Our 90 high-resolution spectra (R=32000) of
Ori were
obtained on La Palma, with the Isaac Newton Telescope and the
fiber-fed ESA-Musicos echelle spectrograph, over a 6 night period
(18-24 November 1997) which was mainly free of bad weather. The
spectra have a wavelength coverage of about 3800-6800 Å, sampled
by 41 echelle orders. The reddest orders are heavily affected by
fringing. Most of the spectra were exposed 10 min or less. We
discarded 8 spectra from the analysis because of poor count rates.
The spectra were reduced using standard packages in IRAF. The CCD overscan region was used to determine the bias level. One-dimensional spectra were extracted for the individual orders. It was found that pixel-to-pixel variations could not be removed properly using our abundant number of flatfield frames: unflatfielded spectra proved to have better S/N than flatfielded ones. A two-dimensional wavelength solution was obtained from 59 manually selected ThAr calibration lines. Spectra were shifted to, and acquisition times were transformed to, the heliocentric frame. The normalization of the orders was achieved in a way similar to that described by Telting & Schrijvers (1998) in order to minimise variable continuum misplacement in the absorption lines: for each night a spectrum with high S/N was used as a template and was divided into the other spectra of that night. The orders in the resulting quotient spectra were normalized by fitting a high-order cubic spline with typically 10 to 15 spline segments. The templates were normalized with a low-order cubic spline fit to the continuum regions. Then the normalized quotient spectra were transformed back by multiplying with their corresponding normalized template spectrum. The reduced spectra have a typical S/N ratio of between 250 and 450.
In Fig. 1 one can clearly see the orbital variability in the spectra, and the line-profile variations of the primary. We did not detect any significant variations in the line profiles of the secondary.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Orbital solution for the template giving the best ![]() |
Solution for the first template | |||
K1 | 144.12 | 0.22 | |
Eccentricity e | 0.0521 | 0.0011 | |
Period P | 2.5335 | 0.0013 | |
Periastron time | 2450773.967 | 0.012 | |
Periastron angle ![]() |
176.1 | 1.6 | |
System velocity v0 | 24.77 | 0.17 | |
K2 | 232.57 | 0.49 | |
![]() |
574.90 | 129 | |
rms | 5.34 | 129 | |
rms primary | 5.74 | 82 | |
rms secondary | 4.56 | 47 | |
Solution for the second template | |||
K1 | 145.08 | 0.19 | |
Eccentricity e | 0.0536 | 0.0015 | |
Period P | 2.5244 | 0.0010 | |
Periastron time | 2450773.907 | 0.010 | |
Periastron angle ![]() |
167.1 | 1.5 | |
System velocity v0 | 14.01 | 0.15 | |
K2 | 240.86 | 0.63 | |
![]() |
716.18 | 129 | |
rms | 8.43 | 129 | |
rms primary | 4.37 | 82 | |
rms secondary | 12.72 | 47 | |
Mean values and error in mean | |||
K1 [kms-1] | 144.6 | 0.5 | |
Eccentricity e | 0.053 | 0.001 | |
Period P [days] | 2.529 | 0.005 | |
Periastron time [HJD] | 2450773.94 | 0.03 | |
Periastron angle ![]() ![]() |
172 | 5 | |
System velocity v0 [kms-1] | 19 | 5 | |
K2 [kms-1] | 237 | 4 | |
![]() |
5.02 | 0.02 | |
![]() |
8.22 | 0.14 | |
![]() ![]() |
9.02 | 0.34 | |
![]() ![]() |
5.50 | 0.12 |
Copyright ESO 2001