1.55 | 1.52 | 1.37 | -21.0 | 155 | 293 |
08/09 | 766.258 | CAO | 2.76 | 1.51 | 1.47 | 1.33 | -19.5 | 154 | 277 |
08/10 | 767.592 | Rit | 3.59 | 1.57 | 1.55 | 1.39 | -19.5 | 154 | 298 |
08/12 | 769.269 | CAO | 2.99 | 1.52 | 1.49 | 1.37 | -25.0 | 152 | 278 |
08/20 | 777.225 | CAO | 3.03 | 1.50 | 1.53 | 1.37 | -28.0 | 154 | 278 |
08/20 | 777.546 | Rit | 4.18 | 1.61 | 1.64 | 1.46 | -28.5 | 151 | 305 |
08/24 | 781.577 | Rit | 4.35 | 1.64 | 1.62 | 1.47 | -30.0 | 153 | 309 |
08/30 | 787.566 | Rit: | 4.62 | 1.65 | 1.60 | 1.50 | -35.0 | ||
08/31 | 788.548 | Rit | 4.68 | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.54 | -38.5 | 165 | 333 |
09/04 | 792.538 | Rit | 5.16 | 1.73 | 1.67 | 1.57 | -48.5 | 160 | 321 |
09/06 | 794.541 | Rit | 5.01 | 1.72 | 1.71 | 1.57 | -48.0 | 160 | 321 |
09/12 | 800.527 | Rit | 5.26 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 1.57 | -54.0 | 160 | 320 |
09/13 | 801.525 | Rit | 4.98 | 1.71 | 1.68 | 1.56 | -49.0 | 155 | 320 |
09/16 | 804.532 | Rit | 4.99 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.57 | -46.0 | 155 | 323 |
09/17 | 805.524 | Rit | 4.82 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.56 | -40.5 | 155 | 321 |
09/18 | 806.508 | Rit | 4.90 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.55 | -38.5 | 150 | 324 |
09/19 | 807.506 | Rit | 4.60 | 1.71 | 1.61 | 1.55 | -41.5 | 152 | 316 |
09/21 | 809.506 | Rit | 4.82 | 1.73 | 1.66 | 1.60 | -33.5 | 150 | 308 |
09/26 | 814.494 | Rit | 4.06 | 1.65 | 1.59 | 1.49 | -30.5 | 145 | 292 |
09/27 | 815.502 | Rit | 3.89 | 1.63 | 1.54 | 1.49 | -31.0 | 150 | 292 |
09/28 | 816.503 | Rit | 3.90 | 1.64 | 1.59 | 1.48 | -26.0 | 145 | 283 |
10/03 | 821.497 | Rit | 3.32 | 1.62 | 1.50 | 1.44 | -24.5 | 145 | 271 |
10/23 | 841.493 | ESO | 2.75 | 1.48 | 1.49 | 1.37 | -18.0 | 150 | 275 |
02/10![]() |
951.948 | Rit | 3.80 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.47 | -8.5 | 135 | 282 |
02/20![]() |
961.904 | Rit | 4.00 | 1.60 | 1.61 | 1.49 | -8.0 | 135 | 282 |
02/27![]() |
968.978 | Rit | 4.00 | 1.61 | 1.62 | 1.49 | -7.5 | 135 | 282 |
03/10![]() |
978.944 | Rit | 4.34 | 1.60 | 1.65 | 1.51 | -7.5 | 130 | 300 |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The emission line profiles of ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Copyright ESO 2001