cat. No. | object name |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
comment |
4050 | COMBO-0332203-280215 |
![]() |
![]() |
21.146 | 21.013 | 20.698 | 20.605 | |
4427 | COMBO-0331278-280156 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.537 | 24.213 | 23.084 | 22.903 | |
4809 | COMBO-0331362-280150 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.695 | 22.525 | 22.258 | 22.046 | |
5826 | COMBO-0332470-280119 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.805 | 23.736 | 22.906 | 22.812 | |
7139 | COMBO-0332354-280041 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.338 | 24.225 | 23.629 | 23.328 | |
7902 | COMBO-0332302-280020 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.308 | 21.901 | 21.809 | 21.972 | |
13244 | COMBO-0333148-275749 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.992 | 24.026 | 23.473 | 23.087 | |
15278 | COMBO-0331208-275649 |
![]() |
![]() |
20.983 | 20.829 | 20.719 | 20.835 | |
15396 | COMBO-0332161-275644 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.064 | 22.916 | 22.533 | 22.440 | |
16155 | COMBO-0332042-275626 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.130 | 23.860 | 23.029 | 22.814 | |
16404 | COMBO-0332226-275622 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.001 | 23.360 | 22.339 | 22.616 | SN candidate |
20787 | COMBO-0333053-275409 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.525 | 21.951 | 21.576 | 21.442 | |
27080 | COMBO-0333042-275103 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.619 | 23.535 | 22.332 | 22.455 | |
28275 | COMBO-0331525-275027 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.062 | 23.586 | 22.456 | 22.613 | |
29793 | COMBO-0333104-274945 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.112 | 23.775 | 23.202 | 22.051 | |
30792 | COMBO-0332432-274914 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.442 | 22.474 | 22.288 | 22.801 | |
32254 | COMBO-0333263-274831 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.329 | 23.352 | 22.957 | 22.712 | |
34357 | COMBO-0332087-274734 |
![]() |
![]() |
19.422 | 19.141 | 18.765 | 18.907 | |
35677 | COMBO-0332142-274647 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.293 | 24.051 | 23.477 | 23.685 | |
36683 | COMBO-0333343-274621 |
![]() |
![]() |
25.560 | 23.748 | 23.329 | 25.408 | SN candidate |
37487 | COMBO-0332391-274602 |
![]() |
![]() |
21.101 | 20.944 | 20.696 | 20.897 | |
38551 | COMBO-0332300-274530 |
![]() |
![]() |
21.692 | 21.480 | 21.102 | 21.249 | |
38905 | COMBO-0333036-274519 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.744 | 23.362 | 22.833 | 22.962 | |
39432 | COMBO-0332302-274505 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.545 | 22.344 | 21.977 | 22.089 | |
41159 | COMBO-0332109-274415 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.073 | 22.931 | 22.350 | 22.247 | |
41247 | COMBO-0331534-274412 |
![]() |
![]() |
24.048 | 23.752 | 22.952 | 22.622 | |
41776 | COMBO-0333358-274400 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.408 | 23.287 | 22.981 | 23.145 | |
42601 | COMBO-0332591-274340 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.463 | 22.176 | 21.482 | 21.380 | |
43151 | COMBO-0332004-274319 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.726 | 22.436 | 22.062 | 22.216 | |
46562 | COMBO-0332479-274148 |
![]() |
![]() |
23.254 | 22.887 | 22.096 | 21.996 | |
47501 | COMBO-0331187-274121 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.768 | 22.291 | 21.989 | 21.556 | |
48870 | COMBO-0333289-274044 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.550 | 22.537 | 22.477 | 22.738 | |
52103 | COMBO-0331256-273908 |
![]() |
![]() |
25.298 | 24.421 | 23.274 | 24.475 | SN candidate |
52280 | COMBO-0333211-273912 |
![]() |
![]() |
20.691 | 20.529 | 20.212 | 20.388 | |
57527 | COMBO-0333184-273641 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.785 | 22.331 | 21.360 | 21.260 | |
58758 | COMBO-0333037-273611 |
![]() |
![]() |
20.924 | 20.755 | 20.298 | 20.423 | |
59821 | COMBO-0332443-273403 |
![]() |
![]() |
22.741 | 22.564 | 22.265 | 22.019 |
For variability studies we calculated a magnitude change between the
two epochs October 1999 and February 2000 and a related error as:
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
(3) |
We selected a first sample of variable objects using the following criteria:
We show the location of the variables in a (B-V) vs. (V-R) color diagram in
Fig. 9. The red magnitude is here only taken from
October 1999 images to keep the color indices free of skewing
by long-term variability. The October frames have been taken during 9 days,
so short-term variability could still have changed the color indices,
especially for RR Lyrae stars given their typical periods of 1
day. Also shown are expected colors for
stars from the Pickles atlas (compare with Fig. 7) and for a
quasar color library derived from quasar spectra modelled
for
as a combination of power-law spectra, an
emission-line contour (Francis et al. 1991) and Lyman-forest.
If we assume an absence of short-term variability, we would classify
most objects as quasars or Seyfert galaxies, while a few could be stars.
Of course, the stellar sample could contain some RR Lyrae stars whose
variability time scale of 1 day could offset their colors.
These color offsets could move the stars in any directions (+/-) along
any of the color axes with equal probability, and a scattered sample
should appear with a comparable fraction of stars below and above the
original color sequence.
In Fig. 9 we see that only three objects show up below
the stellar sequence, while 30 are located above. Therefore we
conclude that most of the variable objects presented are indeed
quasars while some objects are Seyfert-I galaxies where bright host
galaxies dominate the colors. The COMBO-17 group has meanwhile reduced
all data on the Chandra field and prepared lists of stars, galaxies
and quasars at
,
which are analysed in forthcoming papers.
Among the variable objects are also three candidates for Supernovae (see Table 3), which had their bright phase in October 1999 and are undetectable to visual inspection in the February co-added frame. The first two showed up as a significant off-center brightening of a tiny faint galaxy (objects 16404 and 52103 in Table 3).
The third candidate has a rather red B-V color (object 36683 in
Table 3). It is a point source located only
North and
East of a small galaxy with
(no calibration errors included). There is still non-zero flux measured
at the location of the transient object in February 2000 formally yielding
,
but it is not clear, whether the light originates
from the outskirts of the neighboring galaxy or still from the
Supernova.
In October it was measured on Oct. 10 with
,
on Oct. 13
with
and on Oct. 19 and 20 consistently with
.
Again, we can not decide on the B band sum frame
with
PSF whether the B flux is contributed from the galaxy
or from the candidate. If it was a Supernova, the B measurement
bracketed by V and R imaging could not be explained by variability.
Therefore, the object must be unusually red with
and
it is not entirely clear whether the Supernova hypothesis can
account for this color.
We note that the Supernova 1999gu reported by Cappellaro et al. (2000)
and first observed with the WFI on Dec. 29, 1999 at
and
in a galaxy at z=0.147 is clearly
visible in the images of February 2000 with R=21.5, but since our
object list was defined on the deep sum frame of October 1999, it is
not contained in the catalogue presented here.
Copyright ESO 2001